Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) for non-invasive diagnosis of rectosigmoidal endometriosis – a systematic review and meta-analysis

In: Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2011 · vol. 71(05) · doi:10.1055/s-0031-1280507 · W4240344278
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This systematic review and meta-analysis critically analyzed the diagnostic value of transvaginal sonography for the non-invasive, presurgical detection of rectosigmoidal endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to critically analyze the diagnostic value of TVS for non-invasive, presurgical detection of bowel endometriosis.
Full text 1,653 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Objective

The aim of this study was to critically analyze the diagnostic value of TVS for non-invasive, presurgical detection of bowel endometriosis.

Methods

MEDLINE (1966–2010) and EMBASE (1980–2010) databases were searched for relevant studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of TVS for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) involving the bowel. Diagnosis was established by laparoscopy and/or histopathological analysis. Likelihood ratios (LHR's) were recalculated in addition to traditional measures of effectiveness.

Results

Out of 188 papers, a total of 10 studies fulfilled predefined inclusion criteria involving 1106 patients with suspected endometriosis. The prevalence of bowel endometriosis varied from 14% to 73.3%. Positive LHR's ranged from 4.8 to 48.56, negative LHR's ranged from 0.02 to 0.75 with wide confidence intervals (CI's). Pooled estimates of sensitivities and specificities were 91% and 98%; PPVs and NPVs 98% and 95%; positive and negative LHR's 30.36 and 0.09, respectively. Three of the studies used bowel preparations to enhance the visibility of the rectal wall; one study directly compared the use of water contrast (RWC-TVS) versus no prior bowel enema (TVS). The negative LHR was 0.04 for RWC-TVS versus 0.47 for TVS.

Conclusions

TVS with or without the use of prior bowel preparation is an accurate test for non-invasive, presurgical detection of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectosigmoid.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisbowel_endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK