Delta PSA: A New Metric for Conformational Dynamics Underlying Macrocyclic Peptide Permeability

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Development of oral cyclic drugs often suffers from low oral bioavailability resulting from limited passive permeability making accurate prediction a central challenge in drug development. Existing approaches generally fall into two categories: deep learning–based models and accelerated molecular dynamics (aMD) simulations. While deep learning models enable rapid, high-throughput predictions, they often suffer from dependence on training data, and sensitivity to dataset biases. On the other hand, aMD provide mechanistic interpretability by explicitly modeling peptide translocation across lipid bilayers, however, suffer from huge computational cost. Here, we present a conventional MD-based framework for predicting macrocyclic peptide permeability, designed to facilitate interpretation. Importantly, we show that Delta PSA (Δ PSA ) directly quantifies a peptide’s chameleon propensity, providing a mechanistically meaningful measure. Furthermore, we identify two key structural indicators—the sidechain PSA ratio and the radius of gyration—as refined metrics for assessing conformational behavior. When applied to a benchmark dataset of macrocyclic peptides, our framework achieves an MSE of 0.22, surpassing the 0.25 reported for Multi_CycGT and demonstrating its superior performance. Our work also provides a large dataset of MD trajectories for macrocyclic peptides in both polar and nonpolar environments. This dataset offers access to a broader conformational space for cyclic peptide studies. Abstract Figure
Full text 1,686 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Development of oral cyclic drugs often suffers from low oral bioavailability resulting from limited passive permeability making accurate prediction a central challenge in drug development. Existing approaches generally fall into two categories: deep learning–based models and accelerated molecular dynamics (aMD) simulations. While deep learning models enable rapid, high-throughput predictions, they often suffer from dependence on training data, and sensitivity to dataset biases. On the other hand, aMD provide mechanistic interpretability by explicitly modeling peptide translocation across lipid bilayers, however, suffer from huge computational cost. Here, we present a conventional MD-based framework for predicting macrocyclic peptide permeability, designed to facilitate interpretation. Importantly, we show that Delta PSA (ΔPSA) directly quantifies a peptide’s chameleon propensity, providing a mechanistically meaningful measure. Furthermore, we identify two key structural indicators—the sidechain PSA ratio and the radius of gyration—as refined metrics for assessing conformational behavior. When applied to a benchmark dataset of macrocyclic peptides, our framework achieves an MSE of 0.22, surpassing the 0.25 reported for Multi_CycGT and demonstrating its superior performance. Our work also provides a large dataset of MD trajectories for macrocyclic peptides in both polar and nonpolar environments. This dataset offers access to a broader conformational space for cyclic peptide studies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes The name of one of the authors, Chen Junwei, was incorrect and has been corrected.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0