Divergence, Not Convergence: Regional Wage Inequality and Industrial Development in India’s Formal Manufacturing sector

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Despite decades of economic liberalization and industrial policy interventions, regional divergence is observed in the formal manufacturing sectors of India. Analysing Annual Survey of Industries (ASI) data from 2022-23 across 35 states and union territories, this study employs beta-convergence and sigma-convergence methodologies to examines whether the economically backward regions are able to catch up with advanced states in formal sector wage levels. Consistent positive coefficient is observed through beta analysis (β = 0.980–1.409, p < 0.001) indicating wage divergence proof rather than convergence. Sigma convergence metrics reveals extreme inequality: the Gini coefficient touches 0.693, with a P90/P10 wage ratio of 1,550.6 and a maximum to minimum ratio of 39,957.6. K-means cluster analysis distinguishes three distinct wage clubs showing convergence within but persistent divergence in-between groups. Industrial maturity works as a strongest predictor of occupational wage structures (R²= 0.961), while employment formalization in respect to benefit-to-wage ratio critically enhances aggregate wage levels (β = 23.37, p = 0.015). In contrast to human capital theory, literacy rates show a statistically non-significant negative relationship with wages, suggesting structural impediments beyond educational attainment. These results encounter the assumption of automatic wage convergence and demonstrate the needs for fiscal targeted and institutional interventions to address regional wage inequality in India’s development agenda.
Full text 10,600 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Divergence, Not Convergence: Regional Wage Inequality and Industrial Development in India’s Formal Manufacturing sector | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Divergence, Not Convergence: Regional Wage Inequality and Industrial Development in India’s Formal Manufacturing sector Prithwijit Das Thakur This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8789145/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Despite decades of economic liberalization and industrial policy interventions, regional divergence is observed in the formal manufacturing sectors of India. Analysing Annual Survey of Industries (ASI) data from 2022-23 across 35 states and union territories, this study employs beta-convergence and sigma-convergence methodologies to examines whether the economically backward regions are able to catch up with advanced states in formal sector wage levels. Consistent positive coefficient is observed through beta analysis (β = 0.980–1.409, p < 0.001) indicating wage divergence proof rather than convergence. Sigma convergence metrics reveals extreme inequality: the Gini coefficient touches 0.693, with a P90/P10 wage ratio of 1,550.6 and a maximum to minimum ratio of 39,957.6. K-means cluster analysis distinguishes three distinct wage clubs showing convergence within but persistent divergence in-between groups. Industrial maturity works as a strongest predictor of occupational wage structures (R²= 0.961), while employment formalization in respect to benefit-to-wage ratio critically enhances aggregate wage levels (β = 23.37, p = 0.015). In contrast to human capital theory, literacy rates show a statistically non-significant negative relationship with wages, suggesting structural impediments beyond educational attainment. These results encounter the assumption of automatic wage convergence and demonstrate the needs for fiscal targeted and institutional interventions to address regional wage inequality in India’s development agenda. Wage convergence and divergence Regional inequality Industrial development Beta-convergence Sigma-convergence India Occupational wages Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8789145","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":585871286,"identity":"2fd1ffeb-2bd9-40da-92eb-6bd1c3f6c4a6","order_by":0,"name":"Prithwijit Das Thakur","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Mumbai","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Prithwijit","middleName":"Das","lastName":"Thakur","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-02-04 17:23:22","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8789145/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8789145/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":104399639,"identity":"318d1871-a822-4a92-b3f7-4fce672cc4fd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-11 12:07:01","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":818220,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"FullArticle.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8789145/v1_covered_a2eef934-1c47-4133-89ce-0b94dbe14ea7.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Divergence, Not Convergence: Regional Wage Inequality and Industrial Development in India’s Formal Manufacturing sector","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Wage convergence and divergence, Regional inequality, Industrial development, Beta-convergence, Sigma-convergence, India, Occupational wages","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8789145/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8789145/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eDespite decades of economic liberalization and industrial policy interventions, regional divergence is observed in the formal manufacturing sectors of India. Analysing Annual Survey of Industries (ASI) data from 2022-23 across 35 states and union territories, this study employs beta-convergence and sigma-convergence methodologies to examines whether the economically backward regions are able to catch up with advanced states in formal sector wage levels. Consistent positive coefficient is observed through beta analysis (β\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.980\u0026ndash;1.409, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) indicating wage divergence proof rather than convergence. Sigma convergence metrics reveals extreme inequality: the Gini coefficient touches 0.693, with a P90/P10 wage ratio of 1,550.6 and a maximum to minimum ratio of 39,957.6. K-means cluster analysis distinguishes three distinct wage clubs showing convergence within but persistent divergence in-between groups. Industrial maturity works as a strongest predictor of occupational wage structures (R\u0026sup2;= 0.961), while employment formalization in respect to benefit-to-wage ratio critically enhances aggregate wage levels (β\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;23.37, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.015). In contrast to human capital theory, literacy rates show a statistically non-significant negative relationship with wages, suggesting structural impediments beyond educational attainment. These results encounter the assumption of automatic wage convergence and demonstrate the needs for fiscal targeted and institutional interventions to address regional wage inequality in India\u0026rsquo;s development agenda.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Divergence, Not Convergence: Regional Wage Inequality and Industrial Development in India’s Formal Manufacturing sector","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-02-05 07:30:44","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8789145/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"b990003d-40dc-46af-a1ae-8090dc21afd6","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 5th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-03-01T17:24:09+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-02-05 07:30:44","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8789145","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8789145","identity":"rs-8789145","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0