Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation: our experience

other OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-23

This retrospective study of 365 patients demonstrates that laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation is a safe, efficient technique for benign gynecologic diseases with minimal blood loss and low complication rates.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To present our experience with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation (LSH-TM). DESIGN: A retrospective observational study (Canadian Task Force Classification III). SETTING: Gynecologic Department at Brunico Hospital, Brunico, Italy. PATIENTS: Three hundred sixty-five patients affected by gynecologic benign diseases who underwent LSH-TM. INTERVENTIONS: A minimally invasive surgical technique for supracervical hysterectomy that involves extraction of the morcellated uterus through the cervical canal. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We performed LSH-TM successfully in 365 patients; the mean (standard deviation) operating time was 72.24 (23.21) minutes. We registered no intraoperative complications. The main postoperative complications resulted in 2 cases of second-look laparoscopy because of internal bleeding, 5 cases of asymptomatic hematoma around the cervical stump, and 7 cases of pelvic pain. CONCLUSION: Our experience shows that LSH-TM is a safe and easy to perform technique and that it ensures minimal blood loss.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

MeSH descriptors

Hysterectomy Laparoscopy Pelvic Pain Uterine Diseases Uterus Adult Aged Female Humans Hysterectomy Hysterectomy Italy Middle Aged Operative Time Pelvic Pain Postoperative Hemorrhage Postoperative Hemorrhage Postoperative Hemorrhage Postoperative Pain Postoperative Pain

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-06T09:34:12.023084+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:15.805398+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-11T06:32:28.951138+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine