A review of the role of sexual selection in mammals

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Sexual selection theory states that males compete for mate monopolization and larger males can sire more offspring than smaller males, thereby resulting in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Female grouping facilitates mate monopolization and increases intensity of sexual selection. Sexual selection should be particularly intense in mammals because females have the most parental investment due to gestation and lactation, making them a limiting resource for which males compete. Nevertheless, I found evidence suggesting a minor role of sexual selection in mammals. I found low values of the standardised variances in male reproductive success, Im, and Nonacs’s B indices. Phylogenetic confirmatory path analyses indicated that sexual dimorphism evolved after the evolution of large body size, regardless of the evolution of polygyny and breeding groups. Results are explained by a ‘gender neutral’ model, in which all individuals in a population are initially subjected to the same pressures of natural selection.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00