A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Prolonged Stent Deployment Strategy in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Pilot study

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Prolonged Stent Deployment Strategy in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Pilot study | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Original investigation A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Prolonged Stent Deployment Strategy in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Pilot study Min Ma, Ling Wang, Zhi-gang Yang, Kai-yue Diao, Yong He This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-17067/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the most standard reperfusion strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but the no-reflow phenomenon is still common and is associated with adverse outcomes. Little is known about the consequences of different strategies of deploying stents on outcomes in STEMI patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prolonged inflation would decrease the no-reflow phenomenon in PPCI compared with the conventional rapid inflation/deflation strategy. Methods This was a prospective, single-center, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a prolonged deployment strategy group or a conventional deployment strategy group. A subset of patients was included in a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination assessment. The primary outcomes were the number of patients with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3, the incidence of intraoperative no-reflow/slow flow, the corrected TIMI frame count, the myocardial blush grade, and the number of patients with ST-segment resolution>50%. The secondary outcome was major cardiovascular adverse events at one month and one year following the index PPCI. Results TIMI flow grade 3 was found in 96.7% of the prolonged deployment strategy group and 63.3% of the conventional deployment group (P=0.005). The prolonged inflation strategy and inflation/deflation strategy group respectively showed the following rates: 0% vs 30% no-reflow or slow flow (P=0.002); 90% vs 66.7% ST-segment resolution ≥50% (P=0.028); 35.6±14.5 frames vs 49.18±25.2 frames on corrected TIMI frame count (P=0.014); and 60% vs 20% myocardial blush grade 3 (P=0.001). The major cardiovascular adverse event rate was 3.3% in both groups at one month and 3.3% for the prolonged inflation strategy group vs 6.7% for the rapid inflation/deflation strategy group at one year (P=1.0). In the CMR subset of cases, the presence of microvascular obstruction (MVO) was detected in 6.7% of patients in the prolonged inflation strategy group and in 50% of patients in the rapid inflation/deflation strategy group (P=0.023). Conclusions In the patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI, the effect of the prolonged inflation strategy could decease the no-reflow phenomenon and improve myocardial microcirculation perfusion, but there were no benefits for the 30-day or one-year clinical outcomes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03199014.Registered June 23, 2017,http://https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03199014?term=NCT03199014&cntry=CN&draw=2&rank=1) Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems Endocrinology & Metabolism prolonged inflation strategy rapid inflation/deflation strategy ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction randomized controlled trial Figures Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 5 Background Although there has been an increase in the use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in recent decades in China, the in-hospital mortality and long-term prognosis has not significantly changed[ 1 ]. Coronary no-reflow is defined as a phenomenon in which, despite revascularization therapy with PPCI, the cardiac tissue fails to perfuse normally and has a negative effect on outcomes, negating the potential benefits of PPCI[ 2 – 5 ]. The pathophysiology of the no-reflow phenomenon is multifactorial, and it is now referred to as microvascular obstruction (MVO), which includes injury related to ischemia, reperfusion, endothelial cell edema, thrombus embolization, and embolization of atherosclerotic plaque fragments[ 6 ].Therefore, these injuries are of concern during PPCI[ 7 ].In theory, the manipulation of factors during PPCI may contribute to no-reflow; however, the balloon pressure, inflation time, repeated balloon dilations, and number of stents did not affect the incidence of no-reflow in a retrospective analysis[ 8 ]. In small vessels, it is possible that the stent itself affixes the thrombus to the vessel wall, especially if the thrombus is more fibrous [ 9 ]. The duration of stent inflation has a significant impact on stent expansion, and rapid inflation/deflation may not be enough to fully expand the stent [ 10 , 11 ]. Therefore, a fully expanded stent may entrap the atherothrombus under the struts that are more fixed and reduce distal embolization in PPCI. However, this hypothesis has not been well investigated in randomized controlled studies. The present study was undertaken to evaluate whether prolonged inflation would decrease the no-reflow phenomenon in PPCI compared with the conventional rapid inflation/deflation strategy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03199014) Materials And Methods Trial Design And Study Participants We conduct this single-center randomized, single-blinded parallel pilot trial to compare a prolonged stent deployment strategy with a rapid inflation/deflation deployment strategy. The randomization was performed using a simple random sampling method that was generated by a computer program. The random allocation list was enclosed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. The eligible patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the prolonged inflation group or the rapid inflation/deflation group. The trial design was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board of West China Hospital. The research paper is written in accordance with the international CONSORT 2010 statement[ 12 ]. Patients were eligible for enrollment if they met the following criteria: 1) age ≥ 18 years; 2) patients with STEMI who were referred to PPCI within 12 hours after the onset of symptoms and with ST-segment elevation ≥ 1 mm in ≥ 2 contiguous leads or a presumed new left bundle branch block or a true posterior myocardial infarction; 3) admission within 12 hours of symptom onset or admission between 12 and 24 hours if there was evidence of continuing ischemia. The exclusion criteria were: the left main coronary artery was a target vessel; an artery reference diameter༜2 mm; vessel calcification or tortuosity, a true bifurcation lesion; cardiogenic shock; prior coronary artery surgery; previous percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) of the target segment; a contraindication to CMR imaging (e.g., pacemaker, claustrophobia),and inability to give informed consent. Procedures Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned after coronary angiography to the prolonged stent deployment group or to the conventional rapid inflation/deflation deployment group during PCI. An experienced cardiologists preformed the procedures. All patients received 300 mg of oral aspirin and 600 mg clopidogrel (or 180 mg ticagrelor) as soon as the diagnosis was confirmed. Heparin (60U/kg) was given to all patients in the emergency department and was administered throughout the procedure to maintain an ACT༞300 seconds. Patients were immediately taken to the cardiac catheterization lab, and coronary angiography was performed by using the standard Judkins technique with a transradial approach. If the patient had a high thrombus burden, thrombus aspiration was performed when the floppy, steerable guidewire passed through the target lesion, according to the operator’s judgment. If the operator predicted that direct stenting was possible, predilation was not performed. if direct stenting was impossible, predilation with a single low-pressure inflation was performed. In all patients, only the infarct-related artery was treated. All placed stents were drug-eluting stents, and patients were given the option between two commercially available drug-eluting stents: the PROMUS Element stent (Boston Scientific, Boston, Massachusetts) or a GuReater stent (Lepu, China). The diameters of the stent and balloon were selected by visual estimation to achieve a balloon-to-vessel ratio of 1:1. In the experimental group, the stent was deployed with a single balloon inflation, and low-pressure inflation was sustained for > 30 seconds after the target balloon inflation pressure had been achieved. If the patient could not tolerate the procedure, showed signs of ischemia, or had chest pain, arrhythmia, or a decrease in blood pressure, the stent balloon was immediately deflated. A rapid inflation/deflation strategy was adopted in the control group, in which the stent balloon inflation time was less than 10 seconds. Additional dilation, expansion pressure, and postdilation were left to the discretion of operators. For both study groups, a GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitor (tirofiban) was used as a preventive or bailout therapy at the operator’s discretion. After stent implantation, if the no-reflow phenomenon was present, pharmacological intervention including common vasodilators (nitroprusside, diltiazem) was used. Endpoints, Assessment Of Outcomes And Definitions The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of the no-reflow phenomenon according to TIMI flow. The no-reflow phenomenon was defined as a TIMI flow grade ≤ 2 that was transient or sustained after the occluded epicardial artery was opened; incomplete lesion dilation, epicardial vascular spasm, dissection or in situ thrombosis were carefully excluded[ 13 ]. Two experienced cardiologists independently assessed the occurrence of no-reflow after stent implantation, the TIMI flow grade, the TIMI frame count, and the myocardial blush grade on the most recent angiogram. Thrombolysis in the myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score flow grading system was used to evaluate blood flow. TIMI 0 flow is defined as no antegrade flow beyond the point of occlusion. TIMI 1 flow is defined as faint antegrade flow beyond the occlusion with incomplete filling of the distal vascular bed. TIMI 2 flow is defined as delayed antegrade flow with complete filling of the distal vascular bed. TIMI 3 flow is defined as normal flow with complete filling of the distal vascular bed. The number of angiogram frames required for the dye to reach a specified distal segment in the coronary artery was referred to as the corrected TIMI frame count[ 14 ]. All angiograms were recorded on 21 mm cine film at 15 frames/second (UNIQ FD 10, Philips, USA). The myocardial blush grade (MBG) was used to assess the filling and clearance of contracts in the myocardium. MBG 0 was defined as no apparent tissue-level perfusion in the distribution of the culprit artery. MBG 1 was defined as no clearance from the microvasculature. MBG 2 was defined as the blush clearing slowly. MBG 2 was defined as blush beginning to clear during washout[ 15 ]. The thrombus burden was evaluated by the TIMI thrombus scale, which was classified as a grade between 0 and 5[ 16 ]. A heavy thrombus burden was considered to be present with a TIMI grade ≥ 4. Electrocardiographic resolution of ST-segment elevation was defined as an ST-segment reduction of > 50% in the same lead within 60 min after the index procedure[ 17 ]. The secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), which were defined as any events of target vessel revascularization, recurrent MI or cardiovascular mortality. These outcomes were examined 30 days and one year after the primary PCI. The procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose were also assessed. The safety outcome of major bleeding is defined using a definition of major bleeding from the International Society on Thrombosis & Hemostasis (ISTH)[ 18 ]; the bleeding events that are not defined as major will be counted as minor bleeding. A subset of patients was included in the cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination approximately 3 to 5 days after the index procedure. To assess infarct size, myocardial salvage index, presence and extent of MVO, myocardium hemorrhage, myocardial edema, and left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) and left ventricular(LV) volume. Examinations were performed on a 3.0-T whole-body scanner with an18-element body phased arraycoil (Skyra; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Standard two-, three, and four-chamber cine images were acquired using a TrueFISP sequence. The area at risk was assessed on the initial examination using a T2-weighted short-tau inversion-recovery sequence. Infarct size, LVEF, and LV volume were assessed on both examinations using delayed, contrast-enhanced, electrocardiogram-triggered inversion-recovery images and steady-state free precession(SSFP) cine images. The myocardial salvage index was calculated as [area at risk (mass) – infarct size (mass)]/area at risk (mass). Delayed contrast-enhanced images were obtained 10 min after an intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight gadolinium-based contrast (Gadovist, Bayer Schering, Berlin, Germany). All images were obtained in the short-axis plane, with 8-mm slices without gaps covering the entire LV[ 19 – 21 ]. A subgroup analysis was prespecified to examine factors associated with an increased risk of the no-reflow phenomenon: age (≥ 65 and < 65 years), thrombus burden, thrombosis aspiration, direct stenting, infarct location (anterior and nonanterior), multiple complex lesions, and door-to-balloon time. Statistical analysis The trial was powered for the outcome of ST-segment reduction of > 50% in the same lead within 60 min after the index procedure. The results of previous studies showed that the incidence of electrocardiographic resolution was 60–70% under conventional rapid inflation/deflation strategy in PPCI. We therefore hypothesized that in our trial more patients in the prolonged inflation group achieved ST-segment reduction of > 50%, and the anticipated relative risk reduction (RRR) was 30%. We calculated that 53 patients would need to be enrolled in this study. The sample size was increased by about 10% to total 60 patients to account for loss to follow up. The data are expressed as percentages and means (standard deviations). Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test at a two-sided significance level of 5%. Continuous variables were compared using t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois). Result Patients characteristics Between November 2016 and May 2017, 97 patients with STEMI were considered for inclusion, of whom 60 patients were enrolled according to the eligibility criteria (Fig. 1 ). After angiography, patients were randomly assigned to undergo either a prolonged inflation group during PCI (30 patients) or a rapid inflation/deflation group during PCI (30 patients). The baseline clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups (Table 1 ). The procedural and angiographic characteristics of the study patients are shown (Table 2 ). After undergoing randomization, 10% of the patients in the prolonged inflation group could not tolerate the ischemic deflation of the stenting balloon in advance. The mean time of inflation was 35.87 seconds in the prolonged inflation group and 10.07 seconds in the rapid inflation/deflation group. None of the patients who underwent randomization were lost to follow-up. Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients according to the randomization allocation Characteristic Prolonged inflation group (n = 30) Rapid inflation/deflation group (n = 30) P value Age-years 64.2 ± 10.9 61.9 ± 12.5 0.445 Male sex-no. (%) 25 22 0.347 Body mass index 25.0 ± 2.8 24.5 ± 3.7 0.602 History Hypertension-no. (%) 14 (46.7) 17 (56.7) 0.438 Current smoking-no. (%) 22 (73.3) 17 (56.7) 0.176 Previous myocardial infarction 0 (0) 0 (0) NA Diabetes mellitus-no. (%) 6 (20) 4 (13.3) 0.488 Previous stroke-no. (%) 4 (13.3) 2 (6.7) 0.389 Previous atrial fibrillation-no. (%) 1 (3.3) 1 (3.3) 1.0 Medication used ACEI-no. (%) 0 (0) 1 (3.3) 0.313 ARB-no. (%) 2 (6.7) 1 (3.3) 0.554 CCB-no. (%) 4 (13.3) 5 (16.7) 0.718 Metformin-no. (%) 1(3.3) 2 (6.7) 0.554 β-blocker-no. (%) 0 2 (6.7) 0.492 Clopidogrel-no. (%) 22 (73.3) 20 (66.7) 0.779 Ticagrelor-no. (%) 8 (26.7) 10 (33.3) 0.779 Fibrinolysis before randomization -no. (%) 0 (0) 2 (6.7) 0.492 Door-to-balloon time-min 67 ± 17 67 ± 25 0.972 Target coronary artery 0.663 Left coronary artery-no. (%) 14 (46.7) 12 (40) Left circumflex-no. (%) 2 (6.7) 4 (13.3) Right coronary artery-no. (%) 14 (46.7) 14 (46.7) Multivessel coronary disease-no. (%) 15 (50) 15 (50) 1.00 Killip class-no. (%) 0.431 1 27 26 2 2 4 3 1 0 4 0 0 Systolic blood pressure in lab-mmHg 125.4 ± 21.0 120.2 ± 21.2 0.359 Diastolic blood pressure in lab-mmHg 79.8 ± 16.6 75.7 ± 13.7 0.301 Heart rate in lab-bpm 76.9 ± 11.6 84.1 ± 20.9 0.095 TIMI flow-no. (%) 0.193 0 or 1 25 (83.3) 19 (63.3) 2 2 (6.7) 3 (10) 3 3 (10) 8 (26.7) Thrombus burden-no. (%) 0.643 0 1 (3.3) 3 (10) 1 3 (10) 5 (16.7) 2 2 (6.7) 3 (10) 3 2 (6.7) 3 (10) 4 3 (10) 1 (3.3) 5 19 (63.3) 15 (50) Laboratory tests Total cholesterol-mmol/L 3.8 ± 2 3.9 ± 1.8 0.893 LDL-mmol/L 3.2 ± 0.94 2.9 ± 0.98 0.335 C-reactive protein-mg/L 6.8 ± 19 4.5 ± 6.5 0.56 Creatinine-mmol/L 80.2 ± 20.1 77.6 ± 20.2 0.627 Troponin (CTn)-ng/L 6319.7 ± 3559 6275.4 ± 3451.8 0.961 Ejection fraction (EF)-% 51.8 ± 8.6 53.7 ± 10.1 0.427 ACEI:angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor;ARB:angiotensin receptor blocker;CCB: calcium channel block ;TIMI:thrombolysis in myocardial infarction;LDL:low density lipoprotein . Table 2 Characteristics of the procedural data Characteristic Prolonged inflation group (n = 30) Rapid inflation/deflation group (n = 30) P value Direct stenting-no. (%) 15 (50) 9 (37.5) 0.114 Thrombectomy-no. (%) 10 (33.3) 5 (16.7) 0.136 Predilation balloon diameter-mm 2.4 ± 0.21 2.4 ± 0.21 0.945 No. of stents-no. (%) 1.13 ± 0.35 1.17 ± 0.38 0.723 Type of drug-eluting stent-no. (%) 0.554 PROMUS Element 28 (93.3) 29 (96.7) GuReater 2 (6.7) 1 (3.3) Total stent length-mm 33.1 ± 14.5 31.3 ± 14.6 0.640 Stent diameter-mm 3.17 ± 0.29 3.09 ± 0.41 0.418 Inflation time-seconds 35.87 ± 10.38 10.07 ± 7.19 ༜0.0001 Inflation pressure-atm 13.47 ± 1.28 13.40 ± 2.23 0.89 Postdilation-no. (%) 5 (16.7) 9 (30) 0.222 Medication use-no. (%) Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor 16 (53.3) 15 (50) 0.796 Nitroprusside 0 2 (6.7) 0.492 Diltiazem 1 (3.3) 2 (6.7) 0.554 Procedural Outcomes Primary outcome The proportion of patients with an immediate TIMI grade 3 flow was higher in the prolonged inflation group than in the rapid inflation/deflation group after the stent was deployed (90% vs 63.3%, respectively, P = 0.005) (Table 3 ). The final no-reflow proportion was lower in the prolonged inflation group than in the rapid inflation/deflation group (0% vs 30%, respectively, P = 0.002). In addition, 78% (7/9) of patients exhibiting the no-reflow phenomenon in the rapid inflation/deflation group recovered after pharmacological intervention. The corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) was lower in the prolonged inflation group than in the rapid inflation/deflation group (35.6 ± 14.5 vs 49.18 ± 25.2, respectively, P = 0.014), and more patients in the prolonged inflation group had a ST-segment resolution ≥ 50% than in the rapid inflation/deflation group (90% vs 66.7%, respectively, P = 0.028). The percentage of patients achieve a myocardial blush grade (MBG) of 3 was higher in the prolonged group than in the rapid inflation/deflation group (60% vs 20%, P = 0.01). Table 3 Primary and secondary outcomes outcome Prolonged inflation group (n = 30) Rapid inflation/deflation group (n = 30) P value Immediate TIMI flow-no. (%) 0.005 TIMI 0–1 0 (0) 1 (3.3) TIMI 2 1 (3.3) 10 (33.3) TIMI 3 29 (96.7) 19 (63.3) The incidence of no-reflow-no. (%) 0 (0) 9 (30) 0.002 ST-segment resolution ≥ 50%-no. (%) 27 (90) 20 (66.7) 0.028 Corrected TIMI frame count-no. (%) 35.6 ± 14.5 49.18 ± 25.2 0.014 Distal embolization of culprit vessels-no. (%) 0 1 (3.3) 0.313 Myocardial blush grade-no. (%) 0.001 1 0 (0) 6 (20) 2 12 (40) 18 (60) 3 18 (60) 6 (20) Procedure time-min 37 ± 11.8 39 ± 18 0.572 Radiation exposure time-min 1208.6 ± 757.7 932.69 ± 452.9 0.130 Bleeding events-no. (%) 0 1 (3.3) 0.313 30-day clinical outcomes -no. (%) 4 (13.3) 7 (23.3) 0.506 Target vessel revascularization 2 (6.7) 3 (10) 1.000 Recurrent myocardial infarction 1 (3.3) 3 (10) 0.612 Cardiovascular mortality 1 (3.3) 1 (3.3) 1.00 One-year clinical outcomes -no. (%) 7 (23.3) 11 (36.7) 0.399 Target vessel revascularization 3 (10) 5 (16.7) 0.706 Recurrent myocardial infarction 3 (10) 4 (13.3) 1.00 Cardiovascular mortality 1 (3.3) 2 (6.7) 1.00 Secondary outcome There was no significant difference in the procedure time, radiation exposure time, or contrast volume. The number of bleeding events and clinical end point were also not significantly different between the two groups (Table 3 ). The subset analysis was show in Fig. 2 . According to the CMR subset, the prolonged inflation strategy can reduce the incidence of MVO and improve cardiac function (Table 4 , Fig. 3 ). Table 4 Cardiac magnetic resonance data Endpoint Prolonged inflation group (n = 15) Rapid inflation/deflation group (n = 10) P value Infarct size (%LVM) 12.1 (4.5) 13.4 (3.9) 0.512 Presence of MVO-no. (%) 1/15 (6.7) 5/10 (50) 0.023 Presence of IMH-no. (%) 3/15 (20) 4/10 (25) 0.378 Myocardial salvage index 60.5 (22.1) 56.4 (20.1) 0.081 LVEF (%) 50.2 (7.5) 42.1 (6.3) 0.026 %LVM = percentage of LV mass, MVO = microvascular vessel obstruction, IMH = intramyocardial hemorrhage, LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction Discussion To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the effect of prolonged inflation time in PPCI. We designed this small proof-of concept pilot study to determine whether prolonged or rapid strategies could provide more short- and long-term benefits for STEMI patients. The major findings of the present study were as follows: 1) the prolonged inflation strategy reduced the no-reflow phenomenon and improved myocardial microcirculation perfusion, but there were no benefits in the 30-day and one-year clinical outcomes; 2) there were no significant differences between the study groups in terms of the procedure time, radiation exposure time and the number of bleeding events (for safety surveillance); 3) according to the subset analysis, it seems that the prolonged inflation strategy was more effective in patients who were male, had a thrombectomy, had a heavy thrombosis burden, and nonanterior wall infraction; and 4) as evaluated by theCMR subset, the prolonged inflation strategy can reduce the incidence of MVO and improve cardiac function. In the early days of coronary angioplasty, an autoperfusion balloon angioplasty catheter was used for long balloon inflation, which was based on the hypothesis that the loose flap of dissection may be definitively “tacked back” and might deliver a better result[ 22 – 24 ]. A human study found that in approximately half of patients whose initial angioplasty was a failure, could be reverted to a success by prolonged dilation[ 25 ]. With the wide application of stents, this technique was not used. Subsequently, an in vitro human study investigated the duration of balloon inflation for optimal stent deployment[ 10 , 11 ]. Prolonged balloon inflation could have a significant impact on stent expansion and strut apposition, as evaluated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT)[ 26 – 28 ]. However, these studies were not limited to patients with STEMI. Despite the use of PPCI and the development of emergency transports resulting in shorter ischemic times, STEMI-related mortality remains considerable[ 29 ]. The no-reflow phenomenon can offset, at least in part, the benefits of PPCI[ 30 ]. Coronary microvascular dysfunction plays a key role in the development of no-reflow phenomenon[ 31 ]. This phenomenon occurs in approximately 50% of STEMI patients after PPCI[ 21 ]. Thrombotic material and thromboembolisms will travel distally either spontaneously or at the time of PPCI when an angioplasty balloon is expanded or a stent is deployed[ 3 ]. The debris released from a PPCI can also include soluble substances such as vasoactive agents or inflammatory mediators that may stimulate microvascular arteriolar spasms[ 32 , 33 ]. Thus, the removal of an intravascular thrombus with an extraction catheter during the procedure for reducing atherothrombotic embolization is an active strategy that has been evaluated in RCT trials and meta-analyses [ 34 ]. Although there were negative results from the TASTE and TOTAL trials and recent guidelines no longer recommend routine aspiration for STEMI[ 35 , 36 ], neither study allows us to rule out the possibility that thrombus aspiration might be beneficial in high-risk patients[ 37 , 38 ]. Even so, with more than 30% of patients showing minimal particles after thrombectomy and persistent residual thrombus in vitro models, distal embolization may not fully prevent thrombectomy[ 39 , 40 ]. Direct stenting is another strategy to reduce the risk of distal embolization of thrombus fragments[ 41 , 42 ]. A meta-analysis found that direct stenting significantly reduced short-term and one-year mortality and the after-procedural no-reflow phenomenon[ 43 ]. However, few studies have been limited to STEMI patients. Recently, the Thrombectomy Trialists Collaboration conducted a patient-level meta-analysis that found that direct stenting was not significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with conventional stenting among patients with STEMI undergoing PCI[ 44 ]. Approximately 37% of patients in that study underwent direct stenting[ 45 ]. In our study, direct stenting and thrombectomy were performed more often in the prolonged inflation group (50% and 33.3%, respectively) than in the rapid inflation/deflation group, but the differences were not significant. Even though the data from the Thrombectomy Trialists Collaboration affirm the facilitation of direct stenting by aspiration thrombectomy, there was no significant interaction between thrombus aspiration and any of the clinical outcome variables investigated[ 45 ]. According to our subset analysis, patients with thrombectomy and heavy thrombosis burden may have better angiographic myocardial reperfusion outcomes, but there was not enough statistical power, and the interaction was not excluded. Three randomized studies investigated filter devices for distal protection, but these studies failed to show a benefit in terms of reperfusion measures or clinical outcomes[ 46 – 48 ]. A recent randomized study evaluated the utility of distal protection in patients with acute coronary syndrome with native coronary artery lesions and attenuated plaque ≥ 5 mm in length on pre-PCI intravascular ultrasound. The incidence of the no-reflow phenomenon was decreased in these high-risk distal embolization patients[ 49 ]. However, no study found that distal protection could affect the infarct size[ 50 ]. Because of the potential disadvantages of thrombectomy, distal protection devices and direct stenting, and the neutral effect for distal embolization, another novel strategy to prevent the no-reflow phenomenon is a clinical imperative. In the present study, the prolonged inflation strategy during stent deployment may work through the following mechanisms: First, a long inflation time and a low-pressure inflation could reduce iatrogenic rupture of thin-cap fibroatheroma through stent expansion, which induced distal embolization, particularly in lesions with low-echoic structures and large amounts of atherosclerotic plaque with vulnerable components[ 51 ]. Second, although thrombectomy may reduce thrombus burden, persistent residual thrombus may also cause distal embolization[ 39 ]. When added to direct stenting, the loosened atherothrombus material was affixed to the vessel wall under the stent struts[ 52 ]. However, incomplete stent deployment and inadequate apposition may weaken the “confinement effect” for atherothrombus material. Therefore, the conventional rapid inflation/deflation strategy was not enough[ 10 ], especially in the PPCI setting in which postdilation should be avoided. Third, prolonged inflation may be analogous to the postcondition that was performed within 1 minute of reflow by brief episodes of reversible ischemia-reperfusion during angioplasty. A meta-analysis found that postconditioning following PCI induced by transient coronary ischemia in STEMI patients may reduce myocardial injury biomarkers and improve cardiac function[ 53 ]. However, the POST and DANAMI-3–iPOST trials found that ischemic postconditioning did not improve myocardial reperfusion and clinical outcomes[ 54 , 55 ]. The primary endpoint results contribute to the theory that postconditioning algorithm, in which postconditioning is instituted after a very short reperfusion time, might be a more effective method[ 54 ]. In the present study, if the occlusion persisted for more than 30 seconds after the stent was deployed, the conditioning therapy was completed before reperfusion injury could occur. Therefore, this postconditioning algorithm may be effective. The indexes of angiography for evaluating coronary microvascular circulation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory are semiquantitative and can be subjective[ 56 ]. CMR is the gold standard method to assess the MVO, MI size, LV volume and LVEF, but it is expensive and not yet widely available[ 56 ]. Areas of no-reflow have been associated with MVO as seen on magnetic resonance images and correlate with a higher degree of myocardial damage[ 57 ]. Therefore, in the present study, we designed a subset of CMR to assess the no-reflow phenomenon after PPCI. Approximately 50% of the patients included in this study underwent CMR. The incidence of MVO was 50% in the conventional rapid inflation/deflation group and was consistent with previous studies[ 58 ]. The prolonged inflation strategy could reduce the incidence of MVO and improve cardiac function, but not infarction size, as evaluated by CMR. Kloner[ 3 ] found that no-reflow did not directly contribute to myocyte cell death, and several studies showed that it was independent of the size of the infarction[ 59 , 60 ]. The no-reflow phenomenon is associated with poor healing of the infarct scar[ 61 ], including thinner scars and more infarct expansion; therefore, it appears that some therapies that can reduce no-reflow without reducing infarct size[ 62 ]. Limitations This study included the following limitations of note.Firstly,this was a single-center study with a relatively small sample.Second,the study was underpowered for detecting significant differences in 30-day and one-year clinical outcomes.Because high-risk patients with more complex lesions and unstable hemodynamics were excluded, the results cannot be applied to all STEMI patients. However, this study implemented rigorous inclusion criteria to reduce the risk of confounding bias. Furthermore, few studies have reported data in this area, thus contributing to the value of our study. We aim to fullfillment this study in our future research endeavors. Conclusions we evaluated the effect of a prolonged inflation strategy that could reduce the no-reflow phenomenon of MVOs and improve the myocardial microcirculation perfusion, but there were no benefits in the 30-day and one-year clinical outcomes. However, large-sample, randomized controlled clinical trials with a long-term follow-up period are needed to confirm this preliminary result. Abbreviations PPCI:Primary percutaneous coronary intervention;STEMI:ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction;CMR:cardiac magnetic resonance; TIMI:Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction;MVO: microvascular obstruction;MBG:myocardial blush grade; MACEs: major adverse cardiovascular events; MI:myocardial infarction;LVEF:left ventricular ejection fraction;LV:left ventricular; RRR:relative risk reduction; cTFC: corrected TIMI frame count;OCT: optical coherence tomography;IVUS: intravascular ultrasound. Declarations Author’s Contribution: Y.H conceived of the study, and participated in its design. M.M and L.W coordination, drafted the manuscript, collect data and algorithms. KY.D take responsibility of the imaging data analysis. Y.ZG and H.Y are both the study guarantors, had full access to the data in the study and take responsibility of the study design and the accuracy of the data analysis, and had the final responsibility to submit for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgments: We would like to thank the patients who participated in the study and the staff from departments of Cardiology and Radiology. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Availability of data and materials The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request Consent for publication Not applicable Ethics approval and consent to participate The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Written informed consents were obtained from all the study participants. Funding: This work was funded by the Key Research Projects in Sichuan Province (No. 20ZDYF3295 ) and 1·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University(ZYGD18013). References Li J, Li X, Wang Q, Hu S, Wang Y, Masoudi FA, et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China from 2001 to 2011 (The China PEACE-Retrospective Acute Myocardial Infarction Study): a retrospective analysis of hospital data. Lancet.2015;385:441-51. Rezkalla SH, Kloner RA.No-reflow phenomenon. Circulation. 2002;105:656-662. Kloner RA, King KS, Harrington MG. No-reflow phenomenon in the heart and brain. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol.2018;315:H550-H562. Rezkalla SH,Stankowski RV,Hanna J,Kloner RA. Management of no-Reflow phenomenon in the catheterization laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:215-223. Kloner RA. No-reflow phenomenon: maintaining vascular integrity. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2011;16:244-50. Reffelmann T, Kloner RA. Microvascular alterations after temporary coronary artery occlusion: the no-reflow phenomenon. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther .2004;9:163-172. Kloner RA. The importance of no-reflow/microvascular obstruction in the STEMI patient. Eur Heart J.2017;38:3511-3513. Zhou H, He XY, Zhuang SW, Wang J, Lai Y, Qi WG,et al. Clinical and procedural predictors of no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. World J Emerg Med.2014;5:96-102. Yip HK, Chen MC, Chang HW, Hang CL, Hsieh YK, Fang CY, et al. Angiographic morphologic features of infarct-related arteries and timely reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: predictors of slow-flow and no-reflow phenomenon. Chest. 2002;122:1322-1332. Hovasse T, Mylotte D,Garot P,Salvatella N,Morice MC,Chevalier B,et al. Duration of balloon inflation for optimal stent deployment: five seconds is not enough. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81:446-453. Vallurupalli S,Bahia A,Ruiz-Rodriguez E, Ahmed Z, Hakeem A, Uretsky BF. Optimization of stent implantation using a high pressure inflation protocol. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016,87:65-72. Schulz KF,Altman DG,Moher D,CONSORT Group.CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332. TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. N Engl J Med 1985,312:932-936. Gibson CM, Murphy SA,Rizzo MJ,Ryan KA,Marble SJ,McCabe CH,et al.Relationship between TIMI frame count and clinical outcomes after thrombolytic administration. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group. Circulation. 1999;99:1945-1950. van't Hof AW,Liem A,Suryapranata H,Hoorntje JC,de Boer MJ,Zijlstra F. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Circulation. 1998;97:2302-2306. Gibson CM,de Lemos JA, Murphy SA,Marble SJ, McCabe CH,Cannon CP,et al.Combination therapy with abciximab reduces angiographically evident thrombus in acute myocardial infarction: A TIMI 14 substudy. Circulation .2001;103:2550-2554. de Lemos JA,Antman EM,Giugliano RP,McCabe CH,Murphy SA,Van de Werf F,et al. ST-segment resolution and infarct-related artery patency and flow after thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 14 investigators. Am J Cardiol.2000;85:299-304. Schulman S,Kearon C. Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis .Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:692-694. Bonanad C,Monmeneu JV,Lopez-Lereu MP,Hervas A,de Dios E,Gavara J,et al. Prediction of long-term major events soon after a first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur J Radiol.2016;85:585-592. Husser O,Monmeneu JV,Sanchis J,Nunez J,Lopez-Lereu MP,Bonanad C,et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived intramyocardial hemorrhage after STEMI: Influence on long-term prognosis, adverse left ventricular remodeling and relationship with microvascular obstruction. Int J Cardiol.2013;167:2047-2054. van Kranenburg M,Magro M,Thiele H,de Waha S,Eitel I,Cochet A,et al. Prognostic Value of Microvascular Obstruction and Infarct Size, as Measured by CMR in STEMI Patients. JACC:Cardiovascular Imaging.2014;7:930-939. Colle JP,Delarche N. PTCA with side-by-side balloon using fixed guide wire systems: a potential alternative autoperfusion device--An in vitro study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992;27:303-308. de Muinck ED,den Heijer P,van Dijk RB,Crijns HJ,Hillege HJ,Twisk SP,et al. Autoperfusion balloon versus stent for acute or threatened closure during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol.1994;74:1002-1005. Turic ZG,Campbell CA,Gottimukkala MV,Kloner RA. Preservation of distal coronary perfusion during prolonged balloon inflation with an autoperfusion angioplasty catheter. Circulation.1987;75:1273-1280. van der Linden LP,Bakx AL,Sedney MI,Buis B,Bruschke AV. Prolonged dilation with an autoperfusion balloon catheter for refractory acute occlusion related to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol.1993;22:1016-1023. Asano T,Kobayashi Y, Fukushima K, Iwata Y, Kitahara H, Ishio N,et al.Effect of balloon inflation time on expansion of sirolimus-eluting stent. Heart Vessels.2009;24:335-339. Hee Ann S,Chung JW,DE Jin C,Ho Lee J, Min Kim J, Garg S,et al. Better Inflation Time of Stent Balloon for Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Expansion and Apposition: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study. J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27:171-176. Cook JR, Mhatre A, Wang FW, Uretsky BF. Prolonged high-pressure is required for optimal stent deployment as assessed by optical coherence tomography.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:521-527. Torabi A,Cleland JGF,Khan NK,Loh PH, Clark AL, Alamgir F,et al. The timing of development and subsequent clinical course of heart failure after a myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:859-870. Brosh D, Assali AR,Mager A, Porter A, Hasdai D, Teplitsky I, et al. Effect of no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction on six-month mortality. Am J Cardiol.2007;99:442-445. Durante A,Camici PG. Novel insights into an "old" phenomenon: the no reflow. Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:273-280. Hildebrandt HA,Patsalis PC, Al-Rashid F, Neuhäuser M, Rassaf T, Heusch G, et al. Quantification and characterisation of released plaque material during bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation into right coronary artery lesions by multimodality intracoronary imaging. EuroIntervention.2016;12:1481-1489. Kleinbongard P,Konorza T,Böse D, Baars T, Haude M, Erbel R,et al.Lessons from human coronary aspirate.J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;52:890-896. Dominguez AC,Bittl JA,El-Hayek G,Contreras E,Tamis-Holland JE. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention with aspiration thrombectomy Vs. Conventional percutaneous coronary intervention during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.2016;87:1203-1210. Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, Omerovic E, Gudnason T, Maeng M, et al.Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med.2013;369:1587-1597. Jolly SS,Cairns JA,Yusuf S,Meeks B, Pogue J,Rokoss MJ,et al. Randomized trial of primary PCI with or without routine manual thrombectomy. N Engl J Med.2015;372:1389-1398. Ibanez B,James S,Agewall S,Antunes MJ,Bucciarelli-Ducci C,Bueno H,et al.. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J.2018;39:119-177. Crea F. Coronary Microvascular Obstruction — A Puzzle with Many Pieces.N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1464-1465. Serdoz R,Pighi M,Konstantinidis NV,Kilic ID,Abou-Sherif S,Di Mario C. Thrombus aspiration in primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014;16:431. Müller-Hülsbeck S,Grimm J,Leidt J,Jahnke T,Heller M. Comparison of in vitro effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy devices.J Vasc Interv Radiol.2001;12:1185-1191. Barbato E,Marco J,Wijns W. Direct stenting. Eur Heart J.2003;24:394-403. Loubeyre C,Morice MC, Lefèvre T, Piéchaud JF,Louvard Y,Dumas P. A randomized comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol.2002;39:15-21. Alak A,Lugomirski P,Aleksova N,Jolly SS. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Conventional Stenting Versus Direct Stenting in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Invasive Cardiol.2015;27:405-409. Mahmoud KD,Jolly SS,James S, Džavík V,Cairns JA,Olivecrona GK,et al. Clinical impact of direct stenting and interaction with thrombus aspiration in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Thrombectomy Trialists Collaboration. Eur Heart J.2018;39:2472-2479. Neumann FJ,Gick M. Direct stenting in ST-elevation myocardials infarction: convenient, but not improving outcomes. Eur Heart J.2018;39:2480-2483. Gick M,Jander N,Bestehorn HP,Kienzle RP,Ferenc M,Werner K, et al. Randomized evaluation of the effects of filter-based distal protection on myocardial perfusion and infarct size after primary percutaneous catheter intervention in myocardial infarction with and without ST-segment elevation. Circulation.2005;112:1462-1469. Kelbaek H,Terkelsen CJ,Helqvist S,Lassen JF,Clemmensen P, Kløvgaard L,et al. Randomized comparison of distal protection versus conventional treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the drug elution and distal protection in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DEDICATION) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol.2008;51:899-905. Stone GW,Webb J,Cox DA,Brodie BR,Qureshi M,Kalynych A,et al. Distal microcirculatory protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293:1063-1072. Hibi K,Kozuma K, Sonoda S,Endo T,Tanaka H, Kyono H,et al. A Randomized Study of Distal Filter Protection Versus Conventional Treatment During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Attenuated Plaque Identified by Intravascular Ultrasound. JACC Cardiovasc Interv.2018;11:1545-1555. Stone GW,Maehara A,Muller JE,Rizik DG,Shunk KA,Ben-Yehuda O, et al. Plaque Characterization to Inform the Prediction and Prevention of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The CANARY Trial (Coronary Assessment by Near-infrared of Atherosclerotic Rupture-prone Yellow). JACC Cardiovasc Interv.2015;8:927-936. Amano H,Ikeda T,Toda M,Okubo R,Yabe T,Watanabe I, et al. Plaque Composition and No-Reflow Phenomenon During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Low-Echoic Structures in Grayscale Intravascular Ultrasound. Int Heart J. 2016;57:285-291. Niccoli G,Burzotta F,Galiuto L,Crea F. Myocardial no-reflow in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol.2009;54:281-292. Gao J,Luo JY,Liu F,Zheng YY,Chen BD,Chen QJ,et al.Short-and long-term effects of ischemic postconditioning in STEMI patients: a meta-analysis.Lipids Health Dis.2015;14:147. Engstrøm T,Kelbaek H,Helqvist S, Høfsten DE, Kløvgaard L,Clemmensen P, et al.Third Danish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients With STEMI-IPI. Effect of Ischemic Postconditioning During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol.2017;2:490-497. Kim EK,Hahn JY,Song YB,Lee SC,Choi JH,Choi SH, et al. Effect of ischemic postconditioning on myocardial salvage in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: cardiac magnetic resonance substudy of the POST randomized trial. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging.2015;31:629-637. Bulluck H,Foin N,Tan JW,Low AF,Sezer M,Hausenloy DJ. Invasive Assessment of the Coronary Microcirculation in Reperfused ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: Where Do We Stand? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004373 . Karimianpour A,Maran A. Advances in Coronary No-Reflow Phenomenon-a Contemporary Review. Curr Atheroscler Rep.2018;20:44. Rezkalla SH,Kloner RA. Coronary no-reflow phenomenon: from the experimental laboratory to the cardiac catheterization laboratory.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.2008;72:950-957. Ndrepepa G,Tiroch K,Fusaro M,Keta D,Seyfarth M,Byrne RA,et al. 5-year prognostic value of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010,55:2383-2389. Bolognese L,Carrabba N,Parodi G,Santoro GM,Buonamici P,Cerisano G,et al. Impact of microvascular dysfunction on left ventricular remodeling and long-term clinical outcome after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation.2004;109:1121-1126. Kloner RA,Dai W,Hale SL. No-Reflow Phenomenon. A New Target for Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction Independent of Myocardial Infarct Size. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018;23:273-276. Reffelmann T,Hale SL,Dow JS,Kloner RA. No-reflow phenomenon persists long-term after ischemia/reperfusion in the rat and predicts infarct expansion. Circulation. 2003;108:2911-2917. Wang R,Lagakos SW,Ware JH,Hunter DJ,Drazen JM.Statistics in Medicine — Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials. N Engl J Med.2007;357:2189-2194. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-17067","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Original investigation","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":402927,"identity":"fbfef8aa-3b66-4770-b02d-798c63c3d410","order_by":1,"name":"Min Ma","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Sichuan University West China Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Min","middleName":"","lastName":"Ma","suffix":""},{"id":402928,"identity":"0fd521a0-a962-48cf-8714-e3051d90b8e6","order_by":2,"name":"Ling Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Mian Yang People's Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ling","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":402929,"identity":"e7aadf28-252f-4263-857f-f0a0dc28ff96","order_by":3,"name":"Zhi-gang Yang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Sichuan University West China Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhi-gang","middleName":"","lastName":"Yang","suffix":""},{"id":402930,"identity":"643abc3f-d4bb-45d8-b5be-fe39d9bb75e2","order_by":4,"name":"Kai-yue Diao","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Sichuan University West China Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kai-yue","middleName":"","lastName":"Diao","suffix":""},{"id":402931,"identity":"bdf39df4-e5bf-49a9-9f5a-b4f233944916","order_by":5,"name":"Yong He","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yong","middleName":"","lastName":"He","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2020-03-10 13:58:13","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-17067/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-17067/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":640909,"identity":"3b217e10-62c0-4fe3-972f-a9aa7cfef2ae","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-03-13 01:13:57","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":61977,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Study flow chart","description":"","filename":"Figure1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-17067/v1/Figure 1.jpg"},{"id":640910,"identity":"61de57f2-6034-4773-92ae-afecf8a08145","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-03-13 01:13:58","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":144029,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Forest plot of Subset analysis","description":"","filename":"Figure2.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-17067/v1/Figure 2.jpg"},{"id":640911,"identity":"daed2645-2b12-4830-b98b-2774d693c46a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-03-13 01:13:58","extension":"jpg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":188455,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Cardiac magnetic resonance image.\nThe top row was from a patient who under prolonged inflation group, there is no imaging features of microvascular obstruction. Bottom row was from a patient with anteroseptal infarct who under rapid inflation/deflation strategy, there is imaging features of microvascular obstruction.","description":"","filename":"Figure3.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-17067/v1/Figure 3.jpg"},{"id":13493501,"identity":"92db2fbc-40a3-4cbc-811b-af9255a60e0d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-09-16 22:35:54","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":688893,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-17067/v1/4772b060-1c48-4325-b272-d67f748f8fb8.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Prolonged Stent Deployment Strategy in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Pilot study","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":" \u003cp\u003eAlthough there has been an increase in the use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in recent decades in China, the in-hospital mortality and long-term prognosis has not significantly changed[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. Coronary no-reflow is defined as a phenomenon in which, despite revascularization therapy with PPCI, the cardiac tissue fails to perfuse normally and has a negative effect on outcomes, negating the potential benefits of PPCI[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR3 CR4\" citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe pathophysiology of the no-reflow phenomenon is multifactorial, and it is now referred to as microvascular obstruction (MVO), which includes injury related to ischemia, reperfusion, endothelial cell edema, thrombus embolization, and embolization of atherosclerotic plaque fragments[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e].Therefore, these injuries are of concern during PPCI[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e].In theory, the manipulation of factors during PPCI may contribute to no-reflow; however, the balloon pressure, inflation time, repeated balloon dilations, and number of stents did not affect the incidence of no-reflow in a retrospective analysis[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. In small vessels, it is possible that the stent itself affixes the thrombus to the vessel wall, especially if the thrombus is more fibrous [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe duration of stent inflation has a significant impact on stent expansion, and rapid inflation/deflation may not be enough to fully expand the stent [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, a fully expanded stent may entrap the atherothrombus under the struts that are more fixed and reduce distal embolization in PPCI. However, this hypothesis has not been well investigated in randomized controlled studies. The present study was undertaken to evaluate whether prolonged inflation would decrease the no-reflow phenomenon in PPCI compared with the conventional rapid inflation/deflation strategy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03199014)\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Materials And Methods","content":" \u003ch2\u003eTrial Design And Study Participants\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWe conduct this single-center randomized, single-blinded parallel pilot trial to compare a prolonged stent deployment strategy with a rapid inflation/deflation deployment strategy. The randomization was performed using a simple random sampling method that was generated by a computer program. The random allocation list was enclosed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. The eligible patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the prolonged inflation group or the rapid inflation/deflation group. The trial design was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board of West China Hospital. The research paper is written in accordance with the international CONSORT 2010 statement[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePatients were eligible for enrollment if they met the following criteria: 1) age\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;18 years; 2) patients with STEMI who were referred to PPCI within 12 hours after the onset of symptoms and with ST-segment elevation\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;1\u0026nbsp;mm in \u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;2 contiguous leads or a presumed new left bundle branch block or a true posterior myocardial infarction; 3) admission within 12 hours of symptom onset or admission between 12 and 24 hours if there was evidence of continuing ischemia. The exclusion criteria were: the left main coronary artery was a target vessel; an artery reference diameter༜2\u0026nbsp;mm; vessel calcification or tortuosity, a true bifurcation lesion; cardiogenic shock; prior coronary artery surgery; previous percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) of the target segment; a contraindication to CMR imaging (e.g., pacemaker, claustrophobia),and inability to give informed consent.\u003c/p\u003e \n\u003ch2\u003eProcedures\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePatients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned after coronary angiography to the prolonged stent deployment group or to the conventional rapid inflation/deflation deployment group during PCI. An experienced cardiologists preformed the procedures. All patients received 300\u0026nbsp;mg of oral aspirin and 600\u0026nbsp;mg clopidogrel (or 180\u0026nbsp;mg ticagrelor) as soon as the diagnosis was confirmed. Heparin (60U/kg) was given to all patients in the emergency department and was administered throughout the procedure to maintain an ACT༞300 seconds. Patients were immediately taken to the cardiac catheterization lab, and coronary angiography was performed by using the standard Judkins technique with a transradial approach. If the patient had a high thrombus burden, thrombus aspiration was performed when the floppy, steerable guidewire passed through the target lesion, according to the operator\u0026rsquo;s judgment. If the operator predicted that direct stenting was possible, predilation was not performed. if direct stenting was impossible, predilation with a single low-pressure inflation was performed. In all patients, only the infarct-related artery was treated.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll placed stents were drug-eluting stents, and patients were given the option between two commercially available drug-eluting stents: the PROMUS Element stent (Boston Scientific, Boston, Massachusetts) or a GuReater stent (Lepu, China). The diameters of the stent and balloon were selected by visual estimation to achieve a balloon-to-vessel ratio of 1:1. In the experimental group, the stent was deployed with a single balloon inflation, and low-pressure inflation was sustained for \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;30 seconds after the target balloon inflation pressure had been achieved. If the patient could not tolerate the procedure, showed signs of ischemia, or had chest pain, arrhythmia, or a decrease in blood pressure, the stent balloon was immediately deflated. A rapid inflation/deflation strategy was adopted in the control group, in which the stent balloon inflation time was less than 10 seconds. Additional dilation, expansion pressure, and postdilation were left to the discretion of operators. For both study groups, a GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitor (tirofiban) was used as a preventive or bailout therapy at the operator\u0026rsquo;s discretion. After stent implantation, if the no-reflow phenomenon was present, pharmacological intervention including common vasodilators (nitroprusside, diltiazem) was used.\u003c/p\u003e \n\u003ch2\u003eEndpoints, Assessment Of Outcomes And Definitions\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe primary outcome of this study was the incidence of the no-reflow phenomenon according to TIMI flow. The no-reflow phenomenon was defined as a TIMI flow grade\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;2 that was transient or sustained after the occluded epicardial artery was opened; incomplete lesion dilation, epicardial vascular spasm, dissection or in situ thrombosis were carefully excluded[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. Two experienced cardiologists independently assessed the occurrence of no-reflow after stent implantation, the TIMI flow grade, the TIMI frame count, and the myocardial blush grade on the most recent angiogram. Thrombolysis in the myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score flow grading system was used to evaluate blood flow. TIMI 0 flow is defined as no antegrade flow beyond the point of occlusion. TIMI 1 flow is defined as faint antegrade flow beyond the occlusion with incomplete filling of the distal vascular bed. TIMI 2 flow is defined as delayed antegrade flow with complete filling of the distal vascular bed. TIMI 3 flow is defined as normal flow with complete filling of the distal vascular bed. The number of angiogram frames required for the dye to reach a specified distal segment in the coronary artery was referred to as the corrected TIMI frame count[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. All angiograms were recorded on 21\u0026nbsp;mm cine film at 15 frames/second (UNIQ FD 10, Philips, USA). The myocardial blush grade (MBG) was used to assess the filling and clearance of contracts in the myocardium. MBG 0 was defined as no apparent tissue-level perfusion in the distribution of the culprit artery. MBG 1 was defined as no clearance from the microvasculature. MBG 2 was defined as the blush clearing slowly. MBG 2 was defined as blush beginning to clear during washout[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. The thrombus burden was evaluated by the TIMI thrombus scale, which was classified as a grade between 0 and 5[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. A heavy thrombus burden was considered to be present with a TIMI grade\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;4. Electrocardiographic resolution of ST-segment elevation was defined as an ST-segment reduction of \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;50% in the same lead within 60\u0026nbsp;min after the index procedure[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), which were defined as any events of target vessel revascularization, recurrent MI or cardiovascular mortality. These outcomes were examined 30\u0026nbsp;days and one year after the primary PCI. The procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose were also assessed. The safety outcome of major bleeding is defined using a definition of major bleeding from the International Society on Thrombosis \u0026amp; Hemostasis (ISTH)[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]; the bleeding events that are not defined as major will be counted as minor bleeding.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA subset of patients was included in the cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination approximately 3 to 5 days after the index procedure. To assess infarct size, myocardial salvage index, presence and extent of MVO, myocardium hemorrhage, myocardial edema, and left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) and left ventricular(LV) volume. Examinations were performed on a 3.0-T whole-body scanner with an18-element body phased arraycoil (Skyra; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Standard two-, three, and four-chamber cine images were acquired using a TrueFISP sequence. The area at risk was assessed on the initial examination using a T2-weighted short-tau inversion-recovery sequence. Infarct size, LVEF, and LV volume were assessed on both examinations using delayed, contrast-enhanced, electrocardiogram-triggered inversion-recovery images and steady-state free precession(SSFP) cine images. The myocardial salvage index was calculated as [area at risk (mass) \u0026ndash; infarct size (mass)]/area at risk (mass). Delayed contrast-enhanced images were obtained 10\u0026nbsp;min after an intravenous injection of 0.1\u0026nbsp;mmol/kg body weight gadolinium-based contrast (Gadovist, Bayer Schering, Berlin, Germany). All images were obtained in the short-axis plane, with 8-mm slices without gaps covering the entire LV[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR20\" citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA subgroup analysis was prespecified to examine factors associated with an increased risk of the no-reflow phenomenon: age (\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;65 and \u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;65\u0026nbsp;years), thrombus burden, thrombosis aspiration, direct stenting, infarct location (anterior and nonanterior), multiple complex lesions, and door-to-balloon time.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe trial was powered for the outcome of ST-segment reduction of \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;50% in the same lead within 60\u0026nbsp;min after the index procedure. The results of previous studies showed that the incidence of electrocardiographic resolution was 60\u0026ndash;70% under conventional rapid inflation/deflation strategy in PPCI. We therefore hypothesized that in our trial more patients in the prolonged inflation group achieved ST-segment reduction of \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;50%, and the anticipated relative risk reduction (RRR) was 30%. We calculated that 53 patients would need to be enrolled in this study. The sample size was increased by about 10% to total 60 patients to account for loss to follow up. The data are expressed as percentages and means (standard deviations). Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test at a two-sided significance level of 5%. Continuous variables were compared using t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e "},{"header":"Result","content":" \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePatients characteristics\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBetween November 2016 and May 2017, 97 patients with STEMI were considered for inclusion, of whom 60 patients were enrolled according to the eligibility criteria (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). After angiography, patients were randomly assigned to undergo either a prolonged inflation group during PCI (30 patients) or a rapid inflation/deflation group during PCI (30 patients). The baseline clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The procedural and angiographic characteristics of the study patients are shown (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). After undergoing randomization, 10% of the patients in the prolonged inflation group could not tolerate the ischemic deflation of the stenting balloon in advance. The mean time of inflation was 35.87 seconds in the prolonged inflation group and 10.07 seconds in the rapid inflation/deflation group. None of the patients who underwent randomization were lost to follow-up.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eBaseline characteristics of the patients according to the randomization allocation\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eCharacteristic\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eProlonged inflation group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;30)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eRapid inflation/deflation group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;30)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Italic\" class=\"Italic\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eP\u003c/span\u003e value\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eAge-years\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e64.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.9\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e61.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;12.5\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.445\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMale sex-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e25\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e22\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.347\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eBody mass index\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e25.0\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.8\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e24.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.7\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.602\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eHistory\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eHypertension-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e14 (46.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e17 (56.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.438\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eCurrent smoking-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e22 (73.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e17 (56.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.176\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePrevious myocardial infarction\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0 (0)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0 (0)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eNA\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eDiabetes mellitus-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e6 (20)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e4 (13.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.488\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePrevious stroke-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e4 (13.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.389\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePrevious atrial fibrillation-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1.0\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMedication used\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eACEI-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0 (0)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.313\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eARB-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.554\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eCCB-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e4 (13.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e5 (16.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.718\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMetformin-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1(3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.554\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eβ-blocker-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.492\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eClopidogrel-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e22 (73.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e20 (66.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.779\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTicagrelor-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e8 (26.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e10 (33.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.779\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eFibrinolysis before randomization -no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0 (0)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.492\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eDoor-to-balloon time-min\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e67\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;17\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e67\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;25\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.972\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTarget coronary artery\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.663\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eLeft coronary artery-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e14 (46.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e12 (40)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eLeft circumflex-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e4 (13.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eRight coronary artery-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e14 (46.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e14 (46.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMultivessel coronary disease-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e15 (50)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e15 (50)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1.00\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eKillip class-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.431\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e27\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e26\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e4\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e4\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eSystolic blood pressure in lab-mmHg\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e125.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;21.0\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e120.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;21.2\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.359\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eDiastolic blood pressure in lab-mmHg\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e79.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;16.6\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e75.7\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;13.7\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.301\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eHeart rate in lab-bpm\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e76.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.6\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e84.1\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;20.9\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.095\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTIMI flow-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.193\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0 or 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e25 (83.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e19 (63.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3 (10)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3 (10)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e8 (26.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eThrombus burden-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.643\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3 (10)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3 (10)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e5 (16.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3 (10)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3 (10)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e4\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3 (10)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e5\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e19 (63.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e15 (50)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eLaboratory tests\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTotal cholesterol-mmol/L\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.8\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.893\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eLDL-mmol/L\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.94\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2.9\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.98\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.335\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eC-reactive protein-mg/L\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e6.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;19\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e4.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.5\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.56\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eCreatinine-mmol/L\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e80.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;20.1\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e77.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;20.2\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.627\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTroponin (CTn)-ng/L\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e6319.7\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3559\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e6275.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3451.8\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.961\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eEjection fraction (EF)-%\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e51.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.6\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e53.7\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.1\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.427\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003eACEI:angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor;ARB:angiotensin receptor blocker;CCB: calcium channel block ;TIMI:thrombolysis in myocardial infarction;LDL:low density lipoprotein .\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eCharacteristics of the procedural data\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eCharacteristic\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eProlonged inflation group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;30)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eRapid inflation/deflation group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;30)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Italic\" class=\"Italic\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eP\u003c/span\u003e value\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eDirect stenting-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e15 (50)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e9 (37.5)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.114\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eThrombectomy-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e10 (33.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e5 (16.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.136\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePredilation balloon diameter-mm\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.21\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.21\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.945\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eNo. of stents-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1.13\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.35\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1.17\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.38\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.723\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eType of drug-eluting stent-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.554\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePROMUS Element\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e28 (93.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e29 (96.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eGuReater\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTotal stent length-mm\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e33.1\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;14.5\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e31.3\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;14.6\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.640\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eStent diameter-mm\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3.17\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.29\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3.09\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.41\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.418\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eInflation time-seconds\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e35.87\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.38\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e10.07\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.19\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e༜0.0001\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eInflation pressure-atm\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e13.47\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.28\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e13.40\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.23\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.89\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePostdilation-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e5 (16.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e9 (30)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.222\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMedication use-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eGlycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e16 (53.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e15 (50)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.796\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eNitroprusside\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.492\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eDiltiazem\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.554\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \n\u003ch2\u003eProcedural Outcomes\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cdiv id=\"FPar1\" renderingstyle=\"Style1\" class=\"FormalPara\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Heading\"\u003ePrimary outcome\u003c/div\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe proportion of patients with an immediate TIMI grade 3 flow was higher in the prolonged inflation group than in the rapid inflation/deflation group after the stent was deployed (90% vs 63.3%, respectively, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.005) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). The final no-reflow proportion was lower in the prolonged inflation group than in the rapid inflation/deflation group (0% vs 30%, respectively, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.002). In addition, 78% (7/9) of patients exhibiting the no-reflow phenomenon in the rapid inflation/deflation group recovered after pharmacological intervention. The corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) was lower in the prolonged inflation group than in the rapid inflation/deflation group (35.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;14.5 vs 49.18\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;25.2, respectively, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.014), and more patients in the prolonged inflation group had a ST-segment resolution\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;50% than in the rapid inflation/deflation group (90% vs 66.7%, respectively, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.028). The percentage of patients achieve a myocardial blush grade (MBG) of 3 was higher in the prolonged group than in the rapid inflation/deflation group (60% vs 20%, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.01).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePrimary and secondary outcomes\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eoutcome\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eProlonged inflation group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;30)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eRapid inflation/deflation group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;30)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Italic\" class=\"Italic\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eP\u003c/span\u003e value\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eImmediate TIMI flow-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.005\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTIMI 0\u0026ndash;1\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0 (0)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTIMI 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e10 (33.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTIMI 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e29 (96.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e19 (63.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eThe incidence of no-reflow-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0 (0)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e9 (30)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.002\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eST-segment resolution\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;50%-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e27 (90)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e20 (66.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.028\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eCorrected TIMI frame count-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e35.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;14.5\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e49.18\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;25.2\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.014\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eDistal embolization of culprit vessels-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.313\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMyocardial blush grade-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.001\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0 (0)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e6 (20)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e12 (40)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e18 (60)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e18 (60)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e6 (20)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eProcedure time-min\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e37\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.8\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e39\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;18\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.572\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eRadiation exposure time-min\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1208.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;757.7\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e932.69\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;452.9\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.130\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eBleeding events-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.313\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Bold\" class=\"Bold\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003e30-day clinical outcomes\u003c/span\u003e-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e4 (13.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e7 (23.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.506\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTarget vessel revascularization\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3 (10)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1.000\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eRecurrent myocardial infarction\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3 (10)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.612\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eCardiovascular mortality\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1.00\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Bold\" class=\"Bold\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eOne-year clinical outcomes\u003c/span\u003e-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e7 (23.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e11 (36.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.399\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTarget vessel revascularization\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3 (10)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e5 (16.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.706\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eRecurrent myocardial infarction\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3 (10)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e4 (13.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1.00\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eCardiovascular mortality\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1 (3.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1.00\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"FPar2\" renderingstyle=\"Style1\" class=\"FormalPara\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"Heading\"\u003eSecondary outcome\u003c/div\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere was no significant difference in the procedure time, radiation exposure time, or contrast volume. The number of bleeding events and clinical end point were also not significantly different between the two groups (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). The subset analysis was show in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e. According to the CMR subset, the prolonged inflation strategy can reduce the incidence of MVO and improve cardiac function (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eCardiac magnetic resonance data\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eEndpoint\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eProlonged inflation group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;15)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eRapid inflation/deflation group (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;10)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e\u003cspan type=\"Italic\" class=\"Italic\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eP\u003c/span\u003e value\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eInfarct size (%LVM)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e12.1 (4.5)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e13.4 (3.9)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.512\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePresence of MVO-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1/15 (6.7)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e5/10 (50)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.023\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePresence of IMH-no. (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3/15 (20)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e4/10 (25)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.378\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMyocardial salvage index\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e60.5 (22.1)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e56.4 (20.1)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.081\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eLVEF (%)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e50.2 (7.5)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e42.1 (6.3)\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.026\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003e%LVM\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;percentage of LV mass, MVO\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;microvascular vessel obstruction, IMH\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;intramyocardial hemorrhage, LVEF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;left ventricular ejection fraction\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e "},{"header":"Discussion","content":" \u003cp\u003eTo the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the effect of prolonged inflation time in PPCI. We designed this small proof-of concept pilot study to determine whether prolonged or rapid strategies could provide more short- and long-term benefits for STEMI patients. The major findings of the present study were as follows: 1) the prolonged inflation strategy reduced the no-reflow phenomenon and improved myocardial microcirculation perfusion, but there were no benefits in the 30-day and one-year clinical outcomes; 2) there were no significant differences between the study groups in terms of the procedure time, radiation exposure time and the number of bleeding events (for safety surveillance); 3) according to the subset analysis, it seems that the prolonged inflation strategy was more effective in patients who were male, had a thrombectomy, had a heavy thrombosis burden, and nonanterior wall infraction; and 4) as evaluated by theCMR subset, the prolonged inflation strategy can reduce the incidence of MVO and improve cardiac function.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the early days of coronary angioplasty, an autoperfusion balloon angioplasty catheter was used for long balloon inflation, which was based on the hypothesis that the loose flap of dissection may be definitively \u0026ldquo;tacked back\u0026rdquo; and might deliver a better result[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR23\" citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. A human study found that in approximately half of patients whose initial angioplasty was a failure, could be reverted to a success by prolonged dilation[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. With the wide application of stents, this technique was not used. Subsequently, an in vitro human study investigated the duration of balloon inflation for optimal stent deployment[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. Prolonged balloon inflation could have a significant impact on stent expansion and strut apposition, as evaluated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT)[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR27\" citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. However, these studies were not limited to patients with STEMI.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite the use of PPCI and the development of emergency transports resulting in shorter ischemic times, STEMI-related mortality remains considerable[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e]. The no-reflow phenomenon can offset, at least in part, the benefits of PPCI[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. Coronary microvascular dysfunction plays a key role in the development of no-reflow phenomenon[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. This phenomenon occurs in approximately 50% of STEMI patients after PPCI[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. Thrombotic material and thromboembolisms will travel distally either spontaneously or at the time of PPCI when an angioplasty balloon is expanded or a stent is deployed[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. The debris released from a PPCI can also include soluble substances such as vasoactive agents or inflammatory mediators that may stimulate microvascular arteriolar spasms[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]. Thus, the removal of an intravascular thrombus with an extraction catheter during the procedure for reducing atherothrombotic embolization is an active strategy that has been evaluated in RCT trials and meta-analyses [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. Although there were negative results from the TASTE and TOTAL trials and recent guidelines no longer recommend routine aspiration for STEMI[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e], neither study allows us to rule out the possibility that thrombus aspiration might be beneficial in high-risk patients[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e]. Even so, with more than 30% of patients showing minimal particles after thrombectomy and persistent residual thrombus in vitro models, distal embolization may not fully prevent thrombectomy[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e]. Direct stenting is another strategy to reduce the risk of distal embolization of thrombus fragments[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e]. A meta-analysis found that direct stenting significantly reduced short-term and one-year mortality and the after-procedural no-reflow phenomenon[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e]. However, few studies have been limited to STEMI patients. Recently, the Thrombectomy Trialists Collaboration conducted a patient-level meta-analysis that found that direct stenting was not significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with conventional stenting among patients with STEMI undergoing PCI[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. Approximately 37% of patients in that study underwent direct stenting[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e]. In our study, direct stenting and thrombectomy were performed more often in the prolonged inflation group (50% and 33.3%, respectively) than in the rapid inflation/deflation group, but the differences were not significant. Even though the data from the Thrombectomy Trialists Collaboration affirm the facilitation of direct stenting by aspiration thrombectomy, there was no significant interaction between thrombus aspiration and any of the clinical outcome variables investigated[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e]. According to our subset analysis, patients with thrombectomy and heavy thrombosis burden may have better angiographic myocardial reperfusion outcomes, but there was not enough statistical power, and the interaction was not excluded. Three randomized studies investigated filter devices for distal protection, but these studies failed to show a benefit in terms of reperfusion measures or clinical outcomes[\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR47\" citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e]. A recent randomized study evaluated the utility of distal protection in patients with acute coronary syndrome with native coronary artery lesions and attenuated plaque\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;5\u0026nbsp;mm in length on pre-PCI intravascular ultrasound. The incidence of the no-reflow phenomenon was decreased in these high-risk distal embolization patients[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e]. However, no study found that distal protection could affect the infarct size[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e]. Because of the potential disadvantages of thrombectomy, distal protection devices and direct stenting, and the neutral effect for distal embolization, another novel strategy to prevent the no-reflow phenomenon is a clinical imperative.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the present study, the prolonged inflation strategy during stent deployment may work through the following mechanisms: First, a long inflation time and a low-pressure inflation could reduce iatrogenic rupture of thin-cap fibroatheroma through stent expansion, which induced distal embolization, particularly in lesions with low-echoic structures and large amounts of atherosclerotic plaque with vulnerable components[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e]. Second, although thrombectomy may reduce thrombus burden, persistent residual thrombus may also cause distal embolization[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e]. When added to direct stenting, the loosened atherothrombus material was affixed to the vessel wall under the stent struts[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e]. However, incomplete stent deployment and inadequate apposition may weaken the \u0026ldquo;confinement effect\u0026rdquo; for atherothrombus material. Therefore, the conventional rapid inflation/deflation strategy was not enough[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e], especially in the PPCI setting in which postdilation should be avoided. Third, prolonged inflation may be analogous to the postcondition that was performed within 1 minute of reflow by brief episodes of reversible ischemia-reperfusion during angioplasty. A meta-analysis found that postconditioning following PCI induced by transient coronary ischemia in STEMI patients may reduce myocardial injury biomarkers and improve cardiac function[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e]. However, the POST and DANAMI-3\u0026ndash;iPOST trials found that ischemic postconditioning did not improve myocardial reperfusion and clinical outcomes[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e]. The primary endpoint results contribute to the theory that postconditioning algorithm, in which postconditioning is instituted after a very short reperfusion time, might be a more effective method[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e]. In the present study, if the occlusion persisted for more than 30 seconds after the stent was deployed, the conditioning therapy was completed before reperfusion injury could occur. Therefore, this postconditioning algorithm may be effective.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe indexes of angiography for evaluating coronary microvascular circulation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory are semiquantitative and can be subjective[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e]. CMR is the gold standard method to assess the MVO, MI size, LV volume and LVEF, but it is expensive and not yet widely available[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e]. Areas of no-reflow have been associated with MVO as seen on magnetic resonance images and correlate with a higher degree of myocardial damage[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, in the present study, we designed a subset of CMR to assess the no-reflow phenomenon after PPCI. Approximately 50% of the patients included in this study underwent CMR. The incidence of MVO was 50% in the conventional rapid inflation/deflation group and was consistent with previous studies[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e58\u003c/span\u003e]. The prolonged inflation strategy could reduce the incidence of MVO and improve cardiac function, but not infarction size, as evaluated by CMR. Kloner[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e] found that no-reflow did not directly contribute to myocyte cell death, and several studies showed that it was independent of the size of the infarction[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e59\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e60\u003c/span\u003e]. The no-reflow phenomenon is associated with poor healing of the infarct scar[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e], including thinner scars and more infarct expansion; therefore, it appears that some therapies that can reduce no-reflow without reducing infarct size[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Limitations","content":" \u003cp\u003eThis study included the following limitations of note.Firstly,this was a single-center study with a relatively small sample.Second,the study was underpowered for detecting significant differences in 30-day and one-year clinical outcomes.Because high-risk patients with more complex lesions and unstable hemodynamics were excluded, the results cannot be applied to all STEMI patients. However, this study implemented rigorous inclusion criteria to reduce the risk of confounding bias. Furthermore, few studies have reported data in this area, thus contributing to the value of our study. We aim to fullfillment this study in our future research endeavors.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Conclusions","content":" \u003cp\u003ewe evaluated the effect of a prolonged inflation strategy that could reduce the no-reflow phenomenon of MVOs and improve the myocardial microcirculation perfusion, but there were no benefits in the 30-day and one-year clinical outcomes. However, large-sample, randomized controlled clinical trials with a long-term follow-up period are needed to confirm this preliminary result.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":" \u003cp\u003ePPCI:Primary percutaneous coronary intervention;STEMI:ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction;CMR:cardiac magnetic resonance; TIMI:Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction;MVO: microvascular obstruction;MBG:myocardial blush grade; MACEs: major adverse cardiovascular events; MI:myocardial infarction;LVEF:left ventricular ejection fraction;LV:left ventricular; RRR:relative risk reduction; cTFC: corrected TIMI frame count;OCT: optical coherence tomography;IVUS: intravascular ultrasound.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor\u0026rsquo;s Contribution:\u003c/strong\u003eY.H conceived of the study, and participated in its design. M.M and L.W coordination, drafted the manuscript, collect data and algorithms. KY.D take responsibility of the imaging data analysis. Y.ZG and H.Y are both the study guarantors, had full access to the data in the study and take responsibility of the study design and the accuracy of the data analysis, and had the final responsibility to submit for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgments:\u003c/strong\u003e We would like to thank the patients who participated in the study and the staff from departments of Cardiology and Radiology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflicts of Interest:\u003c/strong\u003e The authors declare no conflict of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Not applicable\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003cbr /\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eThe study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Written informed consents were obtained from all the study participants.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding: \u003c/strong\u003eThis work was funded by the Key Research Projects in Sichuan Province (No. 20ZDYF3295 ) and 1\u0026middot;3\u0026middot;5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University(ZYGD18013).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi J, Li X, Wang Q, Hu S, Wang Y, Masoudi FA, et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China from 2001 to 2011 (The China PEACE-Retrospective Acute Myocardial Infarction Study): a retrospective analysis of hospital data. Lancet.2015;385:441-51.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRezkalla SH, Kloner RA.No-reflow phenomenon. Circulation. 2002;105:656-662.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKloner RA, King KS, Harrington MG. No-reflow phenomenon in the heart and brain. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol.2018;315:H550-H562.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRezkalla SH,Stankowski RV,Hanna J,Kloner RA. Management of no-Reflow phenomenon in the catheterization laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:215-223.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKloner RA. No-reflow phenomenon: maintaining vascular integrity. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2011;16:244-50.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReffelmann T, Kloner RA. Microvascular alterations after temporary coronary artery occlusion: the no-reflow phenomenon. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther .2004;9:163-172.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKloner RA. The importance of no-reflow/microvascular obstruction in the STEMI patient. Eur Heart J.2017;38:3511-3513.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhou H, He XY, Zhuang SW, Wang J, Lai Y, Qi WG,et al. Clinical and procedural predictors of no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. World J Emerg Med.2014;5:96-102.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYip HK, Chen MC, Chang HW, Hang CL, Hsieh YK, Fang CY, et al. Angiographic morphologic features of infarct-related arteries and timely reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: predictors of slow-flow and no-reflow phenomenon. Chest. 2002;122:1322-1332.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHovasse T, Mylotte D,Garot P,Salvatella N,Morice MC,Chevalier B,et al. Duration of balloon inflation for optimal stent deployment: five seconds is not enough. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81:446-453.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVallurupalli S,Bahia A,Ruiz-Rodriguez E, Ahmed Z, Hakeem A, Uretsky BF. Optimization of stent implantation using a high pressure inflation protocol. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016,87:65-72.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchulz KF,Altman DG,Moher D,CONSORT Group.CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. N Engl J Med 1985,312:932-936.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGibson CM, Murphy SA,Rizzo MJ,Ryan KA,Marble SJ,McCabe CH,et al.Relationship between TIMI frame count and clinical outcomes after thrombolytic administration. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group. Circulation. 1999;99:1945-1950.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003evan't Hof AW,Liem A,Suryapranata H,Hoorntje JC,de Boer MJ,Zijlstra F. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Circulation. 1998;97:2302-2306.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGibson CM,de Lemos JA, Murphy SA,Marble SJ, McCabe CH,Cannon CP,et al.Combination therapy with abciximab reduces angiographically evident thrombus in acute myocardial infarction: A TIMI 14 substudy. Circulation .2001;103:2550-2554.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ede Lemos JA,Antman EM,Giugliano RP,McCabe CH,Murphy SA,Van de Werf F,et al. ST-segment resolution and infarct-related artery patency and flow after thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 14 investigators. Am J Cardiol.2000;85:299-304.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchulman S,Kearon C.\u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Subcommittee+on+Control+of+Anticoagulation+of+the+Scientific+and+Standardization+Committee+of+the+International+Society+on+Thrombosis+and+Haemostasis%5bCorporate+Author%5d\"\u003eSubcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis\u003c/a\u003e.Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:692-694.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBonanad C,Monmeneu JV,Lopez-Lereu MP,Hervas A,de Dios E,Gavara J,et al. Prediction of long-term major events soon after a first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur J Radiol.2016;85:585-592.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHusser O,Monmeneu JV,Sanchis J,Nunez J,Lopez-Lereu MP,Bonanad C,et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived intramyocardial hemorrhage after STEMI: Influence on long-term prognosis, adverse left ventricular remodeling and relationship with microvascular obstruction. Int J Cardiol.2013;167:2047-2054.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003evan Kranenburg M,Magro M,Thiele H,de Waha S,Eitel I,Cochet A,et al. Prognostic Value of Microvascular Obstruction and Infarct Size, as Measured by CMR in STEMI Patients. JACC:Cardiovascular Imaging.2014;7:930-939.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eColle JP,Delarche N. PTCA with side-by-side balloon using fixed guide wire systems: a potential alternative autoperfusion device--An in vitro study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992;27:303-308.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ede Muinck ED,den Heijer P,van Dijk RB,Crijns HJ,Hillege HJ,Twisk SP,et al. Autoperfusion balloon versus stent for acute or threatened closure during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol.1994;74:1002-1005.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTuric ZG,Campbell CA,Gottimukkala MV,Kloner RA. Preservation of distal coronary perfusion during prolonged balloon inflation with an autoperfusion angioplasty catheter. Circulation.1987;75:1273-1280.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003evan der Linden LP,Bakx AL,Sedney MI,Buis B,Bruschke AV. Prolonged dilation with an autoperfusion balloon catheter for refractory acute occlusion related to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol.1993;22:1016-1023.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAsano T,Kobayashi Y, Fukushima K, Iwata Y, Kitahara H, Ishio N,et al.Effect of balloon inflation time on expansion of sirolimus-eluting stent. Heart Vessels.2009;24:335-339.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHee Ann S,Chung JW,DE Jin C,Ho Lee J, Min Kim J, Garg S,et al. Better Inflation Time of Stent Balloon for Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Expansion and Apposition: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study. J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27:171-176.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCook JR, Mhatre A, Wang FW, Uretsky BF. Prolonged high-pressure is required for optimal stent deployment as assessed by optical coherence tomography.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:521-527.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTorabi A,Cleland JGF,Khan NK,Loh PH, Clark AL, Alamgir F,et al. The timing of development and subsequent clinical course of heart failure after a myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:859-870.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrosh D, Assali AR,Mager A, Porter A, Hasdai D, Teplitsky I, et al. Effect of no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction on six-month mortality. Am J Cardiol.2007;99:442-445.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDurante A,Camici PG. Novel insights into an \"old\" phenomenon: the no reflow. Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:273-280.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHildebrandt HA,Patsalis PC, Al-Rashid F, \u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Neuh%C3%A4user+M\u0026amp;cauthor_id=27998840\"\u003eNeuh\u0026auml;user\u003c/a\u003e M, Rassaf T, Heusch G, et al. Quantification and characterisation of released plaque material during bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation into right coronary artery lesions by multimodality intracoronary imaging. EuroIntervention.2016;12:1481-1489.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKleinbongard P,Konorza T,B\u0026ouml;se D, Baars T, Haude M, Erbel R,et al.Lessons from human coronary aspirate.J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;52:890-896.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDominguez AC,Bittl JA,El-Hayek G,Contreras E,Tamis-Holland JE. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention with aspiration thrombectomy Vs. Conventional percutaneous coronary intervention during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.2016;87:1203-1210.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Fr%C3%B6bert+O\u0026amp;cauthor_id=23991656\"\u003eFr\u0026ouml;bert\u003c/a\u003e O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, Omerovic E, Gudnason T, Maeng M, et al.Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med.2013;369:1587-1597.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJolly SS,Cairns JA,Yusuf S,Meeks B, Pogue J,Rokoss MJ,et al. Randomized trial of primary PCI with or without routine manual thrombectomy. N Engl J Med.2015;372:1389-1398.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIbanez B,James S,Agewall S,Antunes MJ,Bucciarelli-Ducci C,Bueno H,et al.. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J.2018;39:119-177.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCrea F. Coronary Microvascular Obstruction \u0026mdash; A Puzzle with Many Pieces.N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1464-1465.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSerdoz R,Pighi M,Konstantinidis NV,Kilic ID,Abou-Sherif S,Di Mario C. Thrombus aspiration in primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014;16:431.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=M%C3%BCller-H%C3%BClsbeck+S\u0026amp;cauthor_id=11585885\"\u003eM\u0026uuml;ller-H\u0026uuml;lsbeck\u003c/a\u003e S,Grimm J,Leidt J,Jahnke T,Heller M. Comparison of in vitro effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy devices.J Vasc Interv Radiol.2001;12:1185-1191.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBarbato E,Marco J,Wijns W. Direct stenting. Eur Heart J.2003;24:394-403.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLoubeyre C,Morice MC,\u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Lef%C3%A8vre+T\u0026amp;cauthor_id=11755281\"\u003eLef\u0026egrave;vre\u003c/a\u003e T,\u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Pi%C3%A9chaud+JF\u0026amp;cauthor_id=11755281\"\u003ePi\u0026eacute;chaud\u003c/a\u003e JF,Louvard Y,Dumas P. A randomized comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol.2002;39:15-21.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlak A,Lugomirski P,Aleksova N,Jolly SS. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Conventional Stenting Versus Direct Stenting in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Invasive Cardiol.2015;27:405-409.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMahmoud KD,Jolly SS,James S,\u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=D%C5%BEav%C3%ADk+V\u0026amp;cauthor_id=29688419\"\u003eDžav\u0026iacute;k\u003c/a\u003e V,Cairns JA,Olivecrona GK,et al. Clinical impact of direct stenting and interaction with thrombus aspiration in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Thrombectomy Trialists Collaboration. Eur Heart J.2018;39:2472-2479.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNeumann FJ,Gick M. Direct stenting in ST-elevation myocardials infarction: convenient, but not improving outcomes. Eur Heart J.2018;39:2480-2483.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGick M,Jander N,Bestehorn HP,Kienzle RP,Ferenc M,Werner K, et al. Randomized evaluation of the effects of filter-based distal protection on myocardial perfusion and infarct size after primary percutaneous catheter intervention in myocardial infarction with and without ST-segment elevation. Circulation.2005;112:1462-1469.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKelbaek H,Terkelsen CJ,Helqvist S,Lassen JF,Clemmensen P,\u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Kl%C3%B8vgaard+L\u0026amp;cauthor_id=18308157\"\u003eKl\u0026oslash;vgaard\u003c/a\u003e L,et al. Randomized comparison of distal protection versus conventional treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the drug elution and distal protection in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DEDICATION) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol.2008;51:899-905.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStone GW,Webb J,Cox DA,Brodie BR,Qureshi M,Kalynych A,et al. Distal microcirculatory protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293:1063-1072.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHibi K,Kozuma K, Sonoda S,Endo T,Tanaka H, Kyono H,et al. A Randomized Study of Distal Filter Protection Versus Conventional Treatment During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Attenuated Plaque Identified by Intravascular Ultrasound. JACC Cardiovasc Interv.2018;11:1545-1555.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStone GW,Maehara A,Muller JE,Rizik DG,Shunk KA,Ben-Yehuda O, et al. Plaque Characterization to Inform the Prediction and Prevention of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The CANARY Trial (Coronary Assessment by Near-infrared of Atherosclerotic Rupture-prone Yellow). JACC Cardiovasc Interv.2015;8:927-936.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmano H,Ikeda T,Toda M,Okubo R,Yabe T,Watanabe I, et al. Plaque Composition and No-Reflow Phenomenon During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Low-Echoic Structures in Grayscale Intravascular Ultrasound. Int Heart J. 2016;57:285-291.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNiccoli G,Burzotta F,Galiuto L,Crea F. Myocardial no-reflow in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol.2009;54:281-292.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGao J,Luo JY,Liu F,Zheng YY,Chen BD,Chen QJ,et al.Short-and long-term effects of ischemic postconditioning in STEMI patients: a meta-analysis.Lipids Health Dis.2015;14:147.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Engstr%C3%B8m+T\u0026amp;cauthor_id=28249094\"\u003eEngstr\u0026oslash;m\u003c/a\u003e T,Kelbaek H,Helqvist S,\u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=H%C3%B8fsten+DE\u0026amp;cauthor_id=28249094\"\u003eH\u0026oslash;fsten\u003c/a\u003e DE,\u003ca href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Kl%C3%B8vgaard+L\u0026amp;cauthor_id=28249094\"\u003eKl\u0026oslash;vgaard\u003c/a\u003e L,Clemmensen P, et al.Third Danish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients With STEMI-IPI. Effect of Ischemic Postconditioning During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol.2017;2:490-497.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKim EK,Hahn JY,Song YB,Lee SC,Choi JH,Choi SH, et al. Effect of ischemic postconditioning on myocardial salvage in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: cardiac magnetic resonance substudy of the POST randomized trial. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging.2015;31:629-637.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBulluck H,Foin N,Tan JW,Low AF,Sezer M,Hausenloy DJ. Invasive Assessment of the Coronary Microcirculation in Reperfused ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: Where Do We Stand? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:doi:\u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.116.004373\"\u003e10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004373\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKarimianpour A,Maran A. Advances in Coronary No-Reflow Phenomenon-a Contemporary Review. Curr Atheroscler Rep.2018;20:44.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRezkalla SH,Kloner RA. Coronary no-reflow phenomenon: from the experimental laboratory to the cardiac catheterization laboratory.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.2008;72:950-957.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNdrepepa G,Tiroch K,Fusaro M,Keta D,Seyfarth M,Byrne RA,et al. 5-year prognostic value of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010,55:2383-2389.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBolognese L,Carrabba N,Parodi G,Santoro GM,Buonamici P,Cerisano G,et al. Impact of microvascular dysfunction on left ventricular remodeling and long-term clinical outcome after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation.2004;109:1121-1126.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKloner RA,Dai W,Hale SL. No-Reflow Phenomenon. A New Target for Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction Independent of Myocardial Infarct Size. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018;23:273-276.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReffelmann T,Hale SL,Dow JS,Kloner RA. No-reflow phenomenon persists long-term after ischemia/reperfusion in the rat and predicts infarct expansion. Circulation. 2003;108:2911-2917.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang R,Lagakos SW,Ware JH,Hunter DJ,Drazen JM.Statistics in Medicine \u0026mdash; Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials. N Engl J Med.2007;357:2189-2194.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"prolonged inflation strategy, rapid inflation/deflation strategy, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, randomized controlled trial","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-17067/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-17067/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eBackground \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePrimary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the most standard reperfusion strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but the no-reflow phenomenon is still common and is associated with adverse outcomes. Little is known about the consequences of different strategies of deploying stents on outcomes in STEMI patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prolonged inflation would decrease the no-reflow phenomenon in PPCI compared with the conventional rapid inflation/deflation strategy. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMethods \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis was a prospective, single-center, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a prolonged deployment strategy group or a conventional deployment strategy group. A subset of patients was included in a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination assessment. The primary outcomes were the number of patients with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3, the incidence of intraoperative no-reflow/slow flow, the corrected TIMI frame count, the myocardial blush grade, and the number of patients with ST-segment resolution\u0026gt;50%. The secondary outcome was major cardiovascular adverse events at one month and one year following the index PPCI. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eResults \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTIMI flow grade 3 was found in 96.7% of the prolonged deployment strategy group and 63.3% of the conventional deployment group (P=0.005). The prolonged inflation strategy and inflation/deflation strategy group respectively showed the following rates: 0% vs 30% no-reflow or slow flow (P=0.002); 90% vs 66.7% ST-segment resolution ≥50% (P=0.028); 35.6±14.5 frames vs 49.18±25.2 frames on corrected TIMI frame count (P=0.014); and 60% vs 20% myocardial blush grade 3 (P=0.001). The major cardiovascular adverse event rate was 3.3% in both groups at one month and 3.3% for the prolonged inflation strategy group vs 6.7% for the rapid inflation/deflation strategy group at one year (P=1.0). In the CMR subset of cases, the presence of microvascular obstruction (MVO) was detected in 6.7% of patients in the prolonged inflation strategy group and in 50% of patients in the rapid inflation/deflation strategy group (P=0.023). \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eConclusions \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI, the effect of the prolonged inflation strategy could decease the no-reflow phenomenon and improve myocardial microcirculation perfusion, but there were no benefits for the 30-day or one-year clinical outcomes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03199014.Registered June 23, 2017,http://https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03199014?term=NCT03199014\u0026amp;cntry=CN\u0026amp;draw=2\u0026amp;rank=1)\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Prolonged Stent Deployment Strategy in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Pilot study","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2020-03-13 01:13:45","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-17067/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"8ba2daaf-11fd-4ba1-8b72-43aa7b86d0d5","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 13th, 2020","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":69628,"name":"Cardiac \u0026 Cardiovascular Systems"},{"id":69629,"name":"Endocrinology \u0026 Metabolism"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2020-03-13 01:13:45","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-17067","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-17067","identity":"rs-17067","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"cBFmMYwuxLRRLfASyISRj","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}