Cellular basis of accelerated whole-tooth regeneration

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Teeth are ectodermal organs that have, throughout their long evolutionary history, retained the capacity for full regeneration and replacement, even in adult stages. Yet, because most mammals (e.g., humans, mice) lack lifelong dental replacement, we do not fully understand its tempo and mode, and we do not have a clear picture of the cell populations and signals that contribute to the process. Here, we used cichlid fishes from Lake Malawi, species that differ in tooth formula (tooth shape and number) but share one-for-one tooth replacement, to (i) explore the tempo of dental replacement after plucking and then (ii) identify the cell populations, gene expression signatures, and interactions between cell populations that change in this plucking paradigm. We observed that cichlid species with divergent dentitions accelerated tooth replacement >3x on the plucked half of the jaw. Then, we used single-nucleus RNA-seq to profile cellular and molecular changes across the first week of post-plucking tooth replacement. This approach allowed us to infer cellular trajectories in dental epithelium and mesenchyme that underlie tooth regeneration. We identifed distinct gene expression profiles and cellular interactions across four time points of accelerated tooth replacement, with divergent involvement of epithelial, mesenchymal and immune cell types. Diferential signaling of Collagen, BMP, MMP, Semaphorin and Slit-Robo pathways was evident after plucking and highlights temporally-sequenced roles of immune response, odontogenesis, vascularization and nerve pathfinding as teeth are constructed anew. Overall, this study provides insight into the trajectory of cellular interactions accompanying whole-tooth replacement and offers a comparative foundation for understanding dental regeneration in vertebrates.
Full text 1,906 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Teeth are ectodermal organs that have, throughout their long evolutionary history, retained the capacity for full regeneration and replacement, even in adult stages. Yet, because most mammals (e.g., humans, mice) lack lifelong dental replacement, we do not fully understand its tempo and mode, and we do not have a clear picture of the cell populations and signals that contribute to the process. Here, we used cichlid fishes from Lake Malawi, species that differ in tooth formula (tooth shape and number) but share one-for-one tooth replacement, to (i) explore the tempo of dental replacement after plucking and then (ii) identify the cell populations, gene expression signatures, and interactions between cell populations that change in this plucking paradigm. We observed that cichlid species with divergent dentitions accelerated tooth replacement >3x on the plucked half of the jaw. Then, we used single-nucleus RNA-seq to profile cellular and molecular changes across the first week of post-plucking tooth replacement. This approach allowed us to infer cellular trajectories in dental epithelium and mesenchyme that underlie tooth regeneration. We identifed distinct gene expression profiles and cellular interactions across four time points of accelerated tooth replacement, with divergent involvement of epithelial, mesenchymal and immune cell types. Diferential signaling of Collagen, BMP, MMP, Semaphorin and Slit-Robo pathways was evident after plucking and highlights temporally-sequenced roles of immune response, odontogenesis, vascularization and nerve pathfinding as teeth are constructed anew. Overall, this study provides insight into the trajectory of cellular interactions accompanying whole-tooth replacement and offers a comparative foundation for understanding dental regeneration in vertebrates. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0