Gender expression is associated with selection of uterine preservation or hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse surgery: Novel methodology for sex‐ and gender‐based analysis in gynecologic research

In: International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · 2022 · vol. 159(2) , pp. 522–529 · doi:10.1002/ijgo.14169 · PMID:35262193 · W4220877393
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether patient characteristics were associated with gender expression, and to further determine impact of gender expression on patient selection of hysterectomy or uterine-preservation in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. METHODS: Within a prospective cohort, a self-reported gender expression tool classified patients as expressing gender polar (i.e., reporting only feminine traits) or non-polar gender scores (i.e., reporting feminine and masculine traits). Multivariate modeling explored associations of gender expression with traditional socio-demographic variables, and with selection of hysterectomy or uterine-preserving surgery. Descriptive statistics of socio-demographic variables were reported by frequency, proportion and mean (SD). RESULTS: 177 participants completed the gender score questionnaire. Overall, the sample had a more feminine gender expression with the majority of respondents classified as gender polar (67.23%, n = 119). Participants with non-polar gender scores were 2.53 times (95% 1.05-6.09) more likely to choose uterine preservation versus hysterectomy-based surgery. Gender polarity was weakly associated with age, but no other sociodemographic variables. CONCLUSION: Gender expression is not tightly associated with socio-demographic variables, and is thus a novel measurement in gynecologic research. Gender polarity appears to be associated with choice to undergo hysterectomy. Further research is required to understand this relationship and implications in clinical outcomes.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (25)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T03:45:26.960562+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK