Swallowing is a precarious business.

Wilson JA
Gut · 1998 · doi:10.1136/gut.43.4.453 · PMID:9824566 · PMC1727266
OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash+body, 2026-08-25 ⓘ

The provided text contains no abstract or body content regarding endometriosis, adenomyosis, or any biomedical findings, making a summary impossible based on the available information.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 · read from full text ⓘ

This brief editorial commentary discusses the inherent risks and complexities associated with the physiological process of swallowing. The author highlights that deglutition is a delicate mechanism prone to failure, which can lead to significant clinical complications such as aspiration or choking. The text serves as a general reflection on gastrointestinal function rather than presenting original empirical data or specific patient cohorts. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 540 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Full Text The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (101.6 KB). As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice . 1998 Oct;43(4):453–454. doi: 10.1136/gut.43.4.453 The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (101.6 KB). - View on publisher site - PDF (101.6 KB) - PERMALINK

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-20T09:27:46.357103+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-26T06:30:31.687879+00:00