Tech Giants Remain Undeterred by Intellectual Property Litigation Revolutionary Legal Methods Urgently Needed to Solve This Global Crisis in the AI Era

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 8,403 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Tech Giants Remain Undeterred by Intellectual Property Litigation Revolutionary Legal Methods Urgently Needed to Solve This Global Crisis in the AI Era | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 12 January 2026 V1 Latest version Share on Tech Giants Remain Undeterred by Intellectual Property Litigation Revolutionary Legal Methods Urgently Needed to Solve This Global Crisis in the AI Era Author : Prof. Dr. Peter Chew 0000-0002-5935-3041 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176825036.66806797/v1 324 views 61 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract This article examines the systematic failure of current intellectual property litigation to deter technology giants from unauthorized use of proprietary research and innovations. Despite frequent court losses and substantial financial penalties, large corporations continue systematic IP infringement by exploiting three critical structural advantages: (1) financial capacity to absorb multi-million dollar legal costs and damages as routine operational expenses, generating $4.7 billion average net profit per stolen innovation through a calculated 5-year exploitation cycle; (2) procedural warfare tactics that deliberately extend litigation timelines to 5-10 years through armies of specialized lawyers, causing 70% of individual plaintiffs to abandon legitimate claims due to financial and psychological exhaustion before trial; and (3) weaponization of contradictory legal frameworks-exploiting conflicts between copyright/fair use, trade secret/patent disclosure, civil/criminal standards, and international jurisdictional fragmentation-to create legal labyrinths that only corporations with 100+ lawyer teams can navigate while individual innovators with 1-2 attorneys face insurmountable complexity. This analysis reveals the devastating real-world consequences of this broken enforcement system. First, the innovation crisis: when researchers witness systematic IP theft rewarded with billions in profit and minimal consequences, rational innovators-particularly in critical medical and pharmaceutical fields-cease independent research, blocking breakthroughs in cancer treatment, drug discovery, and diagnostic technologies that could save millions of lives. Second, the safety catastrophe: tech giants steal innovations without understanding the founder's deep safety knowledge of failure modes, danger zones, and operational limits, then deploy systems globally for maximum profit while skipping safety protocols. 2 The predictable result is preventable deaths-medical AI misdiagnosing vulnerable populations, autonomous systems failing in conditions founders knew were unsafe, and pharmaceutical algorithms recommending dangerous compounds-because giants optimize for revenue ($5 billion) rather than safety, calculating that wrongful death settlements ($500 million) cost less than proper safety implementation. The article demonstrates why even recent regulatory efforts like the EU AI Act, while correctly identifying the crisis, cannot solve the enforcement problem using traditional legal mechanisms. The solution requires a revolutionary approach: linking existing but currently separate legal mechanisms-criminal fraud prosecution, securities law enforcement, antitrust regulations, and RICO statutes-into a unified framework that creates exponential rather than additive consequences. Like Einstein's E=mc² which revolutionized physics not by inventing new concepts but by discovering how to link energy, mass, and velocity, oncoming article the Peter Chew Against Giant IP Theft Method (E=MC) will transform IP enforcement by linking laws that already exist into a configuration that generates unstoppable deterrent force, while preserving the innovation especially medical innovation essential to saving human lives Supplementary Material File (12-1-2026 analysis of giant corporate non.pdf) Download 613.80 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 12 January 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords ai intellectual property theft medical innovation safety tech giant ip infringement Authors Affiliations Prof. Dr. Peter Chew 0000-0002-5935-3041 [email protected] View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 324 views 61 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Prof. Dr. Peter Chew. Tech Giants Remain Undeterred by Intellectual Property Litigation Revolutionary Legal Methods Urgently Needed to Solve This Global Crisis in the AI Era. Authorea . 12 January 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176825036.66806797/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176825036.66806797/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fdf98d9cc1d4807',t:'MTc3OTE1Njk2MA=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00