References
1. Einhorn TA, and Gerstenfeld LC. Fracture healing: mechanisms and interventions. Nat Rev
Rheumatol. 2015;11(1):45-54.
2. Bahney CS, Zondervan RL, Allison P, Theologis A, Ashley JW, Ahn J, et al. Cellular
biology of fracture healing. J Orthop Res. 2019;37(1):35-50.
3. Reed AA, Joyner CJ, Brownlow HC, and Simpson AH. Human atrophic fracture non -
unions are not avascular. J Orthop Res. 2002;20(3):593-9.
4. Panteli M, Vun JSH, Pountos I, A JH, Jones E, and Giannoudis PV. Biological and
molecular profile of fracture non -union tissue: A systematic review and an update on
current insights. J Cell Mol Med. 2022;26(3):601-23.
5. Serowoky MA, Arata CE, Crump JG, and Mariani FV. Skeletal stem cells: insights into
maintaining and regenerating the skeleton. Development. 2020;147(5).
6. Matthews BG, Novak S, Sbrana FV, Funnell JL, Cao Y, Buckels EJ, et al. Heterogeneity
of murine periosteum progenitors involved in fracture healing. Elife. 2021;10.
7. Mizoguchi T, and Ono N. The diverse origin of bone -forming osteoblasts. J Bone Miner
Res. 2021;36(8):1432-47.
8. Perrin S, and Colnot C. Periosteal Skeletal Stem and Progenitor Cells in Bone
Regeneration. Current osteoporosis reports. 2022;20(5):334-43.
9. Iwaki A, Jingushi S, Oda Y, Izumi T, Shida JI, Tsuneyoshi M, et al. Localization and
quantification of proliferating cells during rat fracture repair: detection of proliferating cell
nuclear antigen by immunohistochemistry. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12(1):96-102.
10. Yukata K, Xie C, Li TF, Takahata M, Hoak D, Kondabolu S, et al. Aging periosteal
progenitor cells have reduced regenerative responsiveness to bone injury and to the
anabolic actions of PTH 1-34 treatment. Bone. 2014;62:79-89.
11. Julien A, Perrin S, Martinez-Sarra E, Kanagalingam A, Carvalho C, Luka M, et al. Skeletal
Stem/Progenitor Cells in Periosteum and Skeletal Muscle Share a Common Molecular
Response to Bone Injury. J Bone Miner Res. 2022;37(8):1545-61.
12. Aubin JE. Regulation of osteoblast formation and function. Rev Endocr Metab Disord.
2001;2(1):81-94.
13. Rutkovskiy A, Stenslokken KO, and Vaage IJ. Osteoblast Differentiation at a Glance. Med
Sci Monit Basic Res. 2016;22:95-106.
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
20
14. Long F. Building strong bones: molecular regulation of the osteoblast lineage. Nat Rev Mol
Cell Biol. 2011;13(1):27-38.
15. Stein GS, Lian JB, van Wijnen AJ, Stein JL, Montecino M, Javed A, et al. Runx2 control
of organization, assembly and activity of the regulatory machinery for skeletal gene
expression. Oncogene. 2004;23(24):4315-29.
16. Pritchard JJ. A cytological and histochemical study of bone and cartilage formation in the
rat. J Anat. 1952;86(3):259-77.
17. Owen M. Cell Population Kinetics of an Osteogenic Tissue. I. J Cell Biol. 1963;19(1):19-
32.
18. Jilka RL, O'Brien CA, Ali AA, Roberson PK, Weinstein RS, and Manolagas SC.
Intermittent PTH stimulates periosteal bone formation by actions on post -mitotic
preosteoblasts. Bone. 2009;44(2):275-86.
19. Hixon KR, McKenzie JA, Sykes DAW, Yoneda S, Hensley A, Buettmann EG, et al.
Ablation of Proliferating Osteoblast Lineage Cells After Fracture Leads to Atrophic
Nonunion in a Mouse Model. J Bone Miner Res. 2021;36(11):2243-57.
20. Kalajzic I, Kalajzic Z, Kaliterna M, Gronowicz G, Clark SH, Lichtler AC, et al. Use of
type I collagen green fluorescent protein transgenes to identify subpopulations of cells at
different stages of the osteoblast lineage. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(1):15-25.
21. Chan CK, Seo EY, Chen JY, Lo D, McArdle A, Sinha R, et al. Identification and
specification of the mouse skeletal stem cell. Cell. 2015;160(1-2):285-98.
22. Debnath S, Yallowitz AR, McCormick J, Lalani S, Zhang T, Xu R, et al. Discovery of a
periosteal stem cell mediating intramembranous bone formation. Nature.
2018;562(7725):133-9.
23. Maes C, Kobayashi T, Selig MK, Torrekens S, Roth SI, Mackem S, et al. Osteoblast
precursors, but not mature osteoblasts, move into developing and fractured bones along
with invading blood vessels. Dev Cell. 2010;19(2):329-44.
24. Buettmann EG, Yoneda S, Hu P, McKenzie JA, and Silva MJ. Postnatal Osterix but not
DMP1 lineage cells significantly contribute to intramembranous ossification in three
preclinical models of bone injury. Front Physiol. 2022;13:1083301.
25. Tu Q, Valverde P, and Chen J. Osterix enhances proliferation and osteogenic potential of
bone marrow stromal cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications.
2006;341(4):1257-65.
26. Tirosh I, Izar B, Prakadan SM, Wadsworth MH, 2nd, Treacy D, Trombetta JJ, et al.
Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single -cell RNA-seq.
Science. 2016;352(6282):189-96.
27. Kelman Z. PCNA: structure, functions and interactions. Oncogene. 1997;14(6):629-40.
28. Wildemann B, Schmidmaier G, Ordel S, Stange R, Haas NP, and Raschke M. Cell
proliferation and differentiation during fracture healing are influenced by locally applied
IGF-I and TGF -beta1: comparison of two proliferation markers, PCNA and BrdU. J
Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;65(1):150-6.
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
21
29. Zoch ML, Clemens TL, and Riddle RC. New insights into the biology of osteocalcin. Bone.
2016;82:42-9.
30. Zhang M, Xuan S, Bouxsein ML, von Stechow D, Akeno N, Faugere MC, et al. Osteoblast-
specific knockout of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptor gene reveals an essential
role of IGF signaling in bone matrix mineralization. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(46):44005-12.
31. Mesnil M, and Yamasaki H. Bystander effect in herpes simplex virus -thymidine
kinase/ganciclovir cancer gene therapy: role of gap -junctional intercellular
communication. Cancer research. 2000;60(15):3989-99.
32. Andrade-Rozental AF, Rozental R, Hopperstad MG, Wu JK, Vrionis FD, and Spray DC.
Gap junctions: the "kiss of death" and the "kiss of life". Brain Res Brain Res Rev.
2000;32(1):308-15.
33. Jeffery EC, Mann TLA, Pool JA, Zhao Z, and Morrison SJ. Bone marrow and periosteal
skeletal stem/progenitor cells make distinct contributions to bone maintenance and repair.
Cell stem cell. 2022;29(11):1547-61 e6.
34. Corral DA, Amling M, Priemel M, Loyer E, Fuchs S, Ducy P, et al. Dissociation between
bone resorption and bone formation in osteopenic transgenic mice. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95(23):13835-40.
35. Zannit HM, and Silva MJ. Proliferation and Activation of Osterix-Lineage Cells Contribute
to Loading-Induced Periosteal Bone Formation in Mice. JBMR Plus. 2019;3(11):e10227.
36. Harris TL, and Silva MJ. Dmp1 Lineage Cells Contribute Significantly to Periosteal
Lamellar Bone Formation Induced by Mechanical Loading But Are Depleted from the
Bone Surface During Rapid Bone Formation. JBMR Plus. 2021:e10593.
37. Duncan AW, Dorrell C, and Grompe M. Stem cells and liver regeneration.
Gastroenterology. 2009;137(2):466-81.
38. Dor Y, Brown J, Martinez OI, and Melton DA. Adult pancreatic beta -cells are formed by
self-duplication rather than stem-cell differentiation. Nature. 2004;429(6987):41-6.
39. Matsushita Y, Ono W, and Ono N. Bone regeneration via skeletal cell lineage plasticity:
All hands mobilized for emergencies: Quiescent mature skeletal cells can be activated in
response to injury and robustly participate in bone regeneration through cellular plasticity.
Bioessays. 2021;43(1):e2000202.
40. Stine KC, Wahl EC, Liu L, Skinner RA, Vanderschilden J, Bunn RC, et al. Cisplatin
inhibits bone healing during distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Res. 2014;32(3):464-70.
41. Tortolani PJ, Park AE, Louis-Ugbo J, Attallah-Wasef ES, Kraiwattanapong C, Heller JG,
et al. The effects of doxorubicin (adriamycin) on spinal fusion: an experimental model of
posterolateral lumbar spinal arthrodesis. The spine journal : official journal of the North
American Spine Society. 2004;4(6):669-74.
42. Li J, Chen G, Lu Y, Zhu H, Ji C, and Wang Z. Factors Influencing Osseous Union
Following Surgical Treatment of Bone Tumors with Use of the Capanna Technique. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(22):2036-43.
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
22
43. Rupp M, Biehl C, Budak M, Thormann U, Heiss C, and Alt V. Diaphyseal long bone
nonunions - types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations. Int Orthop.
2018;42(2):247-58.
44. Solomin LN, Semenistyy AA, Komarov AV, Khominets VV, Sheridan GA, and Rozbruch
SR. Universal Long Bone Nonunion Classification. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr.
2023;18(3):169-73.
45. Wang C, Ying J, Nie X, Zhou T, Xiao D, Swarnkar G, et al. Targeting angiogenesis for
fracture nonunion treatment in inflammatory disease. Bone Res. 2021;9(1):29.
46. Wang L, Tower RJ, Chandra A, Yao L, Tong W, Xiong Z, et al. Periosteal Mesenchymal
Progenitor Dysfunction and Extraskeletally -Derived Fibrosis Contribute to Atrophic
Fracture Nonunion. J Bone Miner Res. 2019.
47. Yao L, Lu J, Zhong L, Wei Y, Gui T, Wang L, et al. Activin A marks a novel progenitor
cell population during fracture healing and reveals a therapeutic strategy. Elife. 2023;12.
48. Rousselle P, Montmasson M, and Garnier C. Extracellular matrix contribution to skin
wound re-epithelialization. Matrix Biol. 2019;75-76:12-26.
49. Pakshir P, Noskovicova N, Lodyga M, Son DO, Schuster R, Goodwin A, et al. The
myofibroblast at a glance. Journal of cell science. 2020;133(13).
50. Caley MP, Martins VL, and O'Toole EA. Metalloproteinases and Wound Healing. Adv
Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4(4):225-34.
51. Perrin S, Ethel M, Bretegnier V, Goachet C, Wotawa CA, Luka M, et al. Single -nucleus
transcriptomics reveal the differentiation trajectories of periosteal skeletal/stem progenitor
cells in bone regeneration. Elife. 2024;13.
52. Xiao D, Fang L, Liu Z, He Y, Ying J, Qin H, et al. DNA methylation -mediated Rbpjk
suppression protects against fracture nonunion caused by systemic inflammation. J Clin
Invest. 2023;134(3).
53. Li Z, Bagchi DP, Zhu J, Bowers E, Yu H, Hardij J, et al. Constitutive bone marrow
adipocytes suppress local bone formation. JCI Insight. 2022;7(21).
54. Xing W, Feng H, Jiang B, Gao B, Liu J, Xie Z, et al. Itm2a expression marks periosteal
skeletal stem cells that contribute to bone fracture healing. J Clin Invest. 2024;134(17).
55. Matsushita Y, Nagata M, Kozloff KM, Welch JD, Mizuhashi K, Tokavanich N, et al. A
Wnt-mediated transformation of the bone marrow stromal cell identity orchestrates skeletal
regeneration. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):332.
56. Shi Y, He G, Lee WC, McKenzie JA, Silva MJ, and Long F. Gli1 identifies osteogenic
progenitors for bone formation and fracture repair. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):2043.
57. McBride-Gagyi SH, McKenzie JA, Buettmann EG, Gardner MJ, and Silva MJ. Bmp2
conditional knockout in osteoblasts and endothelial cells does not impair bone formation
after injury or mechanical loading in adult mice. Bone. 2015;81:533-43.
58. Hao Y, Hao S, Andersen-Nissen E, Mauck WM, 3rd, Zheng S, Butler A, et al. Integrated
analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell. 2021;184(13):3573-87 e29.
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
23
59. Salomon B, Maury S, Loubiere L, Caruso M, Onclercq R, and Klatzmann D. A truncated
herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase phosphorylates thymidine and nucleoside analogs
and does not cause sterility in transgenic mice. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15(10):5322-8.
60. Powell WF, Jr., Barry KJ, Tulum I, Kobayashi T, Harris SE, Bringhurst FR, et al. Targeted
ablation of the PTH/PTHrP receptor in osteocytes impairs bone structure and homeostatic
calcemic responses. J Endocrinol. 2011;209(1):21-32.
61. Alentado VJ, Knox AM, Staut CA, McGuire AC, Chitwood JR, Mostardo SL, et al.
Validation of the modified radiographic union score for tibia fractures (mRUST) in murine
femoral fractures. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2022;13:911058.
62. Zannit HM, Brodt MD, and Silva MJ. Proliferating osteoblasts are necessary for maximal
bone anabolic response to loading in mice. FASEB J. 2020;34(9):12739-50.
63. Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernandez JA, Dombrowski Y, McArt DG, Dunne PD, et al.
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep.
2017;7(1):16878.
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
24
Figure Captions
Figure 1: Ablation of proliferating 3.6Col1a1-lineage cells in the first 3-14 days following
fracture causes defects in callus formation at 21 days post-fracture.
(A) Femur fractures were created in 12-week-old wildtype control (CTL) and Col1-TK
experimental (EXPT) mice, followed by ganciclovir (GCV) dosing for 3, 7, or 14 days (n=7-9).
(B) (Left) Representative radiographs at 21 days post-fracture (DPF). (Right) Quantification of
radiographic healing. (C) 3D microCT images at 21 DPF (scale bar, 1 mm). (D) Sagittal callus
sections were stained with picrosirius red (PSR) to visualize collagen-rich bone and alcian blue
(AB) for proteoglycan-rich cartilage, and callus composition was determined (scale bar=1 mm).
(Graphs depict mean ± SD; individual data points shown [pink=female; blue=male]. Statistics:
Chi-square test (B) or two-Way ANOV A with Tukey Post Hoc test (C,D); *p<0.05, **<0.01,
****0.05)
Figure 2: Ablation of proliferating 3.6Col1a1 lineage cells for 5 days after fracture depletes
callus osteoblasts and chondrocytes and alters callus composition.
(A) After fracture Col1-TK mice were treated with water (Control, n=3) or GCV (Exptl, n=3) for
5 days. Cells isolated from whole-fracture callus were subjected to scRNAseq. (B) UMAP plot of
total callus cells with annotated cell cluster identities based on canonical gene expression and
bioinformatic analysis (COMPBIO). (C) Mesenchymal cells were selected in silico and re -
clustered. (D) Expression of canonical genes for osteoblasts ( Sp7, Alpl), chondrocytes ( Acan,
Col2a1), and hypertrophic chondrocytes (Col10a1, Mmp13) projected on UMAPS and displayed
as violin plots. (E) Mesenchymal cells were identified by treatment group, and the percent of cells
in each cluster was quantified (n=3). (F) Histological sections of callus at 5 DPF from Control
(n=8; WT + GCV, or Col1 -TK + water) and Exptl (n=5; Col1 -TK + GCV) were stained with
picrosirius red and alcian blue (PSRAB) and used to determine total callus area, and percent area
of woven bone (red), cartilage (blue), fibrous/other tissue, and periosteum. (G) High-power fields
(from F) of TK IHC of control (Col1-TK + water) and experimental (Col1-TK + GCV) mice (white
dashed line=callus periphery, green dashed line=woven bone area, Mu=muscle, Cg=cartilage,
Ct=Cortical bone, WoB=woven bone). (Statistics: two -way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Post Hoc
test (E) or Two-Tailed t-test (F). Scale bars: PSRAB=0.5 mm, TK=1 mm.)
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
25
Figure 3: Ablation of proliferating 3.6Col1a1 lineage cells for 10 days depletes callus
osteoblasts and chondrocytes and reduces callus bone volume.
(A) After femur fracture Col1 -TK mice were treated with water (Control, n=3) or GCV (Exptl,
n=3) for 10 days. Cells isolated from whole -fracture callus were subjected to scRNAseq. (B)
UMAP plot of total callus cells with annotated cluster identities. (C) The number of cells from
immune clusters on Day 5 (Clusters 2, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16) and Day 10 (Clusters 7, 10, 13, 15)
normalized to total cell numbers. (D) Mesenchymal cells were selected in silico and re-clustered.
(E) Expression of canonical genes for osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and hypertrophic chondrocytes
displayed as violin plots and projected on UMAPS. (F) Mesenchymal cells were identified by
treatment group, and the percent of cells in each cluster was quantified (n=3). (G) Callus bone
volume was quantified by microCT (n=5 -8). (H) Histological sections of callus at 10 DPF were
analyzed to determine total callus area and callus tissue composition. (I) Representative images of
TK IHC of control (Col1-TK + water) and exptl (Col1-TK + GCV). (Statistics: two-Way ANOVA
with Holm-Sidak Post Hoc test (C, F) or two -tailed t-test (G, H). Scale bars: PSRAB = 1 mm,
TK=1 mm.)
Figure 4: Ablation of proliferating Osterix-expressing cells impairs fracture callus bridging
and mineralization.
(A) Mice were treated with TMX starting at 10 -wks age, followed by femur fracture at 12 -wks,
followed by 2 weeks GCV treatment. Healing was assessed 14 days post -fracture. Genotype
controls were mice lacking either Osx-CreERT2 (Cre-) or ROSA-TK (TK-) alleles; experimental
mice had both alleles (Cre+/TK+) (n=6). (B) TK+ mice were treated with water for TK IHC, which
shows robust TK expression in callus woven bone only in Cre+ mice (green dashed line=callus
periphery; WoB=Woven Bone; Mu=Muscle). (C) (Left) Re presentative radiographs. (Right)
Quantification of radiographic healing. ( D) Histological analysis of PSRAB stained -sections to
assess callus size and composition. (E) Callus bone volume was quantified by microCT. (Statistical
differences determined by Chi-Square test (C) or by two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Post-Hoc
test (D, E); *p<0.05, **p<0.01. Scale bars: TK=0.25 mm, PSRAB=1 mm, microCT=1 mm.)
Figure 5: Sp7/Osterix-expressing osteoblasts proliferate during fracture healing.
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
26
(A) Mesenchymal cells from scRNAseq analysis at days 5 and 10 post-fracture annotated for cell
cycle stage. (B) Mesenchymal cells with high Sp7 gene expression annotated for cell cycle stage.
(C) Representative fracture callus sections from Control mice at 3, 5 and 10 days post -fracture
stained by immunofluorescence for Osx and proliferation marker PCNA. (Scale bars: Low -
Power=1 mm, Zoom=0.1 mm; Dashed yellow line=cortical bone; Dashed white line= callus
periphery; Yellow Arrows=Osx+;PCNA+ cells.) (D) Quantification of percent PCNA+ nuclei and
Osx+;PCNA+ nuclei. (n=3; graphs depict mean±SD; statistical differences determined by two -
way ANOVA (A, B) or one-way ANOVA (D) with Holm-Sidak Post-Hoc.)
Figure 6. Ablation of proliferating Osteocalcin-lineage cells impairs fracture healing.
(A) Femur fracture was performed at 12 -wks age, followed by 2 weeks GCV treatment. Healing
was assessed 14 days after fracture. Genotype controls included mice lacking either Ocn -Cre or
RosaTK alleles; experimental mice were Cre+/TK+ (n=5 -10). (B) TK+ mice were treated with
water for HSV-TK IHC, which shows TK expression in callus woven bone only in Cre+ mice. (C)
(Left) Representative radiographs. (Right) Quantification of radiographic healing. (D) Histological
analysis of fracture callus composition on PSRA B-stained slides showed that experimental mice
have altered composition, with less woven bone and more fibrous tissue compared to control. (E)
Callus bone volume quantified by microCT. (Statistical differences determined by Chi-Square test
(C) or two -way ANOVA with Holm -Sidak Post -Hoc test (D, E). Scale bars: TK=0.25 mm,
PSRAB=1 mm, microCT=1 mm.)
Figure 7. Bglap/Osteocalcin-expressing osteoblasts proliferate during fracture healing.
(A) Mesenchymal cells from scRNAseq analysis at 5 and 10 DPF with high Bglap expression were
annotated for cell cycle stage (n=3). (B) Representative callus sections from Control mice at days
3, 5 and 10 post -fracture stained by immunofluorescence for Ocn and PCNA. (Scale bars: Low -
Power=1 mm, Zoom=0.1 mm; Ct.Bone=cortical bone; Callus=callus periphery; Yellow
Arrows=Ocn+;PCNA+ cells.) (C) Quantification of percent PCNA+ nuclei and Ocn+;PCNA+
nuclei. (Graphs depict mean±SD; statistical differences determi ned by two -way ANOVA (A) or
one-way ANOVA (C) with Holm-Sidak Post-Hoc.)
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
27
Figure 8: Ablation of proliferating Dmp1 -expressing cells impairs fracture callus bridging
and mineralization.
(A) Mice were treated with TMX starting at 10 -wks age, followed by femur fracture at 12 -wks,
followed by 2 weeks GCV treatment . Healing was assessed 14 days after fracture. Control mice
were Cre-;TK+ while experimental mice were Cre+;TK+. (B) TK+ mice were treated with water
for HSV-TK IHC, which shows robust TK expression in callus woven bone only in Cre+ mice.
(C) Fracture callus bridging was quantified based on radiographic images. (D) Histological
analysis of PSRAB stained -sections was used to assess ca llus size and composition. (E) Callus
bone volume was quantified using microCT. (Statistical differences were determined by Chi -
Square test (B) or by two -tailed t -test (C, D). Scale bars: PSRAB=1 mm, TK IHC=0.25 mm,
microCT=1 mm.)
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
28
Gould et al, Supplemental Material
Supplemental Results
Blocking gap junction -mediated intercellular communication (GJIC) does not rescue impaired
fracture healing in Osx-CreERT2, Ocn-Cre, or Dmp1-CreERT2; ROSA-TK mice
A feature of the TK/GCV model that has been noted is a bystander effect (1, 2). This occurs
when a TK-expressing cell is linked to other cells via gap junctions, which facilitates the passage
of the toxic mono-phosphorylated GCV (mediated only by TK enzymatic activity) to neighboring
cells that may not express TK. This modified GCV can then be further phosphorylated and lead to
apoptosis in a proliferating cell that never expressed TK. To test whether this by -stander effect
contributes to the impaired fracture healing seen in ROSA-TK mice, we treated Osx -CreERT2;
ROSA-TK, Ocn -Cre; ROSA-TK, and Dmp1 -CreERT2; ROSA-TK mice and their respective
controls with the gap junction blocker Carbenoxolone (CBX) once daily (along with GCV)
following full femur fracture. Based on microCT analysis at 14 DPF, Cre+/TK+ mice had
significantly diminished callus bone volume compared to Cre-/TK+ control mice, and this was not
different in CBX-treated mice than in mice that were not treated with CBX (Suppl Fig S9). Thus,
inhibiting gap junction communication did not rescue impaired fracture healing in any of the
ROSA-TK models. This result indicates that the impaired healing observed when early and mature
proliferating osteoblasts are ablated is not due to a gap junction-mediated intercellular bystander
effect but is due to the ablation of actively proliferating Osterix -, Osteocalcin -, or Dmp1 -
expressing cells during fracture healing.
Ablation of proliferating Adq-expressing cells modestly affects fracture healing
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
29
Fracture callus is predominantly derived from periosteal skeletal progenitors, albeit with
some contribution from bone marrow cells (3). Adiponectin (Adq) is expressed in osteoprogenitor
cells in bone marrow, but is not expressed by periosteal cells (4). Therefore, we evaluated fracture
healing in Adq -CreERT2; ROSA -TK mice as a negative control, i.e., with the hypothesis that
fracture healing would be minimally affected. To activate Cre, m ice were dosed with TMX 2
weeks prior to fracture . Cre-/TK+ (control) and Cre+/TK+ (exptl) mice were treated with TMX
and GCV and fracture healing was evaluated at 14 days post-fracture (Suppl Fig 10A).
Radiographic analysis indicated that 80% of control mice had callus bridging of both
cortices and 90% had bridged at least one cortex, compared to 38% and 75%, respectively, in
Cre+/TK+ mice, suggesting delayed bridging in the latter (Suppl Fig 10B). Histologically, fracture
calluses from Cre+/TK+ mice were marginally smaller than Cre -/TK+ controls (-25%, p=0.11)
although callus composition was proportionately normal in Cre+/TK+ mice (Suppl Fig 10C).
MicroCT analysis showed that callus bone volume was marginally less in Cre+/TK+ mice than in
Cre- controls (-20%, p=0.14), while callus BMD was not affected (Suppl Fig 10D). In comparison,
Osx-CreERT2;ROSA-TK mice have 65% lower callus bone volume compared to their controls
(p<0.0001; Fig 4E). These results indicate a modest effect on fracture callus formation in mice
wherein proliferating adiponectin-expressing cells were ablated, consistent with targeting of bone
marrow skeletal progenitors but not periosteal progenitors. This finding supports that Cre+/TK+
mice treated with GCV do not inherently have impaired fracture healing.
Supplemental Methods
Chemicals and Reagents : Tamoxifen (TMX, T5648), corn oil (C8267), and Ganciclovir (GCV,
G2536) were from Millipore Sigma. Goat Anti -Rabbit Immunoglobulins/HRP (affinity isolated,
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
30
P0448) was from Agilent Dako. Diaminobenzidine (DAB) chrom ogen (SK -4105) and
Hematoxylin QS Counterstain (H-3404) were from Vector Laboratories. ReadyProbes Mouse-on-
Mouse IgG Blocking Solution (R37621), Goat anti -Mouse IgG (H+L), Superclonal ™
Recombinant Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor ™ 488 (A28175), Goat anti -Rabbit IgG (H+L)
Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 546 (A11035), and ProLong™ Glass
Antifade Mountant with NucBlue ™ Stain (P36981) were from ThermoFisher. Anti -Osteocalcin
(A93876) and Anti -Osterix (22552) were from Abcam. Anti -PCNA (258 6) w as from Cell
Signaling Technology. 22m sterile filters (09-720-004) were from Fisher Scientific. Collagenase
Type II (L5004176) was from Worthington. Pronase (53702), Trypan blue (T8154), and High
Glucose DMEM (D6429) were from Sigma. LIVE/DEAD ™ Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit (L3224)
was from Invitrogen. 40 m SureStrain™ Premium Cell Strainers (C4040) were from MTCBio.
MS Columns (130-042-201) were from Miltenyi Biotec. The Corded Dremel (5EEU5) was from
Grainger. The Dremel bit (2901A247) and the tungsten guide wire (3775K37) were from
McMaster Carr. Hypodermic tubing (3 04H24TW) was from Microgroup. 4 -0 nylon sutures
(1854G) were from Ethicon. Anti-Thymidine Kinase Antibody was a gift from William Summers
(Yale).
Col1-TK Mice: Breeders were rederived from cryopreserved embryos gifted by Drs. O’Brien and
Jilka (5) (UAMS). A total of 90 mice, age 12 -wks were used. Transgenic 3.6Col1a1-TK (Col1-
TK) mice were used to target proliferating (pre)osteoblasts, wherein expression of herpes simplex
virus thymidine kinase (TK) in early osteoblasts is driven by the 3.6 kilobase rat Col1a1 promoter
(5, 6). Heterozygous female Col1 -TK mice were bred to wild -type males to generate wild -type
(WT) controls or Col1 -TK (TK) experimental mice of both sexes. Mice were administered
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
31
ganciclovir (GCV, 8 mg/kg i.p., 1/d) starting on the day of fracture and were euthanized at 5-, 10-
, or 21-days post-fracture.
Fracture Model: An established model of mid-diaphyseal femur fracture was used (6, 7). Briefly,
following administration of an analgesic (Buprenorphine SR, 1 mg/kg, s.c), mice were
anesthetized (1-3% isofluorane) and a 5 mm incision was made above the knee, exposing the distal
femoral condyles. The medullary canal was reamed out, and a 1.5 -inch-long tungsten guide wire
was inserted into the marrow space. To create a mid -point femur fracture, a transverse force was
applied using a three -point bending set -up (DynaMight 8841; Instron). A 24 -gauge, 1 -inch
hypodermic stainless -steel tube was ins erted over the guidewire to stabilize the fracture. The
guidewire was removed, the tube clipped to length, and the incision closed using 4-0 nylon suture.
Pin placement was confirmed with radiography immediately after surgery. This model heals via
secondary fracture healing, with intramembranous bone formation at the periphery and
endochondral bone formation within the fracture gap.
Cell Isolation for Single Cell RNA Sequencing:
For scRNAseq, Col1-TK mice (n=3/time/treatment) were fractured and treated with either water
(Control) or GCV (Exptl) for 5 - or 10-days post-fracture. Following euthanasia, the fracture site
was exposed, and total callus tissue scraped away from cortical bone using a fresh scalpel. Tissue
was minced in 1 mL of 22 mm sterile -filtered digestion buffer comprised of 1663 U/mL
Collagenase Type II and 1814 PUK/mL Pronase in High Glucose DMEM with 8% FBS. After
digestion for 1 hr at 37ºC, cells were pelleted and re-suspended in 0.01% BSA in sterile PBS. Cells
were filtered through a 40 mm filter, and dead cells were removed using an MS Column. Trypan
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
32
Blue-stained cells were counted and viability estimated using a Live/Dead kit. Twelve samples
(one per mouse , no pooling ) comprising 40,000 cells/sample with 70% viability were sent for
sequencing.
Single Cell RNA Sequencing and Analysis:
Twelve single cell suspensions were transferred to the Genome Technology Access Center at
Washington University for library preparation using the 10X Genomics Chromium Single Cell 3’
Reagent Kit (v3.1). Sequencing was done in a single lane of Illumina Nova seq (avg. 8,700 cells
per sample; range: 4170-16,323). A mean of 74,692 reads per cell were sequenced, and mapped to
a median of 2,770 genes per cell, with overall coverage of 61% of the transcriptome. An average
of 23,140 genes were detected per sample. F ollowing standard normalization and filtering, data
from 104,740 cells (Day 5: Control 32,322 cells; GCV 28,383; Day 10: Control 23,278; GCV:
20,307) were available for analysis.
Secondary analysis was done using Seurat Version 4.4.0 in R (8). All cells from each time
point, independent of treatment, were subjected to unbiased clustering and were visualized on
UMAP plots. For cluster annotation, the top 50 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from each
cluster were entered into Comprehensive Multi-Omics Platform for Biological Interpretation
(COMPBIO, Washington University) to identify the top biological themes and components for
each cluster. Following annotation, clusters comprised of predominantly mesenchymal lineage
cells were digitally selected and re-clustered for better cell identity resolution. The top 50 DEGs
from the mesenchymal-only clusters were also input into COMPBIO for annotation. Seurat in R
was used for cell subsetting. Threshold cutoffs for Sp7/Osterix and Bglap/Osteocalcin used were
90% of the mean gene expression of mesenchymal cells only from control water-treated mice from
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
33
each time point. Cell cycle stage was determined based on canonical gene expression profiles as
described (9). Cells are assigned to either G1 phase (stagnant, functional phase), S Phase (actively
replicating DNA in preparation for cell division), or G2M phase (preparing for and going through
mitosis). Cells assigned to either the S or G2M phase are judged to be actively proliferating.
Generation and Validation of a ROSA-TK Mouse Line:
To generate a Cre -inducible mouse ( ROSA26-LSL-HSV-TK, or ‘ROSA -TK’) for targeted
ablation of proliferating cells, we utilized a truncated herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase allele
(HSV-deltaTK, Addgene 114273) to circumvent male sterility caused by the full sequence TK
while retaining enzymatic function(10). The HSV-deltaTK knock-in targeting vector contained a
CAG promoter, followed by floxed stop cassette (LSL), the HSV -deltaTK allele, a P2A self -
cleaving site, and finally an mCherry allele (Suppl Fig S4). The plasmid was synthesized by the
Genome Engineering an d Stem Cell Core (Washington University). The floxed stop cassette
allows for tissue-specific expression of HSV-deltaTK and mCherry upon Cre-mediated excision.
The P2A site allows for bicistronic expression of the HSV-deltaTK and mCherry genes. ROSA26
specific TALENs were designed using the ZiFit targeter (http://zifit.partners.org) and ROSA26
TALENs binding sites as follows:
1) 5’ ROSA26 TALEN binding site: 5’ TCCCTCGTGATCTGCAACTCC 3’
2) 3’ ROSA26 TALEN binding site: 5’ GGGCGGGAGTCTTCTGGGCA 3’
The TALEN kit used for TALE assembly was a gift from Keith Joung (Addgene kit #
1000000017). DNA fragments encoding ROSA TALEN repeat arrays were cloned into plasmid
pJDS71. ROSA TALENs plasmids were linearized for in vitro transcription with EcoRI and
TALENs RNA was synthesized using the mMessage mMachine T7 Ultra kit (Ambion) and
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
34
purified with Megaclear columns (Ambion). The knock-in cassette was introduced into the mouse
genome via pronuclear injection of in vitro transcribed TALENs RNA and ROSA donor DNA into
C57BL/6J;CBA hybrid oocytes which were then implanted into hosts dams (Mouse Genetics Core,
Washington University). Six offspring with correctly targeted alleles were identified by long-range
PCR using ROSA specific primers external to the homology arms (not shown). These six potential
founders (F0 generation) were bred to WT C57Bl/6 mice. Presence of the mutant allele was
demonstrated in the six potential founders (F0) using standard PCR ( Suppl Fig S5A-B). F1 pups
were screened to confirm transmission of the mutant allele from founders to offspring (Suppl Fig
S5C).
Two confirmed ROSA - TK founders (354 -7 and 356 -4) were crossed to tamoxifen -
inducible Osx-CreERT2 mice and validation was assessed in F1 mice by three methods. First, we
confirmed tamoxifen-dependent excision of the stop cassette only in Cre+ mice (Suppl F ig S5D-
E). Second, we used IHC to confirm Cre-dependent TK protein expression in trabecular osteoblasts
only in Osx -CreERT2+; R OSA-TK+ mice, supporting that excision of the stop cassette is
sufficient to drive TK expression in the targeted cells (Suppl Fig S5F). Third, we demonstrated
nonunion fractures only in Cre+/TK+ mice (Fig 4, Suppl Fig 6). These two founders were used to
establish the ROSA-TK lines, and all mice for subsequent studies were derived therefrom. Each
founder line was kept separate to ensure reproducibility of phenotypes independent of founder.
(Note that we did not detect mCherry fluorescence on frozen sections, but confirmed mCherry
expression using IHC (not shown).)
Maintenance of Cre Lines and Generation of Cre;TK Mice:
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
35
Osx-CreERT2 (from Dr. Kronenberg (11), MGI:4829803), Dmp1 -CreERT2 (from Dr. Divieti
Pajevic(12), MGI:5792965) and Ocn-Cre (Jackson Laboratory, #19509) mice were acquired and
maintained by breeding Cre -positive males to wild type C57Bl/6 females (Jackson Laboratory,
#000664). Cre-positive males were bred with ROSA-TK females to generate control (Cre -;TK-,
Cre-;TK+, Cre+;TK-) and experimental (Cre+;TK+) littermates. When possible, Cre+;TK+ males
were bred to Cre-;TK+ females to generate control and experimental littermates with homozygous
TK+/+ genotypes.
Genotyping:
For 3.6ColTK mice, genotyping was done by Transnetyx using toe biopsies for the absence or
presence of the puromycin selection cassette:
• Fwd: 5’ –GCGGTGTTCGCCGAGAT– 3’; Rev: 5’ –GAGGCCTTCCATCTGTTGCT– 3’
For ROSA-TK mice, primers targeting the wild-type ROSA allele or the CAG promoter were used
to distinguish wild-type and mutant (TK+) alleles:
• Wild-type: For: 5’ – GTTATCAGTAAGGGAGCTGCAGTGGAGTAG – 3’; Rev: 5’ –
CCGAAAATCTGTGGGAAGTCTTGTCCCTCC – 3’
• TK+: For: 5’ - GTTATCAGTAAGGGAGCTGCAGTGGAGTAG - 3’; Rev: 5’ -
CTCCACCCATTGACGTCAATGGAAAGTCCC - 3’
Following establishment of the ROSA-TK line, genotyping was done by Transnetyx using toe
biopsies for the wild-type ROSA allele or the inclusion of the mCherry (TK+) sequence:
• Wild-type: For: 5’ – TTCCCTCGTGATCTGCAACTC – 3’; Rev: 5’ –
CTTTAAGCCTGCCCAGAAGACT – 3’
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
36
• mCherry: For: 5’ – AGCGCGTGATGAACTTCGA – 3’; Rev: 5’ –
GCGCAGCTTCACCTTGTAGAT – 3’
For Stop cassette genotyping in Osx -CreERT2; ROSA-TK mice, mice were given three doses of
TMX across 5 days. Tail snips were taken prior to and after full TMX treatment for genotyping to
visualize excision of the stop cassette:
• Fwd: 5’ – GAGGGCCTTCGTGCGTC – 3’; Rev – 5’ CATCGGCTCGGGTACGTAGA
– 3’
For Cre allele genotyping, genotyping was done by Transnetyx using toe biopsies:
• Osx-CreERT2 and Dmp1-CreERT2: Fwd: 5’ - TGCGCCTGCTGGAAGAT -3’; Rev: 5’
– GGTTGGCAGCTCTCATGTCT – 3’
• Ocn-Cre: Fwd: 5’ – TTAATCCATATTGGCAGAACGAAAACG – 3’; Rev: 5’ –
CAGGCTAAGTGCCTTCTCTACA – 3’
Radiographic Evaluation:
Lateral radiographs were taken weekly to confirm proper positioning of the intramedullary pin and
to monitor healing (Faxitron UltraFocus100). Radiographs from 14 or 21 weeks post-fracture were
blindly scored using the modified RUST (radiographic union score for tibial fracture) method
adapted for mouse femurs (13). From the lateral projection, we scored the anterior and posterior
cortices on a 4 -point scale (1=fracture line visible, no callus formation; 2=fracture line visible,
visible callus; 3=fracture line visible, callus fully bridged; 4=fracture line not visible, callus fully
bridged) and summed the two scores (possible range 2 to 8). Because the fracture lines were still
visible on both cortices at these timepoints, the maximum score in our study was 6. Mice were
excluded if the fixation pin displaced during healing.
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
37
Micro-Computed Tomography:
Fractured and intact contralateral femurs were fixed in 10% non -buffered formalin for 16 hours,
rinsed with PBS and stored in 70% ethanol. Femurs were scanned ex vivo using microCT (VivaCT
40, Scanco, 10.5m voxel size, 55kV, 145A, 300ms integration time). Conventional analysis of
a 600-slice ROI centered on the mid-point of the fracture line was done, as described (6). A single
lower threshold (200 per mille, contour peel 2) was used to determine bone volume (BV, mm 3),
tissue volume (TV, mm 3), volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD, mg HA/cm 3), and tissue
mineral density (TMD, mg HA/cm 3), inclusive of callus bone and cortical bone . Cortical
parameters from the mid-diaphysis of intact limbs were similarly analyzed; the population mean
(dotted line) and standard deviation (grey shading) are shown overlaying data from fractured
limbs. To isolate callus bone in fractured femurs, a two -threshold method was used: 150 and 460
per mille (contour peel of 0) to segment total bone and cortical bone, respectively.
Cortical bone volume (CBV460) was subtracted from total bone volume (TBV150) to yield callus
bone volume (mm3). Following microCT, femurs were decalcified and processed for histology.
Histology and Analysis of Callus Composition:
Femurs were decalcified in 14% EDTA, pH 7.0 for 2 weeks, with EDTA changed every 3-4 days.
Femurs were embedded in paraffin wax and 5 m thick, longitudinal sagittal sections through the
middle of the fracture callus were mounted on glass slides. Slides were deparaffinized in xylenes,
rehydrated in graded ethanol s and stained by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and picrosirius red
and alcian blue (PSRAB) to visualize collagen-rich woven bone and proteoglycan -rich cartilage,
respectively. Slides were imaged at 20× on a Nanozoomer slide scanner (Hamamatsu Photonics).
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
38
Callus composition was q uantified in NDP View 2 software (Hamamatsu) by drawing custom
contours around different tissue components (see example in Suppl Fig S1C). Total callus area
was the area of both sides of the periosteal callus, excluding any intact cortical bone or bone
marrow. Cartilage was identified by Alcian blue stained areas and woven bone was identified by
Picrosirius red stained areas. Fibrous tissue was identified as a mix of the two stains that did not
morphologically resemble either cartilage or bone.
Thymidine Kinase (TK) Immunohistochemistry:
Immunohistochemistry was used to visualize HSV -TK expression in the callus region of
histological sections. Following deparaffinization, e ndogenous peroxidase activity was blocked
using 3 % hydrogen peroxide. Sections were blocked with 10% goat sera + 1% bovine serum
albumin for 1 hr at room temperature (RT). Anti -TK antibody (1:1000, gift from William
Summers(14)) was diluted in 2% goat sera and incubated overnight at 4C. Anti-rabbit HRP (1:500)
was diluted in 2% goat sera and incubated for 1 hr at RT. All samples were incubated with
diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen for 30 sec and rinsed in water to stop the reaction. Sections
were counterstained with hematoxylin for 30 sec and imaged at 20× as above.
Co-Immunofluorescence:
Antigen retrieval was done with boiling 10mM citrate buffer and overnight incubation at 60C.
Sections were permeabilized with 0.3% Triton -X 100, blocked with 10% goat serum for 1 hr at
RT, and endogenous mouse IgG was blocked with Mouse-on-Mouse IgG Blocking Solution for 1
hr at RT. Sections were stained with either anti -PCNA (1:500) and anti -Osterix (1:150) or Anti -
PCNA and anti-Osteocalcin (1:500) diluted in 1.5% goat serum overnight at 4C. 1:200 anti-mouse
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
39
488 (A28175) and 1:200 anti-rabbit 546 were diluted in 1.5% goat serum and incubated at RT for
1.5 hr. Sections were mounted and coverslipped with Prolong Glass with DAPI. PCNA is
expressed during the S phase of the cell cycle where it interacts with DNA polymerase complexes
to increase processivity by holding DNA polymerase onto the DNA strand (15). When compared
to the incorporation of BrdU in rat fracture model as a marker for DNA synthesis and cell
proliferation, PCNA staining closely mimicked BrdU incorporation, supporting its use in detecting
proliferating cells (16).
Co-Immunofluorescence Imaging and Quantification:
Fluorescent slides were imaged at 20× (Nanozoomer). QuPATH v0.4.4 (17) was used to quantify
PCNA+ osteoblasts. Briefly, each half of the callus was manually contoured and Positive Cell
Detection on the DAPI channel was used to identify the total number of nuclei. Single
Measurement Classifiers were made for the PCNA and Osterix (Osx) signals individually, with
thresholds based on maximum nuclear intensities for each channel. A Composite Measurement
Classifier was created from the individual classifiers to identify PCNA -;Osx-, PCNA+;Osx -,
PCNA-;Osx+, and PCNA+;Os x+ nuclei. Per cent of proliferating osterix -expressing cells was
calculated as the number of PCNA+;Os x+ cells divided by the total number of Os x+ nuclei.
Similarly for Osteocalcin (Ocn)-stained sections, Positive Cell Detection on the DAPI channel was
used to identify the total number of nuclei and the cell body was identified using cell expansion of
3 m for 3-day and 4 m for 5- and 10-day post-fracture samples. Osteocalcin thresholding was
based on maximum cell intensity. Percent proliferating Ocn-expressing cells was calculated as the
number of PCNA+;Ocn+ cells divided by the total number of Ocn+ cells. The two halves of each
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
40
callus were averaged together to determine the rate of osteoblast proliferation throughout the entire
callus (n=3 mice/timepoint).
Statistics:
Experimenters were blinded to animal genotype and treatment during data collection and analysis.
Analyses were carried out in GraphPad Prism 9.0. Data were tested for normality prior to analysis.
Data were compared with Chi -Squared tests, unpaired two -tailed t-tests, one-way ANOVA with
Holm-Sidak post-hoc correction, two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak post-hoc correction, or non-
parametric Kruskal -Wallis multiple comparison tests, as indicated in figure legends. ANOVA
tables are provided as a supplemental excel file for main variable effects. A p-value of <0.05 was
used as a threshold for statistical significance. Graphs show means with error bars indicating SD.
Supplementary References
1. Mesnil M, and Yamasaki H. Bystander effect in herpes simplex virus -thymidine
kinase/ganciclovir cancer gene therapy: role of gap -junctional intercellular
communication. Cancer research. 2000;60(15):3989-99.
2. Andrade-Rozental AF, Rozental R, Hopperstad MG, Wu JK, Vrionis FD, and Spray DC.
Gap junctions: the "kiss of death" and the "kiss of life". Brain Res Brain Res Rev.
2000;32(1):308-15.
3. Colnot C. Skeletal cell fate decisions within periosteum and bone marrow during bone
regeneration. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(2):274-82.
4. Jeffery EC, Mann TLA, Pool JA, Zhao Z, and Morrison SJ. Bone marrow and periosteal
skeletal stem/progenitor cells make distinct contributions to bone maintenance and repair.
Cell stem cell. 2022;29(11):1547-61 e6.
5. Jilka RL, O'Brien CA, Ali AA, Roberson PK, Weinstein RS, and Manolagas SC.
Intermittent PTH stimulates periosteal bone formation by actions on post -mitotic
preosteoblasts. Bone. 2009;44(2):275-86.
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
41
6. Hixon KR, McKenzie JA, Sykes DAW, Yoneda S, Hensley A, Buettmann EG, et al.
Ablation of Proliferating Osteoblast Lineage Cells After Fracture Leads to Atrophic
Nonunion in a Mouse Model. J Bone Miner Res. 2021;36(11):2243-57.
7. McBride-Gagyi SH, McKenzie JA, Buettmann EG, Gardner MJ, and Silva MJ. Bmp2
conditional knockout in osteoblasts and endothelial cells does not impair bone formation
after injury or mechanical loading in adult mice. Bone. 2015;81:533-43.
8. Hao Y, Hao S, Andersen-Nissen E, Mauck WM, 3rd, Zheng S, Butler A, et al. Integrated
analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell. 2021;184(13):3573-87 e29.
9. Tirosh I, Izar B, Prakadan SM, Wadsworth MH, 2nd, Treacy D, Trombetta JJ, et al.
Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single -cell RNA-seq.
Science. 2016;352(6282):189-96.
10. Salomon B, Maury S, Loubiere L, Caruso M, Onclercq R, and Klatzmann D. A truncated
herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase phosphorylates thymidine and nucleoside analogs
and does not cause sterility in transgenic mice. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15(10):5322-8.
11. Maes C, Kobayashi T, Selig MK, Torrekens S, Roth SI, Mackem S, et al. Osteoblast
precursors, but not mature osteoblasts, move into developing and fractured bones along
with invading blood vessels. Dev Cell. 2010;19(2):329-44.
12. Powell WF, Jr., Barry KJ, Tulum I, Kobayashi T, Harris SE, Bringhurst FR, et al. Targeted
ablation of the PTH/PTHrP receptor in osteocytes impairs bone structure and homeostatic
calcemic responses. J Endocrinol. 2011;209(1):21-32.
13. Alentado VJ, Knox AM, Staut CA, McGuire AC, Chitwood JR, Mostardo SL, et al.
Validation of the modified radiographic union score for tibia fractures (mRUST) in murine
femoral fractures. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2022;13:911058.
14. Smiley WR, Laubert B, Howard BD, Ibanez C, Fong TC, Summers WS, et al.
Establishment of parameters for optimal transduction efficiency and antitumor effects with
purified high-titer HSV-TK retroviral vector in established solid tumors. Hum Gene Ther.
1997;8(8):965-77.
15. Kelman Z. PCNA: structure, functions and interactions. Oncogene. 1997;14(6):629-40.
16. Wildemann B, Schmidmaier G, Ordel S, Stange R, Haas NP, and Raschke M. Cell
proliferation and differentiation during fracture healing are influenced by locally applied
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
42
IGF-I and TGF -beta1: comparison of two proliferation markers, PCNA and BrdU. J
Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;65(1):150-6.
17. Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernandez JA, Dombrowski Y, McArt DG, Dunne PD, et al.
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep.
2017;7(1):16878.
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 1: Ablation of proliferating 3.6Col1a1-lineage cells in the first 3-14 days following fracture causes defects
in callus formation at 21 days post-fracture.
(A) Femur fractures were created in 12-week-old wildtype control (CTL) and Col1-TK experimental (EXPT) mice,
followed by ganciclovir (GCV) dosing for 3, 7, or 14 days (n=7-9). (B) (Left) Representative radiographs at 21 days
post-fracture (DPF). (Right) Quantification of radiographic healing. (C) 3D microCT images at 21 DPF (scale bar, 1
mm). (D) Sagittal callus sections were stained with picrosirius red (PSR) to visualize collagen-rich bone and alcian
blue (AB) for proteoglycan-rich cartilage, and callus composition was determined (scale bar=1 mm). (Graphs
depict mean ± SD; individual data points shown [pink=female; blue=male]. Statistics: Chi-square test (B) or two-
Way ANOVA with Tukey Post Hoc test (C,D); *p<0.05, **<0.01, ****0.05)
A.
Genotype: <0.001
GCV Dur: 0.36
Interaction: 0.002
Genotype: <0.0001
GCV Dur: 0.51
Interaction: 0.0003
C. 3d 14d7d
EXPT
(TK)
CTL
(WT)
GCV dosing duration D.
3d 14d7d
CTL
(WT)
EXPT
(TK)
GCV dosing duration
3d
7d
14d
B. GCV dosing duration
CTL
(WT)
EXPT
(TK)
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Fibroblasts
Chondrocytes
Figure 2: Ablation of proliferating 3.6Col1a1 lineage cells for 5 days after fracture depletes callus osteoblasts
and chondrocytes and alters callus composition.
(A) After fracture Col1-TK mice were treated with water (Control, n=3) or GCV (Exptl, n=3) for 5 days. Cells
isolated from whole-fracture callus were subjected to scRNAseq. (B) UMAP plot of total callus cells with
annotated cell cluster identities based on canonical gene expression and bioinformatic analysis (COMPBIO). (C)
Mesenchymal cells were selected in silico and re-clustered. (D) Expression of canonical genes for osteoblasts
(Sp7, Alpl), chondrocytes (Acan, Col2a1), and hypertrophic chondrocytes (Col10a1, Mmp13) projected on UMAPS
and displayed as violin plots. (E) Mesenchymal cells were identified by treatment group, and the percent of cells
in each cluster was quantified (n=3). (F) Histological sections of callus at 5 DPF from Control (n=8; WT + GCV, or
Col1-TK + water) and Exptl (n=5; Col1-TK + GCV) were stained with picrosirius red and alcian blue (PSRAB) and
used to determine total callus area, and percent area of woven bone (red), cartilage (blue), fibrous/other tissue,
and periosteum. (G) High-power fields (from F) of TK IHC of control (Col1-TK + water) and experimental (Col1-TK
+ GCV) mice (white dashed line=callus periphery, green dashed line=woven bone area, Mu=muscle, Cg=cartilage,
Ct=Cortical bone, WoB=woven bone). (Statistics: two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Post Hoc test (E) or Two-
Tailed t-test (F). Scale bars: PSRAB=0.5 mm, TK=1 mm.)
Sp7
Acan
Col10a1
Alpl
Col2a1
Mmp13
C.
A. B.
D.
E.
Group: ns
Cluster: ****
Interaction: *
Control
Exptl
F.
Control (WT) Experimental (TK)
5d GCV 5d GCV
p= 0.48
G.
Ct
Control
TK+ Mu
WoB
Experimental
TK+ Mu
Ct
Cg
Cg
Day 5 Mesenchymal Cells
Mesenchymal Cells
Immune Cells
Sm. Muscle
Endothelial
Cells
Sk. Muscle
Mesenchymal Cells by Treatment
3.6Col1TK
Day 5 All Cells
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
10
20
30
40
50
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
ll
l
l
l
ll
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l lll l
l
lll
Cluster
Percent of Cells (%)
✱✱
✱ ✱
Controll
Experimental
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
0
10
20
30
40
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
ll
ll
l
ll
l
l
ll l
ll
l
ll lll
l
ll
Cluster
Percent of Cells (%)
✱✱ ✱ ✱✱✱ ✱✱ Controll
Experimental
A.
D.
Col2a1
Col10a1
Mmp13
Sp7
Bglap
Acan
E.
B.
C.
F.
Mesenchymal Cells
by Treatment
Group: ns
Cluster: ****
Interaction: ***
Figure 3: Ablation of proliferating 3.6 Col1a1 lineage cells for 10 days depletes callus osteoblasts and
chondrocytes and reduces callus bone volume.
(A) After femur fracture Col1-TK mice were treated with water (Control, n=3) or GCV (Exptl, n=3) for 10 days. Cells
isolated from whole-fracture callus were subjected to scRNAseq. (B) UMAP plot of total callus cells with
annotated cluster identities. (C) The number of cells from immune clusters on Day 5 (Clusters 2, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12,
14, 16) and Day 10 (Clusters 7, 10, 13, 15) normalized to total cell numbers. (D) Mesenchymal cells were selected
in silico and re-clustered. (E) Expression of canonical genes for osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and hypertrophic
chondrocytes displayed as violin plots and projected on UMAPS. (F) Mesenchymal cells were identified by
treatment group, and the percent of cells in each cluster was quantified (n=3). (G) Callus bone volume was
quantified by microCT (n=5-8). (H) Histological sections of callus at 10 DPF were analyzed to determine total callus
area and callus tissue composition. (I) Representative images of TK IHC of control (Col1-TK + water) and exptl
G.
Control (WT) Exptl (TK)
10d GCV 10d GCV
H.
Control (WT)
10d GCV
Experimental (TK)
10d GCV
I.
Control
TK+ Ct
Mu
WoB
Cg
Experimental
TK+
Ct
Mu
WoBCg
Day 10 All Cells
Day 10 Mesenchymal Cells
Control
Exptl
3.6Col1TK
1 2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Immune Cells
Percent of Cells (%)
✱ ns
Day 5 10 5 10
CTL EXPT
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
0
5
10
15Callus Area (mm2)
a
a
a
b
_ _+ +Osx-CreERT2
RosaTK _ _ + +
B.
C.
ROSA
TK-
ROSA
TK+
OsxCreERT2- OsxCreERT2+
D. ROSA-TK-ROSA-TK+
OsxCreERT2- OsxCreERT2+
ROSA-TK-ROSA-TK+
OsxCreERT2- OsxCreERT2+
E.
TK:***
Cre: *
Interaction: ***
TK:**
Cre: ns
Interaction: **
ROSA-TK;
OsxCreERT2-
ROSA-TK;
OsxCreERT2+
PSRAB TK IHC
1 2 3 4
0
50
100Percent (%) Score 2
Score 3
Score 4
Score 5
Score 6
5
1
6 5 2
6 6 6 6Total Count:
1 1
1
2
*
No Bridging
Full Bridging
_ _+ +Osx-CreERT2
_ _ + +RosaTK
C3 C2 C1 Expt
0
50
100
Percent Callus
Composition (%)
Cartilage
Woven Bone
Fibrous Tissue
*
*
6 6 6 6Total Count:
_ _+ +Osx-CreERT2
RosaTK _ _ + +
0
10
20
30
40
Callus Bone
Volume (mm3)
a
a
a
b
_ _+ +Osx-CreERT2
RosaTK _ _ + +
Water-treated controls
Figure 4: Ablation of proliferating Osterix-expressing cells impairs fracture callus bridging and
mineralization.
(A) Mice were treated with TMX starting at 10-wks age, followed by femur fracture at 12-wks, followed by 2
weeks GCV treatment. Healing was assessed 14 days post-fracture. Genotype controls were mice lacking
either Osx-CreERT2 (Cre-) or ROSA-TK (TK-) alleles; experimental mice had both alleles (Cre+/TK+) (n=6). (B)
TK+ mice were treated with water for TK IHC, which shows robust TK expression in callus woven bone only in
Cre+ mice (green dashed line=callus periphery; WoB=Woven Bone; Mu=Muscle). (C) (Left) Representative
radiographs. (Right) Quantification of radiographic healing. (D) Histological analysis of PSRAB stained-
sections to assess callus size and composition. (E) Callus bone volume was quantified by microCT. (Statistical
differences determined by Chi-Square test (C) or by two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Post-Hoc test (D, E);
*p<0.05, **p<0.01. Scale bars: TK=0.25 mm, PSRAB=1 mm, microCT=1 mm.)
OsxCreERT2 x ROSA-TK Mice
CTL: Cre-/TK-; Cre+/TK-; Cre-/TK+
Exptl: Cre+/TK+
A.
WoB
WoB
Mu
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
A.
Day 5 Sp7+ Cells Day 10 Sp7+ Cells
Day 5 Mesenchymal Cells Day 10 Mesenchymal Cells
B.
Figure 5: Sp7/Osterix-expressing osteoblasts proliferate during fracture healing.
(A) Mesenchymal cells from scRNAseq analysis at days 5 and 10 post-fracture annotated for cell cycle stage. (B)
Mesenchymal cells with high Sp7 gene expression annotated for cell cycle stage. (C) Representative fracture callus
sections from Control mice at 3, 5 and 10 days post-fracture stained by immunofluorescence for Osx and proliferation
marker PCNA. (Scale bars: Low-Power=1 mm, Zoom=0.1 mm; Dashed yellow line=cortical bone; Dashed white line=
callus periphery; Yellow Arrows=Osx+;PCNA+ cells.) (D) Quantification of percent PCNA+ nuclei and Osx+;PCNA+ nuclei.
(n=3; graphs depict mean±SD; statistical differences determined by two-way ANOVA (A, B) or one-way ANOVA (D) with
Holm-Sidak Post-Hoc.)
7848 Cells 12695 Cells
1668 Cells 5561 Cells
C.
G1
G2M
S
G1
G2M
S
G1
G2M
S
G1
G2M
S
G1 G2/M + S
0
20
40
60
80
100
Mesenchymal Cells
% Cells
ns
ns
Day 5 10 5 10
G1 G2M + S
G1 G2/M + S
0
20
40
60
80
100
Sp7+ Mesenchymal Cells% Cells
ns
ns
Day 5 10 5 10
G1 G2M + S
3 5 10
0
20
40
60
80
100Osx+;PCNA+ Nuclei (%)
a
b
b
Day 5 103
3 5 10
0
20
40
60
80
100PCNA+ Nuclei (%)
Day
a
b b
Day 5 103
D.
Day 3
Day 5
Day 10
OsterixPCNAMerge
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
B.
C.
ROSA
TK-
ROSA
TK+
OcnCre- OcnCre+
ROSA
TK-
Rosa
TK+
OcnCre- OcnCre+
E.
TK: *
Cre: ns
Interaction: **
Figure 6. Ablation of proliferating Osteocalcin-lineage cells impairs fracture healing.
(A) Femur fracture was performed at 12-wks age, followed by 2 weeks GCV treatment. Healing was assessed
14 days after fracture. Genotype controls included mice lacking either Ocn-Cre or RosaTK alleles;
experimental mice were Cre+/TK+ (n=5-10). (B) TK+ mice were treated with water for HSV-TK IHC, which
shows TK expression in callus woven bone only in Cre+ mice. (C) (Left) Representative radiographs. (Right)
Quantification of radiographic healing. (D) Histological analysis of fracture callus composition on PSRAB-
stained slides showed that experimental mice have altered composition, with less woven bone and more
fibrous tissue compared to control. (E) Callus bone volume quantified by microCT. (Statistical differences
determined by Chi-Square test (C) or two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Post-Hoc test (D, E). Scale bars:
TK=0.25 mm, PSRAB=1 mm, microCT=1 mm.)
ROSA-TK;
OcnCre-
ROSA-TK;
OcnCre+
PSRAB TK IHC
C3 C2 C1 Expt
0
50
100Percent (%) Score 2
Score 3
Score 4
Score 5
Score 6
4
1
6 7
2
5 7 10 10Total Count:
1 2
2
3
1
2
1
No Bridging
Full Bridging
*
_ _+ +Ocn-Cre
_ _ + +RosaTK
C3 C2 C1 Expt
0
50
100
Percent Callus
Composition (%)
Cartilage
Woven Bone
Fibrous Tissue
*
*
5 7 10 10Total Count:
_ _+ +Ocn-Cre
RosaTK _ _ + +0
5
10
15Callus Area (mm2)
a
a
a
b
_ _+ +Ocn-Cre
RosaTK _ _ + +
Water-treated controls D.
OcnCre x ROSA-TK Mice
CTL: Cre-/TK-; Cre+/TK-; Cre-/TK+
Exptl: Cre+/TK+
A.
ROSA
TK-
ROSA
TK+
OcnCre- OcnCre+
TK:**
Cre: *
Interaction: **
0
10
20
30
40
Callus Bone
Volume (mm3)
a
a a b
_ _+ +Ocn-Cre
RosaTK _ _ + +
WoB
WoB
Cg
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Day 5 Bglap+ Cells Day 10 Bglap+ Cells
A.
B.
Figure 7. Bglap/Osteocalcin-expressing osteoblasts proliferate during fracture healing.
(A) Mesenchymal cells from scRNAseq analysis at 5 and 10 DPF with high Bglap expression were annotated for
cell cycle stage (n=3). (B) Representative callus sections from Control mice at days 3, 5 and 10 post-fracture
stained by immunofluorescence for Ocn and PCNA. (Scale bars: Low-Power=1 mm, Zoom=0.1 mm;
Ct.Bone=cortical bone; Callus=callus periphery; Yellow Arrows=Ocn+;PCNA+ cells.) (C) Quantification of percent
PCNA+ nuclei and Ocn+;PCNA+ nuclei. (Graphs depict mean±SD; statistical differences determined by two-way
ANOVA (A) or one-way ANOVA (C) with Holm-Sidak Post-Hoc.)
72 Cells 1933 Cells G1 G2/M + S
0
20
40
60
80
100
Bglap+ Mesenchymal Cells% Cells
ns
ns
Day 5 10 5 10
G1 G2M + S
C.
Day 3Day 5Day 10
0
20
40
60
80
100Ocn+;PCNA+ Cells (%)Day 5 103
a
b
b
3 5 10
0
20
40
60
80
100PCNA+ Nuclei (%)
Day
a
b b
Day 5 103
Day 3 Day 5
Day 10
PCNA
Osteocalcin
Merge
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Dmp1CreERT2- Dmp1CreERT2+
ROSA-TK+
Figure 8: Ablation of proliferating Dmp1-expressing cells impairs fracture callus bridging and mineralization.
(A) Mice were treated with TMX starting at 10-wks age, followed by femur fracture at 12-wks, followed by 2
weeks GCV treatment. Healing was assessed 14 days after fracture. Control mice were Cre-;TK+ while
experimental mice were Cre+;TK+. (B) TK+ mice were treated with water for HSV-TK IHC, which shows robust
TK expression in callus woven bone only in Cre+ mice. (C) Fracture callus bridging was quantified based on
radiographic images. (D) Histological analysis of PSRAB stained-sections was used to assess callus size and
composition. (E) Callus bone volume was quantified using microCT. (Statistical differences were determined by
Chi-Square test (B) or by two-tailed t-test (C, D). Scale bars: PSRAB=1 mm, TK IHC=0.25 mm, microCT=1 mm.)
Dmp1CreERT2- Dmp1CreERT2+
ROSATK+
ROSA-TK+
Dmp1CreERT2- Dmp1CreERT2+
ROSA-TK;
Dmp1CreERT2-
ROSA-TK;
Dmp1CreERT2+
PSRAB TK IHC
A.
B.
C.
D. E.
C E
0
50
100Percent (%)
4
1
5 6Total Count:
0.0801
Score 2
Score 3
Score 4
Score 5
Score 6
1
2
2
1
No Bridging
Full Bridging
_ +Dmp1-CreERT2
+ +RosaTK
+ +
0
50
100
Percent Callus
Composition (%)
Cartilage
Woven Bone
Fibrous Tissue
5 6Total Count:
*
*
_ +Dmp1-CreERT2
+ +RosaTK+ +
0
5
10
15Callus Area (mm2)
_ +Dmp1-CreERT2
+ +RosaTK
*
- +
0
10
20
30
40
Callus Bone
Volume (mm3)
_ +Dmp1-CreERT2
+ +RosaTK
✱✱
Dmp1CreERT2 x ROSA-TK Mice
CTL: Cre-/TK-; Cre+/TK-; Cre-/TK+
Exptl: Cre+/TK+
WoB
Cg
WoB
Cg
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Supplemental Figure S1. (This figure supplements manuscript Figure 1.)
Figure S1. (A) Radiographic scoring by dosing duration at 7, 14 and 21 days post-fracture (DPF) (n=7-
9). (Score 2=neither cortex bridged; 6=both cortices bridged). (B) microCT parameters from the callus
region at 21 DPF (includes callus + cortical bone). (Dashed lines indicate avg. value of contralateral
intact femurs; shading denotes +/- SD). (C) Histological callus composition at 21 DPF was determined
from sections stained by picrosirius red and alcian blue (PSRAB). Image is representative section from
Col1-TK mouse treated for 7 days with GCV. (Cg: cartilage, Wb: woven bone, F: fibrous tissue, Ps:
periosteum.) (Graphs B, C depict mean ± SD; statistical differences determined by Fisher’s Exact Test)
A. Radiographic scoring
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
B. MicroCT parameters at 21 DPF. (ROI includes callus and cortical bone.)
C. Histological callus composition at 21 DPF
Supplemental Figure S1. (cont)
7d TK+ Cg
FWb
Ps
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Control
Experimental
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
0
10
20
30
l
l
l
l
l
l
ll
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l l
l
l l
ll
lll l
ll l
l
l ll
l lll l
ll
l
ll lll ll lll ll
Cluster
Percent of Cells (%)
✱✱✱✱
Group: ns
Cluster: ****
Interaction: ns
A.
B. C.
Supplemental Figure S2: Ablating proliferating 3.6Col1a1-lineage cells during the first 5 days of healing alters
fracture callus mesenchymal cell and tissue composition.
(A) Expression of Prrx1 (mesenchymal cells), Pecam1 (endothelial cells), and Ptprc/CD45 (immune cells) in all
cells 5 days post-fracture (DPF). (B) Top 5 DEGs for each cluster of all cells from 5 DPF. (C) UMAP colored by
group (Control, Exptl). Percent of cells in each cluster by group was quantified (number of cells in cluster/total
number cells from that callus) for each replicate callus and plotted (n=3). (D) Expression of myofibroblast genes
(Acta2, Tagln2, Actg1, and Tpm2), nonspecific fibroblast genes (Col1a1,Col3a1, and Postn), and innate immune
genes (Isg15, Ifit1, Irf7) used to annotate mesenchymal cell clusters. (E) Histological analysis of callus
composition (n=5-8). (Graphs depict mean±SD; statistical differences were determined by two-Way ANOVA with
Holm-Sidak post-hoc test.)
Supplemental Figure S2. (This figure supplements manuscript Figure 2.)
Day 5 All Cells: Prrx1 Day 5 All Cells: Pecam1 Day 5 All Cells: Ptprc/Cd45
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
E.
D.
Acta2 Expression
Tagln2 Expression
Actg1 Expression
Tpm2 Expression
Col1a1 Expression
Col3a1 Expression
Supplemental Figure S2. (cont) Day 5
Postn Expression
Isg15 Expression
Ifit1 Expression
Irf7 Expression
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Supplemental Figure S3. (This figure supplements manuscript Figure 3.)
A.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
0
10
20
30
40
l
ll
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l l
ll l
ll
l
l
l l
l
l
ll
l
l
ll l
ll
lll
lll lll lll lll lll lll
Cluster
Percent of Cells (%)
✱✱✱✱
✱✱
✱
✱✱
Group: ns
Cluster: ****
Interaction: ***
B.
C. D.
Control Experimental
0
2
4
6
8
10
SSPCs Over Time
Percent of Cells (%)
Day 5
Day 10
Supplemental Figure S3: Ablating proliferating 3.6Col1a1-expressing cells during the first 10 days of healing
significantly alters fracture callus mesenchymal cell and tissue composition.
(A) Overlay of Prrx1 (mesenchymal cells), Pecam1 (endothelial cells), or Ptprc/CD45 (immune cells) of all cells
10 days post-fracture. (B) Top 5 DEGs for each cluster of all cells from 10 DPF. (C) UMAP colored by group
(Control, Exptl). The percent of cells in each cluster by group was quantified (number of cells in cluster/total
number of cells from that callus) for each replicate callus and plotted (n=3). (D) Number of Skeletal Stem and
Progenitor Cells (SSPCs, defined as cells expressing Acta2, Ly6a, Itgav, Thy1, and Ctsk) normalized to the total
number of cells from that replicate callus. (E) Expression of myofibroblast genes (Acta2, Tagln2, Actg1, and
Tpm2), nonspecific fibroblast genes (Col1a1, Col3a1, and Postn), and innate immune genes (Isg15, Ifit1, Irf7)
used to annotate mesenchymal cell clusters. (F) MicroCT analysis of fracture callus. (G) Histological analysis of
callus composition. (Graphs depict mean±SD; statistical differences were determined by a two-Way ANOVA
with Holm-Sidak Post-Hoc test.)
Control
Experimental
Day 10 All Cells: Prrx1 Day 10 All Cells: Pecam1 Day 10 All Cells: Ptprc/Cd45
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
E.
Supplemental Figure S3. (cont)
Acta2 Expression
Tagln2 Expression
Actg1 Expression
Tpm2 Expression
Col1a1 Expression
Col3a1 Expression
Postn Expression
Isg15 Expression
Ifit1 Expression
Irf7 Expression
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Supplemental Figure S3. (cont)
F.
G.
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Supplemental Figure S4
Supplemental Figure S4: Targeting plasmid used to create ROSA-TK founders.
Targeting plasmid that contains a CAG promoter, floxed stop cassette, the HSV-deltaTK allele, a
P2A self-cleaving site, and an mCherry allele.
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
413bp
306bp
Mutant
WT
B.
Mutant
WT
413bp
306bp
F1 From
Parent:
C.
A. D.
E.
ROSA-TK
Osx-CreERT2
+ + + + + +WT WT
+ + + +- - - -
Pre-TMX Post-TMX
1450bp
450bp
Stop Intact
Stop Excised
F. Osx-CreERT2-
TK IHC Zoom
Osx-CreERT2+
TK IHC Zoom
GP
TB
Mar
GP
TB
Mar
Supplemental Figure S5: Generation of a novel ROSA-TK mouse line to drive tissue-specific TK
expression using Cre-recombinase.
(A) Sc hema of plasmid used to recombine the targeting vector into the ROSA26 allele. Genotyping
primers to confirm proper recombination utilized a forward primer targeting the ROSA26 homology
arm and reverse primers targeting either the wild-type ROSA26 allele or the mutant CAG promoter.
(B) Six heterozygous founders were identified using the above-described primers and were then bred
with wild-type B6 mice. (C) Progeny from each of the six founders maintained the mutant allele. (D)
Genotyping scheme to evaluate stop cassette excision in response to tamoxifen (TMX) activation of
inducible Osx-CreERT2. Genotyping primers spanning either the intact stop cassette or the CAG
promoter and TK gene delineate the intact versus excised stop cassette. (E) Tail snips from Osx-
CreERT2;ROSA-TK mice prior to TMX treatment shows only intact stop cassettes. After three TMX
treatments, a second tail snip from the same mice shows stop cassette excision only in mice that have
both ROSA-TK and Osx-CreERT2 alleles. Mice lacking Osx-CreERT2 show retention of the stop cassette
and mice without the ROSA-TK allele show no PCR amplification of either the intact or excised stop
cassette products. ( F) IHC for TK shows that TMX induces TK expression in osteoblasts lining the
trabecular bone in the growth plate in 5-week-old Osx-CreERT2;ROSA-TK mice but not Osx-CreERT2-
(neg); ROSA-TK mice. Scale bar = 1 mm in TK IHC, 0.5 mm in Zoom.
Supplemental Figure S5
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Supplemental Figure S6. OsxCreERT2;ROSA-TK mice. (Supplement to
manuscript Figure 4.)
0
10
20
30
BV (mm3)
RosaTK
GCV
_
+
+
_+
+
+
+
+
Osx-CreERT2
a
b
a
0
20
40
60
80
TV (mm3)
RosaTK
GCV
_
+
+
_+
+
+
+
+
Osx-CreERT2
a
b
a
0
10
20
30
BV (mm3)
RosaTK
TMX
_
+
+_+
+
+
+
+
Osx-CreERT2
a c
b
0
20
40
60
80
TV (mm3)
RosaTK
TMX
_
+
+_+
+
+
+
+
Osx-CreERT2
a
b
a
A. B.
C.
D. E.
Cre-Cre+Cre-Cre+
0
50
100
150% Woven Bone
_ _+ +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Osx-CreERT2
a a a b
TK: **
Cre: **
Interaction: *
Cre-Cre+Cre-Cre+
0
5
10
15% Cartilage
_ _+ +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Osx-CreERT2
a
a
a
a
TK: ns
Cre: ns
Interaction: *
Cre-Cre+Cre-Cre+
0
50
100
150% Fibrous Tissue
_ _+ +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Osx-CreERT2
a a a
b
TK: **
Cre: **
Interaction: **
Cre- Cre+ Cre- Cre+
0
5
10
15
Non-Fx Femur
TV (mm3)
a a a a
_ _ + +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Osx-CreERT2
TK: ns
Cre: ns
Interaction: ns
0
10
20
30BV (mm3)
a
a a
b
_ _+ +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Osx-CreERT2
TK: ***
Cre: *
Interaction: ****
0
20
40
60
80TV (mm3)
_ _+ +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Osx-CreERT2
a
a
a
b
TK: **
Cre: **
Interaction: *
Cre- Cre+ Cre- Cre+
0
2
4
6
8
Non-Fx Femur
BV (mm3)
a a a a
_ _ + +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Osx-CreERT2
TK: ns
Cre: ns
Interaction: ns
Cre- Cre+ Cre- Cre+
0
5
10
15
20
Non-Fx Femur
Femur Length (mm)
a a a a
_ _ + +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Osx-CreERT2
TK: ns
Cre: ns
Interaction: ns
Supplemental Figure S6: Ablation of proliferating Osterix-expressing cells significantly impairs fracture callus
mineralization without affecting the contralateral non-fractured limb.
(A) Histological analysis of callus. Ablation of proliferating Osterix-expressing cells for 14 days post-fracture
significantly reduces the amount of woven bone and significantly increases the amount of fibrous tissue
within the fracture callus, without affecting %cartilage. These data are summarized in the stacked bar graph in
Figure 4D. (B) microCT analysis of the callus region (includes callus + cortical bone). Ablation of proliferating
Osterix-expressing cells for 14 days post-fracture significantly reduces Total Volume (TV) and Bone Volume
(BV) at the site of fracture callus. (Dashed lines indicate avg. value of contralateral intact femurs; shading
denotes +/- SD). (C) microCT analysis of non-fractured bones. Treatment with GCV does not significantly
change TV, BV, or femur length in the contralateral, non-fractured femurs. (All mice in A-C were dosed with
GCV.) (D) Impairments in fracture callus size and bone volume are only seen in mice that are Cre+;TK+ and
treated with GCV, even if all received TMX treatment. (E) Impairments in fracture callus size and bone volume
are only seen in mice that are Cre+;TK+ and are treated with TMX, even if all received GCV treatment. (The
third bar of graphs in panels D and E show identical data, also shown in the fourth bar of panel B.) (Graphs
depict mean±SD and statistical differences were determined by (A-C) a Two-Way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak
Post-Hoc test or (D & E) Kruskal-Wallis test.)
TMX + + + TMX + + + GCV + + + GCV + + +
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Cre-Cre+Cre-Cre+
0
50
100% Woven Bone
a a a b
_ _+ +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Ocn-Cre
TK: **
Cre: **
Interaction: **
Cre-Cre+Cre-Cre+
0
10
20
30
40
50% Cartilage
a
a
a
a
_ _+ +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Ocn-Cre
TK: ns
Cre: ns
Interaction: ns
Cre-Cre+Cre-Cre+
0
50
100% Fibrous Tissuea a a
b
_ _+ +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Ocn-Cre
TK: **
Cre: **
Interaction: **
A. B.
C. D.
TK: ns
Cre: ns
Interaction: **
0
20
40
60
80
100TV (mm3)
a,b
a
a b
_ _+ +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Ocn-Cre
TK: *
Cre: *
Interaction: *
0
5
10
15
20
25BV (mm3)
_ _+ +
_ _ +RosaTK
Ocn-Cre
+
a a a b
TK: ns
Cre: ns
Interaction: ns
Cre-Cre+Cre-Cre+
0
5
10
15
20
Non-Fx Femur
TV (mm3)
_ _+ +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Ocn-Cre
a a a a
TK: ns
Cre: ns
Interaction: ns
Cre-Cre+Cre-Cre+
0
2
4
6
8
Non-Fx Femur
BV (mm3)
_ _+ +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Ocn-Cre
a a a a
TK: ns
Cre: ns
Interaction: ns
Cre-Cre+Cre-Cre+
0
5
10
15
20
Non-Fx Femur
Femur Length (mm)
_ _+ +
_ _ + +RosaTK
Ocn-Cre
a a a a
0
5
10
15
20
25
BV (mm3)
a
a,b
b
RosaTK
GCV
_
+
+
_+
+
+
+
+
Ocn-Cre
0
20
40
60
80
100TV (mm3)
a
a,b b
RosaTK
GCV
_
+
+
_+
+
+
+
+
Ocn-Cre
Supplemental Figure S7: Ablation of proliferating Osteocalcin-lineage cells significantly impairs
fracture callus mineralization without affecting the contralateral non-fractured limb.
(A) Fracture callus composition was determined from histology. TK+/Ocn-Cre+ mice have reduced woven
bone and increased fibrous tissue within the fracture callus without affecting cartilage composition.
These data are summarized in the stacked bar graph in Figure 6D. (B) MicroCT analysis of callus region
(includes callus + cortical bone). TK+/OcnCre+ mice have reduced Total Volume (TV) and Bone Volume
(BV). (Dashed lines indicate avg. value of contralateral intact femurs; shading denotes +/- SD). (C)
MicroCT of intact femurs. Genotype does not alter TV, BV, or Femur Length in the contralateral, non-
fractured femurs from the same cohort of mice. (All mice in A-C were dosed with GCV.) (D) Impairments
in fracture callus morphology are only seen in mice that are Cre+;TK+ and treated with GCV. (Graphs
depict mean±SD and statistical differences were determined by a two-Way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Post-
Hoc test.)
Supplemental Figure S7. Ocn-Cre;ROSA-TK mice – 14 DPF. (Supplement to
manuscript Figure 6.)
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
A. B.
C. Ocn-Cre-Ocn-Cre+
Week 2 Week 12
Ocn-Cre-Ocn-Cre+
Day 3 Day 5 Day 10
Ocn-Cre-Ocn-Cre+
Day 3 Day 5 Day 10
Time: ****
Cre: ****
Interaction: ****
Time: ****
Cre: ****
Interaction: ****
3 5 10
0
20
40
60TV (mm3)
Ocn-Cre _ + _ + _ +
Day 3 Day 5 Day 10
✱✱✱✱
✱✱✱✱ ✱✱✱✱
3 5 10
0
5
10
15BV (mm3)
✱✱✱✱
✱✱✱✱
Ocn-Cre _ + _ + _ +
Day 3 Day 5 Day 10
✱✱✱✱
Time: ****
Cre: ****
Interaction: ****
1 2 3
0
5×106
1×107
1.5×107
Callus Area (mm2)
Ocn-Cre _ + _ + _ +
Day 3 Day 5 Day 10
✱✱✱
✱✱✱✱
✱✱
✱✱✱
✱✱✱✱
Time: ****
Cre: *
Interaction: *
1 2 3
0
20
40
60% Woven Bone
Ocn-Cre _ + _ + _ +
Day 3 Day 5 Day 10
✱✱
✱✱✱
Time: ****
Cre: ****
Interaction: ****
1 2 3
0
10
20
30
40
50% Cartilage
Ocn-Cre _ + _ + _ +
Day 3 Day 5 Day 10
✱✱✱✱
✱✱✱✱ ✱✱✱✱
Time: ****
Cre: ****
Interaction: ****
1 2 3
0
50
100
150% Fibrous Tissue
Ocn-Cre _ + _ + _ +
Day 3 Day 5 Day 10
✱✱✱✱
✱✱
✱✱✱✱
✱✱✱✱
Ocn-Cre-Ocn-Cre+
Week 12
Control 2wkExperimental 2wkControl 12wkExperimental 12wk
0
50
100Percent (%) Score 2
Score 3
Score 6
2 3Total Count:
No Bridging
Full Bridging
Score 5
Score 42
1
1
1
Ocn-Cre _ +
✱
2
2
3
1
2
_ +
Week 2 Week 12
D.
Supplemental Figure S8: Ablation of proliferating Osteocalcin-lineage cells significantly impairs fracture callus
healing in long- and short-term.
(A) Ocn-Cre;ROSA-TK mice were treated with GCV for 2 weeks post-fracture (as depicted in Fig 6A), then GCV
was withdrawn for the following 10 weeks. X-ray scoring shows that Ocn-Cre- mice fully bridge and remodel by
12 weeks post-fracture, whereas Ocn-Cre+ mice have significantly impaired bridging at 2 weeks post-fracture
that does not fully recover by 12 weeks. (B) PSRAB staining of representative samples shows that Ocn-Cre- mice
12 weeks post-fracture have bony healing at the fracture site, whereas Ocn-Cre+ mice still have cartilaginous
and fibrotic calluses 12 weeks post-fracture. (C) Ocn-Cre;ROSA-TK mice were treated with GCV for 3-, 5-, or 10-
days post-fracture and euthanized on the last day of treatment indicated. PSRAB staining and analysis shows
early changes in callus composition. (D) microCT analysis of Ocn-Cre;RosaTK mice treated with GCV for 3-, 5-, or
10-days post-fracture and euthanized on the last day of treatment indicated shows that control Cre- mice
increase callus mineralization over time, whereas Cre+ experimental mice do not create a mineralized callus.
(Graphs depict mean±SD; statistical differences were determined by (A) Chi-Square test, or (C-D) two-Way
ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Post-Hoc test.)
Supplemental Figure S8. Ocn-Cre;ROSA-TK mice – Additional timepoints.
(Supplement to manuscript Figure 6.)
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Supplemental Figure S9: Treatment with gap junction inhibitor does not rescue impaired fracture healing in
Osx-CreERT2, Ocn-Cre, or Dmp1-CreERT2;ROSA-TK mice 2 weeks post-fracture.
(A) Cre;ROSA-TK mice were treated with GCV and also treated with carbenoxolone (CBX) to block gap junction
intercellular communication. In three lines of mice receiving CBX, callus bone volume measured by microCT was
significantly less in Cre+ experimental vs. Cre- control. Callus bone volume in Cre+/CBX+ mice was not different
from experimental Cre+ mice that did not receive CBX (the latter data also shown in Figs. 4E, 6E, and 8E). (B)
When data from each Cre line were aggregated to overcome low sample size, Cre+ mice had impaired callus
mineralization compared to Cre- mice, both treated with CBX. (Graphs depict mean±SD; statistical differences
were determined by One-Way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD Post-Hoc (A) or Mann-Whitney U test (B).)
Supplemental Figure S9.
A. B.
- + +
0
10
20
30
Callus Bone
Volume (mm3)
0.0122
0.7221
Osx-CreERT2
CBX + + -
- +
0
10
20
30
Callus Bone
Volume (mm3)
Cre
CBX + +
✱✱
Osx-CreERT2;RosaTK
Dmp1-CreERT2;RosaTK
Ocn-Cre;RosaTK
- + +
0
10
20
30
Callus Bone
Volume (mm3) 0.0310
0.1931
Dmp1-CreERT2
CBX + + -
- + +
0
10
20
30
Callus Bone
Volume (mm3)
0.0393
0.7555
Ocn-Cre
CBX + + -
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint
Adq-CreERT2- Adq-CreERT2+
RosaTK+
Supplemental Figure S10: Ablation of proliferating adiponectin expressing cells modestly affects fracture
healing.
(A) Mice were treated with TMX starting at 10-wks age, followed by femur fracture at 12-wks, followed by 2
weeks GCV treatment. Healing was assessed 14 days after fracture. Control mice were Cre-;TK+ while
experimental mice were Cre+;TK+. (B) Radiographs showed less mineralized callus in Cre+ mice, resulting in
modestly poorer callus bridging scores than in Cre- controls. (C) Histological analysis shows a marginally
smaller callus area in Cre+ mice, but normal percent cartilage and woven bone compared to Cre- controls.
(D) Fractured bones were assessed by microCT; there were no significant differences in callus bone volume
or BMD between Cre+ mice and control mice. (Statistical differences were determined by Chi-Square test
(B) or by two-tailed t-test (C,D). Scale bars: PSRAB=1 mm, TK IHC=0.5 mm, microCT=1 mm.)
Adq-CreERT2- Adq-CreERT2+
ROSA-TK+
ROSA-TK+
Adq-CreERT2- Adq-CreERT2+
A. B.
C. D.
Adq-CreERT2 x ROSA-TK Mice
CTL: Cre-/TK-; Cre+/TK-; Cre-/TK+
Exptl: Cre+/TK+
Supplemental Figure S10. Adq-CreERT2;ROSA-TK mice
0
100
200
300
400
500
Callus BMD
(mgHA/cm3)
0.2563
_ +Adq-CreERT2
RosaTK + +
0
5
10
15
20
25
Callus Bone
Volume (mm3)
_ +Adq-CreERT2
RosaTK + +
0.1399
CTRL
EXPT
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted May 31, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.27.656371doi: bioRxiv preprint