A randomized prospective comparative study of general versus epidural anesthesia for transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2001 · vol. 184(3) , pp. 273–276 · doi:10.1067/mob.2001.108997 · PMID:11228472 · W2073324403
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study compared general anesthesia to epidural anesthesia for transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection, evaluating outcomes between the two anesthetic techniques.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study was undertaken to compare general versus epidural anesthesia during hysteroscopic endometrial resection for dysfunctional uterine bleeding.Study designIn a prospective comparative study, 24 women with abnormal uterine bleeding that was unresponsive to conservative medical management were randomly assigned to undergo hysteroscopic endometrial resection with either general or epidural anesthesia.ResultsThe durations of the endometrial resection procedure were similar for women who had general and epidural anesthesia (28.3 +/- 4.2 minutes vs 27.5 +/- 5.4 minutes, respectively). However, there was a statistically significantly lower absorption of distention fluid in women who underwent the procedure with general rather than epidural anesthesia (380.8 +/- 158.2 mL vs 648.3 +/- 157.1 mL, respectively; P < .0005).ConclusionA significantly lower amount of glycine distention fluid was absorbed during endometrial resection in women who underwent the procedure with general rather than epidural anesthesia.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

Cited by (4)

References (29)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:10:27.824888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK