The Plausibility Gap: A model of sensemaking
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
When people make plausibility judgments about an assertion, an event, or a piece of evidence, they are gauging whether it makes sense. Therefore, we can treat plausibility judgments as sensemaking activities. In this paper, we review the research literature, presenting the different ways that plausibility has been defined and measured. Then we describe the research program that allowed us to formulate our sensemaking perspective on plausibility. The model is based on an analysis of 23 cases, most of which involved understanding and interacting with information technology. The resulting model describes the user’s attempts to construct a narrative as a state transition string, relying on plausibility judgments.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0