Group decision-making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations considers the best and worst indexes

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

To address the situation where the Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems with hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs), this study develops group decision-making considering the best and worst indexes simultaneously. First, the concepts of best and worst multiplicative consistency indexes of HFPRs are proposed, and then the concept of acceptable multiplicative consistent HFPRs is developed, which takes into accounted best consistency index (BCI) and worst consistency index (WCI). Second, several optimization models are constructed for improving the consistency of HFPRs when they are unacceptable. The main characteristic of the constructed optimization models is that two predefined thresholds for the BCI and WCI are taken into accounted. It requires all the fuzzy preference relations (FPRs) derived from original HFPRs meet the threshold of WCI, and there is a FPR meets the threshold of BCI. Third, the proposed consistency checking and improving processes are extended to incomplete evaluation information. Fourth, an algorithm is designed for deriving priority weights from acceptable consistent HFPRs/incomplete HFPRs. Finally, an illustrative example in conjunction with comparative analysis is used to demonstrate the proposed method is feasible and efficiency for practical MCDM problems.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0