Inducible 70kDa Heat Shock Protein and Autophagy-related Protein P62 Levels in Women With Breast Cancer: an Exploratory Investigation

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15

This study found elevated inducible 70kDa heat shock protein (HSPA1A) and decreased autophagy-related protein p62 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of women with malignant breast masses compared to benign lesions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15 · read from full text

This exploratory study measured intracellular inducible 70 kDa heat shock protein HSPA1A and autophagy-related p62/sequestosome-1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 46 women undergoing preoperative breast mass surgery, comparing malignant (n=38) versus benign (n=8) lesions using ELISA. Women with breast cancer had higher PBMC HSPA1A levels (79.3 ng/ml vs 44.2 ng/ml, p=0.04) and lower PBMC p62 levels (0.6 ng/ml vs 2.3 ng/ml, p<0.001), with p62 additionally lower in invasive carcinoma and in those with positive lymph node biopsy. The paper’s main caveat is that it is small and explicitly exploratory, using PBMC lysate ELISA with detection limits and no peer-reviewed validation at the time of posting. Relevance to endometriosis: endometriosis and adenomyosis are not discussed in the provided text; the paper is included in the corpus via keyword match rather than explicit citation or mechanistic linkage.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) respond to altered physiological conditions to alleviate the threat. The inducible 70kDa heat shock protein (HSPA1A) protects proteins from degradation. Autophagy is an intracellular process that removes damaged proteins and recycles their components to the cytoplasm. Sequestosome-1 (p62) is a protein consumed during autophagy. We hypothesized that the PBMC response to a malignant breast mass involves elevated production of HSPA1A and a decrease in intracellular p62. Methods: : In this study 46 women had their breast mass excised. PBMCs were isolated and intracellular levels of HSPA1A and p62 were quantitated by ELISA. Differences between women with a benign or malignant breast mass were determined. Results: : A breast malignancy was diagnosed in 38 women (82.6%) while 8 had a benign lesion. Mean intracellular HSPA1A levels were 79.3 ng/ml in PBMCs from women with a malignant lesion and 44.2 ng/ml in controls (p=0.04). The mean PBMC p62 level was 2.3 ng/ml in women with a benign breast lesion as opposed to 0.6 ng/ml in those with breast cancer (p<0.001). Mean p62 levels were also lower in women with invasive carcinoma and a positive lymph node biopsy when compared to those with in-situ carcinoma or absence of lymphadenopathy, respectively. Conclusion: Intracellular HSPA1A and p62 levels in PBMCs differ between women with a malignant or benign breast lesion. These measurements may be of value in the preoperative triage of women with a breast mass.
Full text 78,877 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Inducible 70kDa Heat Shock Protein and Autophagy-related Protein P62 Levels in Women With Breast Cancer: an Exploratory Investigation | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Inducible 70kDa Heat Shock Protein and Autophagy-related Protein P62 Levels in Women With Breast Cancer: an Exploratory Investigation Theofano Orfanelli, Spyridon Giannopoulos, Eleni Zografos, Aikaterini Athanasiou, and 9 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-475229/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 8 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) respond to altered physiological conditions to alleviate the threat. The inducible 70kDa heat shock protein (HSPA1A) protects proteins from degradation. Autophagy is an intracellular process that removes damaged proteins and recycles their components to the cytoplasm. Sequestosome-1 (p62) is a protein consumed during autophagy. We hypothesized that the PBMC response to a malignant breast mass involves elevated production of HSPA1A and a decrease in intracellular p62. Methods: In this study 46 women had their breast mass excised. PBMCs were isolated and intracellular levels of HSPA1A and p62 were quantitated by ELISA. Differences between women with a benign or malignant breast mass were determined. Results: A breast malignancy was diagnosed in 38 women (82.6%) while 8 had a benign lesion. Mean intracellular HSPA1A levels were 79.3 ng/ml in PBMCs from women with a malignant lesion and 44.2 ng/ml in controls (p=0.04). The mean PBMC p62 level was 2.3 ng/ml in women with a benign breast lesion as opposed to 0.6 ng/ml in those with breast cancer (p<0.001). Mean p62 levels were also lower in women with invasive carcinoma and a positive lymph node biopsy when compared to those with in-situ carcinoma or absence of lymphadenopathy, respectively. Conclusion: Intracellular HSPA1A and p62 levels in PBMCs differ between women with a malignant or benign breast lesion. These measurements may be of value in the preoperative triage of women with a breast mass. Cancer Biology Immunology cancer breast malignancy Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) intracellular process Introduction The malignant transformation of cells anywhere in the body is almost always accompanied by changes in systemic immunity. Alterations in antigen expression and perturbations in the local environment are detected by the immune system and result in changes in the properties of immune cells [ 1 ]. The ability to identify immune cell alterations that predict malignancy will be of value in the initial screening of individuals with a suspected malignancy. Autophagy is an intracellular mechanism present in almost all organisms to maintains cell functions and optimizes survival. Aggregated or non-functional proteins and organelles become bound to a cytoplasmic protein, sequestosome-1 (p62) [ 2 , 3 ] and the complex is sequestered in a double-membraned structure called an autophagosome [ 4 , 5 ]. The autophagosome merges with a lysosome and the engulfed components along with p62 are degraded by lysosomal enzymes. The amino acid, nucleoside, carbohydrate and lipid components are returned to the cytoplasm for reutilization [ 6 – 11 ]. The variation in p62 concentration in the cytoplasm has been used as a biomarker for the extent of autophagy induction [ 12 – 14 ]. However, p62 is also involved in other cellular processes such as apoptosis and inflammatory reactions [ 15 – 17 ]. Therefore, these other properties must be kept in mind when utilizing measurement of p62 to monitor autophagy activity in different systems. An additional mechanism that promotes cell survival under different conditions is induction of the inducible 70kDa heat shock protein, HSPA1A. When a cell encounters non-physiological conditions, HSPA1A synthesis is greatly up-regulated. The HSPA1A binds to nascent peptides and promotes the formation of functional proteins. It also prevents protein denaturation [ 18 – 20 ]. The HSPA1A is also released from the stressed cell and functions in the extracellular milieu to activate pro-inflammatory immunity to combat the perceived stress [ 21 ]. Numerous studies have reported on elevations in circulating HSPA1A in association with malignant transformation, including breast cancer [ 22 – 25 ]. While multiple studies have evaluated changes in autophagy and HSPA1A expression in mammary cells that are associated with malignancy [ 26 – 29 ], concomitant potential alterations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) have not been evaluated. In this exploratory study we compared the level of p62 and HSPA1A in PBMCs from women with malignant and benign breast lesions. We hypothesized that HSPA1A would be increased, and p62 decreased. in association with malignant transformation and might serve as potential biomarkers for breast cancer. Material And Methods Patient enrollment Women with a breast mass referred to the Section of Breast Surgery at Weill Cornell Medical College who underwent diagnostic breast surgery from 2015 to 2017 and consented to have their PBMCs obtained and evaluated, were enrolled in the study. All patients had preoperative confirmation of a breast mass by sonography, mammogram or magnetic resonance imaging followed by a fine needle aspiration biopsy or a core biopsy. Women with a cancer diagnosis underwent surgery for surgical staging. Women with a benign breast biopsy underwent surgery either for definitive tissue diagnosis, especially for large lesions, or for management of symptoms. All women with a previous history of any type of malignancy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with an active infection or a history of a chronic inflammatory disease were excluded. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Weill Cornell Medical College and was conducted according to Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects provided written informed consent at their initial preoperative evaluation. The following baseline clinicopathologic characteristics were collected from each subject: age, histology, histology subtypes, Estrogen Receptor (ER) status, Progesterone (PR) status, Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) status, grade, sentinel lymph node status, and stage. In all cases, the diagnosis of breast cancer was made by a clinical pathologist based on histological tissue analysis from surgical excision of the breast mass. The personnel of the laboratory were blinded to all clinical and histological data until the completion of all experimental assays. PBMC isolation and intracellular hsp70 and p62 quantification Blood was collected from a peripheral vein preoperatively into a sterile heparin-containing tube and sent to the laboratory for analysis. The isolation of PBMCs was performed by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation. The PBMC fraction was gently removed and resuspended in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium for two cycles of centrifugation and resuspension. The final suspension was adjusted to a concentration of 5x10 6 cells/ml. The PBMCs were centrifuged again and 130 µl of a cell lysate buffer (1% Triton X 100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 20 mg/mL deoxyribonuclease, 100 mmol/L protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St Louis, Missouri) in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, and 1 mmol/L ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid) was added to the pellets. The mixture was incubated for 30 min and the lysed PBMCs were centrifuged at 11000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and concentrations of HSPA1A and p62 were quantitated using commercial ELISA kits (HSPA1A ELISA kit from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, p62 ELISA kit from Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, New York). The lower limit of detection was 156 pg/ml for HSPA1A and 100 pg/ml for p62. Values were converted to ng/ml by comparison to a standard curve generated in parallel to each assay. Statistical analysis The Mann-Whitney U test was utilized as appropriate to compare continuous variables as the values were not normally distributed. The Pearson chi-square test or Fisher exact test was performed to assess for association between categorical variables. The software GRAPH PAD INSTAT Version 3.0 was utilized for all statistical analyses, with p-values < 0.05 considered as statistically significant. Results A total of 38 patients (82.6%) women were diagnosed with a breast malignancy, and 8 (17.4%) had a benign breast lesion. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1 . There were no differences in age, ethnicity/race, body mass index or reproductive history between the two groups. Table 2 summarizes the histopathologic characteristics of the 38 breast cancer patients. The majority were diagnosed with early stage (IA) ductal carcinoma with positive ER/PR. In 34 women (89.5%) their breast carcinoma was invasive while 4 women (10.5%) had carcinoma-in situ. Table 1 Characteristics of the study population Characteristic Benign (n = 8) Malignant (n = 38) P value Age, median (range) 49.5 (34,71) 54 (31,71) NS Race/Ethinicity – n (%) NS Non-Hispanic White 3 (37.5) 15 (39.5) Non-Hispanic Black 2 (25.0) 9 (18.8) Asian 1 (12.5) 4 (10.5) Hispanic 2 (25.0) 7 (18.4) Other 0 (0.0) 3 (7.9) Body mass index (BMI) – mean (SD) 30.2 (6.5) 30.9 (8.3) NS Gravidity, median (range) 3 (0,6) 3 (0,10) NS Parity, median (range) 2 (0,5) 2 (0,8) NS NS, not significant Table 2 Histopathologic characteristics of patients diagnosed with breast malignancy Characteristic No. women (n = 38) Histologic Subtype – n (%) Ductal 25 (65.8) Lobular 9 (23.7) Mixed (Ductal and Lobular) 4 (10.5) ER status – n (%) Positive 33 (86.8) Negative 5 (13.2) PR status – n (%) Positive 32 (84.2) Negative 6 (15.8) HER2 status – n (%) Positive 6 (15.8) Negative 29 (76.3) Unknown 3 (7.9) Histologic Grade – n (%) 1 7 (18.4) 2 16 (42.1) 3 14 (36.8) Sentinel Lymph Node – n (%) Positive 8 (21.1) Negative 28 (73.7) Not performed 2 (5.2) Prognostic stage – n (%) 0 (in situ) 4 (10.5) IA 20 (52.6) IB 0 (0.0) IIA 6 (15.8) IIB 7 (18.4) IIIA 0 (0.0) IIIB 0 (0.0) IIIC 1 (2.6) IV 0 (0.0) ER; Estrogen Receptor, PR; Progesterone Receptor, HER2; Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 The mean intracellular PBMC HSPA1A and p62 levels in all subjects is shown in Table 3 . The median HSPA1A concentration was 79.3 ng/ml in women with breast cancer versus 44.2 ng/ml in the benign group (p = 0.04). Conversely, the mean intracellular p62 level was 0.6 ng/ml in women with breast cancer and 2.3 ng/ml in the controls (p < 0.001). Table 3 Comparison of intracellular HSPA1A and p62 in PBMCs from women with malignant or benign breast disease Breast malignancy (n = 38) Benign breast disease (n = 8) P value Intracellular HSPA1A, (ng/ml) 79.3 ± 7.4 44.2 ± 8.6 0.04 Intracellular p62, (ng/ml) 0.6 ± 0.1 2.3 ± 0.5 < 0.01 Data are presented as mean ± SEM. A subgroup analysis in the women with breast cancer revealed that the mean PBMC p62 level in those with invasive carcinoma (0.30 ng/ml) was significantly lower compared to those with in-situ carcinoma (1.10 ng/ml) (p = 0.01). There was no difference in the levels of intracellular HSPA1A between these two groups. A sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 36 (94.7%) of the cancer patients and 8 (22.2%) were found to be positive. Women with a positive sentinel lymph node had a significantly lower intracellular p62 level in their PBMCs (0.04 ng/ml) as compared to those with negative lymph nodes (1.4 ng/ml) (p = 0.008). There were no differences in the concentrations of intracellular HSPA1A or p62 between women with different histological types or stages of breast cancer. Discussion The results of the present study demonstrate that HSPA1A is elevated and the p62 level is decreased in PBMCs from women with breast cancer as compared to their levels in PBMCs from women with benign breast lesions. We also found that the p62 level was decreased in PBMCs from patients with invasive carcinoma as compared to those with in situ carcinoma. This paralleled our observation that p62 was lower in PBMCs from breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy as compared to those with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. The influence of HSPA1A levels on autophagy has been investigated previously. Doklandy et al. [ 30 ] in an in vitro study clearly demonstrated that the extent of HSPA1A expression was inversely related to the level of autophagy in tumor cell lines. The mechanism involved activation of Akt kinase and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a kinase that blocks autophagy induction. The authors proposed that an inverse correlation might exist between HSPA1A and autophagy in tumor cells. Additionally, Kanninen et al. [ 31 ] in an in vitro study provided data suggesting that the intracellular HSPA1A concentration in PBMCs from pregnant women and autophagy induction were inversely proportional. Other studies in yeast cells demonstrated that the chaperone activity of HSPA1A might be the main mechanism to prevent accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum and, thus, limit autophagy [ 32 , 33 ]. The mechanism(s) responsible for decreased p62 levels and elevated HSPA1A production in PBMCs in women with a malignant mammary tumor remains to be determined. It is likely that tumor-related antigens as well as intracellular macromolecules released from lysed cells appear in the circulation following malignant transformation of mammary cells. Their presence would signal the need for immune system stimulation and an elevated level of autophagy and HSPA1A activation in PBMCs. A probable subsequent increased elevation of these and likely other compounds in the systemic circulation as tumorigenesis progresses is consistent with our observation of decreased p62 and increased HSPA1A in PBMCs as breast cancer became more invasive. Therefore, based on findings from our study, we hypothesize that elevated intracellular levels of HSPA1A and decreased p62 levels in PBMCs could be markers of breast cancer and for advanced disease. A strength of our study is its unique focus on PBMCs rather than on tumor cells, and specifically on alterations in intracellular levels of compounds associated with elevated immune activation. However, the findings must be interpreted in the context of several limitations. First, the sample size of the study population, especially the group with benign breast lesions, was very small and, therefore, subject to selection bias. The majority of women with benign lesions do not typically undergo surgery which limited our ability to recruit more subjects in this category. In addition, our study was not designed to detect differences in HSPA1A and p62 levels based on histology and stage of breast cancer. Therefore, our study was under- powered to evaluate these differences and the findings must be regarded as preliminary and hypothesis-generating. Further studies are warranted to compare the preoperative and postoperative levels of these markers, since HSPA1A and p62 levels may also fluctuate according to physical conditions and stresses other than breast malignancy. Lastly, utilization of p62 as the sole measure of autophagy is not definitive and optimally requires independent confirmation by measurement of other autophagy-associated biomarkers [ 31 , 34 ]. Conclusion Intracellular properties of PBMCs are altered in women with a malignant breast tumor. Detection of elevated levels of HSPA1A and decreased concentrations of p62 in PBMCs may have value as a diagnostic indicator of a breast malignancy or its recurrence. Additional investigations of the observations reported here might be of value in development of clinically useful tests for early detection of invasive breast cancer and/or its differentiation from benign breast masses. Declarations Author contributions TO, EA and SW designed the study, acquired the data and drafted the manuscript. SG, EZ, AA, AMB, GD, TAM, DL, CB, GT, GZ contributed to the interpretation of the data and substantially revised the manuscript. All authors have approved the submitted version and agree to be personally accountable for their own contributions. Sources of Funding The authors disclosed receipt of no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Disclosures All other authors have no relationships to disclose. References Gunasinghe, S. D., Peres, N. G., Goyette, J. & Gaus, K. Biomechanics of T Cell Dysfunctions in Chronic Diseases. Front Immunol. 12 , 600829 (2021). Katsuragi, Y., Ichimura, Y. & Komatsu, M. p62/SQSTM1 functions as a signaling hub and an autophagy adaptor. Febs j. 282 (24), 4672–4678 (2015). Bjørkøy, G., Lamark, T., Pankiv, S., Øvervatn, A. & Brech, A. Johansen, T. Monitoring autophagic degradation of p62/SQSTM1. Methods Enzymol. 452 , 181–197 (2009). Orfanelli, T., Jeong, J. M., Doulaveris, G., Holcomb, K. & Witkin, S. S. Involvement of autophagy in cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 135 (3), 519–528 (2014). Zhang, Y. & Calderwood, S. K. Autophagy, protein aggregation and hyperthermia: a mini-review. Int J Hyperthermia. 27 (5), 409–414 (2011). He, C. & Klionsky, D. J. Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy. Annu Rev Genet. 43 , 67–93 (2009). Cuervo, A. M. Autophagy: in sickness and in health. Trends Cell Biol. 14 (2), 70–77 (2004). Levine, B. & Klionsky, D. J. Development by self-digestion: molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. Dev Cell. 6 (4), 463–477 (2004). Mizushima, N., Ohsumi, Y. & Yoshimori, T. Autophagosome formation in mammalian cells. Cell Struct Funct. 27 (6), 421–429 (2002). Mizushima, N. Physiological functions of autophagy. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 335 , 71–84 (2009). Yorimitsu, T. & Klionsky, D. J. Autophagy: molecular machinery for self-eating. Cell Death Differ. 12 (Suppl 2), 1542–1552 (2005). Suppl 2 Ichimura, Y. & Komatsu, M. Pathophysiological role of autophagy: lesson from autophagy-deficient mouse models. Exp Anim. 60 (4), 329–345 (2011). Levine, B., Mizushima, N. & Virgin, H. W. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature. 469 (7330), 323–335 (2011). Xu, X. & Ren, J. Unmasking the janus faces of autophagy in obesity-associated insulin resistance and cardiac dysfunction. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 39 (2), 200–208 (2012). Christian, F., Krause, E., Houslay, M. D. & Baillie, G. S. PKA phosphorylation of p62/SQSTM1 regulates PB1 domain interaction partner binding. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1843 (11), 2765–2774 (2014). Moscat, J., Diaz-Meco, M. T. & Wooten, M. W. Signal integration and diversification through the p62 scaffold protein.. Trends Biochem Sci. 32 (2), 95–100 (2007). Seibenhener, M. L., Geetha, T. & Wooten, M. W. Sequestosome 1/p62–more than just a scaffold. FEBS Lett. 581 (2), 175–179 (2007). Mosser, D. D. & Martin, L. H. Induced thermotolerance to apoptosis in a human T lymphocyte cell line. J Cell Physiol. 151 (3), 561–570 (1992). Musch, M. W., Ciancio, M. J., Sarge, K. & Chang, E. B. Induction of heat shock protein 70 protects intestinal epithelial IEC-18 cells from oxidant and thermal injury.. Am J Physiol. 270 (2 Pt 1), C429–36 (2006). Murata, M., Gong, P., Suzuki, K. & Koizumi, S. Differential metal response and regulation of human heavy metal-inducible genes. J Cell Physiol. 180 (1), 105–113 (1999). Craig, E. A. The stress response: changes in eukaryotic gene expression in response to environmental stress. Science. 230 (4727), 800–801 (1985). Zagouri, F. et al. HSP90, HSPA8, HIF-1 alpha and HSP70-2 polymorphisms in breast cancer: a case-control study. Mol Biol Rep. 39 (12), 10873–10879 (2012). Ciocca, D. R. et al. Heat shock protein hsp70 in patients with axillary lymph node-negative breast cancer: prognostic implications. J Natl Cancer Inst. 85 (7), 570–574 (1993). Vargas-Roig, L. M. et al. Heat shock proteins and cell proliferation in human breast cancer biopsy samples. Cancer Detect Prev. 21 (5), 441–451 (1997). Gong, J. et al. Targeting the hsp70 gene delays mammary tumor initiation and inhibits tumor cell metastasis. Oncogene. 34 (43), 5460–5471 (1997). Han, Y. et al. Role of autophagy in breast cancer and breast cancer stem cells (Review). Int J Oncol. 52 (4), 1057–1070 (2018). Sun, R. et al. Nanoparticle-facilitated autophagy inhibition promotes the efficacy of chemotherapeutics against breast cancer stem cells. Biomaterials. 103 , 44–55 (2016). Ahn, C. H. et al. Expression of beclin-1, an autophagy-related protein, in gastric and colorectal cancers. APMIS. 115 , 1344–1349 (2007). Cocco, S. et al. Targeting autophagy in breast cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 21 (21), 7836 (2020). Dokladny, K. et al. Regulatory coordination between two major intracellular homeostatic systems: heat shock response and autophagy. J Biol Chem. 288 (21), 14959–14972 (2013). Kanninen, T. T., Sisti, G. & Witkin, S. S. Induction of the 70 kDa heat shock protein stress response inhibits autophagy: possible consequences for pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 29 (1), 159–162 (2016). Patil, C. & Walter, P. Intracellular signaling from the endoplasmic reticulum to the nucleus: the unfolded protein response in yeast and mammals. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 13 (3), 349–355 (2001). Yorimitsu, T., Nair, U., Yang, Z. & Klionsky, D. J. Endoplasmic reticulum stress triggers autophagy. J Biol Chem. 281 (40), 30299–30304 (2006). Orfanelli, T. et al. Inhibition of autophagy in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by vaginal fluid from women with a malignant adnexal mass. Int J Cancer. 137 (12), 2879–2884 (2015). Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revision 22 Jul, 2021 Reviews received at journal 21 Jun, 2021 Reviewers agreed at journal 08 Jun, 2021 Reviewers invited by journal 10 May, 2021 Editor assigned by journal 10 May, 2021 Editor invited by journal 29 Apr, 2021 Submission checks completed at journal 29 Apr, 2021 First submitted to journal 28 Apr, 2021 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-475229","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":24036335,"identity":"397e706d-50eb-4e57-b5b7-34ee5e9e2f2d","order_by":0,"name":"Theofano Orfanelli","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippocration General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Theofano","middleName":"","lastName":"Orfanelli","suffix":""},{"id":24036336,"identity":"3d2fefa2-631c-442d-9f5b-ca392e5bda20","order_by":1,"name":"Spyridon Giannopoulos","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"First Department of Surgery, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Spyridon","middleName":"","lastName":"Giannopoulos","suffix":""},{"id":24036337,"identity":"0cba4e08-ac38-4c68-9545-152f172cf075","order_by":2,"name":"Eleni Zografos","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Eleni","middleName":"","lastName":"Zografos","suffix":""},{"id":24036338,"identity":"2f63f518-f860-47cf-a476-5411ed217920","order_by":3,"name":"Aikaterini Athanasiou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Obstetrics \u0026 Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Aikaterini","middleName":"","lastName":"Athanasiou","suffix":""},{"id":24036339,"identity":"565557a5-e8c2-4776-98db-3c39aa202420","order_by":4,"name":"Ann Marie Bongiovanni","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Obstetrics \u0026 Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ann","middleName":"Marie","lastName":"Bongiovanni","suffix":""},{"id":24036340,"identity":"d06f714f-e3ac-41ee-860a-7728127487f0","order_by":5,"name":"Georgios Doulaveris","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Obstetrics \u0026 Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Georgios","middleName":"","lastName":"Doulaveris","suffix":""},{"id":24036341,"identity":"4574711e-4b0c-4e76-8fd0-8330933b93f3","order_by":6,"name":"Tracy-Ann Moo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tracy-Ann","middleName":"","lastName":"Moo","suffix":""},{"id":24036342,"identity":"428fa68e-846e-4aec-8ee5-500d8d6759c3","order_by":7,"name":"Dayle LaPolla","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dayle","middleName":"","lastName":"LaPolla","suffix":""},{"id":24036343,"identity":"d86201e5-c286-4836-a9e7-43474f0d1f9d","order_by":8,"name":"Chris Bakoyiannis","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"First Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Laikon General Hospital, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chris","middleName":"","lastName":"Bakoyiannis","suffix":""},{"id":24036344,"identity":"8687d893-0220-41bd-b089-443141bef47c","order_by":9,"name":"Georgios Theodoropoulos","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippocration General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Georgios","middleName":"","lastName":"Theodoropoulos","suffix":""},{"id":24036345,"identity":"a80b8061-839b-473b-9ef8-483667d05453","order_by":10,"name":"Georgios Zografos","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippocration General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Georgios","middleName":"","lastName":"Zografos","suffix":""},{"id":24036346,"identity":"91381071-7e64-40b1-a844-3639dc9a75c8","order_by":11,"name":"Eleni Andreopoulou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Eleni","middleName":"","lastName":"Andreopoulou","suffix":""},{"id":24036347,"identity":"84123e0f-2c25-4c87-ba17-08455b0c368a","order_by":12,"name":"Steven Witkin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Obstetrics \u0026 Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Steven","middleName":"","lastName":"Witkin","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2021-04-29 02:59:04","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-475229/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-475229/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":13690106,"identity":"fea46f66-c384-43d0-98bf-7db02f9f3087","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-09-17 12:32:29","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":383304,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-475229/v1/41874c30-6a51-49a1-8d41-23e38cd6f66c.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eInducible 70kDa Heat Shock Protein and Autophagy-related Protein P62 Levels in Women With Breast Cancer: an Exploratory Investigation\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":" \u003cp\u003eThe malignant transformation of cells anywhere in the body is almost always accompanied by changes in systemic immunity. Alterations in antigen expression and perturbations in the local environment are detected by the immune system and result in changes in the properties of immune cells [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. The ability to identify immune cell alterations that predict malignancy will be of value in the initial screening of individuals with a suspected malignancy.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAutophagy is an intracellular mechanism present in almost all organisms to maintains cell functions and optimizes survival. Aggregated or non-functional proteins and organelles become bound to a cytoplasmic protein, sequestosome-1 (p62) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e] and the complex is sequestered in a double-membraned structure called an autophagosome [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. The autophagosome merges with a lysosome and the engulfed components along with p62 are degraded by lysosomal enzymes. The amino acid, nucleoside, carbohydrate and lipid components are returned to the cytoplasm for reutilization [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR7 CR8 CR9 CR10\" citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. The variation in p62 concentration in the cytoplasm has been used as a biomarker for the extent of autophagy induction [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR13\" citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. However, p62 is also involved in other cellular processes such as apoptosis and inflammatory reactions [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR16\" citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, these other properties must be kept in mind when utilizing measurement of p62 to monitor autophagy activity in different systems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn additional mechanism that promotes cell survival under different conditions is induction of the inducible 70kDa heat shock protein, HSPA1A. When a cell encounters non-physiological conditions, HSPA1A synthesis is greatly up-regulated. The HSPA1A binds to nascent peptides and promotes the formation of functional proteins. It also prevents protein denaturation [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR19\" citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e]. The HSPA1A is also released from the stressed cell and functions in the extracellular milieu to activate pro-inflammatory immunity to combat the perceived stress [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. Numerous studies have reported on elevations in circulating HSPA1A in association with malignant transformation, including breast cancer [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR23 CR24\" citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile multiple studies have evaluated changes in autophagy and HSPA1A expression in mammary cells that are associated with malignancy [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR27 CR28\" citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e], concomitant potential alterations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) have not been evaluated. In this exploratory study we compared the level of p62 and HSPA1A in PBMCs from women with malignant and benign breast lesions. We hypothesized that HSPA1A would be increased, and p62 decreased. in association with malignant transformation and might serve as potential biomarkers for breast cancer.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Material And Methods","content":" \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePatient enrollment\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWomen with a breast mass referred to the Section of Breast Surgery at Weill Cornell Medical College who underwent diagnostic breast surgery from 2015 to 2017 and consented to have their PBMCs obtained and evaluated, were enrolled in the study. All patients had preoperative confirmation of a breast mass by sonography, mammogram or magnetic resonance imaging followed by a fine needle aspiration biopsy or a core biopsy. Women with a cancer diagnosis underwent surgery for surgical staging. Women with a benign breast biopsy underwent surgery either for definitive tissue diagnosis, especially for large lesions, or for management of symptoms. All women with a previous history of any type of malignancy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with an active infection or a history of a chronic inflammatory disease were excluded. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Weill Cornell Medical College and was conducted according to Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects provided written informed consent at their initial preoperative evaluation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe following baseline clinicopathologic characteristics were collected from each subject: age, histology, histology subtypes, Estrogen Receptor (ER) status, Progesterone (PR) status, Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) status, grade, sentinel lymph node status, and stage. In all cases, the diagnosis of breast cancer was made by a clinical pathologist based on histological tissue analysis from surgical excision of the breast mass. The personnel of the laboratory were blinded to all clinical and histological data until the completion of all experimental assays.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePBMC isolation and intracellular hsp70 and p62 quantification\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBlood was collected from a peripheral vein preoperatively into a sterile heparin-containing tube and sent to the laboratory for analysis. The isolation of PBMCs was performed by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation. The PBMC fraction was gently removed and resuspended in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium for two cycles of centrifugation and resuspension. The final suspension was adjusted to a concentration of 5x10\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003e cells/ml. The PBMCs were centrifuged again and 130 \u0026micro;l of a cell lysate buffer (1% Triton X 100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 20 mg/mL deoxyribonuclease, 100 mmol/L protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St Louis, Missouri) in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, and 1 mmol/L ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid) was added to the pellets. The mixture was incubated for 30 min and the lysed PBMCs were centrifuged at 11000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and concentrations of HSPA1A and p62 were quantitated using commercial ELISA kits (HSPA1A ELISA kit from R\u0026amp;D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, p62 ELISA kit from Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, New York). The lower limit of detection was 156 pg/ml for HSPA1A and 100 pg/ml for p62. Values were converted to ng/ml by comparison to a standard curve generated in parallel to each assay.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Mann-Whitney U test was utilized as appropriate to compare continuous variables as the values were not normally distributed. The Pearson chi-square test or Fisher exact test was performed to assess for association between categorical variables. The software GRAPH PAD INSTAT Version 3.0 was utilized for all statistical analyses, with p-values\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 considered as statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e "},{"header":"Results","content":" \u003cp\u003eA total of 38 patients (82.6%) women were diagnosed with a breast malignancy, and 8 (17.4%) had a benign breast lesion. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e. There were no differences in age, ethnicity/race, body mass index or reproductive history between the two groups. Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e summarizes the histopathologic characteristics of the 38 breast cancer patients. The majority were diagnosed with early stage (IA) ductal carcinoma with positive ER/PR. In 34 women (89.5%) their breast carcinoma was invasive while 4 women (10.5%) had carcinoma-in situ.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCharacteristics of the study population\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCharacteristic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBenign\u0026nbsp;(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMalignant\u0026nbsp;(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eP value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAge, median (range)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e49.5 (34,71)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e54 (31,71)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRace/Ethinicity \u0026ndash; n (%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNon-Hispanic White\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (37.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15 (39.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNon-Hispanic Black\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (25.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9 (18.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAsian\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1 (12.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4 (10.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHispanic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (25.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7 (18.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0 (0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (7.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBody mass index (BMI) \u0026ndash; mean (SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30.2 (6.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30.9 (8.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGravidity, median (range)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (0,6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (0,10)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eParity, median (range)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (0,5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (0,8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003eNS, not significant\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHistopathologic characteristics of patients diagnosed with breast malignancy\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCharacteristic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo. women (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eHistologic Subtype \u0026ndash; n (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuctal\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25 (65.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLobular\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9 (23.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMixed (Ductal and Lobular)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4 (10.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eER status \u0026ndash; n (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePositive\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e33 (86.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNegative\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5 (13.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePR status \u0026ndash; n (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePositive\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32 (84.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNegative\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6 (15.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eHER2 status \u0026ndash; n (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePositive\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6 (15.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNegative\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e29 (76.3)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnknown\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3 (7.9)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eHistologic Grade \u0026ndash; n (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7 (18.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16 (42.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14 (36.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSentinel Lymph Node \u0026ndash; n (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePositive\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8 (21.1)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNegative\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28 (73.7)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNot performed\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2 (5.2)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePrognostic stage \u0026ndash; n (%)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0 (in situ)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4 (10.5)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20 (52.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIB\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0 (0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIIA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6 (15.8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIIB\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7 (18.4)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIIIA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0 (0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIIIB\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0 (0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIIIC\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1 (2.6)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIV\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0 (0.0)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"2\"\u003eER; Estrogen Receptor, PR; Progesterone Receptor, HER2; Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe mean intracellular PBMC HSPA1A and p62 levels in all subjects is shown in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e. The median HSPA1A concentration was 79.3 ng/ml in women with breast cancer versus 44.2 ng/ml in the benign group (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.04). Conversely, the mean intracellular p62 level was 0.6 ng/ml in women with breast cancer and 2.3 ng/ml in the controls (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparison of intracellular HSPA1A and p62 in PBMCs from women with malignant or benign breast disease\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBreast malignancy (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;38)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBenign breast disease (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eP value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eIntracellular HSPA1A, (ng/ml)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e79.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e44.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.04\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eIntracellular p62, (ng/ml)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003eData are presented as mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SEM.\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA subgroup analysis in the women with breast cancer revealed that the mean PBMC p62 level in those with invasive carcinoma (0.30 ng/ml) was significantly lower compared to those with in-situ carcinoma (1.10 ng/ml) (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.01). There was no difference in the levels of intracellular HSPA1A between these two groups. A sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 36 (94.7%) of the cancer patients and 8 (22.2%) were found to be positive. Women with a positive sentinel lymph node had a significantly lower intracellular p62 level in their PBMCs (0.04 ng/ml) as compared to those with negative lymph nodes (1.4 ng/ml) (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.008). There were no differences in the concentrations of intracellular HSPA1A or p62 between women with different histological types or stages of breast cancer.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Discussion","content":" \u003cp\u003eThe results of the present study demonstrate that HSPA1A is elevated and the p62 level is decreased in PBMCs from women with breast cancer as compared to their levels in PBMCs from women with benign breast lesions. We also found that the p62 level was decreased in PBMCs from patients with invasive carcinoma as compared to those with \u003cem\u003ein situ\u003c/em\u003e carcinoma. This paralleled our observation that p62 was lower in PBMCs from breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy as compared to those with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe influence of HSPA1A levels on autophagy has been investigated previously. Doklandy et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e] in an \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e study clearly demonstrated that the extent of HSPA1A expression was inversely related to the level of autophagy in tumor cell lines. The mechanism involved activation of Akt kinase and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a kinase that blocks autophagy induction. The authors proposed that an inverse correlation might exist between HSPA1A and autophagy in tumor cells. Additionally, Kanninen et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e] in an \u003cem\u003ein vitro\u003c/em\u003e study provided data suggesting that the intracellular HSPA1A concentration in PBMCs from pregnant women and autophagy induction were inversely proportional. Other studies in yeast cells demonstrated that the chaperone activity of HSPA1A might be the main mechanism to prevent accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum and, thus, limit autophagy [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe mechanism(s) responsible for decreased p62 levels and elevated HSPA1A production in PBMCs in women with a malignant mammary tumor remains to be determined. It is likely that tumor-related antigens as well as intracellular macromolecules released from lysed cells appear in the circulation following malignant transformation of mammary cells. Their presence would signal the need for immune system stimulation and an elevated level of autophagy and HSPA1A activation in PBMCs. A probable subsequent increased elevation of these and likely other compounds in the systemic circulation as tumorigenesis progresses is consistent with our observation of decreased p62 and increased HSPA1A in PBMCs as breast cancer became more invasive. Therefore, based on findings from our study, we hypothesize that elevated intracellular levels of HSPA1A and decreased p62 levels in PBMCs could be markers of breast cancer and for advanced disease.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA strength of our study is its unique focus on PBMCs rather than on tumor cells, and specifically on alterations in intracellular levels of compounds associated with elevated immune activation. However, the findings must be interpreted in the context of several limitations. First, the sample size of the study population, especially the group with benign breast lesions, was very small and, therefore, subject to selection bias. The majority of women with benign lesions do not typically undergo surgery which limited our ability to recruit more subjects in this category. In addition, our study was not designed to detect differences in HSPA1A and p62 levels based on histology and stage of breast cancer. Therefore, our study was under- powered to evaluate these differences and the findings must be regarded as preliminary and hypothesis-generating. Further studies are warranted to compare the preoperative and postoperative levels of these markers, since HSPA1A and p62 levels may also fluctuate according to physical conditions and stresses other than breast malignancy. Lastly, utilization of p62 as the sole measure of autophagy is not definitive and optimally requires independent confirmation by measurement of other autophagy-associated biomarkers [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Conclusion","content":" \u003cp\u003eIntracellular properties of PBMCs are altered in women with a malignant breast tumor. Detection of elevated levels of HSPA1A and decreased concentrations of p62 in PBMCs may have value as a diagnostic indicator of a breast malignancy or its recurrence. Additional investigations of the observations reported here might be of value in development of clinically useful tests for early detection of invasive breast cancer and/or its differentiation from benign breast masses.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTO, EA and SW designed the study, acquired the data and drafted the manuscript. SG, EZ, AA, AMB, GD, TAM, DL, CB, GT, GZ contributed to the interpretation of the data and substantially revised the manuscript. All authors have approved the submitted version and agree to be personally accountable for their own contributions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSources of Funding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors disclosed receipt of no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDisclosures\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll other authors have no relationships to disclose.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGunasinghe, S. D., Peres, N. G., Goyette, J. \u0026amp; Gaus, K. Biomechanics of T Cell Dysfunctions in Chronic Diseases. \u003cem\u003eFront Immunol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e12\u003c/b\u003e, 600829 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKatsuragi, Y., Ichimura, Y. \u0026amp; Komatsu, M. p62/SQSTM1 functions as a signaling hub and an autophagy adaptor. \u003cem\u003eFebs j.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e282\u003c/b\u003e (24), 4672\u0026ndash;4678 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBj\u0026oslash;rk\u0026oslash;y, G., Lamark, T., Pankiv, S., \u0026Oslash;vervatn, A. \u0026amp; Brech, A. Johansen, T. Monitoring autophagic degradation of p62/SQSTM1. \u003cem\u003eMethods Enzymol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e452\u003c/b\u003e, 181\u0026ndash;197 (2009).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOrfanelli, T., Jeong, J. M., Doulaveris, G., Holcomb, K. \u0026amp; Witkin, S. S. Involvement of autophagy in cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer. \u003cem\u003eInt J Cancer.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e135\u003c/b\u003e (3), 519\u0026ndash;528 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang, Y. \u0026amp; Calderwood, S. K. Autophagy, protein aggregation and hyperthermia: a mini-review. \u003cem\u003eInt J Hyperthermia.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e27\u003c/b\u003e (5), 409\u0026ndash;414 (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHe, C. \u0026amp; Klionsky, D. J. Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy. \u003cem\u003eAnnu Rev Genet.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e43\u003c/b\u003e, 67\u0026ndash;93 (2009).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCuervo, A. M. Autophagy: in sickness and in health. \u003cem\u003eTrends Cell Biol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e14\u003c/b\u003e (2), 70\u0026ndash;77 (2004).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLevine, B. \u0026amp; Klionsky, D. J. Development by self-digestion: molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. \u003cem\u003eDev Cell.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e6\u003c/b\u003e (4), 463\u0026ndash;477 (2004).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMizushima, N., Ohsumi, Y. \u0026amp; Yoshimori, T. Autophagosome formation in mammalian cells. \u003cem\u003eCell Struct Funct.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e27\u003c/b\u003e (6), 421\u0026ndash;429 (2002).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMizushima, N. Physiological functions of autophagy. \u003cem\u003eCurr Top Microbiol Immunol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e335\u003c/b\u003e, 71\u0026ndash;84 (2009).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYorimitsu, T. \u0026amp; Klionsky, D. J. Autophagy: molecular machinery for self-eating. \u003cem\u003eCell Death Differ.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e12\u003c/b\u003e (Suppl 2), 1542\u0026ndash;1552 (2005). \u003cb\u003eSuppl 2\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIchimura, Y. \u0026amp; Komatsu, M. Pathophysiological role of autophagy: lesson from autophagy-deficient mouse models. \u003cem\u003eExp Anim.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e60\u003c/b\u003e (4), 329\u0026ndash;345 (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLevine, B., Mizushima, N. \u0026amp; Virgin, H. W. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. \u003cem\u003eNature.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e469\u003c/b\u003e (7330), 323\u0026ndash;335 (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXu, X. \u0026amp; Ren, J. Unmasking the janus faces of autophagy in obesity-associated insulin resistance and cardiac dysfunction. \u003cem\u003eClin Exp Pharmacol Physiol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e39\u003c/b\u003e (2), 200\u0026ndash;208 (2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChristian, F., Krause, E., Houslay, M. D. \u0026amp; Baillie, G. S. PKA phosphorylation of p62/SQSTM1 regulates PB1 domain interaction partner binding. \u003cem\u003eBiochim Biophys Acta.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e1843\u003c/b\u003e (11), 2765\u0026ndash;2774 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoscat, J., Diaz-Meco, M. T. \u0026amp; Wooten, M. W. Signal integration and diversification through the p62 scaffold protein.. \u003cem\u003eTrends Biochem Sci.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e32\u003c/b\u003e (2), 95\u0026ndash;100 (2007).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSeibenhener, M. L., Geetha, T. \u0026amp; Wooten, M. W. Sequestosome 1/p62\u0026ndash;more than just a scaffold. \u003cem\u003eFEBS Lett.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e581\u003c/b\u003e (2), 175\u0026ndash;179 (2007).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMosser, D. D. \u0026amp; Martin, L. H. Induced thermotolerance to apoptosis in a human T lymphocyte cell line. \u003cem\u003eJ Cell Physiol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e151\u003c/b\u003e (3), 561\u0026ndash;570 (1992).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMusch, M. W., Ciancio, M. J., Sarge, K. \u0026amp; Chang, E. B. Induction of heat shock protein 70 protects intestinal epithelial IEC-18 cells from oxidant and thermal injury.. \u003cem\u003eAm J Physiol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e270\u003c/b\u003e (2 Pt 1), C429\u0026ndash;36 (2006).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMurata, M., Gong, P., Suzuki, K. \u0026amp; Koizumi, S. Differential metal response and regulation of human heavy metal-inducible genes. \u003cem\u003eJ Cell Physiol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e180\u003c/b\u003e (1), 105\u0026ndash;113 (1999).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCraig, E. A. The stress response: changes in eukaryotic gene expression in response to environmental stress. \u003cem\u003eScience.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e230\u003c/b\u003e (4727), 800\u0026ndash;801 (1985).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZagouri, F. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e HSP90, HSPA8, HIF-1 alpha and HSP70-2 polymorphisms in breast cancer: a case-control study. \u003cem\u003eMol Biol Rep.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e39\u003c/b\u003e (12), 10873\u0026ndash;10879 (2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCiocca, D. R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Heat shock protein hsp70 in patients with axillary lymph node-negative breast cancer: prognostic implications. \u003cem\u003eJ Natl Cancer Inst.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e85\u003c/b\u003e (7), 570\u0026ndash;574 (1993).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVargas-Roig, L. M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Heat shock proteins and cell proliferation in human breast cancer biopsy samples. \u003cem\u003eCancer Detect Prev.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e21\u003c/b\u003e (5), 441\u0026ndash;451 (1997).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGong, J. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Targeting the hsp70 gene delays mammary tumor initiation and inhibits tumor cell metastasis. \u003cem\u003eOncogene.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e34\u003c/b\u003e (43), 5460\u0026ndash;5471 (1997).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHan, Y. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Role of autophagy in breast cancer and breast cancer stem cells (Review). \u003cem\u003eInt J Oncol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e52\u003c/b\u003e (4), 1057\u0026ndash;1070 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSun, R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Nanoparticle-facilitated autophagy inhibition promotes the efficacy of chemotherapeutics against breast cancer stem cells. \u003cem\u003eBiomaterials.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e103\u003c/b\u003e, 44\u0026ndash;55 (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAhn, C. H. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Expression of beclin-1, an autophagy-related protein, in gastric and colorectal cancers. \u003cem\u003eAPMIS.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e115\u003c/b\u003e, 1344\u0026ndash;1349 (2007).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCocco, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Targeting autophagy in breast cancer. \u003cem\u003eInt J Mol Sci.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e21\u003c/b\u003e (21), 7836 (2020).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDokladny, K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Regulatory coordination between two major intracellular homeostatic systems: heat shock response and autophagy. \u003cem\u003eJ Biol Chem.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e288\u003c/b\u003e (21), 14959\u0026ndash;14972 (2013).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKanninen, T. T., Sisti, G. \u0026amp; Witkin, S. S. Induction of the 70 kDa heat shock protein stress response inhibits autophagy: possible consequences for pregnancy outcome. \u003cem\u003eJ Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e29\u003c/b\u003e (1), 159\u0026ndash;162 (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePatil, C. \u0026amp; Walter, P. Intracellular signaling from the endoplasmic reticulum to the nucleus: the unfolded protein response in yeast and mammals. \u003cem\u003eCurr Opin Cell Biol.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e13\u003c/b\u003e (3), 349\u0026ndash;355 (2001).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYorimitsu, T., Nair, U., Yang, Z. \u0026amp; Klionsky, D. J. Endoplasmic reticulum stress triggers autophagy. \u003cem\u003eJ Biol Chem.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e281\u003c/b\u003e (40), 30299\u0026ndash;30304 (2006).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOrfanelli, T. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Inhibition of autophagy in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by vaginal fluid from women with a malignant adnexal mass. \u003cem\u003eInt J Cancer.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cb\u003e137\u003c/b\u003e (12), 2879\u0026ndash;2884 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"cancer, breast malignancy, Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), intracellular process","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-475229/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-475229/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cu\u003eBackground:\u003c/u\u003e \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePeripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) respond to altered physiological conditions to alleviate the threat. The inducible 70kDa heat shock protein (HSPA1A) protects proteins from degradation. Autophagy is an intracellular process that removes damaged proteins and recycles their components to the cytoplasm. Sequestosome-1 (p62) is a protein consumed during autophagy.\u0026nbsp;We hypothesized that the PBMC response to a malignant breast mass involves elevated production of HSPA1A and a decrease in intracellular p62.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cu\u003eMethods:\u003c/u\u003e \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn this study 46 women had their breast mass excised. PBMCs were isolated and intracellular levels of HSPA1A and p62 were quantitated by ELISA. Differences between women with a benign or malignant breast mass were determined. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cu\u003eResults:\u003c/u\u003e \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA breast malignancy was diagnosed in 38 women (82.6%) while 8 had a benign lesion. Mean intracellular HSPA1A levels were 79.3 ng/ml in PBMCs from women with a malignant lesion and 44.2 ng/ml in controls (p=0.04). The mean PBMC p62 level was 2.3 ng/ml in women with a benign breast lesion as opposed to 0.6 ng/ml in those with breast cancer (p\u0026lt;0.001). Mean p62 levels were also lower in women with invasive carcinoma and a positive lymph node biopsy when compared to those with in-situ carcinoma or absence of lymphadenopathy, respectively. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cu\u003eConclusion:\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntracellular HSPA1A and p62 levels in PBMCs differ between women with a malignant or benign breast lesion. These measurements may be of value in the preoperative triage of women with a breast mass.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Inducible 70kDa Heat Shock Protein and Autophagy-related Protein P62 Levels in Women With Breast Cancer: an Exploratory Investigation","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2021-04-30 20:42:52","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-475229/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revision","date":"2021-07-22T12:22:50+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2021-06-21T05:50:48+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"dff3f0be-6e11-4e74-b7e8-a233682d3dfd","date":"2021-06-08T19:12:27+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2021-05-10T16:43:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2021-05-10T16:40:22+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2021-04-29T15:00:07+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2021-04-29T08:24:07+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2021-04-29T02:54:21+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"5d7c65f7-0fad-478c-ac1d-99e36e7087d2","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 30th, 2021","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":4018760,"name":"Cancer Biology"},{"id":4018761,"name":"Immunology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-11-02T04:59:06+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2021-04-30 20:42:52","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-475229","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-475229","identity":"rs-475229","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"_2-kVJe1T_tPrBINL-cwx","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0