[Endometriosis and sterility: whom to treat and how?].

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This review analyzes the benefits and drawbacks of medical, surgical, and IVF treatments for endometriosis, highlighting the inadequacy of the AFS score and identifying effective therapeutic associations for pregnancy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The difficulty in evaluating the efficacy of treatments for endometriosis in terms of sterility results from the frequent confusion between the inhibition of the natural progression of endometriosis and a beneficial effect on fertility. The authors review the supposed benefits and the drawbacks of the various medical and surgical treatments available and medically assisted fertilization (IVF) in the context of the various types of endometriosis damage. They highlight the inadequacy of the AFS score, which gives very similar scores for effects with widely differing impacts on fertility. The authors attempt to identify the therapeutic associations which seem currently to be useful in treating endometriosis and also beneficial in obtaining a pregnancy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Adult Clomiphene Clomiphene Danazol Danazol Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Fertilization in Vitro Gestrinone Gestrinone Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Humans Infant, Newborn Infertility, Female

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:22:48.782012+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:49.821429+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK