Linking Plant Community Characteristics and Soil Properties under Grazing Disturbance in a Desert Steppe Ecosystem

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

This preprint studied how plant community characteristics and soil physicochemical properties vary across a grazing intensity gradient in a desert steppe (CK no grazing, LG light, MG moderate, HG heavy, EG extreme), using plant biomass, quantitative traits, species diversity, and functional group classification alongside soil nutrient analyses. The results showed that aboveground biomass and forbs/grass structural traits were markedly reduced under the strongest grazing, while species diversity indices (Sobs, Shannon–Wiener, Pielou) reached minima under HG and dominance peaked there; available nitrogen and phosphorus declined with increasing grazing intensity, with larger reductions at HG. Pearson correlations and structural equation modeling indicated that plant α-diversity and structural characteristics were positively related to available N and P, and that grazing affected plant communities both directly and indirectly via nutrient reductions (P < 0.05). The caveat explicitly stated is that the work is a preprint and not peer reviewed, and the presented data are preliminary. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Grazing is a key driver of structural and functional changes in desert steppe ecosystems. However, the responses of plant communities and their functional groups to soil properties under different grazing intensities remain insufficiently understood. This study examined variations in plant community characteristics, including biomass, quantitative traits, and species diversity, under a gradient of grazing intensities (CK: no grazing; LG: light grazing; MG: moderate grazing; HG: heavy grazing; EG: extreme grazing). Species were classified into functional groups, and their corresponding soil physicochemical properties were analyzed. The results showed that aboveground biomass in CK and LG treatments was 85.59% and 70.91% higher, respectively, than in the EG treatment. The height and coverage of annual and biennial forbs and perennial grasses were highest in CK and lowest in EG, with large reductions of 92.24% and 70.67% in height and 99.10% and 70.78% in coverage, respectively. Species diversity indices (Sobs, Shannon–Wiener, and Pielou) reached their minimum values under HG, decreasing by 14.10%, 28.90%, and 35.36%, respectively. In contrast, Simpson's dominance index peaked in this treatment (P < 0.05). Soil analysis revealed that available nitrogen (AN) and available phosphorus (AP) declined with increasing grazing intensity, with reductions of 25.58% and 44.94%, respectively, in the HG treatment compared with CK. Pearson correlation analysis indicated significant positive relationships between AN, AP, and plant α-diversity, biomass, and structural characteristics (P < 0.05). Structural equation modeling further showed that grazing not only directly affected plant communities but also influenced them indirectly through reductions in soil available nutrients (AN and AP) (P < 0.05). In conclusion, regulating grazing intensity to maintain soil nutrient availability is essential for sustaining the stability and functioning of desert steppe ecosystems.
Full text 7,356 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Linking Plant Community Characteristics and Soil Properties under Grazing Disturbance in a Desert Steppe Ecosystem | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL Ecology and Evolution This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 12 May 2026 V1 Latest version Share on Linking Plant Community Characteristics and Soil Properties under Grazing Disturbance in a Desert Steppe Ecosystem Authors : xiao guan 0009-0006-1914-4276 [email protected] , Yanling Wu [email protected] , Rui Dong 0009-0002-0954-930X [email protected] [email protected] , and Wentao Wang [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/authorea.15003159/v1 9 views 5 downloads Contents Abstract Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Grazing is a key driver of structural and functional changes in desert steppe ecosystems. However, the responses of plant communities and their functional groups to soil properties under different grazing intensities remain insufficiently understood. This study examined variations in plant community characteristics, including biomass, quantitative traits, and species diversity, under a gradient of grazing intensities (CK: no grazing; LG: light grazing; MG: moderate grazing; HG: heavy grazing; EG: extreme grazing). Species were classified into functional groups, and their corresponding soil physicochemical properties were analyzed. The results showed that aboveground biomass in CK and LG treatments was 85.59% and 70.91% higher, respectively, than in the EG treatment. The height and coverage of annual and biennial forbs and perennial grasses were highest in CK and lowest in EG, with large reductions of 92.24% and 70.67% in height and 99.10% and 70.78% in coverage, respectively. Species diversity indices (Sobs, Shannon–Wiener, and Pielou) reached their minimum values under HG, decreasing by 14.10%, 28.90%, and 35.36%, respectively. In contrast, Simpson's dominance index peaked in this treatment (P < 0.05). Soil analysis revealed that available nitrogen (AN) and available phosphorus (AP) declined with increasing grazing intensity, with reductions of 25.58% and 44.94%, respectively, in the HG treatment compared with CK. Pearson correlation analysis indicated significant positive relationships between AN, AP, and plant α-diversity, biomass, and structural characteristics (P < 0.05). Structural equation modeling further showed that grazing not only directly affected plant communities but also influenced them indirectly through reductions in soil available nutrients (AN and AP) (P < 0.05). In conclusion, regulating grazing intensity to maintain soil nutrient availability is essential for sustaining the stability and functioning of desert steppe ecosystems. Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 12 May 2026 Collection Ecology and Evolution Authors Affiliations xiao guan 0009-0006-1914-4276 [email protected] Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China, 010022 View all articles by this author Yanling Wu [email protected] Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China, 010022 View all articles by this author Rui Dong 0009-0002-0954-930X [email protected] [email protected] Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China, 010022 View all articles by this author Wentao Wang [email protected] Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China, 010022 View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 9 views 5 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation xiao guan, Yanling Wu, Rui Dong, et al. Linking Plant Community Characteristics and Soil Properties under Grazing Disturbance in a Desert Steppe Ecosystem. Authorea . 12 May 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/authorea.15003159/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/authorea.15003159/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fe4cc87dee3df88',t:'MTc3OTIxMTUwNQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00