Repetition Coherence Reveals Computational Principles of Auditory Object Formation

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-ND-4.0

Abstract

A foundational task for perceptual systems is to identify objects. In hearing, repetition — for example of a feature critical to object identity — is a powerful cue for object formation. The principles governing how repetition may underpin this process are not well understood, particularly for the noisy, approximate repetition typical of biological environments. To characterize the perceptual organization of acoustic scenes into objects, we adapted the very successful motion-coherence paradigm from vision research, developing a repetition-coherence framework to investigate the evidence accumulation that yields auditory perceptual objects. Participants heard dense tone-cloud sequences in which subsets of tones repeated across cycles. The proportion of repeating tones defined coherence, and the length of the repeating unit was varied. They performed two tasks: repetition detection, which captures the endpoint of object formation, and sensorimotor synchronization, which provides a continuous readout of object formation as it unfolds. The convergence between the two tasks validates sensorimotor synchronization as an online behavioral probe of an otherwise covert process. We discovered that at high coherence both detection and stable tracking were achieved at the same number of cycles, independent of other factors. Yet within this fixed integration regime, longer repeated units were less likely to give rise to a perceptual object, dissociating the likelihood of object emergence from its timing. This scale-independent integration limit suggests that auditory object formation is governed by two interacting principles: extraction of statistical regularities and a fixed integration window. The behavioral signatures parallel known neurophysiological dynamics, providing a helpful link to interpret them.
Full text 1,997 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Repetition is a powerful cue for auditory object formation. In natural environments, however, repetitions are rarely exact copies of sound sequences and often overlap with competing sounds. To characterise the temporal integration dynamics and the evidence required for perceptual organisation of acoustic scenes into objects, we developed a repetition-coherence framework inspired by motion-coherence paradigms in vision. Participants listened to dense tone-cloud sequences in which a subset of tones repeated across cycles, with the proportion of repeating tones indicating coherence. Across two psychophysical tasks (repetition detection and sensorimotor synchronization), repetition coherence had strikingly similar effects: it shaped both the likelihood of object formation and the consistency of subsequent tracking. At high coherence, the emergence of the object and the attainment of a stable tracking phase occurred at the same number of cycles. The behavioural trajectory of synchronization performance, used to infer the dynamics of temporal integration, parallels prior neurophysiological findings in non-human primates, establishing a link between perception and neurophysiology. Moreover, we observed threshold shifts due to unit duration in the detection task, which indicates a dissociation between the effect of temporal scale on the likelihood and timing of object emergence: longer units when repeated reduced detection probability, but emergence timing remained constant. These findings demonstrate convergent behavioural dynamics shaped by bottom-up regularities, while intrinsic temporal integration windows constrain the process differently according to task demands. Overall, repetition coherence provides a principled framework for probing the processes underpinning auditory object formation, revealing common behavioural signatures alongside distinct sensitivities to temporal scale. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-ND-4.0