Can we use a biomarker detection algorithm to measure the effectiveness of 14-channel neurofeedback in dyslexia?

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

The most common neurological diversity that children experience is dyslexia and it manifests itself in reduced reading ability. There is a genetic predisposition for dyslexia, and more recent theories explain it as a disruption in left hemispheric lateralization that reduces effective reading and writing. Software for smartphones called Auto Train Brain helps children with dyslexia to improve their reading comprehension and reading speed. Measuring the efficacy of the mobile app training was done manually with psychometric tests beforehand and we use a biomarker detection software to measure the efficacy of the neurofeedback. Machine learning (ML) techniques have recently been used to classify children with dyslexia and typically developing children (TDC). The data consists of 100 sessions of 2-minute resting-state eyes-open 14-channel Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) data from 100 children with dyslexia and of 100 TDC. We used the dyslexia biomarker detection software to assess the efficacy of 14-channel neurofeedback that was applied with Auto Train Brain. The results have shown that 48% of the sessions of children with dyslexia were classified as electrophysiologically normal, and 61% of the children with dyslexia were classified as electrophysiologically normal for at least 1 session after the 20th session of neurofeedback.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0