A toolbox to quantify human activity in protected areas for park management

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

1. Recreation in protected areas (PAs) is growing worldwide, potentially conflicting with wildlife and ecosystem protection. Efficiently estimating human activity in PAs is crucial for balancing a dual mandate of supporting visitor access and biodiversity, but managers lack clear recommendations about how best to monitor spatial and temporal trends in human activity. 2. Through two case studies, we reviewed several key tools for measuring human activity in PAs to assess the impacts on wildlife: camera traps, day passes, trail counters, and social media. We measured human activity across multiple scales and compared spatial and temporal activity estimates within and between PAs. 3. We found strong correlations between tools across PAs and a combination of tools may be better suited to understand finer-scale trends within parks. Individual tools, and their combination, can be tailored to specific research and management goals. 4. Synthesis and applications: Our case studies provide insights into the effectiveness of tools for measuring human activity in PAs and informs practitioners and researchers about how they can be used to address real-world management decisions. Tools varied in their strengths and their weaknesses and looking forward, the widespread adoption of multiple, integrated measures of human activity is needed to develop evidence-based park management strategies, benefitting both humans and nature.
Full text 2,100 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. 1. Recreation in protected areas (PAs) is growing worldwide, potentially conflicting with wildlife and ecosystem protection. Efficiently estimating human activity in PAs is crucial for balancing a dual mandate of supporting visitor access and biodiversity, but managers lack clear recommendations about how best to monitor spatial and temporal trends in human activity. 2. Through two case studies, we reviewed several key tools for measuring human activity in PAs to assess the impacts on wildlife: camera traps, day passes, trail counters, and social media. We measured human activity across multiple scales and compared spatial and temporal activity estimates within and between PAs. 3. We found strong correlations between tools across PAs and a combination of tools may be better suited to understand finer-scale trends within parks. Individual tools, and their combination, can be tailored to specific research and management goals. 4. Synthesis and applications: Our case studies provide insights into the effectiveness of tools for measuring human activity in PAs and informs practitioners and researchers about how they can be used to address real-world management decisions. Tools varied in their strengths and their weaknesses and looking forward, the widespread adoption of multiple, integrated measures of human activity is needed to develop evidence-based park management strategies, benefitting both humans and nature. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2KP7F Biodiversity camera trap, outdoor recreation, social media, park visitation Published: 2024-08-26 13:10 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts to declare Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0