Abstract
As the risk of preterm birth is known to vary widely, we aimed to determine if antenatal steroid
exposure among LPBs varied based on sociodemographic characteristics. We hypothesized
that sociodemographic factors may influence a provider’s clinical judgment of a patient’s
likelihood of preterm birth and, therefore, also be associated with antenatal steroid use. This
cross-sectional analysis used the 2021 US natality data and included non-anomalous, liveborn,
hospital-based singleton births at ≥34 weeks of gestation to mothers without diabetes, a cohort
similar to those in the ALPS Trial. The following sociodemographic factors were compared
among those who received vs. did not receive steroids using chi-square tests: age, race (as
designated and categorized on the birth certificate), ethnicity, primary pay for the delivery,
marital status, and education. In 2021, 237,025 late preterm births met eligibility criteria, of
which 17.3% were exposed to antenatal steroids. Among the following sociodemographic
factors, the odds of antenatal steroid receipt were lower compared to the reference majority
population: 1) Black (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.88 (95% CI 0.81, 0.96)) and Native Hawaiian
or Other Pacific Islander (NHOPI) (aOR 0.58 (95% CI 0.43, 0.79) compared to White race; 2)
less than high school education (aOR 0.76 (95% CI 0.72, 0.81)) or high school education (aOR
0.87 (95% CI 0.83, 0.91)) compared to post-secondary education; and 3) public (aOR 0.83
(95% CI 0.78, 0.87)) or no insurance (aOR 0.68 (95% CI 0.61, 0.77)) compared to private
insurance. Age and marital status were not associated with steroid receipt. Despite no known
differential treatment effects of antenatal steroids by sociodemographic factors, steroid exposure
among LBPs varied significantly among races, ethnicities, payers, and education levels in the
US.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 24, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.22.24301562doi: medRxiv preprint
Objective
In 2016, the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroid Trial demonstrated the benefit of antenatal steroids
in reducing respiratory morbidity among late preterm births (“LPB,” 34-36 weeks of gestation).1
Prior studies have shown that this trial and its dissemination resulted in increased steroid use in
the late preterm period in the US, though adoption was not uniform.2–4 As the risk of preterm
birth is known to vary widely, we aimed to determine if antenatal steroid exposure among LPBs
varied based on sociodemographic characteristics.5 We hypothesized that sociodemographic
factors may influence a provider’s clinical judgment of a patient’s likelihood of preterm birth and,
therefore, also be associated with antenatal steroid use.
Study Design:
This cross-sectional analysis used the 2021 US natality data and included non-anomalous,
liveborn, hospital-based singleton births at ≥34 weeks of gestation to mothers without diabetes,
a cohort similar to those in the ALPS Trial.1 The primary outcome was the receipt of steroids, as
reported on the birth certificate. The following sociodemographic factors were compared among
those who received vs. did not receive steroids using chi-square tests: age, race (as designated
and categorized on the birth certificate), ethnicity, primary pay for the delivery, marital status,
and education. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed with all the
sociodemographic and two clinical factors hypothesized to influence clinical decision-making
(parity and week of gestation at delivery). Models used cluster robust standard errors based on
county of birth. Missing data were included in the model as “unknown.” P-values <0.05 were
considered statistically significant. The Mass General Brigham institutional review board
categorized this as non-human subjects research.
Results
In 2021, 237,025 late preterm births met eligibility criteria, of which 17.3% were exposed to
antenatal steroids. Among the following sociodemographic factors, the odds of antenatal steroid
receipt were lower compared to the reference majority population (Table 1): 1) Black race
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 24, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.22.24301562doi: medRxiv preprint
(adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.88 (95% CI 0.81, 0.96)) and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific
Islander (NHOPI) (aOR 0.58 (95% CI 0.43, 0.79) compared to White race; 2) less than high
school education (aOR 0.76 (95% CI 0.72, 0.81)) or high school education (aOR 0.87 (95% CI
0.83, 0.91)) compared to post-secondary education; and 3) Medicaid (aOR 0.83 (95% CI 0.78,
0.87)) or no insurance (aOR 0.68 (95% CI 0.61, 0.77)) compared to private insurance. Age and
marital status were not associated with steroid receipt. Of the two clinical factors included,
nulliparity and earlier gestational ages were associated with increased odds of steroid receipt.
Conclusion
Despite no known differential treatment effects of antenatal steroids by sociodemographic
factors, steroid exposure among LBPs varied significantly among races, ethnicities, payers, and
education levels in the US. Many of the same subgroups with lower odds of steroid receipt have
the highest preterm birth rates.5 There are several possible explanations, including 1) provider
assessment of baseline risk of preterm delivery does not influence the likelihood of steroid
receipt, 2) underlying biases affect clinical judgment that results in disparate use; 3) patients
have a varying willingness to receive intervention; or 4) differential clinical and structural (e.g.,
distance to hospital) factors influence the opportunity to intervene (e.g., patients presenting “too
late” to receive the intervention). The study used US birth certificate data; thus, it was limited in
its ability to observe the exact timing of steroid administration or other clinical factors that may
have affected clinical decision-making. Additional studies examining the drivers of these
sociodemographic differences, such as patient perception of risk, clinician judgment, and
hospital or regional factors affecting steroid use, are needed to inform policy solutions to
address disparities in antenatal steroid use, especially among populations at the highest risk for
preterm birth.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 24, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.22.24301562doi: medRxiv preprint
References
1. Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Thom EA, Blackwell SC, et al. Antenatal Betamethasone for Women
at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374(14):1311-
1320. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1516783
2. Clapp MA, Melamed A, Freret TS, James KE, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Kaimal AJ. US
Incidence of Late-Preterm Steroid Use and Associated Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity After
Publication of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids Trial, 2015-2017. JAMA Netw Open.
2022;5(5):e2212702. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12702
3. Freret TS, Cohen JL, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, et al. Regional Variation in Antenatal Late
Preterm Steroid Use following the ALPS Trial. medRxiv. 2023;2023.05.25.23290522.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.25.23290522
4. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Publications Committee. Implementation of the
use of antenatal corticosteroids in the late preterm birth period in women at risk for preterm
delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):B13-15. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.013
5. Manuck TA. Racial and ethnic differences in preterm birth: A complex, multifactorial problem.
Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(8):511-518. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2017.08.010
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 24, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.22.24301562doi: medRxiv preprint
Table 1: Antenatal Steroid Exposure by Sociodemographic Factors
Characteristics
Late Preterm Births Potentially
Eligible for Antenatal Steroids 1
N=237,025
No Steroid
Receipt
N=195,967
Steroid Receipt 2
N=41,058
Adjusted Odds Ratio
(95% CI) for Steroid
Receipt 3
Age, years
<18 3110 (1.6%) 519 (1.3%) 0.93 (0.83, 1.04)
18-34 150925 (77.0%) 31679 (77.2%) Reference
≥35 41932 (21.4%) 8860 (21.6%) 0.97 (0.93, 1.01)
Race 4
AIAN 2209 (1.1%) 439 (1.1%) 0.96 (0.74, 1.26)
Asian 10371 (5.3%) 2103 (5.1%) 0.83 (0.73, 0.95)**
Black 41212 (21.0%) 8127 (19.8%) 0.88 (0.81, 0.96)**
More than 1 race 5741 (2.9%) 1273 (3.1%) 1.00 (0.88, 1.15)
NHOPI 968 (0.5%) 118 (0.3%) 0.59 (0.43, 0.79)***
White 135466 (69.1%) 28998 (70.6%) Reference
Ethnicity
Hispanic 53160 (27.1%) 8547 (20.8%) 0.74 (0.66, 0.84)***
Non-Hispanic 140920 (71.9%) 32080 (78.1%) Reference
Unknown 1887 (1.0%) 431 (1.0%) 1.09 (0.81, 1.47)
Marital status
Married 89456 (45.6%) 20115 (49.0%) Reference
Not married 86157 (44.0%) 17100 (41.6%) 1.03 (0.99, 1.07)
Unknown 20354 (10.4%) 3843 (9.4%) 0.96 (0.77, 1.20)
Education
Less than high
school 29197 (14.9%) 4533 (11.0%) 0.76 (0.72, 0.81)***
High school 58723 (30.0%) 11108 (27.1%) 0.87 (0.83, 0.91)***
Post-secondary 104724 (53.4%) 24758 (60.3%) Reference
Unknown 3323 (1.7%) 659 (1.6%) 0.87 (0.68, 1.11)
Payer
Medicaid 84326 (43.0%) 20787 (50.6%) 0.83 (0.78, 0.87)***
Other 6144 (3.1%) 1288 (3.1%) 0.90 (0.78, 1.05)
Private 97419 (49.7%) 17795 (43.3%) Reference
Self-pay 6642 (3.4%) 935 (2.3%) 0.68 (0.61, 0.77)***
Unknown 1436 (0.7%) 253 (0.6%) 0.75 (0.59, 0.95)*
Parity
Nulliparity 57667 (29.4%) 13668 (33.3%) 1.13 (1.08, 1.17)***
Multiparity 137473 (70.2%) 27263 (66.4%) Reference
Unknown 827 (0.4%) 127 (0.3%) 0.79 (0.54, 1.15)
Gestational Age at
Birth (week)
34 weeks 30905 (15.8%) 12139 (29.6%) 2.85 (2.71, 3.01)***
35 weeks 53214 (27.2%) 13119 (32.0%) 1.78 (1.72, 1.85)***
36 weeks 111848 (57.1%) 15800 (38.5%) Reference
AIAN, American Indian or Alaskan Native; NHOPI, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
1 “Late Preterm Birth” included births between 34-36 weeks of gestation. “Eligible” births
included non-anomalous, liveborn, hospital-based singleton births at ≥34 weeks of gestation to
mothers without diabetes.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 24, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.22.24301562doi: medRxiv preprint
2 P-value comparisons between the “no steroid receipt” and “steroid receipt” were <0.001 for all
characteristics.
3 The population majority was set as the reference group for each category. P-value
designations: * p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
4 The race variable (‘mrace6’) was pre-defined into the 6 categories in the US natality data.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 24, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.22.24301562doi: medRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.