1/2https://ejgo.org
To the Editor,
We appreciate and thank Dr. Oxley et al. [1 ] for their interest in our work [2 ] and comments.
Their involvement in this field makes them placed to contribute to these discussions. While
we understand their concerns, we respectfully disagree with their interpretation of our
analytic approach and conclusions.
One major concern was that the confidence of the findings was affected by inclusion criteria
for uterine myoma and unmeasured confounders. However, a definitive diagnosis with
International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification (ICD -9 -CM) codes
in the administrative data has important implications for the treatment of women with prior
uterine myoma; thus, our patient selection criteria must be as precise as possible to weed out
potential errors and increase diagnostic accuracy. In addition, to minimize selection bias,
frequency matching can ensure that cases and controls have the same frequencies of exposure
to potentially confounding factors for comparison [3 ]. Although other unmeasured factors
may influence the results, these findings have important implications for understanding the
impact of prior uterine myoma on the development of subsequent ovarian cancer.
Another concern was criticism of the results for ovarian cancer patients with prior uterine
myoma and those who underwent myomectomy and their use of medical care services.
However, this may be an over-interpretation of our results. In fact, Melin et al. [4 ] reported
that women who underwent radical surgical extirpation of endometriosis had a lower risk of
ovarian cancer. It is possible that removing endometriotic tissue would reduce inflammation
in the pelvic cavity and then lower risk of developing ovarian malignant.
Their last concern was that exposure to negative information about uterine myoma risk
may increase women's anxiety. Even if we cannot draw definitive conclusions, we believe
that women with prior uterine myoma should be made aware of the potential conditions
that result in an increased risk of ovarian cancer development. In addition, identification
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;30(5):e109
https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e109
pISSN 2005-0380·eISSN 2005-0399
Correspondence
Received: Jul 6, 2019
Accepted: Jul 7, 2019
Correspondence to
Chun-Che Huang
Department of Medical Research, Taichung
Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan
Boulevard, Sect. 4, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.
E-mail:
[email protected]
Copyright © 2019. Asian Society of
Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of
Gynecologic Oncology
This is an Open Access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
which permits unrestricted non-commercial
use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
ORCID iDs
Chun-Che Huang
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5661-9548
Ching-Heng Lin
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2450-6108
Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this
article was reported.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: H.C.C.; Writing - original
draft: H.C.C.; Writing - review & editing: L.C.H.
Chun-Che Huang ,1 Ching-Heng Lin 1,2,3
1 Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
2 Department of Public Health, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei, Taiwan
3 Department of Health Care Management, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences,
Taipei, Taiwan
Response to comment on: prior uterine
myoma and risk of ovarian cancer: a
population-based case-control study
► See the article “Prior uterine myoma and risk of ovarian cancer: a population-based case-control
study” in volume 30, e72.
► See the letter “Letter to editor in response to: prior uterine myoma and risk of ovarian cancer: a
population-based case-control study” in volume 30, e106.
of patients at increased risk is essential and further studies are needed to clarify the
mechanisms underlying the effects of uterine myoma on the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer.
REFERENCES
1. Oxley SG, Sirkeci F, Odejinmi F. Letter to editor in response to: prior uterine myoma and risk of ovarian
cancer: a population-based case-control study. J Gynecol Oncol 2019;30:e106.
CROSSREF
2. Tseng JJ, Huang CC, Chiang HY, Chen YH, Lin CH. Prior uterine myoma and risk of ovarian cancer: a
population-based case-control study. J Gynecol Oncol 2019;30:e72.
CROSSREF
3. James MT. Longitudinal studies 4: matching strategies to evaluate risk. In: Parfrey PS, Barrett BJ, editors.
Clinical epidemiology. Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1281). New
York, NY: Humana Press; 2015. p.133-43.
4. Melin AS, Lundholm C, Malki N, Swahn ML, Sparèn P, Bergqvist A. Hormonal and surgical treatments for
endometriosis and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:546-54.
PUBMED | CROSSREF
2/2https://ejgo.org https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e109
Prior uterine myoma and ovarian cancer
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.