Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) for non-invasive diagnosis of rectosigmoidal endometriosis – a systematic review and meta-analysis
This systematic review and meta-analysis critically analyzed the diagnostic value of transvaginal sonography for the non-invasive, presurgical detection of rectosigmoidal endometriosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for non-invasive, presurgical detection of rectosigmoidal deep infiltrating endometriosis, using MEDLINE and EMBASE searches for studies where diagnosis was confirmed by laparoscopy and/or histopathology. Ten eligible studies (1106 patients with suspected endometriosis) showed high pooled sensitivity (91%) and specificity (98%), with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 30.36 and 0.09 and PPVs and NPVs of 98% and 95%, respectively, though several estimates had wide confidence intervals. The authors noted that bowel preparation varied across studies (including bowel preparations to visualize the rectal wall) and that one study compared water contrast transvaginal sonography to no enema, finding a lower negative likelihood ratio for water contrast (0.04 vs 0.47). This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically assesses transvaginal sonography accuracy for diagnosing rectosigmoidal bowel endometriosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,653 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Objective
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00