Looking to the future of organs-on-chips: interview with Professor John Wikswo

Other OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-07 ⓘ

This interview with Professor John Wikswo discusses the future of organs-on-chips, highlighting his work on neurovascular and heart-on-a-chip devices while noting no direct connection to endometriosis or adenomyosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 · read from full text ⓘ

This interview with Professor John Wikswo outlines the evolution and future directions of organs-on-chips technology, emphasizing the development of reliable, low-cost micropumps and valves for long-term tissue culture. The discussion highlights applications in studying neurovascular units, cardiac function, and multi-organ interactions to improve drug development and toxicology assessments through systems biology approaches. While focusing primarily on technical hardware challenges and physiological modeling, the text briefly mentions that aromatic hydrocarbons are implicated in endometriosis as part of a broader investigation into developmental toxicology. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for environmental toxin studies, though the paper's main focus is organ-on-a-chip engineering.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

John Wikswo talks to Francesca Lake, Managing Editor: John is the founding Director of the Vanderbilt Institute for Integrative Biosystems Research and Education (VIIBRE). He is also the Gordon A Cain University Professor; a B learned Professor of Living State Physics; and a Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, and Physics. John earned his PhD in physics at Stanford University (CA, USA). After serving as a Research Fellow in Cardiology at Stanford, he joined the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Vanderbilt University (TN, USA), where he went on to make the first measurement of the magnetic field of an isolated nerve. He founded VIIBRE at Vanderbilt in 2001 in order to foster and enhance interdisciplinary research in the biophysical sciences, bioengineering and medicine. VIIBRE efforts have led to the development of devices integral to organ-on-chip research. He is focusing on the neurovascular unit-on-a-chip, heart-on-a-chip, a missing organ microformulator, and microfluidic pumps and valves to control and analyze organs-on-chips.
Full text 17,909 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 1 sections · click to expand

Q

I would start an intensive program to characterize the response of different organs: animal organs in vitro , animal cells in culture, human cells in culture and human cells used to create OOACs. What I would try to do is launch a program of intense characterization of the organs to try to understand the extent to which the in vitro cells on plastic and OOACs in both humans and animals replicate real physiology. There is a paper I just read by a friend of mine, Jim Stevens at Eli Lilly, whose group did a weighted gene co-expression network analysis studying the comparison of in vivo rat liver, in vivo mouse liver and rat primary hepatocytes grown on a dish [ 9 ]. They took as their gold standard the rat liver in vivo , and found that the best model of the rat liver in vivo was a mouse liver in vivo , and that the rat primary hepatocytes growing quietly on a layer of collagen on a plate in the laboratory looked more like rat liver that had been exposed to an extremely toxic drug. The challenge in growing primary hepatocytes in a dish is that the trauma of being removed from a rat and grown on plastic without the right cellular neighbors and the correct media is about as drastic as the trauma of the intact rat being exposed to a highly toxic drug. I think the premise is, although it has not yet been proven universally, that OOAC does a better job of recapitulating human physiology than does biology on plastic. I think that is probably a very valid hypothesis but it has to be tested rigorously. The way to test it is by doing extensive proteomics, metabolomics and transcriptomics on not only the OOAC but the model systems you are comparing it with and decide the extent to which your in vitro models actually replicate in vivo physiology. I am involved in the DARPA Rapid Threat Assessment (RTA) program that is developing the ability to determine the mechanism of action of a drug within 30 days, rather than the typical 10 years it can take to identify some of the off-target effects. The Vanderbilt RTA group, led by Richard Caprioli, is developing analytical techniques and network analyses for proteomics, metabolomics, phosphoproteomics, transcriptomics, and end point assays with high spatiotemporal resolution. I think that our entire RTA analytics platform applied to OOAC would be absolutely the best way to fully understand physiology, pharmacology, and toxicology. The approach would be even stronger were we to suppress specific genes or apply challenge compounds as we refine and validate the mechanism of action.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-04T09:26:46.659050+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:20:11.545185+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Per Europe PMC