[Clinical comparison of transvaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy].
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This study compared transvaginal hysterectomy (TVH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in 301 patients, finding TVH had shorter operation times, less blood loss, and lower costs but was preferred for specific patient profiles.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical characteristics of transvaginal hysterectomy (TVH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). METHOD: Clinical data about 301 cases who received TVH and TLH were collected and the hospital stay days, medical expenses, diagnoses, operation and recovery status were compared between TVH and TLH groups. RESULTS: The ratio of cervical atypical hyperplasia (9.64%), multipara (96.45%) in TVH was higher than that in TLH (2.88%, 89.42%). The ratio of adenoma (29.44%), adnexal disease (4.55%), pelvic endometriosis (4.06%), history of cesarean section (7.11%) in TVH were lower than that in TLH (43.27%, 31.73%, 12.50%, 24.04%). The operation time (76 +/- 28) minutes, bleeding during operation (170 +/- 125) ml, additional operations (5.08%), pelvic adhesion (4.57%), loosening of pelvic adhesion (0.51%), the diameter of the largest myoma or adenoma (49 +/- 17) mm, expenses for operation and hospitalization (1073 +/- 203) yuan in TVH were lower than those in TLH, which were (139 +/- 52) minutes, (206 +/- 153) ml, 36.54%, 41.35%, 17.31%, (57 +/- 22) mm, (1526 +/- 676) yuan respectively. The differences were significant (all P < 0.05). There was no difference of the uterine weight, complication and length of hospitalization duration between the two kinds of operation. CONCLUSIONS: TVH is recommended in cases of few pelvic adhesion, or adnexal disease, cervical disease and of multipara. The uterine weight is not a decisive factor.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:29.922408+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK