Comparative impact of 3D and 2D laparoscopy on ovarian reserve following endometrioma excision: A retrospective study

Sabahattin Anil Ari, E. Sen, Çağdaş Şahin, A. Akdemir, Teksin ÇIRPAN
In: Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders · 2026 · doi:10.1177/22840265261423697 · W7130960279
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effects of three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic visualization systems on operative efficiency and ovarian reserve following unilateral endometrioma excision. Methods: This retrospective study included 89 women aged 18–40 years who underwent laparoscopic unilateral endometrioma excision between 2021 and 2024. Patients were divided into two groups according to the visualization system used: 3D ( n = 46) and 2D ( n = 43). Operative time, change in hemoglobin (Hb), cyst diameter, and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels measured preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively were compared using non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney U and chi-square). A p -value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The median operative time was significantly shorter in the 3D group (66 min (IQR = 50–87)) compared with the 2D group (165 min (IQR = 153–188); p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in hemoglobin change ( p = 0.538), cyst diameter ( p = 0.787), or pre- and postoperative AMH levels ( p = 0.662 and 0.955, respectively). Although the postoperative decline in AMH was greater in the 3D group, this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.125). Conclusions: Three-dimensional laparoscopy significantly enhances surgical efficiency during endometrioma excision without compromising ovarian reserve. These findings support the use of advanced visualization systems to improve precision and ergonomics in reproductive surgery.
Full text 1,390 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Aim:

Methods

Results:

Conclusions

Get full access to this article View all access and purchase options for this article. Data availability statement

References

Cite Cite Cite Download to reference manager If you have citation software installed, you can download citation data to the citation manager of your choice Information, rights and permissions Information Published In

Keywords

Data availability statement Authors Metrics and citations Metrics Journals metrics This article was published in Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders. View All Journal MetricsPublication usage* Total views and downloads: 8 *Publication usage tracking started in December 2016 Publications citing this one Receive email alerts when this publication is cited Web of Science: 0 Crossref: There are no citing articles to show. Figures and tables Figures & Media Tables View Options Access options If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below: loading institutional access options Alternatively, view purchase options below: Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content. Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometrioma

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (20)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK