Endometriosis: the next ten years.
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This review discusses current endometriosis management, limitations of scoring systems, potential for individualized therapies, and the need for future research on dose-response and subtype-specific treatments to refine diagnosis and therapy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Several modalities can be employed in managing the patient with endometriosis, but the ultimate selection is determined by evaluating a number of criteria including age, extent of disease, severity of symptoms and pain. Scoring systems used in many clinical trials are based on the Revised American Fertility Society system but have their limitations. There is a possibility of using such innovations as receptor studies to individualize therapies in the future. Future research must also include dose-response studies, not only for the new GnRH agonists but also for danazol. These are essential to investigate efficacy. It may be that the different subtypes of endometriosis require quite dissimilar approaches to achieve the therapeutic goal. Despite advances in therapy for endometriosis, the disease remains largely a mystery in terms of its aetiology and pathogenesis, but we are drawing closer to refining our diagnostic and scoring techniques and individualizing our approach to therapy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-02T06:17:20.788884+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:12:05.481982+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK