Comments on ‘Effectiveness of hormonal intrauterine system in treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome compared to oral progestin’

Ankur Sharma, Sushma Narsing Katkuri, Varshini Vadhithala, Arun Kumar, Surbhi Verma, Sushma Verma, Dhanya Dedeepya
In: Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders · 2026 · doi:10.1177/22840265261424300 · W7129766846
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-13 ⓘ

This commentary discusses the effectiveness of hormonal intrauterine systems versus oral progestins for treating pelvic congestion syndrome.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-27 · read from full text ⓘ

This publication is a commentary piece rather than an original research study, responding to a previous article on the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome. The text serves as a critique or discussion regarding the effectiveness of hormonal intrauterine systems compared to oral progestins for this specific condition. It does not present new data but engages with existing literature on venous causes of pelvic pain. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,369 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Comments on ‘Effectiveness of hormonal intrauterine system in treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome compared to oral progestin’ Get full access to this article View all access and purchase options for this article. Data availability statement References Cite Cite Cite Download to reference manager If you have citation software installed, you can download citation data to the citation manager of your choice Information, rights and permissions Information Published In Data availability statement Authors Author contributions Metrics and citations Metrics Journals metrics This article was published in Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders. View All Journal MetricsPublication usage* Total views and downloads: 7 *Publication usage tracking started in December 2016 Publications citing this one Receive email alerts when this publication is cited Web of Science: 0 Crossref: There are no citing articles to show. Figures and tables Figures & Media Tables View Options Access options If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below: loading institutional access options Alternatively, view purchase options below: Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content. Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (4)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-22T06:12:16.469521+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK