Full text
5,419 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers enable early diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases in a cost-effective and non-invasive way. Digital cognitive measures can capture early signs of cognitive impairment remotely and at scale. Their combination offers important opportunities for effective screening. We evaluated the performance of a new proteomic assay and a fully remote digital platform in a large memory clinic population (n = 391). Plasma biomarkers were measured using the NUcleic acid Linked Immuno-Sandwich Assay (NULISA) central nervous system panel. OCTAL (Oxford Cognitive Testing Portal) digital cognitive testing platform was used to measure cognition. Distinct proteomic patterns could be identified across different neurodegenerative diseases and associate with specific cognitive functions. Alzheimer’s Disease (e.g., pTau217), and novel proteomics biomarkers (e.g., ACHE and IL6R) were highly correlated with worse cognition. A cluster of biomarkers, including PRDX6, was overexpressed in healthy controls and associated with better cognition, indexing cognitive resilience.
Competing Interest Statement
I.K. is a paid medical advisor for digital healthcare (Five Lives SAS, Lola Speaks) and biotechnology companies (Prima Mente, Oxford Brain Diagnostics) which have a focus on neurodegeneration. IK has received non-promotional speaker fees from Novo Nordisk and Eisai, and for advisory work for Johnson and Johnson, Zylorion and Novo Nordisk. He is in receipt of a grant for an investigator-initiated study from Novo Nordisk. S.T. has received speaker's honoraria for dedicated workshops from Eisai and Bial which are not related to this work. All other authors declare no financial or non-financial competing interests.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre. S.Z., S.T., M.B., A.S., A.F., M.H. are funded by the Wellcome Trust [226645/Z/22/Z]. S.T., S.G.M. and M.H. are also funded by the NIHR Oxford Health BRC. The project was further supported by a Guarantors of Brain post‐doctoral fellowship to S.T. S.G.M. is supported by the NIHR Oxford BRC. C.G. received a residency scholarship, funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR), as part of the Neurology Residency Program at the Universita degli Studi di Milano. A.F. is further supported by funds from Medical Research Council [MR/X022013/1] and MyAware. CMvD is supported by the US National Insititute on Aging (NIH), NovoNordisk, the Oxford-GSK Institute of Molecular and Computational Medicine (IMCM), Centre of Artificial Intelligence for Precision Medicines (CAIPM) of the University of Oxford and King Abdul Aziz University, Alzheimer Research UK (ARUK), UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Center (BRC), ZonMW (Delta Dementie) and Alzheimer Nederland. She is currently the Research Director Brain Health of the Health Data Research UK (HDR UK) and the UK Dementia Research Institute (UK DRI), working in partnership with Dementias Platform UK (DPUK). I.K. declares funding for this work through Alzheimer's Research UK, Alzheimer's Society and the People's Postcode Lottery READ OUT grant as well as the Medical Research Council (Dementias Platform UK) and the Oxford Health NIHR Biomedical Research Facility. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the funders.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Ethical approval was granted by the University of Oxford ethics committee (IRAS ID: 248379, Ethics Approval Reference: 18/SC/0448 and IRAS ID: 301319, Ethics Approval Reference: 22/WA/0183). All participants gave written informed consent prior to the start of the study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available upon reasonable request. Access is contingent upon agreement with the original data providers (i.e. the researchers responsible for data collection) and subject to applicable ethical, legal, and confidentiality constraints.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.