How humans process language (they think) is machine generated

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) produce language that is often indistinguishable from human-generated language, but little is known about how people process it. Do they attribute human-like mental states and accountability to machine-generated language? Through the lens of pragmatic theory we explore how people process language when it is marked as generated by AI. In Experiment 1, we find that people believe the content of sentences presented as AI generated, even if they deem the source unreliable. They also accommodate presuppositions presented from such a source, implying that they adopt a general cooperative stance. In both respects, participant behavior resembled that with an unreliable human interlocutor (Experiment 2), raising the possibility that people reason over machine generated language the same way they reason over human language.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0