Flexible, task-dependent bimanual coordination along movement direction and extent

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent work suggests that coordination of bilateral arm movements is mediated through flexible, task-dependent control policies rather than coupled motor commands that activate homologous muscle groups in the two arms. Here we examined whether such flexibility in bimanual control extends independently across movement direction and extent. We employed a bimanual reach task in which we altered the contribution of each arm to the perpendicular (direction axis) and/or parallel (extent axis) position of a single feedback cursor controlled by both arms together. We first replicated findings of Kitchen et al. (2023) showing that when one arm contributed more to perpendicular cursor motion, its lateral variability was reduced, while variability of the other arm increased. We then extended this result to perturbations affecting movement extent, observing similar asymmetric adjustments in variability in the parallel direction. Subsequent manipulations where contributions along both axes were manipulated simultaneously, revealed that irrespective of the gain combinations, the arm with the higher perpendicular contribution showed reduced lateral variability and the arm with the higher parallel contribution demonstrated restricted parallel variability, while allowing the corresponding lower contribution arms to compensate for perturbation-induced errors. These results suggest that: 1) the sensorimotor system always prioritizes corrections for deviations directly impacting task goals while tolerating higher variability in less relevant dimensions, and 2) that it is capable of adjusting coordination along movement direction and extent largely independently based on peripheral task demands. These findings add to the growing body of evidence supporting task-dependent modulation of bimanual motor coordination. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Bimanual actions in humans are thought to be controlled via a control policy that can be flexibly tuned to task demands. This work aimed to demonstrate that such flexibility in control extends independently to movement direction and extent. We used a shared-cursor bimanual reaching task to selectively manipulate the contribution of each arm to cursor motion along the direction and extent axes first in isolation, then simultaneously. Our results show that the sensorimotor system restricts variability in the more task-relevant arm along each axis, enabling axis-specific coordination. These findings thus provide evidence that bimanual coordination along movement direction and extent can be governed flexibly and largely independently in response to changing task demands.
Full text 2,798 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Recent work suggests that coordination of bilateral arm movements is mediated through flexible, task-dependent control policies rather than coupled motor commands that activate homologous muscle groups in the two arms. Here we examined whether such flexibility in bimanual control extends independently across movement direction and extent. We employed a bimanual reach task in which we altered the contribution of each arm to the perpendicular (direction axis) and/or parallel (extent axis) position of a single feedback cursor controlled by both arms together. We first replicated findings of Kitchen et al. (2023) showing that when one arm contributed more to perpendicular cursor motion, its lateral variability was reduced, while variability of the other arm increased. We then extended this result to perturbations affecting movement extent, observing similar asymmetric adjustments in variability in the parallel direction. Subsequent manipulations where contributions along both axes were manipulated simultaneously, revealed that irrespective of the gain combinations, the arm with the higher perpendicular contribution showed reduced lateral variability and the arm with the higher parallel contribution demonstrated restricted parallel variability, while allowing the corresponding lower contribution arms to compensate for perturbation-induced errors. These results suggest that: 1) the sensorimotor system always prioritizes corrections for deviations directly impacting task goals while tolerating higher variability in less relevant dimensions, and 2) that it is capable of adjusting coordination along movement direction and extent largely independently based on peripheral task demands. These findings add to the growing body of evidence supporting task-dependent modulation of bimanual motor coordination. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Bimanual actions in humans are thought to be controlled via a control policy that can be flexibly tuned to task demands. This work aimed to demonstrate that such flexibility in control extends independently to movement direction and extent. We used a shared-cursor bimanual reaching task to selectively manipulate the contribution of each arm to cursor motion along the direction and extent axes first in isolation, then simultaneously. Our results show that the sensorimotor system restricts variability in the more task-relevant arm along each axis, enabling axis-specific coordination. These findings thus provide evidence that bimanual coordination along movement direction and extent can be governed flexibly and largely independently in response to changing task demands. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0