Introduction
Porocarcinoma (PC) is a rare subtype of cutaneous adnexal carcinoma, originating from the
intraepithelial portion of eccrine sweat glands. 1 PC can present on the legs, head and neck with no
specific predilection of site. 2 Although rare, it has the ability to metastasize to other parts of the body
with mortality rates of 60 to 70%. 3 Previous epidemiological studies estimate PC to only account fo r
0.005 to 0.01% of all malignant cutaneous neoplasms. 4,5 Due to its rarity and lack of studies, both the
pathogenesis and clinical management of PC remain poorly understood.
PC has been thought to develop from pre-existing poromas.
6 Studies have also proposed that exposure
to sunlight 7 or immunosuppression 8 were the main risk factors. As for the genetic mechanisms behind
PC tumorigenesis, specific oncogenic drivers, including cell cycle and signaling pathways have been
implicated. These pathways involve tumor protein 53 (TP53), HRas proto-oncogene, GTPase (HRAS),
retinoblastoma 1 (Rb1), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), epidermal growth factor
receptor (EGFR), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate 3-kinase, AKT serine/threonine kinase (PI3K-AKT)
and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK).
3
Surgical resection of the primary tumor remains the mainstay of treatment for localized PC and is
performed if possible. However, there is no clear management guideline for unresectable PC.
Chemotherapy has been attempted, despite insufficient evidence to support the use of any specific
regimen. Most unresectable or metastatic patients reported in the literature who underwent
chemotherapy were treated with platinum-containing drugs such as carboplatin and cisplatin, achieving
minimal success.
3 Radiotherapy (RT) is sometimes used in combination with chemotherapy or after
surgery. 9 Neither chemotherapy nor RT has yielded good outcomes. Therefore, more effective
treatment strategies are needed.
Here, we present a functional personalized treatment approach to guide the treatment of a patient with
metastatic PC, achieving remarkable clinicoradiological response.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 14, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.09.23289625doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 4 of 13
Methods
Case presentation
A lady in her 50s first presented to an external institution with three-month history of an enlarging left
hip lump in August 2019. She underwent primary resection with close pathological margins of 2 mm.
Staging computed tomography (CT) scan post-surgery showed a suspicious 1.1 cm left inguinal lymph
node, which was subsequently confirmed to be metastatic disease on fine needle aspiration. She was
then referred to the surgical department at our institution and underwent a wider excision and left groin
lymph node dissection in October 2019, two months after the primary resection. Histology of the left
groin tumor revealed no residual carcinoma in the tumor bed, but 21 out of 25 lymph nodes showed
macro-deposits of metastatic PC. Additional stains for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor
(PR) and HER2 were negative. The patient was given adjuvant radiotherapy 50 Gray (Gy) over 25
sessions to the pelvis and left groin from December 2019 to February 2020. In February 2021,
surveillance positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) scans showed
prominent left para-aortic, right common iliac, and left external lymph nodes with mild to moderate
FDG-uptake, suggesting nodal disease recurrence. She was discussed at a multidisciplinary tumor board
and decision was made for close interval CT scan in view of no incremental nodal disease, though the
lesions were FDG-avid on PET-CT. CT scans of her thorax, abdomen, and pelvis performed three months
later in May 2021 showed multiple new pulmonary nodules in the lungs, as well as enlarging
retroperitoneal, pelvic, left supraclavicular and left axillary lymph nodes. She remained clinically well
other than episodic dry cough and was placed on watchful waiting. Patient underwent a left
supraclavicular lymph node biopsy which confirmed the recurrence of metastatic PC in November 2021.
In January 2022, she developed worsening dyspnea and left lower limb swelling. Ultrasound of her deep
veins did not indicate thrombosis. On examination, she was wheelchair-bound, on oxygen
supplementation, and had left lower limb swelling up to her thigh.
Pre-treatment evaluation
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was sent for immunohistochemistry (IHC) for diagnostic
evaluation. Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus was also performed. Dissociated cells from biopsies of
her lung metastases were used for ex vivo drug testing.
Ex vivo drug testing
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 14, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.09.23289625doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 5 of 13
Fresh biopsies of the patient’s lung metastases were digested with a GentleMACS dissociator in warm
RPMI-1640 medium (Biowest) with 100 µg/mL LiberaseTM (Sigma Aldrich, Singapore) for five minutes
and then incubated on a shaker at 70 rpm in a cell culture incubator for two hours. Following filtration
and centrifugation, the isolated cells were collected, resuspended in an appropriate volume of RPMI-
1640 medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, USA), 1% (v/v)
penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, USA) and seeded in 384-well plates at a density of 2000 cells/ well for 24
hours prior to treatment. After 48 hours of drug treatment at concentrations ranging from 0.000001 μM
to 100 μM, cell viability was measured using CellTiter-Glo (CTG) Luminescent Cell Viability Assay
(Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To compute IC
50 values, sigmoidal dose-
response curves were generated using Prism 9 software (GraphPad) by fitting quantified cell viability.
The list of drugs used are shown in Figure 2A-C.
Results
Histology and Comprehensive Genomic Profiling
Sections of supraclavicular and groin lymph nodes revealed nests and islands of malignant epithelioid
cells with ample eosinophilic cytoplasm and oval vesicular nuclei (Figure 1A-C). Additionally, there was
suggestion of duct formation (Figure 1C). Overall histological features and prior history of PC confirm
metastatic PC. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) via Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus on her
formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour specimen demonstrated the existence of genomic alterations
predominantly in three genes: KMT2D, MRE11A, TBX3 (Supplementary Materials). However, these
alterations were not targetable.
Ex vivo drug testing
Compounds used consisted of a selected panel of FDA-approved agents that covers key cancer-
associated signalling pathway targets including tyrosine kinases, TNF-alpha, DNMT, c-kit, mTOR, and
ALK. Single-drug dose response assay was performed (Figure 1C) and individual IC
50 values obtained
were compared with the publicly available GDSC dataset (Figure 1A). The overall most cytotoxic drugs
based on normalized dose responses were pazopanib (multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor; IC 50 0.001 μM) and
irinotecan (Topoisomerase I inhibitor; IC 50 0.001 μM) (Figure 1B). Both drugs displayed significantly lower
IC 50 values in the patient’s cells as compared to almost 1000 other human cancer cell lines within the
GDSC resource, suggesting strong sensitivity of the patient’s tumor cells towards these compounds.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 14, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.09.23289625doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 6 of 13
Clinical response
Based on the lack of standard systemic treatment options in PC, the lack of actionable targets on CGP of
the tumor sample, as well as ex vivo drug testing results, the patient was started on the oral multi-target
tyrosine kinase inhibitor pazopanib 800 mg in January 2022. She was offered pazopanib instead of
doxorubicin or irinotecan as she was deemed unfit for chemotherapy in view of her poor performance
status. When the patient attended the next clinic session on February 2022, she demonstrated
remarkable clinical improvement in both her dyspnea and lower limb swelling. She was able to walk
upslope for up to 500 meters, without oxygen supplementation, support, or rest.
Clinical investigations
In January 2022 prior to molecular profiling and ex vivo drug testing, computed tomography imaging of
the thorax, abdomen and pelvis (CT TAP) revealed an increase in the number and size of numerous
bilateral pulmonary nodules, suspicious for metastasis. The lymph nodes at the left axillary,
supraclavicular, retroperitoneal and pelvic regions were enlarged and suspicious for nodal metastases.
After two months of treatment with pazopanib, her CT TAP revealed a decrease in size and cavitation of
multiple scattered bilateral pulmonary metastases. Right upper lobe lesion decreased from 23 mm to 20
mm (Figure 3A-B). Left upper lobe cavitary mass decreased from 42 mm to 34 mm (Figure 3A-B). The
size of the other lymph nodes remained stable.
Outcome after treatment with pazopanib
The patient remained well on pazopanib for five months and did not report any drug-related side
effects. When she was seen in the clinic in May 2022, she had right hip and back pain, without much
relief with morphine. She was admitted for pain control and underwent CT TAP in June 2022. CT TAP
showed stable disease in lymph nodes and lungs, but progression in her spine, with several compression
fractures. As her performance status had improved with pazopanib treatment, she was offered a switch
to palliative doxorubicin or irinotecan chemotherapy based on the ex vivo drug testing results, but she
declined and opted for best supportive care. The patient eventually passed away on July 2022.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first instance where a functional personalized treatment
approach was used to guide the treatment of a patient with metastatic PC. We describe a patient with
metastatic PC, for whom there is no known effective systemic treatment. To personalize a treatment
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 14, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.09.23289625doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 7 of 13
approach for her deteriorating condition, we performed genomic profiling of her tumor tissue, of which
no actionable findings were elucidated. We proceeded with ex vivo drug testing, revealing that
pazopanib was one of the most potent yet tolerable drugs. The patient was started on pazopanib and
achieved remarkable clinical improvement within a few weeks, maintaining disease control over five
months before eventual disease progression.
Due to the rarity of this disease, there are no established management guidelines. Treatment
information has been limited to case reports or series. Current treatment options for metastatic PC
patients include surgery, RT, and systemic options including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and
targeted therapy with palliative intent. The use of immunotherapy was highlighted in a case report of a
67-year-old lady with metastatic PC by Lee et al .
10 She was started on pembrolizumab against
programmed death-ligand 1 after 12 cycles of carboplatin and capecitabine failed to stop disease
progression. The patient achieved an excellent response. In another case report, targeted therapy
against EGFR using cetuximab and paclitaxel has been shown by Godillot et al .
11 to demonstrate clinical
improvement in one patient. PET-CT showed a complete metabolic response and almost complete
morphological response. However, both Lee et al . and Godillot et al . postulated that the positive
therapeutic response is likely due to strong PD-L1 or EGFR expression respectively and may not be
effective in patients without expression, as in the case of our patient.
This is the first patient where pazopanib has demonstrated its potency in treating metastatic PC.
Pazopanib is an oral multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that serves to inhibit intracellular TKI of vascular
endothelial growth factor receptors-1, -2 and -3, platelet-derived growth factor receptors
-α, and -β ,
leukocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase, interleukin-2 receptor-inducible T-cell kinase, colony-
stimulating factor-1 receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptors, and the stem-cell factor receptor c-KIT.
Although pazopanib was developed for use against various cancers, it is currently only approved for the
treatment of renal cell carcinoma and advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.
12 While the tumorigenic pathways
in PC affected by pazopanib are poorly understood, our patient managed to improve dramatically with
pazopanib. Further studies should focus on uncovering the specific pathways responsible for pazopanib
efficacy in PC or consider incorporating pazopanib into PC treatment regimens.
Fundamentally, this work gives credence to the use of functional personalized treatment. Precision
oncology has traditionally utilized static features of tumors such as expression of key targets or genomic
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 14, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.09.23289625doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 8 of 13
analysis to guide treatment. 13 However, actionable targets are not often found and the efficacy of this
approach has been underwhelming, with several precision oncology trials yielding low clinical
benefit. 14,15 Perhaps unsurprisingly, elucidating the static features of the tumor yielded three genomic
targets, but they were not actionable. On the other hand, a functional personalized treatment approach
identified pazopanib efficacy and eliciting a striking disease response in this patient. While further
studies are required to unravel the pathways underlying this response, this supports the potential of
using functional personalized treatment as an effective approach to treat rare cancers with no
established treatment options. Future research should streamline how functional assays could be
correlated to clinical responses, as well as limiting pre-analytical variability of viable samples.
Conclusion
In summary, this patient is the first patient to undergo a functional personalized treatment for
metastatic porocarcinoma, and the results offer proof-of-concept for such an approach in rare cancers
with no systemic treatment options. Given the promising results, this approach should be tested and
validated in a larger number of patients.
Consent for publication
Consent for publication has been obtained from the patient.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 14, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.09.23289625doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 9 of 13
Figures
Figure 1: Hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining confirms the diagnosis of metas tatic porocarcinoma to th e lymph nodes. Figure 1A: H&E staining o
supraclavicular lymph n odes sh owing p orocarcinoma infiltr ation . Scal e ba r r epr esents 100 µm. Figure 1B : H&E s taining of groin lymph n od e
showing metastasis. Sc ale bar repr esen t s 100 µm. Figure 1C : H&E staining of groin lymph nodes showing ducts formati on. Scale ba r rep rese n t
50 µm.
of
e s
t s
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 14, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.09.23289625doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 10 of 13
Figure 2: Ex vivo drug testing r esults of 1 8 different drugs on fr esh biopsies of th e patien t’s lung met astas es demonst rati n g efficacy of pazopa ni b
Figure 2A: Box plo t compa ring IC 50 data with Genomics of Drug Sensi tivity in Can cer (G DSC) 16 datase t. Drugs used in o ur s ingle-drug t esting assa
are list ed on th e y-axis and corresp ond ing log transformed IC 50 values listed o n the x-a xis. Bo xes rep rese nt th e 25 th t o 75 th percen tiles, a n d
horizon tal lines within the bo xes rep rese nt the median values . ‘+’ re pres ents me an IC 50 values. The ends of the solid lines extendi ng eithe r sid
of the bo xes repr esen t th e app roxima te 95% confidence int ervals. Figure 2B : D ose-respons e curves for p azopanib and irinot ecan th e t op tw o
drugs with t he la rgest leftward devia tion of IC 50 of the p ati ent’s tumor sample fr o m the me an IC 50 values from the G DSC d atase t. Figure 2C : Dos
response cu rves of the remaining d rug s in order of ascending IC 50 values. All dose-respons e curves ar e r epres ent ed as means (SD) of tw
technical r eplicat es.
b .
y
d
e
o
e
o
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 14, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.09.23289625doi: medRxiv preprint
P age 11 of 13
Figure 3: C omputed tomography ( C T) images of the chest before and aft er pazopanib tr eatm en t
showing remarkable radi ological outco mes. Figure 3A : CT images of the chest before pa zopani b
trea tmen t in Janua ry 2022. Figure 3B : C T images of the ch est after two mon ths of pazopanib tr eatm en t
in March 2022 . S ev eral bilat eral pulmo nary lesions demonst ra ting a d ecre ase in size a nd cav ita tion
C av itation suggests tumor liquefacti on and nec rosis, co nsisten t wit h known p att erns of radi ologica
response to pazop anib. 17
t
b
t
.
l
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 14, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.09.23289625doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 12 of 13
References
1. Joshy J, Mistry K, Levell NJ, et al. Porocarcinoma: a review. Clinical and Experimental
Dermatology 2022;47(6):1030-1035. DOI: 10.1111/ced.15126.
2. Robson A, Greene J, Ansari N, et al. Eccrine porocarcinoma (malignant eccrine
poroma): a clinicopathologic study of 69 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25(6):710-20. (In
eng). DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200106000-00002.
3. Miyamoto K, Yanagi T, Maeda T, Ujiie H. Diagnosis and Management of Porocarcinoma.
Cancers (Basel) 2022;14(21) (In eng). DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215232.
4. Mehregan AH, Hashimoto K, Rahbari H. Eccrine adenocarcinoma. A clinicopathologic
study of 35 cases. Arch Dermatol 1983;119(2):104-14. (In eng). DOI:
10.1001/archderm.119.2.104.
5. Joshy J, van Bodegraven B, Mistry K, et al. Epidemiology of porocarcinoma in England
2013-18: a population-based registry study. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
2023:llad122. DOI: 10.1093/ced/llad122.
6. Pylyser K, De Wolf-Peeters C, Marien K. The histology of eccrine poromas: a study of 14
cases. Dermatologica 1983;167(5):243-9. (In eng). DOI: 10.1159/000249790.
7. Salih AM, Kakamad FH, Baba HO, et al. Porocarcinoma; presentation and management,
a meta-analysis of 453 cases. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2017;20:74-79. (In eng). DOI:
10.1016/j.amsu.2017.06.027.
8. Mahomed F, Blok J, Grayson W. The squamous variant of eccrine porocarcinoma: a
clinicopathological study of 21 cases. J Clin Pathol 2008;61(3):361-5. (In eng). DOI:
10.1136/jcp.2007.049213.
9. Fionda B, Di Stefani A, Lancellotta V, et al. The role of postoperative radiotherapy in
eccrine porocarcinoma: a multidisciplinary systematic review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol
Sci 2022;26(5):1695-1700. (In eng). DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202203_28238.
10. Lee KA, Cioni M, Robson A, Bataille V. Metastatic porocarcinoma achieving complete
radiological and clinical response with pembrolizumab. BMJ Case Rep 2019;12(9) (In
eng). DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-228917.
11. Godillot C, Boulinguez S, Riffaud L, et al. Complete response of a metastatic
porocarcinoma treated with paclitaxel, cetuximab and radiotherapy. Eur J Cancer
2018;90:142-145. (In eng). DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.009.
12. Miyamoto S, Kakutani S, Sato Y, Hanashi A, Kinoshita Y, Ishikawa A. Drug review:
Pazopanib. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2018;48(6):503-513. DOI:
10.1093/jjco/hyy053.
13. Letai A, Bhola P, Welm AL. Functional precision oncology: Testing tumors with drugs to
identify vulnerabilities and novel combinat ions. Cancer Cell 2022;40(1):26-35. DOI:
10.1016/j.ccell.2021.12.004.
14. Chen AP, Kummar S, Moore N, et al. Molecular Profiling-Based Assignment of Cancer
Therapy (NCI-MPACT): A Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial. JCO Precision
Oncology 2021(5):133-144. DOI: 10.1200/PO.20.00372.
15. Flaherty KT, Gray RJ, Chen AP, et al. Molecular Landscape and Actionable Alterations
in a Genomically Guided Cancer Clinical Trial: National Cancer Institute Molecular
Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH). J Clin Oncol 2020;38(33):3883-3894. (In
eng). DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.03010.
16. Yang W, Soares J, Greninger P, et al. Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC):
a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res
2013;41(Database issue):D955-61. (In eng). DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1111.
17. Esser M, Kloth C, Thaiss WM, et al. CT-morphologic and CT-textural patterns of
response in inoperable soft tissue sarcomas treated with pazopanib-a preliminary
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 14, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.09.23289625doi: medRxiv preprint
Page 13 of 13
retrospective cohort study. Br J Radiol 2019;92(1103):20190158. (In eng). DOI:
10.1259/bjr.20190158.
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted May 14, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.09.23289625doi: medRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.