A randomized prospective comparative study of general versus epidural anesthesia for transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2001 · vol. 184(3) , pp. 273–276 · doi:10.1067/mob.2001.108997 · PMID:11228472 · W2073324403
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study compared general anesthesia to epidural anesthesia for transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection, evaluating outcomes between the two anesthetic techniques.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

Cited by (4)

References (29)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:10:27.824888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK