Affordable and Sustainable Housing: A Systematic Review of Global Evidence, Equity Gaps, and Policy Pathways

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

This systematic review synthesized 29 studies, finding that sustainable housing measures reduce energy consumption and offer cost savings, but regional disparities and governance fragmentation persist, particularly in lower-income countries.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16 · read from full text

This systematic review, registered with PROSPERO and conducted using PRISMA 2020, examined evidence from 29 peer-reviewed studies (2019–2023) addressing sustainable and affordable housing across environmental, building performance, urban/regional planning, governance, and affordability dimensions. Synthesizing results where possible, the authors report that sustainable housing measures (e.g., energy efficiency renovations, life-cycle cost analyses, and circular construction) were associated with reductions in thermal energy consumption of up to 35% and average benefit-cost ratios of 1.42 (95% CI 1.11–1.79), while regional differences were substantial (I² = 52–68%). The review highlights explicit uncertainties and disagreement regarding governance approaches (central vs community-led), the feasibility of circular construction in the Global South, and whether renovating or building anew is preferable, and notes gaps related to informal housing frameworks and equity. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Background The worldwide issue of affordable accommodation has become significant, with more than one billion individuals residing in substandard conditions. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) cannot be achieved without the integration of affordability and sustainability. Nevertheless, the development of cohesive evidence-based housing initiatives is made difficult by the division of current research across technical, social, economic, and governance dimensions. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the principles of PRISMA 2020 and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023458912). Peer-reviewed articles published from 2019 to 2023 were obtained from Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE in accordance with the PECO framework. A total of 326 recordings were assessed, resulting in 29 studies that met the criteria. The data were synthesized using theme narrative analysis to examine five aspects of sustainability: environmental, building performance, urban/regional planning, governance, and affordability. Meta-analytical tools were employed when methodological consistency allowed. Results Research has shown that sustainable housing measures, such as energy efficiency renovations, life-cycle cost analyses, and circular construction, can reduce thermal energy consumption by up to 35% and provide long-term cost reductions. The benefit-cost ratios are an average of 1.42 (95% CI: 1.11–1.79). However, the data suggest that there is substantial variation among regions (I² = 52–68%). High-income contexts demonstrate cross-sectoral policy integration, whereas low- and middle-income countries continue to experience governance fragmentation, financial limitations, and unequal access. There are still substantial disagreements regarding the effectiveness of central management in comparison to community-led administration, the viability of circular building in the Global South, and the decision between renovating and new construction. Discussion This research demonstrates that sustainability and affordability are not mutually exclusive concepts, but rather mutually supportive when integrated into effective governance, policy, and finance systems. However, there are still shortcomings in the areas of unofficial housing frameworks, equity, and social consequences such as health and unity in communities. The necessity for additional empirical research in the Global South is underscored by the high level of research from affluent regions. Conclusions Adaptable, context-aware techniques that combine life-cycle cost reductions with social integration and environmental effectiveness are required for sustainable affordable housing. To mitigate equity gaps and ensure that housing aligns with climate and biodiversity goals, future studies must prioritize the incorporation of the informal economy, longitudinal policy assessment, and innovative finance.
Full text 14,124 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Affordable and Sustainable Housing: A Systematic Review of Global Evidence, Equity Gaps, and Policy Pathways | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Systematic Review Affordable and Sustainable Housing: A Systematic Review of Global Evidence, Equity Gaps, and Policy Pathways Mahshid Gorjian This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7390643/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background The worldwide issue of affordable accommodation has become significant, with more than one billion individuals residing in substandard conditions. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) cannot be achieved without the integration of affordability and sustainability. Nevertheless, the development of cohesive evidence-based housing initiatives is made difficult by the division of current research across technical, social, economic, and governance dimensions. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the principles of PRISMA 2020 and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023458912). Peer-reviewed articles published from 2019 to 2023 were obtained from Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE in accordance with the PECO framework. A total of 326 recordings were assessed, resulting in 29 studies that met the criteria. The data were synthesized using theme narrative analysis to examine five aspects of sustainability: environmental, building performance, urban/regional planning, governance, and affordability. Meta-analytical tools were employed when methodological consistency allowed. Results Research has shown that sustainable housing measures, such as energy efficiency renovations, life-cycle cost analyses, and circular construction, can reduce thermal energy consumption by up to 35% and provide long-term cost reductions. The benefit-cost ratios are an average of 1.42 (95% CI: 1.11–1.79). However, the data suggest that there is substantial variation among regions (I² = 52–68%). High-income contexts demonstrate cross-sectoral policy integration, whereas low- and middle-income countries continue to experience governance fragmentation, financial limitations, and unequal access. There are still substantial disagreements regarding the effectiveness of central management in comparison to community-led administration, the viability of circular building in the Global South, and the decision between renovating and new construction. Discussion This research demonstrates that sustainability and affordability are not mutually exclusive concepts, but rather mutually supportive when integrated into effective governance, policy, and finance systems. However, there are still shortcomings in the areas of unofficial housing frameworks, equity, and social consequences such as health and unity in communities. The necessity for additional empirical research in the Global South is underscored by the high level of research from affluent regions. Conclusions Adaptable, context-aware techniques that combine life-cycle cost reductions with social integration and environmental effectiveness are required for sustainable affordable housing. To mitigate equity gaps and ensure that housing aligns with climate and biodiversity goals, future studies must prioritize the incorporation of the informal economy, longitudinal policy assessment, and innovative finance. Urban Studies sustainable affordable housing housing policy life cycle cost analysis energy efficiency circular construction urban governance low- and middle-income countries Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 11) social inclusion climate resilience Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7390643","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Systematic Review","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":501410718,"identity":"0c30632b-a4eb-4931-a909-706b2fb6e5aa","order_by":0,"name":"Mahshid Gorjian","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9135-0687","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mahshid","middleName":"","lastName":"Gorjian","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-08-17 06:07:33","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7390643/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7390643/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":89392242,"identity":"0b7125b5-6f78-471a-90f0-4e918b0a7b8b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-08-19 13:11:44","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":833187,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"A16.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7390643/v1_covered_57014bb1-7b3c-4cb2-ab1c-5c5401c15b6a.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAffordable and Sustainable Housing: A Systematic Review of Global Evidence, Equity Gaps, and Policy Pathways\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"University of Colorado Denver","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"sustainable affordable housing, housing policy, life cycle cost analysis, energy efficiency, circular construction, urban governance, low- and middle-income countries, Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 11), social inclusion, climate resilience","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7390643/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7390643/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe worldwide issue of affordable accommodation has become significant, with more than one billion individuals residing in substandard conditions. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) cannot be achieved without the integration of affordability and sustainability. Nevertheless, the development of cohesive evidence-based housing initiatives is made difficult by the division of current research across technical, social, economic, and governance dimensions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with the principles of PRISMA 2020 and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023458912). Peer-reviewed articles published from 2019 to 2023 were obtained from Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE in accordance with the PECO framework. A total of 326 recordings were assessed, resulting in 29 studies that met the criteria. The data were synthesized using theme narrative analysis to examine five aspects of sustainability: environmental, building performance, urban/regional planning, governance, and affordability. Meta-analytical tools were employed when methodological consistency allowed.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eResearch has shown that sustainable housing measures, such as energy efficiency renovations, life-cycle cost analyses, and circular construction, can reduce thermal energy consumption by up to 35% and provide long-term cost reductions. The benefit-cost ratios are an average of 1.42 (95% CI: 1.11\u0026ndash;1.79). However, the data suggest that there is substantial variation among regions (I\u0026sup2; = 52\u0026ndash;68%). High-income contexts demonstrate cross-sectoral policy integration, whereas low- and middle-income countries continue to experience governance fragmentation, financial limitations, and unequal access. There are still substantial disagreements regarding the effectiveness of central management in comparison to community-led administration, the viability of circular building in the Global South, and the decision between renovating and new construction.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eDiscussion\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis research demonstrates that sustainability and affordability are not mutually exclusive concepts, but rather mutually supportive when integrated into effective governance, policy, and finance systems. However, there are still shortcomings in the areas of unofficial housing frameworks, equity, and social consequences such as health and unity in communities. The necessity for additional empirical research in the Global South is underscored by the high level of research from affluent regions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusions\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAdaptable, context-aware techniques that combine life-cycle cost reductions with social integration and environmental effectiveness are required for sustainable affordable housing. To mitigate equity gaps and ensure that housing aligns with climate and biodiversity goals, future studies must prioritize the incorporation of the informal economy, longitudinal policy assessment, and innovative finance.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Affordable and Sustainable Housing: A Systematic Review of Global Evidence, Equity Gaps, and Policy Pathways","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-08-19 12:39:38","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7390643/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"53ca9c69-6493-4787-b674-ddacc20da6fb","owner":[],"postedDate":"August 19th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":53257209,"name":"Urban Studies"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-08-19T12:39:38+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-08-19 12:39:38","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7390643","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7390643","identity":"rs-7390643","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0