Progestin therapy in premenopausal women with incidental meningioma-a narrative review and recommendations for women's health specialists.

review OA: green CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-24

This review examines progestin use in premenopausal women, finding associations between high-dose/prolonged exposure to certain progestins and increased meningioma risk, while suggesting reassessment after discontinuation.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The provided content does not include the paper’s actual text or findings; it is instead an access-blocking page about preventing automated scraping, so no study population, methods, or results can be extracted. Because the paper content is missing, key conclusions and the authors’ explicitly stated limitations cannot be summarized without fabricating details. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective To review recent evidence on the association between progestin exposure and meningioma risk and to propose practical recommendations for hormonal management in women requiring progestin therapy.Methods A narrative review of studies published between 2015 and 2025 evaluating the relationship between exogenous progestins and meningioma development, growth, or progression was performed. Evidence regarding different progestin compounds, cumulative exposure, reversibility after discontinuation, and implications for gynecologic practice was analyzed.Results Meningiomas account for more than one-third of intracranial tumors and occur two to three times more frequently in women, supporting a potential hormonal influence mediated by progesterone receptors, which are expressed in most tumors. The increasing use of MRI has led to more frequent detection of incidental meningiomas in premenopausal women using progestins for contraception or gynecologic conditions such as endometriosis and heavy menstrual bleeding. Consistent associations with increased meningioma risk were observed for high-dose or prolonged exposure to cyproterone acetate, chlormadinone acetate, nomegestrol acetate, and medroxyprogesterone acetate. Risk appeared to increase with cumulative exposure and decrease after treatment discontinuation. Evidence for other progestins, including desogestrel, dienogest, levonorgestrel, and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, remains limited and less conclusive.Conclusions Women's health specialists should systematically assess a history of meningioma before prescribing progestins. In patients with incidental meningioma, discontinuation of high-risk progestins should be considered, followed by MRI reassessment within 3-6 months. When hormonal treatment remains necessary, the lowest effective dose and regular neuro-oncologic monitoring are recommended. Increased awareness and individualized counseling are essential to optimize hormonal management in women at risk of meningioma.
Full text 1,068 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot! Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-09-08T06:07:36.077809+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK