Standardizing turn-taking metrics: A methodological toolkit for data annotation across species and taxa

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Conversational turn-taking, the cooperative reciprocal exchange of short and flexible turns, is fundamental for communication and social coordination. Initially thought to be uniquely human, recent research showed some evidence of cooperative turn-taking also in other animal species. However, systematic evaluations and comparisons of turn-taking skills within and across species pose considerable challenges due to different measures applied and research foci on specific elements. Here, we build on a comparative framework resting on four key elements of human conversational turn-taking - flexibility, participation frameworks, temporal relationships, and adjacency pair-like sequences - to enable standardized and feasible annotation procedures across species and taxa. Proposed parameters are described in detail, and their operationalization is outlined through step-by-step annotation schemes and real-world examples. By understanding which elements of turn-taking are shared across different model systems and taxa and by mapping similarities and differences, this standardized “turn-taking toolkit” will aid in fostering a more biocentric perspective on the evolution of communication and gaining a better understanding of the evolutionary origins of language and cooperation.
Full text 2,140 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Conversational turn-taking, the cooperative reciprocal exchange of short and flexible turns, is fundamental for communication and social coordination. Initially thought to be uniquely human, recent research showed some evidence of cooperative turn-taking also in other animal species. However, systematic evaluations and comparisons of turn-taking skills within and across species pose considerable challenges due to different measures applied and research foci on specific elements. Here, we build on a comparative framework resting on four key elements of human conversational turn-taking - flexibility, participation frameworks, temporal relationships, and adjacency pair-like sequences - to enable standardized and feasible annotation procedures across species and taxa. Proposed parameters are described in detail, and their operationalization is outlined through step-by-step annotation schemes and real-world examples. By understanding which elements of turn-taking are shared across different model systems and taxa and by mapping similarities and differences, this standardized “turn-taking toolkit” will aid in fostering a more biocentric perspective on the evolution of communication and gaining a better understanding of the evolutionary origins of language and cooperation. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2RD5G Animal Studies, Communication, Social and Behavioral Sciences social interaction, research methods, language evolution, communication, cooperation Published: 2026-03-27 21:13 Last Updated: 2026-03-27 21:13 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Data is available at https://figshare.com/s/c9fe94c30ebad0ed9c7d. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0