Abstract
ABSTRACT It is increasingly necessary to both study biology in 3D and obtain quantitative measurements. Not all 3D-reconstructions are created equal, particularly when using the anatomical model as a basis for force calculations, i.e. computational modeling. Here, we compare 3D anatomical reconstructions from two emerging imaging modalities: 4D ultrasound (4DUS) and light sheet fluorescent microscopy (LSFM) against our previous nano-computed tomography (nanoCT) cohort data, using the tortuous highly intricate pharyngeal arch artery system of the chick embryo as a test bed. We highlight modality-specific morphological image acquisition discrepancies and their influence on subsequent computational fluid dynamics results. Overall, LSFM accurately captured quantitative volumetric measurements of small rapidly-changing vascular morphologies while 4DUS systematically inflated small tortuous vessels. Differences in image-based morphology changes led to significant changes in computationally-obtained force magnitudes and flow patterns linked to vessel angle and tortuosity. This validates LSFM as a comparative preclinical vascular quantitative imaging tool and suggests that 4DUS needs extensive 3D anatomical validation for non cardiac chamber vessels.
Full text
1,340 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
ABSTRACT
It is increasingly necessary to both study biology in 3D and obtain quantitative measurements. Not all 3D-reconstructions are created equal, particularly when using the anatomical model as a basis for force calculations, i.e. computational modeling. Here, we compare 3D anatomical reconstructions from two emerging imaging modalities: 4D ultrasound (4DUS) and light sheet fluorescent microscopy (LSFM) against our previous nano-computed tomography (nanoCT) cohort data, using the tortuous highly intricate pharyngeal arch artery system of the chick embryo as a test bed. We highlight modality-specific morphological image acquisition discrepancies and their influence on subsequent computational fluid dynamics results. Overall, LSFM accurately captured quantitative volumetric measurements of small rapidly-changing vascular morphologies while 4DUS systematically inflated small tortuous vessels. Differences in image-based morphology changes led to significant changes in computationally-obtained force magnitudes and flow patterns linked to vessel angle and tortuosity. This validates LSFM as a comparative preclinical vascular quantitative imaging tool and suggests that 4DUS needs extensive 3D anatomical validation for non cardiac chamber vessels.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.