Representation Methods of Transcriptomics with Applications in Neuroimmune Biology

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This paper investigates how to represent single-cell transcriptomic data to distinguish cellular identities from molecular programs, using microglia as a model system with high transcriptomic and functional heterogeneity. The authors compare differential expression–based analyses (for identities) with co-expression network analyses (for molecular programs) across single-cell datasets, finding that co-expression network analysis identifies significant functional ontologies that are not resolved by differential expression. The resulting co-expression modules were preserved across datasets, supporting the view of reducible functional programs that vary with context, and the authors explicitly frame differential expression as potentially missing continuous or non-separable transcriptional structure. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ABSTRACT Interpretable representations of gene expression are used to define cellular identities and the molecular programs active within cells, two related, but distinct phenomena. In the case of microglia, a cell type with high transcriptomic, functional, and morphological heterogeneity, the predominant representation of transcriptomic data presumes the adoption of distinct molecular identities, despite a lack of easily separable transcriptional states. Here, we explore alternative transcriptomic representations by comparing two single-cell analysis methods: differential expression analysis for identities and co-expression network analysis for molecular programs. For microglia, co-expression network analysis identifies highly significant functional ontologies not resolved by differential expression analysis. The identified co-expression modules are preserved across transcriptomic datasets and suggest reducible functional programs that activate and modulate depending on context. We conclude that co-expression analysis constitutes a best practice for single cell analysis of an individual cell type and describing microglia function as concurrent molecular programs offers a more parsimonious model of microglia function.
Full text 1,484 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Interpretable representations of gene expression are used to define cellular identities and the molecular programs active within cells, two related, but distinct phenomena. In the case of microglia, a cell type with high transcriptomic, functional, and morphological heterogeneity, the predominant representation of transcriptomic data presumes the adoption of distinct molecular identities, despite a lack of easily separable transcriptional states. Here, we explore alternative transcriptomic representations by comparing two single-cell analysis methods: differential expression analysis for identities and co-expression network analysis for molecular programs. For microglia, co-expression network analysis identifies highly significant functional ontologies not resolved by differential expression analysis. The identified co-expression modules are preserved across transcriptomic datasets and suggest reducible functional programs that activate and modulate depending on context. We conclude that co-expression analysis constitutes a best practice for single cell analysis of an individual cell type and describing microglia function as concurrent molecular programs offers a more parsimonious model of microglia function. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Publication statement: Conflicts of interest: The authors have no competing financial interests. Funding statement: BB: NIH Office of the Director DP2MH136493

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0