Management of Infective Endocarditis in a Secondary Care Trust: A Service Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes and Multidisciplinary Involvement

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

1.Abstract 1.1 Background Infective endocarditis (IE) is a complex and life-threatening condition, requiring multidisciplinary team (MDT) input for optimal management.   1.2 Objectives This study aimed to review the demographics, infection management, and clinical outcomes of patients treated for IE at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (CWFT), a secondary care provider in London. This study evaluated local IE service provision against national and international guidelines to identify areas for service improvement.   1.3 Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted, identifying adult patients (≥18 years) treated for IE at CWFT between September 2023 and August 2024. Patients who received >10 days of intravenous amoxicillin, flucloxacillin, cefazolin, or vancomycin were screened. Patients who received a full course of IE treatment were included. Clinical records were reviewed for demographic, microbiological, imaging, MDT involvement, and clinical outcome data.   1.4 Results 31 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 77 years (IQR 53–85) and 74% were male. Staphylococcus aureus (35%) and Enterococcus faecalis (29%) were the most common pathogens. Only 12 patients (39%) were discussed at a cardiothoracic MDT, and 2 patients lacked cardiology input. Microbiology consultations occurred in all cases, but only 55% had documented antimicrobial plans. Outpatient therapy was used in 36% of cases. Adverse outcomes of IE treatment included in-hospital mortality in 12.9% (n=4) and decline functional baseline in 29% (n=9).   1.5 Conclusions While key treatment standards were largely met, gaps in MDT involvement and documentation were identified. Implementation of a dedicated IE MDT may increase adherence to guidelines and improve secondary care service provision.
Full text 1,862 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Full text loading... Abstract 1.1 Background Infective endocarditis (IE) is a complex and life-threatening condition, requiring multidisciplinary team (MDT) input for optimal management. 1.2 Objectives This study aimed to review the demographics, infection management, and clinical outcomes of patients treated for IE at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (CWFT), a secondary care provider in London. This study evaluated local IE service provision against national and international guidelines to identify areas for service improvement. 1.3 Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted, identifying adult patients (≥18 years) treated for IE at CWFT between September 2023 and August 2024. Patients who received >10 days of intravenous amoxicillin, flucloxacillin, cefazolin, or vancomycin were screened. Patients who received a full course of IE treatment were included. Clinical records were reviewed for demographic, microbiological, imaging, MDT involvement, and clinical outcome data. 1.4 Results 31 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 77 years (IQR 53–85) and 74% were male. Staphylococcus aureus (35%) and Enterococcus faecalis (29%) were the most common pathogens. Only 12 patients (39%) were discussed at a cardiothoracic MDT, and 2 patients lacked cardiology input. Microbiology consultations occurred in all cases, but only 55% had documented antimicrobial plans. Outpatient therapy was used in 36% of cases. Adverse outcomes of IE treatment included in-hospital mortality in 12.9% (n=4) and decline functional baseline in 29% (n=9). 1.5 Conclusions While key treatment standards were largely met, gaps in MDT involvement and documentation were identified. Implementation of a dedicated IE MDT may increase adherence to guidelines and improve secondary care service provision. - Received: - Version Posted:

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0