Practical Classification approach for newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis in children and adolescent patients

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

This hospital-based retrospective study analyzed medical records (2017/1/1–2020/4/30) of 153 children and adolescents with newly diagnosed diabetes presenting with ketosis or ketoacidosis, collecting clinical and laboratory data at onset and again 2 years later to classify patients as type 1 vs type 2 diabetes based on subsequent diagnosis, treatment patterns, and C-peptide results. The main findings were that multiple onset characteristics differed between the final T1DM and T2DM groups, and ROC analyses indicated that fatty liver, systolic blood pressure, BMI, and several C-peptide measures had relatively good diagnostic performance for distinguishing the two diabetes types. The paper’s key limitation is that classification relied on retrospective chart-based criteria and 2-year follow-up rather than a prospective, standardized diagnostic gold standard at onset. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Background Distinguishing diabetes diagnosis is fundamental to ensuring proper management of patients, but has been challenging, especially in newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on medical records from 2017/1/1 to 2020/4/30 among children and adolescents with new-onset diabetes accompanied with ketosis or ketoacidosis. Data was collected at diabetes onset and 2 years after discharge. Patients were classified as type 1 or 2 diabetes (T1DM; T2DM) based on the patient's medication and final diagnosis. The best diagnostic cut-off point was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) between T1DM and T2DM. Results Among 153 children and adolescents, 78 patients (51.0%) were diagnosed as T1DM and 75 patients (49.0%) were diagnosed as T2DM after 2 years of follow-up. There were significant differences in sex, age, family history, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, lipids, uric acid (UA), C-peptide, combined fatty liver ratio and any islet autoantibody-positive ratio at the time of onset (P < 0.05). In the ROC analysis, fatty liver, SBP, BMI, fasting/1-h/2-h C peptide at the time of onset performed well on diagnostic typing (ROC AUC = 0.79, 0.83, 0.92, 0.94, 0.96, and 0.95 respectively; Optimal cut point = 1.5, 110.5, 21.0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0). Conclusions This study provides a practical clinical approach to the diagnosis and classification of diabetes. Caution is needed in C-peptide, BMI, SBP and fatty liver at the time of onset, which have effective diagnostic values.
Full text 124,670 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Practical Classification approach for newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis in children and adolescent patients | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Practical Classification approach for newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis in children and adolescent patients Hongxia Liu, Yan Wang, Miao Wang, Bo Zhang, Caixia Ma, Lianlian Cui, and 4 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4662137/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Distinguishing diabetes diagnosis is fundamental to ensuring proper management of patients, but has been challenging, especially in newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on medical records from 2017/1/1 to 2020/4/30 among children and adolescents with new-onset diabetes accompanied with ketosis or ketoacidosis. Data was collected at diabetes onset and 2 years after discharge. Patients were classified as type 1 or 2 diabetes (T1DM; T2DM) based on the patient's medication and final diagnosis. The best diagnostic cut-off point was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) between T1DM and T2DM. Results Among 153 children and adolescents, 78 patients (51.0%) were diagnosed as T1DM and 75 patients (49.0%) were diagnosed as T2DM after 2 years of follow-up. There were significant differences in sex, age, family history, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, lipids, uric acid (UA), C-peptide, combined fatty liver ratio and any islet autoantibody-positive ratio at the time of onset (P < 0.05). In the ROC analysis, fatty liver, SBP, BMI, fasting/1-h/2-h C peptide at the time of onset performed well on diagnostic typing (ROC AUC = 0.79, 0.83, 0.92, 0.94, 0.96, and 0.95 respectively; Optimal cut point = 1.5, 110.5, 21.0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0). Conclusions This study provides a practical clinical approach to the diagnosis and classification of diabetes. Caution is needed in C-peptide, BMI, SBP and fatty liver at the time of onset, which have effective diagnostic values. Diabetic ketosis (DK) Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) Clinical characteristics diabetes typing Adolescents Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Highlights Distinguishing diabetes diagnosis is fundamental to ensuring proper management of patients, but has been challenging, especially in newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis. We retrospectively collected the clinical data from newly 153 diagnosed diabetic children and adolescents with DK/DKA accompanied at the onset and followed up for 2 years, and further figures out the effective diagnostic metrics in effort to shed light on better classify diabetes. Our results indicate that C-peptide, BMI, SBP and fatty liver at the time of onset have effective diagnostic values. It provides a practical classification approach for newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis in children and adolescents, by taking advantage of their characteristics at presentation, which are readily available in clinical practice. Introduction Diabetes is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood. According to the latest estimates, more than 1.2 million children and adolescents worldwide are living with diabetes, and the number of newly diagnosed cases each year is around 180,000( 1 ). As guidelines recommended ( 2 – 4 ), the classification of diabetes in children and adolescences at diagnosis is typically based on their characteristics at presentation and genetic measurements for the specific types. However, increasingly, the ability to make a clinical diagnosis has been hampered due to the overlapping clinical characteristics between type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) ( 5 ). Diabetic ketosis (DK) and ketoacidosis (DKA) occur commonly at the onset of diabetes and have long been considered as a key clinical feature of T1DM, particularly among children and adolescents, with DKA frequencies of 15 ~ 70% ( 6 , 7 ). While it had been demonstrated recently that obese adolescents with a clinical picture suggestive of T2DM can present in DK/DKA of varying degrees with the prevalence of 5 ~ 25% ( 8 , 9 ). Of note, the near-normoglycemia remission has been reported in some patients and may last for months to years. This presentation and clinical course of diabetes has been called as diabetes type 1B, idiopathic T1DM, atypical diabetes, or ketosis-prone T2DM in recent years ( 10 , 11 ). It has also been well described in Blacks and demonstrated to affect other populations at high risk of T2DM such as Chinese, Japanese and Hispanic( 12 – 14 ). The appropriate classification of diabetes is important for determining therapy, and thus, it is critical for clinicians differentiate between the types of diabetes as early as possible. Previously, a group of clinical characteristics, including c-peptide, body mass index (BMI) and onset age, had been proven to be effective diagnostic indicators for diabetes classification among newly diagnosed diabetic adults with DK/DKA accompanied, or among mixed cohorts of adults with the small proportion of youth included. However, it is important to note that the evidence in adults cannot be simply promoted to children and adolescents since there are vast differences between adult-onset and pediatric diabetes, including pathophysiology, development, and response to therapy. In addition, there is currently sporadic evidence to differentiate newly diagnosed diabetes in children and adolescent patients with DK/DKA accompanied, with even none in Asians ( 15 ). Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively collected the clinical data from newly diagnosed diabetic children and adolescents with DK/DKA accompanied at onset and followed up for 2 years, and further figures out the effective diagnostic metrics in an effort to shed light on better classifying diabetes. Materials and Methods This was a hospital-based, retrospective study with data collected from newly diagnosed diabetic children and adolescents with ketosis or ketoacidosis at the onset in Henan Provincial People’s Hospital. The medical records of all episodes of DK/DKA between January, 2017 and April, 2020 were reviewed. A flowchart of patient selection was presented in Fig. 1 . This study was conducted according to the guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Henan Provincial People’s Hospital. Participants The inclusive criteria are as follows: 1) The onset age is under 18 years; 2) diagnosed with DKA, according to the ICD code of an electronic hospital system (EHRs), or with the biochemical criteria of DKA recommended by guidelines( 2 , 16 ): a. hyperglycemia (blood sample glucose > 11 mmol/L [≈ 200 mg/dL]), serum blood bicarbonate < 18 mmol/L or pH < 7.30, ketonemia (blood β-hydroxybutyrate ≥ 3mmol/L) or moderate or large ketonuria; those with hyperglycemia, ketonuria and ketonemia while without acidosis were also included due to the presence of DK; 3) having medical records at both the onset and after 2 years of diabetes. Those with other types of diabetes, including the sedentary diabetes induced by drugs or pancreatitis, neonatal diabetes and genetically induced diabetes, were excluded from this study. Data collection Data at the onset of diabetes was collected by endocrinologists from EHRs via Excel. Information regarding patient demographics, physical examinations (BMI; systolic and diastolic blood pressure [SBP; DBP]), medical histories related to diabetes [family history, precipitating factors for DK/DKA, the presence of fatty liver, treatment, and any acute or chronic complications] were collected. Biomedical characteristics, such as glucose levels at admission, values of glycated hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], triglyceride [TG], total cholesterol [TC], serum uric acid [UA], serum creatine [sCr], and high/low-density lipoprotein cholesterols [HDL-C; LDL-C] were collected. The qualitative results of islet autoantibodies, including glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody (GADA), insulinoma-associated antigen-2 autoantibody (IA-2A), insulin autoantibody (IAA), zinc transporter-8 autoantibody (ZnT8A), and islet-cell antibody (ICA) were also collected. In addition, patients continued to receive intensive insulin therapy for 7 to 10 days (average 8.5 days) after correction of DK/DKA. Then, once the blood glucose level reached the standard and steadily, the C-peptide release test of oral glucose tolerance was conducted, and C-peptide at 0h, 0.5h, 1h, 2h and 3h were collected. Follow-up and classification Information on treatment and diagnosis after 2 years was followed up via the medical records which collected in the outpatient and inpatient EHRs. Patients were finally diagnosed with T1DM if they had a prior diagnosis of T1DM at the onset and continuously received insulin treatment during 2 years. Alternatively, patients were also classified as having T1DM if they had a repeated C peptide below 0.6 nmol/L and received insulin treatment during the 2-year follow-up. On the other hand, patients were finally assigned to T2DM group if they had a previous diagnosis of diabetes and were managed solely with diet and exercise, or if they were prescribed oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs). Additionally, patients who failed to comply with their insulin regimen for more than 4 weeks without experiencing recurrent DK/DKA at any point during their illness were also assigned to the T2DM group. Statistical analysis Statistical analyses of the data were performed using SPSS 26.0 (Chicago, IL). Statistical significance was defined as p value < 0.05. Characteristics were presented as mean (SD) or median with interquartile range (IQR), given in parentheses for normalized continuous or skewed variables. Categories of variables were presented as counts (percentages). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Mann–Whitney U-test was used for comparisons of quantitative variables among groups. Chi-squared test was performed to assess differences in proportions across groups. The receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve and logistic analysis were generated to compare the diagnostic performance of the potential clinical characteristic, with the sensitivities, specificities and optimum cut-off points calculated for diabetes classification. Results Clinical presentations and distributions of included patients Table 1 summaries the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with DK/DKA at the onset of diabetes enrolled in this study. A total of 221 patients with medical records of DK/DKA when newly diagnosed as diabetes were included in the analysis, with 153 (69.23%) patients meeting the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1 ). Among these 153 newly diagnosed diabetic patients with DK/DKA onset, the mean age was 12.65 ± 3.68 years, with females accounting for 43.7% (67/153) of the sample. The average BMI was 21.66 ± 5.69 kg/m 2 , random glucose levels averaged 18.36 (15.00,22.85) mmol/L, and HbA1c levels were measured at 12.52 ± 2.38%. According to the diagnosis at discharge, 72 (47.1%) patients were diagnosed with T1DM, 46 (30.1%) patients were diagnosed with T2DM and the remaining 35 patients (22.8%) could not be “classified”. Table 1 Clinical characteristics of newly diagnosed diabetic children and adolescents with ketosis/ketoacidosis onset. Total (N = 153) T1DM (n = 72) T2DM (n = 46) Unclassified (n = 35) F/χ2/H P-value Gender (M/F) (n) 86/67 32/40 34/12 20/15 9.92 0.007 Age at the onset (yrs) 12.65 ± 3.68 11.36 ± 3.66 14.41 ± 2.82 13.00 ± 3.36 11.17 < 0.001 Family history (n) 58(37.9) 17(23.6) 25(54.3) 16(45.7) 12.44 0.002 BMI (kg/m 2 ) 21.66 ± 5.69 17.93 ± 3.98 27.30 ± 3.71 21.92 ± 4.58 75.26 < 0.001 SBP (mmHg) 114.00 ± 14.00 106.40 ± 11.48 125.26 ± 11.04 112.91 ± 13.38 35.81 < 0.001 DBP (mmHg) 72.00 ± 10.00 69.90 ± 10.55 74.37 ± 8.58 73.51 ± 9.94 3.37 0.037 Hyperglycemia on admission Random Glucose (mmol/L) 18.36 (15.00, 22.85) 19.88(16.63, 25.37) 15.38(11.88,19.75) 18.36(15.91,24.00) 14.79 0.001 HbA1c (%) 12.52 ± 2.38 13.10 ± 2.42 11.60 ± 2.37 12.55 ± 1.85 6.06 0.003 Lipids on admission TC (mmol/L) 4.41 (3.82, 5.09) 4.32(3.70,4.99) 4.58(4.03,5.29) 4.23(3.76,5.04) 3.51 0.173 TG (mmol/L) 1.35 (0.91, 2.15) 1.06(0.80,1.61) 1.85(1.28,3.29) 1.34(0.81,2.42) 23.02 < 0.001 HDL-C(mmol/L) 1.05 (0.86, 1.24) 1.10(0.88,1.37) 0.97(0.76, 1.09) 1.05(0.90,1.28) 11.84 0.003 LDL-C(mmol/L) 2.62 ± 0.80 2.44 ± 0.71 2.92 ± 0.84 2.60 ± 0.81 5.52 0.005 Serum UA (umol/L) 282.5(217.5, 422.3) 239.0(179.5,307.0) 420.5(330.8,604.5) 260.0(226.0,369.0) 36.20 < 0.001 Serum Creatine (umol/L) 37.00 (31.00, 49.00) 35.0(26.25,45.50) 42.00(34.75,53.00) 39.00(32.00, 46.00) 0.61 0.544 Beta-cell function C peptide 0h (nmol/L) 0.49(0.14,1.35) 0.15(0.10,0.32) 1.55(1.10,2.38) 0.68(0.36,1.27) 79.95 < 0.001 C peptide 0.5h (nmol/L) 0.69(0.21,2.11) 0.21(0.10,0.33) 2.42(1.43,4.28) 1.01(0.52,1.97) 90.61 < 0.001 C peptide 1h (nmol/L) 0.97(0.30,3.15) 0.30(0.10,0.62) 3.96(2.45,6.55) 1.42(0.79,3.01) 92.28 < 0.001 C peptide 2h (nmol/L) 1.74(0.44,4.11) 0.44(0.15,0.95) 6.29(3.62,8.59) 1.84(1.12,3.42) 93.72 < 0.001 C peptide 3h (nmol/L) 1.77(0.54,4.26) 0.54(0.17,1.08) 5.10(3.40,7.02) 2.12(1.22,3.66) 94.30 < 0.001 Islet antibody ≥ 1 positive (%) 31(20.3) 26(36.1) 2(4.3) 3(8.6) 21.37 < 0.001 GADA positive (%) 30(19.6) 25(34.7) 2(4.4) 3(8.6) 19.60 < 0.001 IAA positive (%) 1(0.7) 1(1.4) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 1.12 0.572 ICA positive (%) 7(4.6) 6(8.3) 0(0.0) 1(2.9) 4.50 0.096 ZnT8 positive (%) 3(2.0) 2(2.8) 0(0.0) 1(2.9) 1.29 0.525 IA2Ab positive (%) 8(5.2) 7(9.7) 0(0.0) 1(2.9) 5.78 0.056 Fatty Liver (%) 52(34.0) 5(6.9) 38(82.6) 9(25.7) 73.01 < 0.001 Precipitating factors (%) 117(76.5) 55(76.4) 37(80.4) 25(71.4) 0.90 0.639 Treatment at discharge Insulin (%) 99(64.7) 68 (94.4) 9 (19.6) 22 (62.9) 91.69 < 0.001 Insulin + OHA (%) 17(11.1) 2 (2.8) 10 (21.7) 5 (14.3) OHA (%) 21(13.7) 2 (2.8) 16 (34.8) 3 (8.6) GLP-1(%) 10(6.5) 0 (0.0) 10 (21.7) 0 (0.0) Drugs withdrawal (%) 6(3.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.2) 5 (14.3) Abbreviations: T1DM: Type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM: Type 1 diabetes mellitus; BMI: Body mass index; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c: Glycated hemoglobin A1c; TC: Total cholesterol (reference range: 3.10–5.70 mmol/L); TG: Triglyceride (reference range: 0.34–1.92 mmol/L); HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (reference range: 0.78-2.00 mmol/L); LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (reference range: 2.07–3.10 mmol/L); UA: Urine acid (reference range: 90–420 umol/L); GADA: Glutamate decarboxylase antibody; IAA: Insulin autoantibody; ICA: Islet-cell antibody; ZnT8A: Zinc transporter 8 autoantibody; IA2Ab: Islet antigen-2 (IA-2) autoantibody; OHA: Oral-hypoglycemic agents; GLP-1: Glucagon-like peptide-1. Clinical characteristics between groups after 2 years After the 2-year follow-up, there were 113 patients maintaining their initial diagnosis, with 67 (93.06%) patients diagnosed with T1DM and 46 (100.0%) patients diagnosed with T2DM. For those diagnosed with T1DM at onset, 5 patients were subsequently diagnosed with T2DM, among which 2 patients were treated with insulin in combination with OHAs, 2 patients were treated with OHAs alone, and the other one discontinued any anti-hyperglycemic treatment. For those with “un-classified” diabetes at onset (N = 35), 11 patients were ultimately diagnosed with T1DM, with the majority of them receiving insulin treatment and only one patient receiving a combination of insulin and OHAs. The remaining 24 patients were finally diagnosed with T2DM, with 16 patients receiving OHAs, 1 receiving GLP-1 treatment, 3 patients receiving a combination of insulin and OHAs, 2 patients maintaining unmedicated, and 2 patients maintaining basic insulin treatment only. The between-group clinical characteristics after 2 years were shown in Table 2 . Among those who were finally diagnosed with T1DM (n = 78) and T2DM (n = 75), it was observed that, compared to T2DM group, glycemia level was significantly higher in T1DM group, with a random glucose level of 19.60 (16.48,24.93) vs. 16.83 (13.80,22.00) mmol/L ( P = 0.005) and a higher HbA1c value of 13.45(11.88,14.63) vs. 12.10(10.10,13.50) % ( P = 0.001). Additionally, the positive rates of any islet antibody were also higher in the T1DM group (33.3% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.001), particularly the positive rate of GADA with 32.1% vs. 6.8% ( P < 0.001). While for those finally diagnosed with T2DM, male patients predominated (66.7% vs. 46.2%, P = 0.011), and there was a significantly higher age at the onset (14.00[13.00,16.00] vs. 12.00[8.00,14.00] years, P < 0.001), BMI (25.77 ± 4.20 vs. 17.71 ± 3.84 kg/m 2 , P < 0.001), concomitant rate of fatty liver (64.0% vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001), percentage of family history of diabetes and blood pressure than T1DM group. In terms of β-cell function, T2DM had significantly higher C peptide levels in both fasting and within 3-h postprandial periods ( P all < 0.05). Table 2 Comparison of clinical characteristics between the two groups after follow-up. T1DM T2DM t /χ 2 /Z P-value N (%) 78(51.0) 75(49.0) Gender (M/F) 36/42 50/25 6.536 0.011 Age at the onset (yrs) 12.00(8.00,14.00) 14.00(13.00,16.00) -4.764 <0.001 Family history of diabetes (n/%) 16(20.5) 42(56.0) 20.457 <0.001 BMI (kg/m 2 ) 17.71 ± 3.84 25.77 ± 4.20 -12.396 <0.001 SBP (mmHg) 105.81 ± 10.51 121.63 ± 13.19 -8.221 <0.001 DBP (mmHg) 69.71 ± 9.95 74.53 ± 9.52 -3.064 0.003 Random glucose (mmol/L) 19.60(16.48,24.93) 16.83(13.80,22.00) -2.823 0.005 HbA1 C (%) 13.45(11.88,14.63) 12.10(10.10,13.50) -3.202 0.001 TC (mmol/L) 4.25(3.68,4.85) 4.55(3.95,5.27) -1.745 0.081 TG (mmol/L) 1.06(0.78,1.57) 1.78(1.17,2.85) -4.654 <0.001 HDL-C (mmol/L) 1.07(0.88,1.37) 1.02(0.79,1.14) -2.176 0.03 LDL-C (mmol/L) 2.45 ± 0.73 2.80 ± 0.82 -2.796 0.006 Serum UA (mmol/L) 237.00(180.5,303.25) 379.00(260.00,480.00) -5.245 <0.001 Serum Creatine (mmol/L) 33.50(26.75,45.00) 42.00(34.0,52.00) -3.591 <0.001 C peptide 0h (nmol/L) 0.15(0.10,0.33) 1.35(0.73,2.20) -9.411 <0.001 C peptide 0.5h (nmol/L) 0.21(0.10,0.34) 2.11(1.27,4.04) -9.975 <0.001 C peptide 1h (nmol/L) 0.32(0.10,0.64) 3.13(1.62,5.20) -9.864 <0.001 C peptide 2h (nmol/L) 0.50(0.16,1.04) 3.95(2.43,7.33) -9.574 <0.001 C peptide 3h (nmol/L) 0.54(0.17,1.16) 4.18(2.59,6.36) -9.714 <0.001 Positive rate of any islet antibody (%) 26(33.3) 5(6.7) 16.829 <0.001 GADA positive (%) 25(32.1) 5(6.8) 15.337 <0.001 IAA positive (%) 1(1.3) 0(0.0) 0.955 0.328 ICA positive (%) 7(9.0) 0(0.0) 6.962 0.008 ZnT8 positive (%) 3(3.8) 0(0.0) 2.903 0.088 IA2Ab positive (%) 8(10.3) 0(0.0) 8.011 0.005 Fatty Liver (%) 4(5.1) 48(64.0) 59.066 <0.001 Precipitating factors (%) 58(74.4) 59(78.7) 0.394 0.530 Abbreviations: T1DM: Type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM: Type 1 diabetes mellitus; BMI: Body mass index; HbA1c: Glycated hemoglobin A1c; TC: Total cholesterol (reference range: 3.10–5.70 mmol/L); TG: Triglyceride (reference range: 0.34–1.92 mmol/L); HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (reference range: 0.78-2.00 mmol/L); LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (reference range: 2.07–3.10 mmol/L); UA: Urine acid (reference range: 90–420 umol/L); GADA: Glutamate decarboxylase antibody; IAA: Insulin autoantibody; ICA: Islet-cell antibody; ZnT8A: Zinc transporter 8 autoantibody; IA2Ab: Islet antigen-2 (IA-2) autoantibody. ROC curves and logistic regression analysis for classifying diabetes The performance of each metric in classifying diabetes, as indicated by the estimated AUC and its 95%CI, is presented in Fig. 2 . The β-cell function, as measured by the C peptide level within 3 hours, exhibited the highest AUC values for diabetes classification, ranging from 0.940 (95%CI: 0.903 ~ 0.976) ~ 0.961 (95%CI: 0.932 ~ 0.989) ( P all < 0.05). The BMI, with an optimal cut-off point of 20.95 kg/m 2 , demonstrated a significant prognostic value with an AUC value of 0.918 (95%CI: 0.874 ~ 0.962) and the sensitivity and specificity was 88.0% and 83.1% respectively. Both SBP and the presence of fatty liver demonstrated a significant and relatively high prognostic value, with a similar value of 0.826 (95%CI: 0.761 ~ 0.890) and 0.794 (95%CI: 0.720 ~ 0.869). The AUCs of the serum UA, age at the onset, and TG in diabetes classification were all found to be significantly moderate, with a gradual decrease in value from 0.743 (95%CI: 0.663 ~ 0.824) for UA, 0.719 (95%CI: 0.638 ~ 0.799) for age to 0.716 (95%CI: 0.635 ~ 0.797) for TG (all P < 0.05). Conversely, the other metrics, such as gender, family history of diabetes, presence of islet autoantibodies, DBP, TC, HDL-C/LDL-C, and creatine exhibited poor performance and did not demonstrate prognostic ability, with all AUCs being less than 0.7. Logistic regression analysis further confirmed that BMI ( P = 0.003), SBP ( P = 0.042) and C peptide levels at 0h ( P = 0.046) and 0.5h ( P = 0.001) were significantly effective in classifying diabetes. Discussion This study is undertaken to investigate the clinical metrics that effectively shed light on classifying types of diabetes among newly diagnosed diabetic patients with DK/DKA onset. It had demonstrated that C peptide, BMI, SBP and the presence of fatty liver can differentiate diabetes types of newly diagnosed diabetes with DK/DKA onset among children and adolescences. These metrics may assist in the clinical diagnosis and classification of diabetes, particularly in cases with overlapping characteristics. Insulin deficiency is clinically evident through deteriorating glucose control and increased susceptibility to DK or DKA. In this study, similar to previous studies conducted among both adults and those with younger ages ( 12 , 14 , 17 ), the levels of C-peptide remained the most effective value for distinguishing between T1DM and T2DM during the entire duration of the 3-hour tests. However, it is worth noting that the cut-off point for C-peptide in this study was higher than the other studies, with a fasting level of 0.4 nmol/L and 2-h level of 2.0 nmol/L, whereas other studies among adults reported a fasting C-peptide levels of around 0.2 nmol/L and the 2-h level of approximately 0.5 nmol/L ( 18 ). Previously, there was evidence indicating that C-peptide levels at diagnosis were elevated with increasing age within each BMI group, highlighting the independent influence of age on C peptide ( 19 – 21 ). Thus, the discrepancy observed in our study may be attributed to the variations in age, as we included the youngest age of patients among all the studies. Besides, it is worth noting that C-peptide levels may initially rise during the diagnosis of pediatric T1DM, leading to a remission period, but subsequently decline rapidly in the first years after diagnosis. Consequently, employing a relatively high cut-off point for C peptide may enhance the sensitivity and specificity of classification. It is of great importance for pediatrics to pay more attention to those with moderately reserved C peptide. Overweight has been proved to be associated with accelerated progression to T1DM in children and adolescents, in addition to its well-known association with T2DM. In this study, similar to previous studies focusing on adults with ketone-prone diabetes ( 22 ), BMI was proved to have significantly effective value of the classification between T1DM and T2DM among children and adolescents with DK/DKA at the onset, with the ranks of ROC analysis just after C-peptide. Furthermore, unlike most other studies( 13 , 14 ), our study had further included the rate of fatty liver as an evaluation of vesical fat rather than solely relying on subcutaneous fat (estimated by BMI), and it has been observed that the rateincidence of fatty liver does have a relatively high effective value for diabetes classification, particularly in relation to diabetes types in the context of obesity. This highlights the importance of accurately distinguishing between different types of diabetes, especially in the presence of childhood obesity, as it contributes to an overall increase in the population and in youths with diabetes. The autoimmune antibodies, one of the emblematic metrics of T1DM, had been reported to be positive among several youths with T2DM ( 23 ). For ketone-prone diabetes, since it was discovered, the positive status of antibodies has been considered a major value metric for diabetes classification. However, in our study, even though there was a statistically significant difference in the positive rate of islet antibodies between T1DM and T2DM, the relatively small sample size may have contributed to the less effective value in the ROC analysis. Furthermore, as presented by previous studies, the islet of antibodies can be also negative in up to 20% of otherwise classical T1DM, particularly in children. The reported lower sensitivity or false negative rate may also contribute to the results. A strength of the present study is the relatively large number of participants in both the confirmation and prognosis cohort, which had largely reduced the bias from patient selection and post-hoc analysis between comparison of clinical characteristics at the onset had been also made in the present study. In addition, the clinical characteristics employed in our study were those commonly utilized in clinical practice, enhancing the practicality of the obtained findings. The major limitation of our study was the retrospective collection of data from medical records rather than the prospective ones. Therefore, several major metrics, including the nature of islet antibodies, usually missing after 2-year follow-up, which might potentially bias the results. Furthermore, the majority of patients do not receive genetic testing, potentially resulting in the misdiagnosis of monogenic diabetes and skewing the outcomes. Another limitation of this study is that it is an investigation of DK/DKA clinical profiles from a single institution in the central province of China. To validate the effectiveness of prognostic metrics for classification, it is necessary to conduct further investigations with larger cohorts and, most importantly, prospective followed up studies. Conclusions In patients with ambiguous clinical features in whom misclassification of diabetes type occurs at initial presentation, the time between presentation and correct classification poses significant potential risks. Therefore, this study provides a practical clinical approach to the diagnosis and classification of diabetes. Caution is needed in C-peptide, BMI, SBP and fatty liver at the time of onset, which have effective diagnostic values. Declarations Author Contributions: Conceptualization, HXL and CSS; Methodology, HXL and YW; Data cu-ration, MW,BZ, CXM, LLC, QHW, and ZFC; Writing—original draft preparation, HXL and YW; writing—review and editing, HXL, MW and CSS; visualization, HXL and YW; supervision, ZWY and CSS; project administration, HXL and YW; funding acquisition, HXL and CSS. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Funding: This research was funded by the Medical Science and Technology Research Program Joint Construction Project of Henan Province (LHGJ20210003), Medical Science and Technology Research Program Joint Construction Project of Henan Province (LHGJ20220043), Science and Technology Development Planning Project of Henan Province (202102310499). Institutional Review Board Statement: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the by the Ethics Committee of the Henan Provincial People’s Hospital. Informed Consent Statement: A waiver of informed consent was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Henan Provincial People’s Hospital since the waiver would not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects because the study was retrospective and involved no more than minimal risk to the subjects. Data Availability Statement: The authors confirm that the majority of the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. Raw data are available from the authors upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions. Acknowledgments: The authors want to thank all the doctors, nurses, technicians and patients for their dedication to this study. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Disclosure: Part of the data was presented at the IDF World Diabetes Congress 2022, Lisbon and online, December 5-8. References International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation, 2021. National Collaborating Centre for Ws, Children's H. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. Diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2) in Children and Young People: Diagnosis and Management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK). Libman I, Haynes A, Lyons S, Pradeep P, Rwagasor E, Tung JY, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatric diabetes. 2022;23(8):1160-74. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, Bannuru RR, Brown FM, Bruemmer D, et al. 14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023. Diabetes care. 2023;46(Suppl 1):S230-s53. Tripathi A, Rizvi AA, Knight LM, Jerrell JM. Prevalence and impact of initial misclassification of pediatric type 1 diabetes mellitus. Southern medical journal. 2012;105(10):513-7. Nieto T, Castillo B, Nieto J, Redondo MJ. Demographic and diagnostic markers in new onset pediatric type 1 and type 2 diabetes: differences and overlaps. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2022;27(2):121-5. Dabelea D, Rewers A, Stafford JM, Standiford DA, Lawrence JM, Saydah S, et al. Trends in the prevalence of ketoacidosis at diabetes diagnosis: the SEARCH for diabetes in youth study. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):e938-45. Lévy-Marchal C, Patterson CC, Green A. Geographical variation of presentation at diagnosis of type I diabetes in children: the EURODIAB study. European and Dibetes. Diabetologia. 2001;44 Suppl 3:B75-80. Cengiz E, Connor CG, Ruedy KJ, Beck RW, Kollman C, Klingensmith GJ, et al. Pediatric diabetes consortium T1D New Onset (NeOn) study: clinical outcomes during the first year following diagnosis. Pediatric diabetes. 2014;15(4):287-93. Gungor N, Hannon T, Libman I, Bacha F, Arslanian S. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth: the complete picture to date. Pediatric Clinics. 2005;52(6):1579-609. Umpierrez GE, Smiley D, Kitabchi AE. Narrative review: ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(5):350-7. Hwang WB, Kim JH, Cho SM. Two cases of ketosis-prone diabetes mellitus in Korean adolescents. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2019;24(4):257-61. Lu H, Hu F, Zeng Y, Zou L, Luo S, Sun Y, et al. Ketosis onset type 2 diabetes had better islet β-cell function and more serious insulin resistance. Journal of diabetes research. 2014;2014:510643. Low JC, Felner EI, Muir AB, Brown M, Dorcelet M, Peng L, et al. Do obese children with diabetic ketoacidosis have type 1 or type 2 diabetes? Primary care diabetes. 2012;6(1):61-5. Lebovitz HE, Banerji MA. Ketosis-prone diabetes (Flatbush diabetes): an emerging worldwide clinically important entity. Current diabetes reports. 2018;18:1-8. Wolfsdorf JI, Glaser N, Agus M, Fritsch M, Hanas R, Rewers A, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetic ketoacidosis and the hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state. Pediatric diabetes. 2018;19:155-77. Vaibhav A, Mathai M, Gorman S. Atypical diabetes in children: ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes. BMJ case reports. 2013;2013. Liu HX, Li GM, Zhou YW, Luo SH, Zheng XY, Yang DZ, et al. [Clinical characteristics and classification diagnosis of newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis in adult patients]. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi. 2019;99(18):1369-74. Thunander M, Törn C, Petersson C, Ossiansson B, Fornander J, Landin-Olsson M. Levels of C-peptide, body mass index and age, and their usefulness in classification of diabetes in relation to autoimmunity, in adults with newly diagnosed diabetes in Kronoberg, Sweden. European journal of endocrinology. 2012;166(6):1021-9. Redondo MJ, Rodriguez LM, Escalante M, Smith EO, Balasubramanyam A, Haymond MW. Types of pediatric diabetes mellitus defined by anti-islet autoimmunity and random C-peptide at diagnosis. Pediatric diabetes. 2013;14(5):333-40. Novac CN, Boboc AA, Nastac C, Balgradean M, Radulian G. Ketoacidosis Onset of Diabetes on a Patient with Normal C-Peptide Value. Maedica (Bucur). 2021;16(2):320-4. Wang J, Zhang M, Liu Z, Wang X, Pang Y, Lu Y, et al. Heterogeneous clinical features of ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: gender, age, loss of weight and HbA1c. Minerva endocrinologica. 2019;44(4):351-6. Niechciał E, Rogowicz-Frontczak A, Piłaciński S, Fichna M, Skowrońska B, Fichna P, et al. Autoantibodies against zinc transporter 8 are related to age and metabolic state in patients with newly diagnosed autoimmune diabetes. Acta diabetologica. 2018;55(3):287-94. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4662137","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":334883992,"identity":"79455761-990c-4134-8ec1-e0b3c33839a1","order_by":0,"name":"Hongxia Liu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhengzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hongxia","middleName":"","lastName":"Liu","suffix":""},{"id":334883993,"identity":"a90ebe71-9c1e-4ba0-9fe1-73db7135153e","order_by":1,"name":"Yan Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhengzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yan","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":334883994,"identity":"a54a7dfb-3195-4690-b36f-00d782748c51","order_by":2,"name":"Miao Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhengzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Miao","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":334883995,"identity":"0ca592b6-4287-4260-8e38-6974ecaf4d67","order_by":3,"name":"Bo Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhengzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bo","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":334883996,"identity":"e3ccf570-e589-415f-8f73-0ccbb980b00e","order_by":4,"name":"Caixia Ma","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhengzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Caixia","middleName":"","lastName":"Ma","suffix":""},{"id":334883997,"identity":"00ea1536-3c57-40ae-bac7-f26d9ae99d75","order_by":5,"name":"Lianlian Cui","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhengzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lianlian","middleName":"","lastName":"Cui","suffix":""},{"id":334883998,"identity":"a9c16853-4b79-4b33-b66a-4ec7e3f93406","order_by":6,"name":"Qianhan Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhengzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Qianhan","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":334883999,"identity":"91c624f4-a434-41a9-b94b-1ef02b9b10b2","order_by":7,"name":"Zhenfeng Cao","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhengzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhenfeng","middleName":"","lastName":"Cao","suffix":""},{"id":334884000,"identity":"0f488ed0-90d3-4f3b-95c0-dda9680d9e25","order_by":8,"name":"Zhongwen Yang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhengzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhongwen","middleName":"","lastName":"Yang","suffix":""},{"id":334884001,"identity":"a090fa8c-6d6b-43f7-ac98-3cb581b8f2f8","order_by":9,"name":"Changsong Shi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Zhengzhou University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Changsong","middleName":"","lastName":"Shi","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-06-30 09:41:38","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4662137/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4662137/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":62156865,"identity":"68dbdf19-0e2c-4f89-b5bb-4a66b7c5a725","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-09 21:12:32","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":38891,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFlowchart of patient selection\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eAbbreviations: T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4662137/v1/06d0cbfee0a8366cfdeee024.png"},{"id":62156867,"identity":"14deb1da-a525-4453-9ee3-c5e9d59ecad7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-09 21:12:32","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":107014,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eROC analysis for classifying diabetes among all patients with DK/DKA.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAbbreviations: T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMI:Body mass index; TG:Triglyceride (refer-ence range: 0.34-1.92 mmol/L); UA: urine acid (reference range: 90-420 umol/L);\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4662137/v1/1f76e2ab22089829036d7df2.png"},{"id":75261169,"identity":"3e2e86b3-664e-4683-ac4b-73e6d2329719","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-02 14:01:41","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1257554,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4662137/v1/fdbe6747-8acd-4e65-b05d-332a7ce2fcfd.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Practical Classification approach for newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis in children and adolescent patients","fulltext":[{"header":"Highlights","content":"\u003cul start=\"12\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDistinguishing diabetes diagnosis is fundamental to ensuring proper management of patients, but has been challenging, especially in newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWe retrospectively collected the clinical data from newly 153 diagnosed diabetic children and adolescents with DK/DKA accompanied at the onset and followed up for 2 years, and further figures out the effective diagnostic metrics in effort to shed light on better classify diabetes.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eOur results indicate that C-peptide, BMI, SBP and fatty liver at the time of onset have effective diagnostic values. It provides a practical classification approach for newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis in children and adolescents, by taking advantage of their characteristics at presentation, which are readily available in clinical practice.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e"},{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eDiabetes is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood. According to the latest estimates, more than 1.2\u0026nbsp;million children and adolescents worldwide are living with diabetes, and the number of newly diagnosed cases each year is around 180,000(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). As guidelines recommended (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR3\" citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e), the classification of diabetes in children and adolescences at diagnosis is typically based on their characteristics at presentation and genetic measurements for the specific types. However, increasingly, the ability to make a clinical diagnosis has been hampered due to the overlapping clinical characteristics between type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiabetic ketosis (DK) and ketoacidosis (DKA) occur commonly at the onset of diabetes and have long been considered as a key clinical feature of T1DM, particularly among children and adolescents, with DKA frequencies of 15\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;70% (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). While it had been demonstrated recently that obese adolescents with a clinical picture suggestive of T2DM can present in DK/DKA of varying degrees with the prevalence of 5\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;25% (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e). Of note, the near-normoglycemia remission has been reported in some patients and may last for months to years. This presentation and clinical course of diabetes has been called as diabetes type 1B, idiopathic T1DM, atypical diabetes, or ketosis-prone T2DM in recent years (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e). It has also been well described in Blacks and demonstrated to affect other populations at high risk of T2DM such as Chinese, Japanese and Hispanic(\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR13\" citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe appropriate classification of diabetes is important for determining therapy, and thus, it is critical for clinicians differentiate between the types of diabetes as early as possible. Previously, a group of clinical characteristics, including c-peptide, body mass index (BMI) and onset age, had been proven to be effective diagnostic indicators for diabetes classification among newly diagnosed diabetic adults with DK/DKA accompanied, or among mixed cohorts of adults with the small proportion of youth included. However, it is important to note that the evidence in adults cannot be simply promoted to children and adolescents since there are vast differences between adult-onset and pediatric diabetes, including pathophysiology, development, and response to therapy. In addition, there is currently sporadic evidence to differentiate newly diagnosed diabetes in children and adolescent patients with DK/DKA accompanied, with even none in Asians (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e). Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively collected the clinical data from newly diagnosed diabetic children and adolescents with DK/DKA accompanied at onset and followed up for 2 years, and further figures out the effective diagnostic metrics in an effort to shed light on better classifying diabetes.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis was a hospital-based, retrospective study with data collected from newly diagnosed diabetic children and adolescents with ketosis or ketoacidosis at the onset in Henan Provincial People\u0026rsquo;s Hospital. The medical records of all episodes of DK/DKA between January, 2017 and April, 2020 were reviewed. A flowchart of patient selection was presented in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e. This study was conducted according to the guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Henan Provincial People\u0026rsquo;s Hospital.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eParticipants\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe inclusive criteria are as follows: 1) The onset age is under 18 years; 2) diagnosed with DKA, according to the ICD code of an electronic hospital system (EHRs), or with the biochemical criteria of DKA recommended by guidelines(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e): a. hyperglycemia (blood sample glucose\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;11 mmol/L [\u0026asymp;\u0026thinsp;200 mg/dL]), serum blood bicarbonate\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;18 mmol/L or pH\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;7.30, ketonemia (blood β-hydroxybutyrate\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;3mmol/L) or moderate or large ketonuria; those with hyperglycemia, ketonuria and ketonemia while without acidosis were also included due to the presence of DK; 3) having medical records at both the onset and after 2 years of diabetes. Those with other types of diabetes, including the sedentary diabetes induced by drugs or pancreatitis, neonatal diabetes and genetically induced diabetes, were excluded from this study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eData collection\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eData at the onset of diabetes was collected by endocrinologists from EHRs via Excel. Information regarding patient demographics, physical examinations (BMI; systolic and diastolic blood pressure [SBP; DBP]), medical histories related to diabetes [family history, precipitating factors for DK/DKA, the presence of fatty liver, treatment, and any acute or chronic complications] were collected. Biomedical characteristics, such as glucose levels at admission, values of glycated hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], triglyceride [TG], total cholesterol [TC], serum uric acid [UA], serum creatine [sCr], and high/low-density lipoprotein cholesterols [HDL-C; LDL-C] were collected. The qualitative results of islet autoantibodies, including glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody (GADA), insulinoma-associated antigen-2 autoantibody (IA-2A), insulin autoantibody (IAA), zinc transporter-8 autoantibody (ZnT8A), and islet-cell antibody (ICA) were also collected. In addition, patients continued to receive intensive insulin therapy for 7 to 10 days (average 8.5 days) after correction of DK/DKA. Then, once the blood glucose level reached the standard and steadily, the C-peptide release test of oral glucose tolerance was conducted, and C-peptide at 0h, 0.5h, 1h, 2h and 3h were collected.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFollow-up and classification\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eInformation on treatment and diagnosis after 2 years was followed up via the medical records which collected in the outpatient and inpatient EHRs. Patients were finally diagnosed with T1DM if they had a prior diagnosis of T1DM at the onset and continuously received insulin treatment during 2 years. Alternatively, patients were also classified as having T1DM if they had a repeated C peptide below 0.6 nmol/L and received insulin treatment during the 2-year follow-up. On the other hand, patients were finally assigned to T2DM group if they had a previous diagnosis of diabetes and were managed solely with diet and exercise, or if they were prescribed oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs). Additionally, patients who failed to comply with their insulin regimen for more than 4 weeks without experiencing recurrent DK/DKA at any point during their illness were also assigned to the T2DM group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStatistical analyses of the data were performed using SPSS 26.0 (Chicago, IL). Statistical significance was defined as \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e value\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05. Characteristics were presented as mean (SD) or median with interquartile range (IQR), given in parentheses for normalized continuous or skewed variables. Categories of variables were presented as counts (percentages). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Mann\u0026ndash;Whitney U-test was used for comparisons of quantitative variables among groups. Chi-squared test was performed to assess differences in proportions across groups. The receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve and logistic analysis were generated to compare the diagnostic performance of the potential clinical characteristic, with the sensitivities, specificities and optimum cut-off points calculated for diabetes classification.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eClinical presentations and distributions of included patients\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTable\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e summaries the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with DK/DKA at the onset of diabetes enrolled in this study. A total of 221 patients with medical records of DK/DKA when newly diagnosed as diabetes were included in the analysis, with 153 (69.23%) patients meeting the inclusion criteria (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Among these 153 newly diagnosed diabetic patients with DK/DKA onset, the mean age was 12.65\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.68 years, with females accounting for 43.7% (67/153) of the sample. The average BMI was 21.66\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.69 kg/m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e, random glucose levels averaged 18.36 (15.00,22.85) mmol/L, and HbA1c levels were measured at 12.52\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.38%. According to the diagnosis at discharge, 72 (47.1%) patients were diagnosed with T1DM, 46 (30.1%) patients were diagnosed with T2DM and the remaining 35 patients (22.8%) could not be \u0026ldquo;classified\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eClinical characteristics of newly diagnosed diabetic children and adolescents with ketosis/ketoacidosis onset.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTotal (N\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;153)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT1DM (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;72)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT2DM (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;46)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnclassified (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;35)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF/χ2/H\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eP-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eGender (M/F) (n)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e86/67\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32/40\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e34/12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20/15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.92\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.007\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAge at the onset (yrs)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.65\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.68\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.36\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.66\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14.41\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.82\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13.00\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.36\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eFamily history (n)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e58(37.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17(23.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25(54.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16(45.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.44\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.002\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eBMI (kg/m\u003c/b\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003e2\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003cb\u003e)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21.66\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.69\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17.93\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.98\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e27.30\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.71\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21.92\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.58\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e75.26\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSBP (mmHg)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e114.00\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;14.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e106.40\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.48\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e125.26\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.04\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e112.91\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;13.38\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e35.81\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eDBP (mmHg)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e72.00\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e69.90\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.55\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e74.37\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.58\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e73.51\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;9.94\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.037\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"7\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eHyperglycemia on admission\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRandom Glucose (mmol/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18.36 (15.00, 22.85)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19.88(16.63, 25.37)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15.38(11.88,19.75)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18.36(15.91,24.00)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14.79\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHbA1c (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.52\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.38\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13.10\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.42\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.60\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.55\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.85\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.06\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.003\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"7\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eLipids on admission\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTC (mmol/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.41 (3.82, 5.09)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.32(3.70,4.99)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.58(4.03,5.29)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.23(3.76,5.04)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.51\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.173\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTG (mmol/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.35 (0.91, 2.15)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.06(0.80,1.61)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.85(1.28,3.29)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.34(0.81,2.42)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.02\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHDL-C(mmol/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.05 (0.86, 1.24)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.10(0.88,1.37)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.97(0.76, 1.09)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.05(0.90,1.28)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.84\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.003\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLDL-C(mmol/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.62\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.80\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.44\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.71\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.92\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.84\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.60\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.81\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.52\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.005\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSerum UA (umol/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e282.5(217.5, 422.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e239.0(179.5,307.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e420.5(330.8,604.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e260.0(226.0,369.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36.20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSerum Creatine (umol/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37.00 (31.00, 49.00)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e35.0(26.25,45.50)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42.00(34.75,53.00)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e39.00(32.00, 46.00)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.61\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.544\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"7\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eBeta-cell function\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC peptide 0h (nmol/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.49(0.14,1.35)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.15(0.10,0.32)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.55(1.10,2.38)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.68(0.36,1.27)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e79.95\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC peptide 0.5h (nmol/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.69(0.21,2.11)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.21(0.10,0.33)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.42(1.43,4.28)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.01(0.52,1.97)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e90.61\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC peptide 1h (nmol/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.97(0.30,3.15)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.30(0.10,0.62)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.96(2.45,6.55)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.42(0.79,3.01)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e92.28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC peptide 2h (nmol/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.74(0.44,4.11)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.44(0.15,0.95)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.29(3.62,8.59)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.84(1.12,3.42)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e93.72\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC peptide 3h (nmol/L)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.77(0.54,4.26)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.54(0.17,1.08)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.10(3.40,7.02)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.12(1.22,3.66)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e94.30\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eIslet antibody\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;1 positive (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e31(20.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e26(36.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2(4.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3(8.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21.37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGADA positive (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30(19.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25(34.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2(4.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3(8.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19.60\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIAA positive (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1(0.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1(1.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0(0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0(0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.572\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eICA positive (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7(4.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6(8.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0(0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1(2.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.50\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.096\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eZnT8 positive (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3(2.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2(2.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0(0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1(2.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.29\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.525\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIA2Ab positive (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8(5.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7(9.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0(0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1(2.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.78\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.056\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eFatty Liver (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e52(34.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5(6.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38(82.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9(25.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e73.01\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePrecipitating factors (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e117(76.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e55(76.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37(80.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25(71.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.90\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.639\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"7\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTreatment at discharge\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInsulin (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e99(64.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e68 (94.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9 (19.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22 (62.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\" morerows=\"4\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e91.69\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\" morerows=\"4\" rowspan=\"5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInsulin\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;OHA (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17(11.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (2.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10 (21.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5 (14.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOHA (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21(13.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (2.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16 (34.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (8.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGLP-1(%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10(6.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0 (0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10 (21.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0 (0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDrugs withdrawal (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6(3.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0 (0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1 (2.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5 (14.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"7\"\u003eAbbreviations: T1DM: Type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM: Type 1 diabetes mellitus; BMI: Body mass index; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c: Glycated hemoglobin A1c; TC: Total cholesterol (reference range: 3.10\u0026ndash;5.70 mmol/L); TG: Triglyceride (reference range: 0.34\u0026ndash;1.92 mmol/L); HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (reference range: 0.78-2.00 mmol/L); LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (reference range: 2.07\u0026ndash;3.10 mmol/L); UA: Urine acid (reference range: 90\u0026ndash;420 umol/L); GADA: Glutamate decarboxylase antibody; IAA: Insulin autoantibody; ICA: Islet-cell antibody; ZnT8A: Zinc transporter 8 autoantibody; IA2Ab: Islet antigen-2 (IA-2) autoantibody; OHA: Oral-hypoglycemic agents; GLP-1: Glucagon-like peptide-1.\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eClinical characteristics between groups after 2 years\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter the 2-year follow-up, there were 113 patients maintaining their initial diagnosis, with 67 (93.06%) patients diagnosed with T1DM and 46 (100.0%) patients diagnosed with T2DM. For those diagnosed with T1DM at onset, 5 patients were subsequently diagnosed with T2DM, among which 2 patients were treated with insulin in combination with OHAs, 2 patients were treated with OHAs alone, and the other one discontinued any anti-hyperglycemic treatment. For those with \u0026ldquo;un-classified\u0026rdquo; diabetes at onset (N\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;35), 11 patients were ultimately diagnosed with T1DM, with the majority of them receiving insulin treatment and only one patient receiving a combination of insulin and OHAs. The remaining 24 patients were finally diagnosed with T2DM, with 16 patients receiving OHAs, 1 receiving GLP-1 treatment, 3 patients receiving a combination of insulin and OHAs, 2 patients maintaining unmedicated, and 2 patients maintaining basic insulin treatment only.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe between-group clinical characteristics after 2 years were shown in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e. Among those who were finally diagnosed with T1DM (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;78) and T2DM (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;75), it was observed that, compared to T2DM group, glycemia level was significantly higher in T1DM group, with a random glucose level of 19.60 (16.48,24.93) vs. 16.83 (13.80,22.00) mmol/L (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.005) and a higher HbA1c value of 13.45(11.88,14.63) vs. 12.10(10.10,13.50) % (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.001). Additionally, the positive rates of any islet antibody were also higher in the T1DM group (33.3% vs. 6.7%, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), particularly the positive rate of GADA with 32.1% vs. 6.8% (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001). While for those finally diagnosed with T2DM, male patients predominated (66.7% vs. 46.2%, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.011), and there was a significantly higher age at the onset (14.00[13.00,16.00] vs. 12.00[8.00,14.00] years, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), BMI (25.77\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.20 vs. 17.71\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.84 kg/m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), concomitant rate of fatty liver (64.0% vs. 5.1%, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), percentage of family history of diabetes and blood pressure than T1DM group. In terms of β-cell function, T2DM had significantly higher C peptide levels in both fasting and within 3-h postprandial periods (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e all \u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparison of clinical characteristics between the two groups after follow-up.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT1DM\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT2DM\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e/χ\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e/Z\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eP-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eN (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e78(51.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e75(49.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eGender (M/F)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36/42\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e50/25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.536\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.011\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAge at the onset (yrs)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.00(8.00,14.00)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14.00(13.00,16.00)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-4.764\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eFamily history of diabetes (n/%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16(20.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42(56.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20.457\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eBMI (kg/m\u003c/b\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003e2\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003cb\u003e)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17.71\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.84\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25.77\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-12.396\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSBP (mmHg)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e105.81\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.51\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e121.63\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;13.19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-8.221\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eDBP (mmHg)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e69.71\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;9.95\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e74.53\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;9.52\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-3.064\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.003\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eRandom glucose (mmol/L)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19.60(16.48,24.93)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16.83(13.80,22.00)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.823\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.005\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eHbA1\u003c/b\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cb\u003eC\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e \u003cb\u003e(%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13.45(11.88,14.63)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.10(10.10,13.50)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-3.202\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTC (mmol/L)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.25(3.68,4.85)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.55(3.95,5.27)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-1.745\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.081\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTG (mmol/L)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.06(0.78,1.57)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.78(1.17,2.85)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-4.654\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eHDL-C (mmol/L)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.07(0.88,1.37)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.02(0.79,1.14)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.176\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.03\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eLDL-C (mmol/L)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.45\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.73\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.80\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.82\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-2.796\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSerum UA (mmol/L)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e237.00(180.5,303.25)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e379.00(260.00,480.00)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-5.245\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSerum Creatine (mmol/L)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e33.50(26.75,45.00)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e42.00(34.0,52.00)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-3.591\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eC peptide 0h (nmol/L)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.15(0.10,0.33)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.35(0.73,2.20)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-9.411\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eC peptide 0.5h (nmol/L)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.21(0.10,0.34)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.11(1.27,4.04)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-9.975\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eC peptide 1h (nmol/L)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.32(0.10,0.64)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.13(1.62,5.20)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-9.864\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eC peptide 2h (nmol/L)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.50(0.16,1.04)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.95(2.43,7.33)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-9.574\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eC peptide 3h (nmol/L)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.54(0.17,1.16)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.18(2.59,6.36)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-9.714\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePositive rate of any islet antibody (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e26(33.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5(6.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16.829\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eGADA positive (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25(32.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5(6.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15.337\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eIAA positive (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1(1.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0(0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.955\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.328\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eICA positive (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7(9.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0(0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.962\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.008\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eZnT8 positive (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3(3.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0(0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.903\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.088\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eIA2Ab positive (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8(10.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0(0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.011\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.005\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eFatty Liver (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4(5.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e48(64.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e59.066\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePrecipitating factors (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e58(74.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e59(78.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.394\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.530\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"5\"\u003eAbbreviations: T1DM: Type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM: Type 1 diabetes mellitus; BMI: Body mass index; HbA1c: Glycated hemoglobin A1c; TC: Total cholesterol (reference range: 3.10\u0026ndash;5.70 mmol/L); TG: Triglyceride (reference range: 0.34\u0026ndash;1.92 mmol/L); HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (reference range: 0.78-2.00 mmol/L); LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (reference range: 2.07\u0026ndash;3.10 mmol/L); UA: Urine acid (reference range: 90\u0026ndash;420 umol/L); GADA: Glutamate decarboxylase antibody; IAA: Insulin autoantibody; ICA: Islet-cell antibody; ZnT8A: Zinc transporter 8 autoantibody; IA2Ab: Islet antigen-2 (IA-2) autoantibody.\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eROC curves and logistic regression analysis for classifying diabetes\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe performance of each metric in classifying diabetes, as indicated by the estimated AUC and its 95%CI, is presented in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e. The β-cell function, as measured by the C peptide level within 3 hours, exhibited the highest AUC values for diabetes classification, ranging from 0.940 (95%CI: 0.903\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;0.976)\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;0.961 (95%CI: 0.932\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;0.989) (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e all \u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). The BMI, with an optimal cut-off point of 20.95 kg/m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e, demonstrated a significant prognostic value with an AUC value of 0.918 (95%CI: 0.874\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;0.962) and the sensitivity and specificity was 88.0% and 83.1% respectively. Both SBP and the presence of fatty liver demonstrated a significant and relatively high prognostic value, with a similar value of 0.826 (95%CI: 0.761\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;0.890) and 0.794 (95%CI: 0.720\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;0.869). The AUCs of the serum UA, age at the onset, and TG in diabetes classification were all found to be significantly moderate, with a gradual decrease in value from 0.743 (95%CI: 0.663\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;0.824) for UA, 0.719 (95%CI: 0.638\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;0.799) for age to 0.716 (95%CI: 0.635\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;0.797) for TG (all \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Conversely, the other metrics, such as gender, family history of diabetes, presence of islet autoantibodies, DBP, TC, HDL-C/LDL-C, and creatine exhibited poor performance and did not demonstrate prognostic ability, with all AUCs being less than 0.7. Logistic regression analysis further confirmed that BMI (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.003), SBP (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.042) and C peptide levels at 0h (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.046) and 0.5h (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.001) were significantly effective in classifying diabetes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study is undertaken to investigate the clinical metrics that effectively shed light on classifying types of diabetes among newly diagnosed diabetic patients with DK/DKA onset. It had demonstrated that C peptide, BMI, SBP and the presence of fatty liver can differentiate diabetes types of newly diagnosed diabetes with DK/DKA onset among children and adolescences. These metrics may assist in the clinical diagnosis and classification of diabetes, particularly in cases with overlapping characteristics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInsulin deficiency is clinically evident through deteriorating glucose control and increased susceptibility to DK or DKA. In this study, similar to previous studies conducted among both adults and those with younger ages (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e), the levels of C-peptide remained the most effective value for distinguishing between T1DM and T2DM during the entire duration of the 3-hour tests. However, it is worth noting that the cut-off point for C-peptide in this study was higher than the other studies, with a fasting level of 0.4 nmol/L and 2-h level of 2.0 nmol/L, whereas other studies among adults reported a fasting C-peptide levels of around 0.2 nmol/L and the 2-h level of approximately 0.5 nmol/L (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e). Previously, there was evidence indicating that C-peptide levels at diagnosis were elevated with increasing age within each BMI group, highlighting the independent influence of age on C peptide (\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR20\" citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e). Thus, the discrepancy observed in our study may be attributed to the variations in age, as we included the youngest age of patients among all the studies. Besides, it is worth noting that C-peptide levels may initially rise during the diagnosis of pediatric T1DM, leading to a remission period, but subsequently decline rapidly in the first years after diagnosis. Consequently, employing a relatively high cut-off point for C peptide may enhance the sensitivity and specificity of classification. It is of great importance for pediatrics to pay more attention to those with moderately reserved C peptide.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverweight has been proved to be associated with accelerated progression to T1DM in children and adolescents, in addition to its well-known association with T2DM. In this study, similar to previous studies focusing on adults with ketone-prone diabetes (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e), BMI was proved to have significantly effective value of the classification between T1DM and T2DM among children and adolescents with DK/DKA at the onset, with the ranks of ROC analysis just after C-peptide. Furthermore, unlike most other studies(\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e), our study had further included the rate of fatty liver as an evaluation of vesical fat rather than solely relying on subcutaneous fat (estimated by BMI), and it has been observed that the rateincidence of fatty liver does have a relatively high effective value for diabetes classification, particularly in relation to diabetes types in the context of obesity. This highlights the importance of accurately distinguishing between different types of diabetes, especially in the presence of childhood obesity, as it contributes to an overall increase in the population and in youths with diabetes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe autoimmune antibodies, one of the emblematic metrics of T1DM, had been reported to be positive among several youths with T2DM (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e). For ketone-prone diabetes, since it was discovered, the positive status of antibodies has been considered a major value metric for diabetes classification. However, in our study, even though there was a statistically significant difference in the positive rate of islet antibodies between T1DM and T2DM, the relatively small sample size may have contributed to the less effective value in the ROC analysis. Furthermore, as presented by previous studies, the islet of antibodies can be also negative in up to 20% of otherwise classical T1DM, particularly in children. The reported lower sensitivity or false negative rate may also contribute to the results.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA strength of the present study is the relatively large number of participants in both the confirmation and prognosis cohort, which had largely reduced the bias from patient selection and post-hoc analysis between comparison of clinical characteristics at the onset had been also made in the present study. In addition, the clinical characteristics employed in our study were those commonly utilized in clinical practice, enhancing the practicality of the obtained findings. The major limitation of our study was the retrospective collection of data from medical records rather than the prospective ones. Therefore, several major metrics, including the nature of islet antibodies, usually missing after 2-year follow-up, which might potentially bias the results. Furthermore, the majority of patients do not receive genetic testing, potentially resulting in the misdiagnosis of monogenic diabetes and skewing the outcomes. Another limitation of this study is that it is an investigation of DK/DKA clinical profiles from a single institution in the central province of China. To validate the effectiveness of prognostic metrics for classification, it is necessary to conduct further investigations with larger cohorts and, most importantly, prospective followed up studies.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn patients with ambiguous clinical features in whom misclassification of diabetes type occurs at initial presentation, the time between presentation and correct classification poses significant potential risks. Therefore, this study provides a practical clinical approach to the diagnosis and classification of diabetes. Caution is needed in C-peptide, BMI, SBP and fatty liver at the time of onset, which have effective diagnostic values.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contributions:\u003c/strong\u003e Conceptualization, HXL and CSS; Methodology, HXL and YW; Data cu-ration, MW,BZ, CXM, LLC, QHW, and ZFC; Writing\u0026mdash;original draft preparation, HXL and YW; writing\u0026mdash;review and editing, HXL, MW and CSS; visualization, HXL and YW; supervision, ZWY and CSS; project administration, HXL and YW; funding acquisition, HXL and CSS. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding:\u003c/strong\u003e This research was funded by the Medical Science and Technology Research Program Joint Construction Project of Henan Province (LHGJ20210003), Medical Science and Technology Research Program Joint Construction Project of Henan Province (LHGJ20220043), Science and Technology Development Planning Project of Henan Province (202102310499).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInstitutional Review Board Statement:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the by the Ethics Committee of the Henan Provincial People\u0026rsquo;s Hospital.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInformed Consent Statement:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eA waiver of informed consent was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Henan Provincial People\u0026rsquo;s Hospital since the waiver would not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects because the study was retrospective and involved no more than minimal risk to the subjects.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Availability Statement:\u003c/strong\u003e The authors confirm that the majority of the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. Raw data are available from the authors upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAcknowledgments: The authors want to thank all the doctors, nurses, technicians and patients for their dedication to this study.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflicts of Interest:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors declare no conflict of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDisclosure:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ePart of the data was presented at the IDF World Diabetes Congress 2022, Lisbon and online, December 5-8.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInternational Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation, 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNational Collaborating Centre for Ws, Children\u0026apos;s H. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. Diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2) in Children and Young People: Diagnosis and Management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLibman I, Haynes A, Lyons S, Pradeep P, Rwagasor E, Tung JY, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatric diabetes. 2022;23(8):1160-74.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, Bannuru RR, Brown FM, Bruemmer D, et al. 14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023. Diabetes care. 2023;46(Suppl 1):S230-s53.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTripathi A, Rizvi AA, Knight LM, Jerrell JM. Prevalence and impact of initial misclassification of pediatric type 1 diabetes mellitus. Southern medical journal. 2012;105(10):513-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNieto T, Castillo B, Nieto J, Redondo MJ. Demographic and diagnostic markers in new onset pediatric type 1 and type 2 diabetes: differences and overlaps. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2022;27(2):121-5.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDabelea D, Rewers A, Stafford JM, Standiford DA, Lawrence JM, Saydah S, et al. Trends in the prevalence of ketoacidosis at diabetes diagnosis: the SEARCH for diabetes in youth study. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):e938-45.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eL\u0026eacute;vy-Marchal C, Patterson CC, Green A. Geographical variation of presentation at diagnosis of type I diabetes in children: the EURODIAB study. European and Dibetes. Diabetologia. 2001;44 Suppl 3:B75-80.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCengiz E, Connor CG, Ruedy KJ, Beck RW, Kollman C, Klingensmith GJ, et al. Pediatric diabetes consortium T1D New Onset (NeOn) study: clinical outcomes during the first year following diagnosis. Pediatric diabetes. 2014;15(4):287-93.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGungor N, Hannon T, Libman I, Bacha F, Arslanian S. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth: the complete picture to date. Pediatric Clinics. 2005;52(6):1579-609.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUmpierrez GE, Smiley D, Kitabchi AE. Narrative review: ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(5):350-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHwang WB, Kim JH, Cho SM. Two cases of ketosis-prone diabetes mellitus in Korean adolescents. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2019;24(4):257-61.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLu H, Hu F, Zeng Y, Zou L, Luo S, Sun Y, et al. Ketosis onset type 2 diabetes had better islet \u0026beta;-cell function and more serious insulin resistance. Journal of diabetes research. 2014;2014:510643.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLow JC, Felner EI, Muir AB, Brown M, Dorcelet M, Peng L, et al. Do obese children with diabetic ketoacidosis have type 1 or type 2 diabetes? Primary care diabetes. 2012;6(1):61-5.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLebovitz HE, Banerji MA. Ketosis-prone diabetes (Flatbush diabetes): an emerging worldwide clinically important entity. Current diabetes reports. 2018;18:1-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWolfsdorf JI, Glaser N, Agus M, Fritsch M, Hanas R, Rewers A, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Diabetic ketoacidosis and the hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state. Pediatric diabetes. 2018;19:155-77.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVaibhav A, Mathai M, Gorman S. Atypical diabetes in children: ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes. BMJ case reports. 2013;2013.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu HX, Li GM, Zhou YW, Luo SH, Zheng XY, Yang DZ, et al. [Clinical characteristics and classification diagnosis of newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis in adult patients]. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi. 2019;99(18):1369-74.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThunander M, T\u0026ouml;rn C, Petersson C, Ossiansson B, Fornander J, Landin-Olsson M. Levels of C-peptide, body mass index and age, and their usefulness in classification of diabetes in relation to autoimmunity, in adults with newly diagnosed diabetes in Kronoberg, Sweden. European journal of endocrinology. 2012;166(6):1021-9.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRedondo MJ, Rodriguez LM, Escalante M, Smith EO, Balasubramanyam A, Haymond MW. Types of pediatric diabetes mellitus defined by anti-islet autoimmunity and random C-peptide at diagnosis. Pediatric diabetes. 2013;14(5):333-40.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNovac CN, Boboc AA, Nastac C, Balgradean M, Radulian G. Ketoacidosis Onset of Diabetes on a Patient with Normal C-Peptide Value. Maedica (Bucur). 2021;16(2):320-4.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang J, Zhang M, Liu Z, Wang X, Pang Y, Lu Y, et al. Heterogeneous clinical features of ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: gender, age, loss of weight and HbA1c. Minerva endocrinologica. 2019;44(4):351-6.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNiechciał E, Rogowicz-Frontczak A, Piłaciński S, Fichna M, Skowrońska B, Fichna P, et al. Autoantibodies against zinc transporter 8 are related to age and metabolic state in patients with newly diagnosed autoimmune diabetes. Acta diabetologica. 2018;55(3):287-94.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Diabetic ketosis (DK), Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), Clinical characteristics, diabetes typing, Adolescents","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4662137/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4662137/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDistinguishing diabetes diagnosis is fundamental to ensuring proper management of patients, but has been challenging, especially in newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA retrospective analysis was conducted on medical records from 2017/1/1 to 2020/4/30 among children and adolescents with new-onset diabetes accompanied with ketosis or ketoacidosis. Data was collected at diabetes onset and 2 years after discharge. Patients were classified as type 1 or 2 diabetes (T1DM; T2DM) based on the patient's medication and final diagnosis. The best diagnostic cut-off point was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) between T1DM and T2DM.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAmong 153 children and adolescents, 78 patients (51.0%) were diagnosed as T1DM and 75 patients (49.0%) were diagnosed as T2DM after 2 years of follow-up. There were significant differences in sex, age, family history, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, lipids, uric acid (UA), C-peptide, combined fatty liver ratio and any islet autoantibody-positive ratio at the time of onset (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). In the ROC analysis, fatty liver, SBP, BMI, fasting/1-h/2-h C peptide at the time of onset performed well on diagnostic typing (ROC AUC\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.79, 0.83, 0.92, 0.94, 0.96, and 0.95 respectively; Optimal cut point\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.5, 110.5, 21.0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0).\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study provides a practical clinical approach to the diagnosis and classification of diabetes. Caution is needed in C-peptide, BMI, SBP and fatty liver at the time of onset, which have effective diagnostic values.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Practical Classification approach for newly diagnosed diabetes onset with ketosis or ketoacidosis in children and adolescent patients","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-08-09 21:12:27","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4662137/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"1a49365b-470a-4c50-ba7f-5106a68ff8ea","owner":[],"postedDate":"August 9th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-02-02T13:53:33+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-08-09 21:12:27","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4662137","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4662137","identity":"rs-4662137","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0