Per-residue optimisation of protein structures: Rapid alternative to optimisation with constrained alpha carbons

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

In recent years, the number of known protein structures has increased significantly. Predictive algorithms and experimental methods provide the positions of protein residues relative to each other with high accuracy. However, the local quality of the protein structure, including bond lengths, angles, and positions of individual atoms, often lacks the same level of precision. For this reason, protein structures are usually optimised by a force field prior to their application in further research sensitive to structural quality. Protein structure optimisation, however, is computationally challenging. In this paper, we introduce a general method Per-residue optimisation of protein structures: Rapid alternative to optimisation with constrained alpha carbons (PROPTIMUS RAPHAN). Rather than optimising the entire protein structure at once, PROPTIMUS RAPHAN divides the structure into overlapping residual substructures and optimises each substructure individually. This approach results in computational time that scales linearly with the size of the structure. Additionally, we present PROPTIMUS RAPHAN GFN-FF , a reference implementation of our method employing a generic, almost QM-accurate force field, GFN-FF. We tested PROPTIMUS RAPHAN GFN-FF on 461 AlphaFold DB structures and demonstrated that our approach achieves results comparable to the optimisation of the structure with constrained alpha carbons in significantly less time.
Full text 2,322 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract In recent years, the number of known protein structures has increased significantly. Predictive algorithms and experimental methods provide the positions of protein residues relative to each other with high accuracy. However, the local quality of the protein structure, including bond lengths, angles, and positions of individual atoms, often lacks the same level of precision. For this reason, protein structures are usually optimised by a force field prior to their application in further research sensitive to structural quality. Protein structure optimisation, however, is computationally challenging. In this paper, we introduce a general method Per-residue optimisation of protein structures: Rapid alternative to optimisation with constrained alpha carbons (PROPTIMUS RAPHAN). Rather than optimising the entire protein structure at once, PROPTIMUS RAPHAN divides the structure into overlapping residual substructures and optimises each substructure individually. This approach results in computational time that scales linearly with the size of the structure. Additionally, we present PROPTIMUS RAPHANGFN-FF, a reference implementation of our method employing a generic, almost QM-accurate force field, GFN-FF. We tested PROPTIMUS RAPHANGFN-FF on 461 AlphaFold DB structures and demonstrated that our approach achieves results comparable to the optimisation of the structure with constrained alpha carbons in significantly less time. Scientific Contribution The main contribution of this work is the PROPTI-MUS RAPHAN method and its reference parallelisable implementation PROP-TIMUS RAPHANGFN-FF. Because the time requirement increases linearly with the size of the structure, PROPTIMUS RAPHANGFN-FF optimises on average 5 000 atoms per hour and a common CPU. Therefore, prior to any research sensitive to protein structure quality, our method can be employed to obtain protein structures closer to QM-accuracy. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Contributing authors: tomsvo{at}mail.muni.cz; gabriela.bucekova{at}mail.muni.cz; radka.svobodova{at}mail.muni.cz The algorithm description has been rewritten for greater clarity. The Results and Discussion section has been expanded to include further comparisons between optimised and original structures.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0