The impact of bowel preparation on MRI scans for confirming rectosigmoid endometriosis detected by transvaginal ultrasonography

article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

Bowel preparation protocols improve inter-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy for rectosigmoid endometriosis detected by MRI, making its success rate comparable to transvaginal ultrasonography.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This study evaluated whether bowel preparation affects MRI performance and inter-investigator agreement for confirming rectosigmoid endometriosis (RSE) initially detected by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS). Fifty-eight patients were classified as having RSE (n=34) or not (n=24) by TVUS, and MRI was performed both with and without a bowel preparatory protocol (BPP), assessed by investigators including radiologists and clinicians with different MRI experience levels. Concordance was moderate when scans used BPP (Kappa ~0.47–0.52) but was low without BPP (Kappa <0.20), and diagnostic metrics improved after BPP, with sensitivity rising from 0.72 to 0.82 and specificity from 0.47 to 0.74. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically bowel preparation’s impact on MRI confirmation of rectosigmoid endometriosis detected by TVUS.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

AIMS: The study aims to assess the impact of bowel preparation on MRI scans in diagnosing rectosigmoid endometriosis (RSE) and to examine the level of agreement among investigators, including radiologists and clinicians with varying levels of MRI experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients underwent MRI scans, with 34 showing RSE and 24 without involvement, according to TVUS as the reference standard. The scans were conducted both with and without a bowel preparatory protocol (BPP). RESULTS: The highest concordance was observed in the group 4, which included patients with RSE and BPP, with a Kappa value of 0.47-0.52. In contrast, for groups with MRI scans without the BPP, there was no consistency among the investigators (Kappa <0.20). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.72, 0.47, 0.72, and 0.47 without BPP, and increased to 0.82, 0.74, 0.85, and 0.74, respectively, after BPP. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal that the concordance between investigators in detecting RSE via MRI scan improves with the use of BPP. Additionally, the success rate of MRI and TVUS for detecting RSE can be comparable, but only if bowel preparatory techniques are utilized during MRI scans.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics Cathartics

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-15T06:13:43.845377+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-15T06:11:17.018161+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK