Nanoparticle Metal Mass Uptake Governs Radiosensitizing Efficacy Across 2D, 3D, and In Vivo Models

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The study evaluated nanoparticle radiosensitizers using a physiologically relevant 3D head and neck cancer spheroid model made from FaDu cells, directly compared with a corresponding in vivo radiotherapy model. The spheroids formed hypoxic cores and showed growth kinetics and radiation dose–response behavior that mirrored in vivo tumors, enabling long-term monitoring. TiO₂, HfO₂, and Au nanoparticles produced consistent radiosensitization effects across spheroids and in vivo when matched for nanoparticle uptake mass, whereas conventional 2D clonogenic assays did not predict in vivo performance, attributed to lower radioresistance and unrealistic exposure conditions. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,404 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Despite extensive efforts to develop nanoparticle-based radioenhancers, clinical translation remains limited, partly due to the lack of physiologically relevant in vitro models. To address this gap, we developed a 3D spheroid model of head and neck cancer using FaDu cells and compared it directly to a corresponding in vivo model in a radiotherapy setting. The spheroids exhibited key tumor-like features, including the formation of a hypoxic core and growth kinetics comparable to in vivo tumors. Importantly, the model allowed for long-term monitoring of tumor growth and radiation response. Upon X-ray irradiation, dose–response behavior in spheroids mirrored that observed in vivo. Furthermore, TiO₂, HfO₂, and Au nanoparticles demonstrated consistent radiosensitization effects in both systems when matched for uptake mass. In contrast, conventional 2D clonogenic assays failed to predict in vivo performance, likely due to their lower radioresistance and unrealistic nanoparticle exposure conditions. This study introduces a robust, scalable, and clinically compatible 3D in vitro platform for preclinical screening of nanoparticle radioenhancers. The system may offer streamlining of development pipelines and support the 3R principles of reduction, replacement, and refinement in radiation oncology research. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0