COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage, Concerns, and Preferences Among Chinese ICU Clinicians: A Nationwide Survey

preprint OA: closed
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

Background: Health care workers in intensive care units (ICU) have been prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination. In a nationwide vaccination campaign since March in China, better understanding of concerns and preferences of COVID-19 vaccines remain crucial for improving vaccination uptake.Methods: ICU clinicians throughout China’s mainland were contacted to participate in an online survey during March 24-April 10, 2021. We compared concerns by vaccination outcome, and through a discrete choice experiment (DCE) assessed preferences for vaccines in terms of effectiveness (95% vs 80%), risk of adverse reactions (5% vs 10%), duration of immunity (6 vs 12 months), and whether or not coworkers have been vaccinated.Findings: Among 11,951 ICU respondents from 252 prefecture-level cities, vaccination coverage of COVID-19 vaccines was 75·4%, with an additional 9·2% not vaccinated but planning to, and 16·1% not vaccinated and not intending to. Among women not pregnant, vaccination coverage was 82·6%, with lower coverage in those pregnant (11·4%) or breastfeeding (19·7%). ICU clinicians not intending to be vaccinated significantly expressed more concerns about the speed of vaccine development (30·1%) and adverse reactions (65·9%), compared to those already vaccinated. In the DCE, by COVID-19 vaccination status, the only significant difference in preferences of a COVID-19 vaccine was for safety, with those not vaccinated having a stronger preference for a vaccine with fewer adverse reactions (OR=4·49) compared to those already vaccinated (OR=2·90) or those intending to vaccinate (OR=3·46) (P<0·0001).Interpretation: Increasing vaccination coverage among Chinese ICU clinicians will require strong norms surrounding vaccination and transparency about safety information. Funding Information: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#82041028) and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (#20692110200).Declaration of Interests: The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest to this work.Ethics Approval Statement: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Fudan University School of Public Health (IRB 00002408 and FWA 00002399) under IRB #2021-03-0888. Secondary data analysis at the University of Michigan was deemed exempt by the University of Michigan Health Sciences and Behavioral Sciences Institutional Review Board (#HUM00198183). Online informed consent was obtained when the interviewees agreed to fulfill the online questionnaire.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00