Discussion
Main findings
This scoping review mapped the available evidence in the UK regarding uterine fibroids among Black women. We identified six studies addressing three main aspects of interest on the topic: etiological and risk/protective factors, clinical presentation and diagnosis of the condition, and treatment/management of the condition. Across these three aspects, the primary focus from the included studies was on the genetic pre-dispositions and possible links between Vitamin D and uterine fibroids, rare presentations of the condition among black women, and the effectiveness of treatment modalities.
Strengths and limitations of the study
The primary strength of this review lies in its systematic approach to identifying studies and mapping the evidence. In particular, the use of our outcomes framework was helpful in identifying areas for future work, where gaps were identified. A major limitations of this scoping review is the lack of risk of bias appraisal, limiting the immediate use of its recommendations in generating or modifying clinical guidelines.
Interpretation
Many aspects of peer-reviewed literature on fibroids among Black women in the UK are significantly lacking. Compared to other geographical contexts with significantly high proportions of Black women, such as in North America, 18 there is less of a better understanding of fibroids among Black women in the UK, with even the available evidence significantly insufficient to make any concrete conclusions that inform effective social interventions. It is important to note that one of the potential reasons for this paucity in data for Black women could be as a result of the lack of disaggregation, or the generalisability thereof, in racial/ethnicity data or analyses from previous studies on uterine fibroids in the UK.
Regarding aetiological risk/protective factors, although globally there are studies that confirm the strong genetic susceptibility of Black women to uterine fibroids, 19 the confirmation and discovery of particular chromosomes, genes, and loci in the extensive GWAS study by Edwards et al (2019) 12 remains the only available evidence, especially relevant to Black women in the UK mainly due to its significant reliance on data from the UK Biobank. This is, however, preliminary evidence that will require confirmation through studies that seek to further explore the genetic predispositions of Black women in the UK to uterine fibroids. To date, there has been only one other GWAS conducted among a Japanese population, 20 with no overlap in the details of genetic risk to Black women in our included study.
One other risk factor for which we found evidence was relating to Vitamin D. Despite the case report from Judson and Messiou (2020) 17 being the only available evidence of a possible association between Vitamin D and uterine fibroids among Black women in the UK, many recent studies from outside the UK confirm Vitamin D as a modifiable risk factor. 21,22 Among Black women in the USA, for example, high concentrations of vitamin D have been shown to be associated with a decrease in fibroid development. 21 Another study among African women demonstrated that levels of plasma Vitamin D were significantly low among women with uterine fibroids. 22 Although there is an increased advocacy for Vitamin D supplementation, 21,23 there are currently no published reports on Vitamin D supplementation interventions or trials specific to women of Caribbean or African ancestry globally. Consensus therefore remains to be achieved on the effectiveness or potential impact of Vitamin D supplementation or environmental exposure, on the prevalence, progression and severity of uterine fibroids in Black women.
Regarding clinical presentation and diagnosis, we found evidence of parasitic and intravascular leiomyomas in two case reports, representing rare presentations of the condition. However, globally, women of Caribbean and African ancestry are at a higher risk for severe and complicated fibroid presentations. 24 For example, in the USA, African American women have been shown to present with larger and greater numbers of UFs than white women, 25 with common presentations including abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pressure, bowel dysfunction, urinary frequency and urgency, urinary retention, low back pain, constipation, and dyspareunia. 24 Among Black women, however, there are wide variations in the presentation of the condition, 26,27 and this could potentially present in rare forms such as parasitic or intravascular leiomyomas. Parasitic leiomyomas, for example, have been reported more frequently among women in other non-white racial groups outside of the UK; 28,29. However, the evidence for the occurrence of rare presentations such as these remains inadequate for the Black population.
In terms of diagnosis, although ultrasonography is the preferred method for imaging, many cases are discovered incidentally on clinical examination, 30 for e.g. with the use of computerised tomography scans, as evidenced from the case reports in this review. This may most likely be as a result of the late presentation of symptoms or challenges with access to timely diagnosis. 30
For treatment and disease management, our review identified two surgical options for the treatment of fibroids among women of Caribbean and African ancestry in the UK – laparoscopic myomectomy and uterine artery embolism, both minimally invasive techniques.
While both methods are cited as available treatment options alongside traditional surgical methods such as open/abdominal myomectomy and hysterectomy or other pharmacological methods by the National Health Service (NHS) or the National Institute for Care Excellence (NICE), 31 it appears that their use in medical practice in the UK remains limited. 32 It has been argued that although the number of gynaecologists in the UK who perform myomectomies have increased, these numbers still remain small. In addition, almost 40% of women still do have access to facilities offering uterine artery embolisation. 32 conversely, in other countries such as the USA, UAE has become a more popular option, being offered to as many as 3 times the number of Black women compared to white women. 33 Laparoscopic myomectomy on the other hand, despite being sometimes described as the “gold standard” in the UK, 32,34 also appears to remain limited in its application outside of the UK, i.e., in Europe and the USA. 34
Given the prospects associated with the adoption of these techniques, and ongoing efforts to develop newer and more improved techniques that are uterine-preservating and minimally/non-invasive, these surgical methods need to be promoted and assessed for improvements in their application, especially for Black women in the UK.
The only study in our review on recovery time post-surgery, has provided evidence that it could take up to more than 8 weeks for full recovery after laparoscopic myomectomy. 15 Although we did not find any studies on the average recovery time after treatment by UAE, the evidence from outside the UK confirms that compared to Black women who are offered UAE, the recovery time after fibroid treatment using laparoscopic myomectomy lasts significantly longer. 35
Overall, there is a lack of studies outside of the UK that directly compare the quality of life of Black women after myomectomy or UAE, as demonstrated in the UK FEMME trial report 13 in our review. Although the findings from the FEMME trial suggest that myomectomy among Black women was associated with better quality of life outcomes 2 years post-surgery, some studies from North America (where race was not disaggregated) have demonstrated otherwise, showing that UAE and myomectomy resulted in similar long-term quality of life scores. 36 However, there is also some evidence from North America that shows that reintervention rates (experiencing further or subsequent surgical interventions) can be higher for women (including Black women) who experience UAE compared to women who experience myomectomy. 37 That potential in itself should be considered, as this could impact the long-term quality of life of Black patients.
Our review also reported the consideration of therapies for endometriosis during surgical treatments for uterine fibroids, as one recent study has suggested that endometriosis is a potential co-morbidity which may be found during surgeries for uterine leiomyomas. 38 Besides this evidence, there have been no other studies outside of the UK that have assessed the relationship between endometriosis and uterine fibroids in relation to surgical therapies for the latter. Literature on the co-existence or relationship between uterine fibroids and other womb health conditions has not been cited to warrant the consideration of the possibility of treating a co-diagnosis. However, given that this review has identified this as a potentially significant finding for Black women in the UK, our finding requires further investigation.
Implications for future research
When considering the overall evidence for fibroids among Black women in the UK, there remain several aspects of considerable uncertainty that need to be addressed. As demonstrated by this review, the available evidence remains scant; therefore, all aspects of our outcomes framework require further research to be addressed. These aspects include: epidemiological outcomes such as prevalence of the condition and its geographical distribution and temporal patterns in the UK, etiological and risk/protective factors, including gene-environment interactions and their individual and combined contributions to fibroids in the UK, clinical presentations and diagnostic methods, treatment modalities and disease management outcomes, and the separate impacts of the condition and its treatment on reproduction and fertility, quality of life, symptom severity, health equity and access, economic costs, and public health and policy, including screening and early detection and effective public health campaigns. Research on patient experiences must be prioritised, as this ensures that future interventions are relevant and effective .
Implications for practice and policy
Although the evidence base is sparse, several significant implications can be highlighted based on the available research. Clinically, practitioners should actively discuss and offer minimally invasive surgical options, respecting patient preferences for uterine preservation. Clinicians should also be vigilant in considering differential diagnoses, especially for Black women who present with atypical abdominal pain. Routine assessment of vitamin D status, particularly for women at risk for deficiency, could also be integrated into clinical practice. Funding for targeted research will strengthen the evidence base to inform clinical guidelines, e.g. from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence on fibroid management for Black women in the UK.
References
1.
Michel, R., Nicholson, W. K., & Borahay, M. A. (2024). The fibroid crisis in Black women: more work to be done! American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology .
2.
Baird, D. D., Dunson, D. B., Hill, M. C., Cousins, D., & Schectman, J. M. (2003). High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 188 (1), 100–107.
3.
Jefferies, K., Bland, L., Oladimeji, B., Rothfus, M., Etowa, J., Alleyne, A., … & Stirling-Cameron, E. (2024). Uterine fibroids and Black people of African descent globally: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open, 14 (8), e085622.
4.
Eltoukhi, H. M., Modi, M. N., Weston, M., Armstrong, A. Y., & Stewart, E. A. (2014). The health disparities of uterine fibroid tumors for African American women: a public health issue. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 210 (3), 194-199.
5.
Wise, L. A., Palmer, J. R., Stewart, E. A., Rosenberg, L., & Adams-Campbell, L. L. (2005). Age-specific incidence rates for self-reported uterine leiomyomata in the Black Women’s Health Study. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 105 (3), 563-568.
6.
Charifson, M., Vieira, D., Shaw, J., Kehoe, S., & Quinn, G. P. (2023). Why are Black individuals disproportionately burdened with uterine fibroids and how are we examining the disparity? A systematic review. Current Problems in Cardiology, 48 (3), 101530.
7.
MBRRACE-UK, 2023
8.
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8 (1), 19-32.
9.
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., … & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169 (7), 467-473.
10.
Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2020). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18 (9), 1829-1834.
11.
Kwansa AL, Anumba D, Ruddock F, Banke-Thomas A (2025) Uterine Fibroids Among Women of Caribbean and African Descent/Ancestry in the UK: A Scoping Review. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/QYCBP
12.
Edwards, T. L., Giri, A., Hellwege, J. N., Hartmann, K. E., Stewart, E. A., Jeff, J. M., … & Velez Edwards, D. R. (2019). A Trans-Ethnic Genome-Wide Association Study of Uterine Fibroids. Frontiers in Genetics, 10, 511.
13.
Manyonda, I., Belli, A. M., Lumsden, M. A., Moss, J., McKinnon, W., Middleton, L. J., … & FEMME Collaborative Group. (2020). Uterine-Artery Embolization or Myomectomy for Uterine Fibroids. The New England Journal of Medicine, 383 (5), 440-451.
14.
Maclaran, K., Agarwal, N., & Odejinmi, F. (2014). Co-existence of uterine myomas and endometriosis in women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy: risk factors and surgical implications. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 21 (6), 1086-1090.
15.
Huff, K. O., Aref-Adib, M., Magama, Z., Vlachodimitropoulou, E. K., Oliver, R., & Odejinmi, F. (2018). Returning to work after laparoscopic myomectomy: a prospective observational study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 97 (1), 68-73.
16.
Stebbings, C., Latif, A., & Gnananandan, J. (2021). Torsion of a parasitic leiomyoma: a rare but important differential in women presenting with lower abdominal pain. BMJ Case Reports, 14 (1), e232797.
17.
Judson, I., & Messiou, C. (2020). Vitamin D deficiency in the pathogenesis of leiomyoma and intravascular leiomyomatosis: A case report and review of the literature. Gynecologic Oncology Reports, 35, 100681.
18.
Al-Hendy, A., Myers, E., & Stewart, E. (2017). Uterine Fibroids: Burden and Unmet Medical Need. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 35, 473 - 480. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1607264.
19.
Keaton, J., Jasper, E., Hellwege, J., Jones, S., Torstenson, E., Edwards, T., & Edwards, D. (2021). Evidence that geographic variation in genetic ancestry associates with uterine fibroids. Human genetics, 140, 1433 - 1440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-021-02322-y.
20.
Cha, P., Takahashi, A., Hosono, N., Low, S., Kamatani, N., Kubo, M., & Nakamura, Y. (2011). A genome-wide association study identifies three loci associated with susceptibility to uterine fibroids. Nature Genetics, 43, 447-450. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.805.
21.
Baird, D., Hill, M., Schectman, J., & Hollis, B. (2013). Vitamin D and the Risk of Uterine Fibroids. Epidemiology, 24, 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e31828acca0.
22.
Tunau, K., Garba, J., Panti, A., Shehu, C., Adamu, A., Abdulrahman, M., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Low plasma vitamin D as a predictor of uterine fibroids in a nigerian population. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 28, 181 - 186. https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_495_21.
23.
Harmon, Q., Patchel, S., Denslow, S., LaPorte, F., Cooper, T., Wise, L., Wegienka, G., & Baird, D. (2022). Vitamin D and uterine fibroid growth, incidence, and loss: a prospective ultrasound study. Fertility and sterility . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.851.
24.
Sefah, N., Ndebele, S., Prince, L., Korasare, E., Agbleke, M., Nkansah, A., Thompson, H., Al-Hendy, A., & Agbleke, A. (2023). Uterine fibroids — Causes, impact, treatment, and lens to the African perspective. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1045783.
25.
Stewart, E., Nicholson, W., Bradley, L., & Borah, B. (2013). The burden of uterine fibroids for African-American women: results of a national survey. Journal of women’s health, 22 10, 807-16 . https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2013.4334.
26.
Murji, A., Bedaiwy, M., Singh, S., & Bougie, O. (2019). Influence of Ethnicity on Clinical Presentation and Quality of Life in Women With Uterine Fibroids: Results From a Prospective Observational Registry. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d’obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.10.031.
27.
Goosby, B., Winkle-Wagner, R., & Zhang, A. (2024). The Uterus Keeps the Score: Black Women Academics’ Insights and Coping with Uterine Fibroids. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 66, 212 - 227. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221465241268434.
28.
Zoghby, S., Keriakos, K., Daou, S., & Darido, J. (2019). A Case Report with Literature Review: Parasitic Leiomyoma. Journal of Cancer Therapy . https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2019.101003.
29.
Kyabaambu, C., Nzingoula, B., Diani, A., Benzalim, M., & Alj, S. (2024). Parasitic Leiomyoma, A Less Well Known Entity: A Case Report. Scholars Journal of Medical Case Reports . https://doi.org/10.36347/sjmcr.2024.v12i05.003.
30.
De La Cruz, M., & Buchanan, E. (2017). Uterine Fibroids: Diagnosis and Treatment. American family physician, 95 2, 100-107 .
31.
National Health Service [Internet], England. Fibroids Treatment, [Cited 2025 Sep 4]. Available from https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/fibroids/treatment/.
32.
Mallick, R., & Odejinmi, F. (2017). Treating symptomatic uterine fibroids with myomectomy: current practice and views of UK consultants. Gynecological Surgery, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-017-1033-1.
33.
Srinivas, T., Lulseged, B., Attari, M., Borahay, M., & Weiss, C. (2024). Patient Characteristics Associated with Embolization vs Hysterectomy for Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2023.12.018.
34.
Herrmann, A., & De Wilde, R. (2014). Laparoscopic myomectomy—The gold standard. Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, 3, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GMIT.2014.02.001.
35.
Wei, C., Sun, X., Li, S., Bai, X., & Jin, Y. (2025). Comparative efficacy of uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy in treating uterine fibroids: a propensity score matched analysis. Discover Oncology, 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-025-01737-7.
36.
Anchan, R., Wojdyla, D., Bortoletto, P., Terry, K., Disler, E., Milne, A., Gargiulo, A., Petrozza, J., Brook, O., Srouji, S., Morton, C., Greenberg, J., Wegienka, G., Stewart, E., Nicholson, W., Thomas, L., Venable, S., Tommaso, S., Diamond, M., Maxwell, G., Marsh, E., Myers, E., Vines, A., Wise, L., Wallace, K., Jacoby, V., & Spies, J. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of Health-Related Quality of Life 1 Year Following Myomectomy or Uterine Artery Embolization: Findings from the COMPARE-UF Registry. Journal of women’s health . https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2022.0133.
37.
Zaritsky, E., Mitro, S., Lee, C., Wise, L., Xu, F., & Hedderson, M. (2023). Long-Term Risk of Reintervention after Uterine Preserving Surgical Fibroid Treatments and Variation by Sociodemographic Factors. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2023.08.018.
38.
Hemmings, R., Rivard, M., Olive, D., Poliquin-Fleury, J., Gagné, D., Hugo, P., & Gosselin, D. (2004). Evaluation of risk factors associated with endometriosis. Fertility and sterility, 81 6, 1513-21 . https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2003.10.038.
Supplementary Material
File (table 1 for review.docx)
- Download
- 15.59 KB
Information & Authors
Information
Version history
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License.