Temporal trajectories of mismatch negativity reveal dynamics of auditory perceptual learning

preprint OA: closed
⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text ⓘ

The study investigated how mismatch negativity (MMN), interpreted as a precision-weighted prediction error, unfolds over time during auditory perceptual learning in stable versus volatile oddball sequences. EEG was recorded from 45 young adults during passive listening to traditional (stable) and alternating (volatile) sequences, and MMN trajectories were analyzed to capture dynamic changes rather than static condition averages. The authors found MMN amplitude declined over time in stable environments and increased across volatile contexts after changes in auditory regularity, consistent with ongoing model refinement and lower-order building, and they also reported modulation by prior experience, with volatility prior-attenuating MMN in stable contexts but stability prior showing no impact on volatile learning. The paper was explicitly presented as a preprint and not peer reviewed, and the design relied on passive listening with EEG-indexed MMN as the outcome. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Theories of perceptual learning, such as predictive processing, describe learning as a dynamic and continuous process of updating hierarchical internal models in response to environmental regularities. However, most studies reduce this process to static condition-based averages, making them insensitive to how prediction error signals unfold over time. The current study addressed this gap by investigating the temporal trajectories of precision-weighted prediction errors – indexed by mismatch negativity (MMN) – across stable and volatile auditory oddball sequences. EEG was recorded for 45 young adults as they passively listened to Traditional (stable) and Alternating (volatile) sequences, presented in counterbalanced order. Consistent with theoretical predictions, MMN amplitude declined over time in the stable environments and increased across volatile contexts following changes in environmental regularity, reflecting higher-order model refinement and ongoing lower-order model building, respectively. Crucially, MMN trajectories were modulated by prior experience. MMN was attenuated in the stable sequence when preceded by volatility, suggesting that elevated beliefs about environmental uncertainty may constrain the precision of subsequent perceptual inferences. In contrast, prior exposure to stability had no impact on learning in volatile environments, indicating an asymmetry in how prior context shapes perceptual learning. These findings demonstrate the theoretical and methodological value of assessing MMN trajectories, revealing dynamic learning processes often masked by conventional averaging. This approach offers a promising framework for investigating altered learning mechanisms in clinical populations. Together, our results underscore the importance of temporal resolution, prior experience, and environmental structure in understanding the dynamic nature of perceptual inference.
Full text 7,698 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Temporal trajectories of mismatch negativity reveal dynamics of auditory perceptual learning | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL European Journal of Neuroscience This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 31 May 2025 V1 Latest version Share on Temporal trajectories of mismatch negativity reveal dynamics of auditory perceptual learning Authors : Matthew Godfrey 0009-0001-2693-9054 [email protected] , Mattsen Yeark 0000-0001-8473-3786 , Laura Wall , and Juanita Todd 0000-0002-0443-600X Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174868759.97710358/v1 Published European Journal of Neuroscience Version of record Peer review timeline 446 views 225 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Theories of perceptual learning, such as predictive processing, describe learning as a dynamic and continuous process of updating hierarchical internal models in response to environmental regularities. However, most studies reduce this process to static condition-based averages, making them insensitive to how prediction error signals unfold over time. The current study addressed this gap by investigating the temporal trajectories of precision-weighted prediction errors – indexed by mismatch negativity (MMN) – across stable and volatile auditory oddball sequences. EEG was recorded for 45 young adults as they passively listened to Traditional (stable) and Alternating (volatile) sequences, presented in counterbalanced order. Consistent with theoretical predictions, MMN amplitude declined over time in the stable environments and increased across volatile contexts following changes in environmental regularity, reflecting higher-order model refinement and ongoing lower-order model building, respectively. Crucially, MMN trajectories were modulated by prior experience. MMN was attenuated in the stable sequence when preceded by volatility, suggesting that elevated beliefs about environmental uncertainty may constrain the precision of subsequent perceptual inferences. In contrast, prior exposure to stability had no impact on learning in volatile environments, indicating an asymmetry in how prior context shapes perceptual learning. These findings demonstrate the theoretical and methodological value of assessing MMN trajectories, revealing dynamic learning processes often masked by conventional averaging. This approach offers a promising framework for investigating altered learning mechanisms in clinical populations. Together, our results underscore the importance of temporal resolution, prior experience, and environmental structure in understanding the dynamic nature of perceptual inference. Supplementary Material File (ejntrajectorymmngodfrey2025.docx) Download 1.39 MB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 31 May 2025 Peer review timeline Published European Journal of Neuroscience Version of Record 7 Nov 2025 Published Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Collection European Journal of Neuroscience Keywords auditory erp environmental volatility mismatch negativity (mmn) perceptual learning predictive processing Authors Affiliations Matthew Godfrey 0009-0001-2693-9054 [email protected] The University of Newcastle College of Engineering Science and Environment View all articles by this author Mattsen Yeark 0000-0001-8473-3786 The University of Newcastle College of Engineering Science and Environment View all articles by this author Laura Wall The University of Newcastle College of Engineering Science and Environment View all articles by this author Juanita Todd 0000-0002-0443-600X The University of Newcastle View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 446 views 225 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Matthew Godfrey, Mattsen Yeark, Laura Wall, et al. Temporal trajectories of mismatch negativity reveal dynamics of auditory perceptual learning. Authorea . 31 May 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174868759.97710358/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.174868759.97710358/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a008d2d4aafbc13d',t:'MTc3OTU4OTI1MQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00