Calorimetric Signature of Quantum Measurement: A Record-Formation Heat Bound and Differential Microcalorimetry Test

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

We propose that the transition from reversible quantum correlation to an objective classical record is a thermodynamically irreversible process with a quantifiable heat signature. We formulate a three-stage taxonomy separating reversible premeasurement, irreversible record formation, and memory reset, and derive a conditional record-formation heat bound: under explicit operational conditions (C1 to C6) in the uncontrolled-decoherence regime (no work extraction/coherence-recovery channel), the irreversible record-formation channel must dissipate at least kB·T·ln(2) of heat per bit of classical information created, quantified by the mutual information I(X;Y) between a prepared classical label X and the recorded outcome Y. Using an explicit system/pointer/bath model, we identify the precise stage at which this Landauer cost is paid: not during unitary premeasurement coupling, but during irreversible environmental coupling, when the pointer becomes entangled with N ≫ 1 environmental degrees of freedom and the record is stabilized. We design a circuit-QED differential microcalorimetry experiment using superconducting qubits and nanocalorimeters (TES or SNS nanobolometer class). The protocol employs matched ON/OFF branches that share identical premeasurement pulses and routing losses, differing only in whether an objective record is stabilized. The measurand is the per-shot differential deposited energy ΔQ ≡ QON − QOFF, which isolates the record-formation contribution. Four primary controls (ground-state baseline, measurement-strength scaling, reversal-delay timing sweep, and prior-variation) discriminate from systematic effects. Sensitivity analysis using demonstrated nanobolometer performance shows detection is feasible with N ~ 2×109 to 8×109 ON/OFF pairs at 10 mK for Landauer-scale residual tests at SNR ~ 10 (for σQ ≈ 0.32 to 0.6 zJ and ΔQtarget ≈ 9.57×10-5 zJ). The bound is falsified if the observed residual ΔQ − kB·T·ln(2)·I(X;Y) falls statistically below zero.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0