Nanoparticle Metal Mass Uptake Governs Radiosensitizing Efficacy Across 2D, 3D, and In Vivo Models
The study evaluated nanoparticle radiosensitizers using a physiologically relevant 3D head and neck cancer spheroid model made from FaDu cells, directly compared with a corresponding in vivo radiotherapy model. The spheroids formed hypoxic cores and showed growth kinetics and radiation dose–response behavior that mirrored in vivo tumors, enabling long-term monitoring. TiO₂, HfO₂, and Au nanoparticles produced consistent radiosensitization effects across spheroids and in vivo when matched for nanoparticle uptake mass, whereas conventional 2D clonogenic assays did not predict in vivo performance, attributed to lower radioresistance and unrealistic exposure conditions. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
1,404 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00