Pinpointing Fragility: Integrating Resilience Indicators into Risk Evaluation

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0

Abstract

Ecosystems globally are increasingly threatened by climate change and human pressures, yet current ecosystem risk assessments predominantly emphasize exposure to stressors while overlooking intrinsic ecosystem resilience—the capacity to absorb and recover from disturbances. Here, we advocate for an integrated framework that explicitly incorporates resilience into ecosystem risk assessments and demonstrate its value in the context of dryland desertification. Through bibliographic analyses of the desertification literature, we reveal a persistent disconnect between resilience research and desertification risk assessments. We then propose pathways for integration and illustrate this approach using a global dataset of dryland sites to show how accounting for resilience reshapes our understanding of desertification risk. By bridging theoretical resilience science and applied risk assessment, our framework offers a conceptual and practical foundation for pinpointing dryland areas most at risk, thereby supporting proactive management in a warming, drying world.
Full text 1,904 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Ecosystems globally are increasingly threatened by climate change and human pressures, yet current ecosystem risk assessments predominantly emphasize exposure to stressors while overlooking intrinsic ecosystem resilience—the capacity to absorb and recover from disturbances. Here, we advocate for an integrated framework that explicitly incorporates resilience into ecosystem risk assessments and demonstrate its value in the context of dryland desertification. Through bibliographic analyses of the desertification literature, we reveal a persistent disconnect between resilience research and desertification risk assessments. We then propose pathways for integration and illustrate this approach using a global dataset of dryland sites to show how accounting for resilience reshapes our understanding of desertification risk. By bridging theoretical resilience science and applied risk assessment, our framework offers a conceptual and practical foundation for pinpointing dryland areas most at risk, thereby supporting proactive management in a warming, drying world. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2TH54 Life Sciences Resilience, Risk, Vulnerability, Drylands, Desertification, Degradation Published: 2026-05-06 13:55 CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: All data and code are available through Github (https://github.com/bpichon0/Risk_resilience_desertification). Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-27T02:00:06.600101+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0