Role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Unexplained Chronic Abdominal Pain

In: Journal of Armed Forces Medical College, Bangladesh · 2015 · vol. 10(2) , pp. 9–14 · doi:10.3329/jafmc.v10i2.25897 · W2281201102
article OA: bronze CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

Diagnostic laparoscopy identified causes of unexplained chronic abdominal pain in 83.5% of patients, enabling therapeutic procedures and achieving symptom relief in 75%.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This prospective cross-sectional observational study assessed the usefulness of diagnostic laparoscopy for diagnosing and potentially treating unexplained chronic abdominal pain in patients evaluated at a surgical department over two years. Among 30 patients, laparoscopy established a diagnosis in 83.5%, with postoperative bands and adhesions (28%), recurrent appendicitis (24%), endometriosis (16%), and abdominal tuberculosis (16%) reported as common etiologies; 59.4% also received therapeutic procedures and biopsies were taken in 23.1%, with postoperative management based on histopathology, followed for two years. The authors reported that about 75% of patients became symptom free after therapy, 15% had minimal short-term symptoms for six months, and persistent pain persisted in about 10%, and they stated laparoscopy was safe as a diagnostic modality. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reports endometriosis (16%) as one of the most frequently found causes of unexplained chronic abdominal pain discovered during diagnostic laparoscopy.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with chronic abdominal pain get repeated hospitalization. They fail to perform their duties continuously and thus become burdens for their families. These patients are occupying a good number of indoor beds with dilemmatous diagnosis. This indirectly creates pressure on health care facility and plays a notable negative role to our economy.Aim: To determine the usefulness of diagnostic laparoscopy for diagnosis and also to find out the therapeutic scope in unexplained abdominal pain.Method: This is a prospective cross-sectional observational study and was carried out in the Department of surgery, CMH, Dhaka over a period of 2 years from July 2008 to June 2010.Results: Among the study population, 8 (26.67%) patients underwent abdominal and pelvic operation in the past for various diseases. The duration of chronic abdomen pain in these patients was between 6 months to 24 months or more. Twenty five (83.5%) cases out of 30 were diagnosed. Postoperative band & adhesions (28%), recurrent appendicitis (24%), endometriosis (16%), abdominal tuberculosis (16%) were the most frequently found etiologies of unexplained chronic abdominal pain in these patients. Eighteen (59.4%) patients underwent therapeutic procedure during Diagnostic Laparoscopy and biopsy was taken from 7 (23.1%) patients. Patients were provided treatment according to histopathology report. Patients were followed up for 2 years at Out Patient Department (OPD) at CMH. Around 75% cases became symptom free following therapy, 15% had short term minimal symptom for 6 months and persistent pain was present in small percent of patients (10%). 09 JAFMC Bangladesh. Vol 10, No 2 (December) 2014Conclusion: Laparoscopy is a safe diagnostic modality. It is useful to establish diagnosis or for exclusion of suspected abdominal pathology whenever chronic abdominal complaints remain undiagnosed. It also provides an opportunity for definitive treatment by laparoscopy or open surgery in unsuspected lesions.Journal of Armed Forces Medical College Bangladesh Vol.10(2) 2014
Full text 2,302 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Introduction

Patients with chronic abdominal pain get repeated hospitalization. They fail to perform their duties continuously and thus become burdens for their families. These patients are occupying a good number of indoor beds with dilemmatous diagnosis. This indirectly creates pressure on health care facility and plays a notable negative role to our economy. Aim: To determine the usefulness of diagnostic laparoscopy for diagnosis and also to find out the therapeutic scope in unexplained abdominal pain.

Method

This is a prospective cross-sectional observational study and was carried out in the Department of surgery, CMH, Dhaka over a period of 2 years from July 2008 to June 2010.

Results

Among the study population, 8 (26.67%) patients underwent abdominal and pelvic operation in the past for various diseases. The duration of chronic abdomen pain in these patients was between 6 months to 24 months or more. Twenty five (83.5%) cases out of 30 were diagnosed. Postoperative band & adhesions (28%), recurrent appendicitis (24%), endometriosis (16%), abdominal tuberculosis (16%) were the most frequently found etiologies of unexplained chronic abdominal pain in these patients. Eighteen (59.4%) patients underwent therapeutic procedure during Diagnostic Laparoscopy and biopsy was taken from 7 (23.1%) patients. Patients were provided treatment according to histopathology report. Patients were followed up for 2 years at Out Patient Department (OPD) at CMH. Around 75% cases became symptom free following therapy, 15% had short term minimal symptom for 6 months and persistent pain was present in small percent of patients (10%). 09 JAFMC Bangladesh. Vol 10, No 2 (December) 2014

Conclusion

Laparoscopy is a safe diagnostic modality. It is useful to establish diagnosis or for exclusion of suspected abdominal pathology whenever chronic abdominal complaints remain undiagnosed. It also provides an opportunity for definitive treatment by laparoscopy or open surgery in unsuspected lesions. Journal of Armed Forces Medical College Bangladesh Vol.10(2) 2014 Downloads 314 354

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

References (21)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK