Narrative-Movement Framework (NMF): A socio-ecological systems (SES) approach to human narratives, animal movement, and coexistence in shared landscapes

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

1. Managing human-wildlife coexistence is essential for biodiversity conservation in places where humans and nonhumans compete for access to ecosystems. Viewing human-wildlife conflict as part of a complex web of positive and negative connections that exist between humans and nature is essential. 2. The field of socio-ecological systems (SES) seeks to understand these connections between human-specific systems (i.e., cultural, political, economic) and related ecological systems. We contribute to this growing literature with a coupled narrative-behavior SES framework, through which we present human environmental narratives as part of a cultural system that changes and is changed by altered animal movement behavior in shared landscapes. 3. The Narrative-Movement Framework (NMF) is built on a “people with nature” perspective of human-wildlife coexistence that can be used to understand connectivity and coexistence models. The NMF distinguishes itself from previous coupled ecological-cultural frameworks by placing the cultural system of human storytelling as a landscape-shaping factor, along with human-wildlife interactions and wildlife movement. 4. The NMF further encourages long-term thinking, and thinking with the complexity of target SES, to refine human-wildlife coexistence and conservation planning in ways that do not replace, but seek to complement relatively short-term and simplified approaches.
Full text 2,336 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. 1. Managing human-wildlife coexistence is essential for biodiversity conservation in places where humans and nonhumans compete for access to ecosystems. Viewing human-wildlife conflict as part of a complex web of positive and negative connections that exist between humans and nature is essential. 2. The field of socio-ecological systems (SES) seeks to understand these connections between human-specific systems (i.e., cultural, political, economic) and related ecological systems. We contribute to this growing literature with a coupled narrative-behavior SES framework, through which we present human environmental narratives as part of a cultural system that changes and is changed by altered animal movement behavior in shared landscapes. 3. The Narrative-Movement Framework (NMF) is built on a “people with nature” perspective of human-wildlife coexistence that can be used to understand connectivity and coexistence models. The NMF distinguishes itself from previous coupled ecological-cultural frameworks by placing the cultural system of human storytelling as a landscape-shaping factor, along with human-wildlife interactions and wildlife movement. 4. The NMF further encourages long-term thinking, and thinking with the complexity of target SES, to refine human-wildlife coexistence and conservation planning in ways that do not replace, but seek to complement relatively short-term and simplified approaches. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2J93T Behavior and Ethology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Environmental Studies, Life Sciences, Other Arts and Humanities, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Other Life Sciences animal movement, conservation, socio-ecological systems, human-wildlife interactions, natural resource management Published: 2025-10-05 15:18 Last Updated: 2025-10-05 15:18 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: Not applicable Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0