The global protected area network does not harbor genetically diverse populations

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
Full text 2,108 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Global biodiversity conservation targets include expanding protected areas and maintaining genetic diversity within species by 2030. However, the extent to which existing protected areas capture genetic diversity within species is unclear. We examined this question using a global sample of nuclear population-level genetic data comprising georeferenced genotypes from 2,513 local populations, 134,183 individuals, and 176 species of mammals and marine fish. We found that the existing protected area network does not capture populations with higher than average genetic diversity, and populations within protected areas are not more genetically differentiated than populations sampled elsewhere. This general trend does not preclude their effectiveness for specific species or regions currently, or in the future. While it may be desirable to prioritize regions with high genetic diversity when designating new protected areas, we caution that this will not be possible in many of the most at-risk regions of the world due to a lack of data. Continued focus on minimizing population decline and maintaining connectivity between protected areas remain essential considerations in area-based conservation for mediating genetic diversity loss. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X26G7Z Subjects Biodiversity, Evolution, Life Sciences

Keywords

biodiversity, Genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, effective population size conservation policy, genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, effective population size, conservation policy Dates Published: 2024-04-12 08:21 Last Updated: 2025-04-03 20:39 Older Versions License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Data and Code Availability Statement: All data underlying this work are publicly available (see Methods). Code and analyzed datasets will be made available upon acceptance. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0