Evaluation of Musical Conductors' Exposure to Noise

2025 · doi:10.32388/lpcs07
preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 ⓘ

Noise dosimeter measurements revealed that a musical conductor's occupational noise exposure during rehearsals with 90 players exceeded NIOSH permissible levels, reaching 91 dBA on one day.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text ⓘ

This paper evaluates noise exposure levels among musical conductors, using observational measurement approaches to characterize what conductors experience during their work. It reports findings on the extent of exposure in relation to the typical activities of this occupation, focusing on how much noise is encountered. A major limitation is that the available text does not provide specific study design details (e.g., sample size, instrumentation, or statistical analysis) or explicitly stated caveats. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This article presents the results of a case study on the evaluation of occupational noise exposures among a musical conductor in a musical hall (party – center). A calibrated noise dosimeter was used to measure the personal exposure of a music teacher/conductor for 8 hours over two days of rehearsal involving 90 players. Results showed that noise exposure levels were much higher than the permissible levels regulated at 85dBA/8hr by NIOSH. The first day of measurements recorded the highest exposure levels (91 dBA). Several factors contributed to these results, such as the number of players, the types of instruments used, and the activities. Several noise control measures were recommended to address this situation.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0